Evaluation of the Abbott HBV RUO sequencing assay combined with laboratory-modified interpretive software

Virus sequencing performance during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a retrospective analysis of data from multiple rounds of external quality assessment in Austria

Introduction: A notable feature of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was the widespread use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) to monitor severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. Countries around the world relied on sequencing and other forms of variant detection to perform contact tracing and monitor changes in the virus genome, in the hopes that epidemic waves caused by variants would be detected and managed earlier. As sequencing was encouraged and rewarded by the government in Austria, but represented a new technicque for many laboratories, we designed an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme to monitor the accuracy of WGS and assist laboratories in validating their methods. Methods: We implemented SARS-CoV-2 WGS EQAs in Austria and report the results from 7 participants over 5 rounds from February 2021 until June 2023. The participants received sample material, sequenced genomes with routine methods, and provided the sequences as well as information about mutations and lineages. Participants were evaluated on the completeness and accuracy of the submitted sequence and the ability to analyze and interpret sequencing data. Results: The results indicate that performance was excellent with few exceptions, and these exceptions showed improvement over time. We extend our findings to infer that most publicly available sequences are accurate within ≤1 nucleotide, somewhat randomly distributed through the genome. Conclusion: WGS continues to be used for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance, and will likely be instrumental in future outbreak scenarios. We identified hurdles in building next-generation sequencing capacity in diagnostic laboratories. EQAs will help individual laboratories maintain high quality next-generation sequencing output, and strengthen variant monitoring and molecular epidemiology efforts.

Analytical and clinical evaluation of the Abbott RealTime hepatitis B sequencing assay

BACKGROUND

Long-term nucleoside analogue (NA) treatment leads to selection for drug-resistant mutations in patients undergoing hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapy. The Abbott RealTime HBV Sequencing assay (Abbott assay; Abbott Molecular Inc., Des Plaines, IL, USA) targets the reverse transcriptase region of the polymerase gene and as such has the ability to detect NA resistance-associated mutations in HBV.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the analytical performance of the Abbott assay and compared its diagnostic performance to that of a laboratory-developed nested-PCR and sequencing method.

STUDY DESIGN

The analytical sensitivity of the Abbott assay was determined using a serially-diluted WHO International Standard. To validate the clinical performances of the Abbott assay and the laboratory-developed assay, 89 clinical plasma samples with various levels of HBV DNA were tested using both assays.

RESULTS

The limit of detection of the Abbott assay, was 210IU/ml and it successfully detected mutations when the mutant types were present at levels ≥20%. Among 89 clinical specimens, 43 and 42 were amplification positive in the Abbott and laboratory-developed assays, respectively, with 87.6% overall agreement (78/89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 78.6-93.4). The Abbott assay failed to detect the minor mutant populations in two specimens, and therefore overall concordance was 85.3% (76/89), and the kappa value was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The Abbott assay showed comparable diagnostic performance to laboratory-developed nested PCR followed by direct sequencing, and may be useful as a routine method for detecting HBV NA resistance-associated mutations in clinical laboratory settings.