Unstimulated Pleural Fluid Interferon Gamma for Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Diagnostic value of IFN-gamma in tuberculous pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Simple, rapid, and accurate diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) remains challenging. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of IFN-γ in diagnosing TPE.

METHODS

We quantified the expression of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in blood (B), adenosine deaminase (ADA), and IFN-γ in pleural effusions (PE) from 25 TPE patients and 31 non-TPE patients using a combination of immunological assays and flow cytometric analysis. The diagnostic performance of these three biomarkers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

We found that IFN-γ levels in blood and pleural fluid were higher in the TPE group than in the non-TPE group. The mean concentration of IFN-γ in pleural fluid of the TPE group was 3140.90 (1817.94, 6611.05) pg/mL, while that of the non-TPE group was 4.91 (0.69, 8.6) pg/mL), and the difference was statistically significant (z = 6.39, P < 0.001). The mean blood IFN-γ was 40.19 (16.45, 59.08) pg/mL in the TPE group and 2.76 (1.96, 6.02) pg/mL in the non-TPE group, which was statistically different (z = 5.12, P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for pleural fluid IFN-γ, blood IFN-γ, and ADA were 0.999 (95 % CI: 0.994-1.00), 0.901 (95 % CI: 0.798-1.00) and 0.996 (95 % CI: 0.987-1.00), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that IFN-γ has high diagnostic validity in patients with TPE and can potentially be an excellent biomarker.

Utility of Cerebrospinal Fluid Unstimulated Interferon-Gamma (IRISA-TB) as a Same-Day Test for Tuberculous Meningitis in a Tuberculosis-Endemic, Resource-Poor Setting

Background

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) mortality is high and current diagnostics perform suboptimally. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a DNA-based assay (GeneXpert Ultra) against a new same-day immunodiagnostic assay that detects unstimulated interferon-gamma (IRISA-TB).

Methods

In a stage 1 evaluation, IRISA-TB was evaluated in biobanked samples from Zambia (n = 82; tuberculosis [TB] and non-TBM), and specificity in a South African biobank (n = 291; non-TBM only). Given encouraging results, a stage 2 evaluation was performed in suspected TBM patients from Zimbabwe and Malawi (n = 668). Patients were classified as having definite, probable or possible TBM, or non-TBM based on their microbiological results, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chemistry, and whether they received treatment.

Results

In the stage 1 evaluation, sensitivity and specificity of IRISA-TB were 75% and 87% in the Zambian samples, and specificity was 100% in the South African samples. In the stage 2 validation, IRISA-TB sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) was significantly higher than Xpert Ultra (76.2% [55.0%-89.4%] vs 25% [8.9%-53.3%]; P = .0048) when trace readouts were considered negative. Specificity (95% CI) was similar for both assays (91.4% [88.8%-93.4%] vs 86.9% [83.4%-89.8%]). When the Xpert Ultra polymerase chain reaction product was verified by sequencing, the positive predictive value of trace readouts in CSF was 27.8%. Sensitivity of IRISA-TB was higher in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected versus uninfected participants (85.8% vs 66.7%).

Conclusions

As a same-day rule-in test, IRISA-TB had significantly better sensitivity than Xpert Ultra in a TB/HIV-endemic setting. An immunodiagnostic approach to TBM is promising, and further studies are warranted.

Pleural fluid biomarkers: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Pleural fluid is a source from which various biomarkers can be obtained and measured to facilitate the management and prognostication of various conditions. This narrative review aims to summarise a few selected applications of pleural fluid biomarker analysis based on the latest literature.

Methods

A literature search for articles published in English regarding human subjects from the period January 2000 to December 2023 was performed through PubMed. Publications considered by the authors to be relevant were included in this review, with additional references added based on the authors' judgement. This review considered both prospective and retrospective cohort studies analysing the clinical value of a range of pleural fluid biomarkers.

Key Content and Findings

The biomarkers selected in this narrative review have either established clinical applicability or promising initial results which require further research. Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase, mesothelin and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide can optimize the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis, malignant mesothelioma and heart failure-related pleural effusion respectively. The detection rate for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations for lung cancer is higher in the pleural fluid than in the pleural tissue or plasma. Suitable targeted therapy in patients with detectable mutations can offer survival benefits. The pleural fluid neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 carry prognostic implications and can potentially guide subsequent treatment decisions. These biomarkers used individually, or in conjunction with other clinical parameters, should only be utilised in pre-defined, appropriate clinical conditions to maximize their clinical value.

Conclusions

A great variety of different biomarkers are available for analysis in pleural fluid. Further research and development are necessary to widen the spectrum and enhance the clinical utility of pleural fluid biomarkers. Comparison with the diagnostic utilities of serum biomarkers and other investigation parameters, such as radiological findings, could be considered when evaluating the performance of pleural fluid biomarkers.

Diagnostic accuracy and cellular origin of pleural fluid CXCR3 ligands for tuberculous pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Pleural biomarkers represent potential diagnostic tools for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) due to their advantages of low cost, short turnaround time, and less invasiveness. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of two CXCR3 ligands, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL11, for TPE. In addition, we investigated the cellular origins and biological roles of CXCL9 and CXCL11 in the development of TPE.

METHODS

This double-blind study prospectively enrolled patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion from two centers (Hohhot and Changshu) in China. Pleural fluid on admission was obtained and levels of CXCL9 and CXCL11 were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy and net benefit, respectively. THP-1 cell-derived macrophages were treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and ELISA were used to determine the mRNA and protein levels of CXCL9 and CXCL11. The chemoattractant activities of CXCL9 and CXCL11 for T helper (Th) cells were analyzed by a transwell assay.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-three (20 TPEs and 133 non-TPEs) patients were enrolled in the Hohhot Center, and 58 (13 TPEs and 45 non-TPEs) were enrolled in the Changshu Center. In both centers, we observed increased CXCL9 and CXCL11 in TPE patients. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of pleural CXCL9 and CXCL11 in the Hohhot Center were 0.70 (95 % CI: 0.55-0.85) and 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.52-0.84), respectively. In the Changshu Center, the AUCs of CXCL9 and CXCL11 were 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.92-1.00) and 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.94-1.00), respectively. The AUCs of CXCL9 and CXCL11 decreased with the advancement of age. The decision curves of CXCL9 and CXCL11 showed net benefits in both centers. CXCL9 and CXCL11 were upregulated in BCG-treated macrophages. Pleural fluid from TPE and conditioned medium from BCG-treated macrophages were chemotactic for Th cells. Anti-CXCL9 or CXCL11 neutralizing antibodies could partly block the chemotactic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural CXCL9 and CXCL11 are potential diagnostic markers for TPE, but their diagnostic accuracy is compromised in elderly patients. CXCL9 and CXCL11 can promote the migration of peripheral Th cells, thus representing a therapeutic target for the treatment of TPE.

Tuberculous pleuritis: clinical presentations and diagnostic challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) is one of the most common types of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We highlight the latest epidemiology of TBP, the heterogeneity of its presentation and the performance of different diagnostic strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are differential trends in the incidences of TBP worldwide. Its incidence increased in China but decreased in the United States in the past decade. The presentation of TBP is heterogeneous regarding clinical symptoms, radiological findings and pleural fluid analysis results. Conventional microbiological tests have low sensitivities to diagnose TBP. Recent research focused on various diagnostic tools with better yield. The sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) in pleural fluid, including the latest generation of PCR and sequencing-based techniques for detecting tuberculosis, remains suboptimal. Various pleural fluid biomarkers have been explored, but there is a lack of consensus on their clinical utility and cutoff levels.

SUMMARY

The heterogeneity of clinical presentation poses obstacles to diagnosing TBP. Further development of diagnostic tools, including more robust NAAT and biomarkers with additional validation, is needed before incorporation into routine clinical practice.

GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra vs Unstimulated Interferon γ (IRISA-TB) for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pericarditis in a Tuberculosis-Endemic Setting

Background

Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is a paucibacillary disease, where host biomarkers such as unstimulated interferon γ (IRISA-TB) have high diagnostic accuracy. However, DNA-based diagnostic tests (GeneXpert Ultra), more sensitive than an earlier versions, have recently become available. Given that the diagnosis of TBP is challenging, we performed a comparative diagnostic accuracy study comparing both assays.

Methods

We recruited 99 consecutive patients with suspected TBP in Cape Town, South Africa. Definite TBP was defined by microbiological confirmation of tuberculosis (TB) on pericardial fluid culture or an alternative polymerase chain reaction-based test (GeneXpert MTB/RIF) or by use of sputum (polymerase chain reaction or culture). Probable TBP was defined as a high clinical suspicion of TB accompanied by anti-TB treatment, while non-TBP was defined as negative microbiological test results for TB without initiation of TB treatment and/or the presence of an alternative diagnosis.

Results

There were 39 patients with definite TBP, 35 with probable TBP, and 23 with non-TBP. Approximately 70% of participants who received TB treatment were HIV coinfected. Overall, IRISA-TB was more sensitive than Xpert Ultra (88.6% [95% CI, 74.1%-95.5%] vs 71.5% [55.0%-83.7%], n = 53) and significantly more sensitive in participants who were HIV uninfected (100% [95% CI, 72.3%-100.0%] vs 60% [31.3%-83.2%], P = .03). In patients with definite and probable TBP combined (n = 84), sensitivity was significantly higher with IRISA-TB (77.3% [95% CI, 65.9%-85.8%] vs 37.9 [27.2%-50.0%], P < .0001). A similar pattern was seen in persons who were HIV uninfected (88.3% vs 35.3%, P = .002). Specificity was high for both assays (>95%).

Conclusions

Unstimulated interferon γ (IRISA-TB) was significantly more sensitive than Xpert Ultra for the diagnosis of TB pericarditis in a TB-endemic resource-poor setting.

The tuberculous pleural effusion

Pleural tuberculosis (TB) is a common entity with similar epidemiological characteristics to pulmonary TB. It represents a spectrum of disease that can variably self-resolve or progress to TB empyema with severe sequelae such as chronic fibrothorax or empyema necessitans. Coexistence of and progression to pulmonary TB is high. Diagnosis is challenging, as pleural TB is paucibacillary in most cases, but every effort should be made to obtain microbiological diagnosis, especially where drug resistance is suspected. Much attention has been focussed on adjunctive investigations to support diagnosis, but clinicians must be aware that apparent diagnostic accuracy is affected both by the underlying TB prevalence in the population, and by the diagnostic standard against which the specified investigation is being evaluated. Pharmacological treatment of pleural TB is similar to that of pulmonary TB, but penetration of the pleural space may be suboptimal in complicated effusions. Evidence for routine drainage is limited, but evacuation of the pleural space is indicated in complicated disease.

Educational aims

To demonstrate that pleural TB incorporates a wide spectrum of disease, ranging from self-resolving lymphocytic effusions to severe TB empyema with serious sequelae.To emphasise the high coexistence of pulmonary TB with pleural TB, and the importance of obtaining sputum for culture (induced if necessary) in all cases.To explore the significant diagnostic challenges posed by pleural TB, and consequently the frequent lack of information about drug sensitivity prior to initiating treatment.To highlight the influence of underlying TB prevalence in the population on the diagnostic accuracy of adjunctive investigations for the diagnosis of pleural TB.To discuss concerns around penetration of anti-TB medications into the pleural space and how this can influence decisions around treatment duration in practice.

Expert Review on Contemporary Management of Common Benign Pleural Effusions

Heart failure (HF) and cirrhosis are frequently associated with pleural effusions (PEs). Despite their apparently benign nature, both HF-related effusions and hepatic hydrothorax (HH) have poor prognosis because they represent an advanced stage of the disease. Optimization of medical therapy in these two entities involve not only the use of diuretics, but also other pharmacological therapies. For instance, all HF patients with reduced or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction can benefit from angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Conversely, it is better for HH patients to avoid nonselective beta blockers. Refractory cardiac- and cirrhosis-related PEs are commonly managed by iterative therapeutic thoracentesis. When repeated aspirations are needed, thereby diminishing quality of life, the insertion of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) may be warranted. However, in selected HH patients who are diuretic-resistant or diuretic-intractable, placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts should be considered as a bridge to liver transplantation, whereas in transplant candidates the role of IPC is debatable. Another benign condition, pleural tuberculosis (TB) is a serious health problem in developing countries. Diagnostic certainty is still a concern due to the paucibacillary nature of the infection, although the use of more sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests is becoming more widespread. Its treatment is the same as that of pulmonary TB, but the potential drug interactions between antiretroviral and anti-TB drugs in HIV-coinfected patients as well as the current recommended guidelines for the different types of anti-TB drugs resistance should be followed.

Pleural fluid biochemical analysis: the past, present and future

Identifying the cause of pleural effusion is challenging for pulmonologists. Imaging, biopsy, microbiology and biochemical analyses are routinely used for diagnosing pleural effusion. Among these diagnostic tools, biochemical analyses are promising because they have the advantages of low cost, minimal invasiveness, observer independence and short turn-around time. Here, we reviewed the past, present and future of pleural fluid biochemical analysis. We reviewed the history of Light’s criteria and its modifications and the current status of biomarkers for heart failure, malignant pleural effusion, tuberculosis pleural effusion and parapneumonic pleural effusion. In addition, we anticipate the future of pleural fluid biochemical analysis, including the utility of machine learning, molecular diagnosis and high-throughput technologies. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) should address the topic of pleural fluid biochemical analysis in the future to promote specific knowledge in the laboratory professional community.

Tuberculosis-specific antigen stimulated and unstimulated interferon-γ for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is one of the most devastating TB. Accurate identification of TBM is helpful to eliminate TB. Therefore, we assessed the performance of TBAg stimulated IFN-γ (IGRA) and unstimulated IFN-γ in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for diagnosing TBM.

Methods

We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases until March 2022. Bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models were employed to compute summary estimates for diagnostic accuracy parameters of IGRA and unstimulated IFN-γ in blood and CSF for diagnosing TBM.

Results

28 studies including 1,978 participants and 2,641 samples met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUROC) of blood IGRA were separately as 0.73, 0.83, 4.32, 0.33, 13.22 and 0.86, indicating a good diagnostic accuracy of blood IGRA for detecting TBM. The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUROC of CSF IGRA were separately as 0.77, 0.91, 8.82, 0.25, 34.59 and 0.93, indicating good diagnostic accuracy of CSF IGRA for detecting TBM. The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUROC of CSF IFN-γ were separately as 0.86, 0.92, 10.27, 0.16, 65.26 and 0.95, suggesting CSF IFN-γ provided excellent accuracy for diagnosing TBM.

Conclusions

For differentiating TBM from non-TBM individuals, blood and CSF IGRA are good assays and unstimulated CSF IFN-γ is an auxiliary excellent marker.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis

Objective

We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) assays for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), through systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed and Embase databases for publications reporting diagnostic accuracy of Xpert or Ultra for TPE. We used bivariate random-effects modeling to summarize diagnostic accuracy information from individual studies using either mycobacterial culture or composite criteria as reference standard. We performed meta-regression through hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) modeling to evaluate comparative performance of the two tests from studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of both in the same study population.

Results

We retrieved 1097 publications, and included 74 for review. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for Xpert were 0.52 (95% CI 0.43–0.60, I² 82.1%) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99, I² 85.1%), respectively, using culture-based reference standard; and 0.21 (95% CI 0.17–0.26, I² 81.5%) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.00, I² 37.6%), respectively, using composite reference standard. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for Ultra were 0.68 (95% CI 0.55–0.79, I² 80.0%) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.97–0.99, I² 92.1%), respectively, using culture-based reference standard; and 0.47 (95% CI 0.40–0.55, I² 64.1%) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.95–0.99, I² 54.8%), respectively, using composite reference standard. HSROC meta-regression yielded relative diagnostic odds ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 0.65–2.50) and 1.80 (95% CI 0.41–7.84) respectively in favor of Ultra, using culture and composite criteria as reference standard.

Conclusion

Ultra provides superior diagnostic accuracy over Xpert for diagnosing TPE, mainly because of its higher sensitivity.

Diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions: A review

Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the second most common presentation of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. The paucibacillary nature of the effusion poses diagnostic challenges. Biomarkers like adenosine deaminase and interferon-γ have some utility for diagnosing TPEs, as do cartridge-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. When these fluid studies remain indeterminate, pleural biopsies must be performed to confirm the diagnosis. This review article elaborates on the scientific evidence available for various diagnostic tests and presents a practical approach to the diagnosis of TPEs.

Comparative accuracy of pleural fluid unstimulated interferon-gamma and adenosine deaminase for diagnosing pleural tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) through systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

Methods

We queried PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies providing paired data for sensitivity and specificity of both pleural fluid ADA and IFN-γ for diagnosing TPE. We used hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) plots and HSROC meta-regression to model individual and comparative diagnostic performance of the two tests.

Results

We retrieved 376 citations and included 45 datasets from 44 publications (4974 patients) in our review. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for ADA were 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.91) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.89–0.92), while for IFN-γ they were 0.91 (95% CI 0.89–0.94) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.97), respectively. HSROC plots showed consistently greater diagnostic accuracy for IFN-γ over ADA across the entire range of observations. HSROC meta-regression using test-type as covariate yielded a relative diagnostic odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI 1.68–2.94) in favour of IFN-γ, along with better summary sensitivity and specificity figures. No prespecified subgroup variable significantly influenced the summary diagnostic accuracy estimates.

Conclusion

Pleural fluid IFN-γ estimation has better diagnostic accuracy than ADA estimation for diagnosis of TPE.