Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients

Risk Factors for CMV Viremia and Treatment-Associated Adverse Events Among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes substantial morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There are limited data on risk factors for CMV viremia and the safety of antiviral medications used to treat CMV in children.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of children who underwent HSCT between 2000 and 2016. We used log-logistic regression to evaluate associations between clinical characteristics and CMV-free survival at 100 days after HSCT. We compared the incidences of laboratory-defined adverse events (AEs) during treatment with ganciclovir and foscarnet.

RESULTS

Among 969 children, the median (interquartile range) age was 6.5 (3.1-11.5) years, and 80% underwent allogeneic HSCT. Two hundred forty-four (25%) children developed CMV viremia. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98), male sex (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), non-Black, non-White race (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87), umbilical cord blood donor source (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.97), and CMV seropositivity (R-/D+: OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41; R+/D-: OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.21; R+/D+: OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.15) were associated with lower odds of 100-day CMV-free survival. Compared with foscarnet, ganciclovir was associated with lower incidences of thrombocytopenia (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97), electrolyte AEs (IRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.75), endocrine AEs (IRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.79), and renal AEs (IRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

CMV viremia occurred commonly among children after HSCT, and ganciclovir and foscarnet were associated with distinct toxicity profiles among children with CMV infection. These findings should be considered when developing CMV prevention and treatment strategies for children after HSCT.

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus viral loads by two molecular assays in whole-blood and plasma samples from hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are typically monitored using quantitative molecular assays. The Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV test (Cobas CMV) has recently been cleared by the FDA for the monitoring of CMV viral loads in plasma samples from transplant patients. In this study, we compare and correlate the viral loads obtained by a laboratory-developed test (LC CMV) (using Roche analyte-specific reagents [ASR] on the LightCycler 2.0) on whole-blood specimens with those obtained on corresponding plasma and whole-blood specimens by the Cobas CMV assay. Testing was performed on 773 archived patient specimens. The strength of the agreement was good for the two assays performed on whole blood (κ=0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.7) and moderate when the tests were performed on different sample types (κ=0.54; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.62 for the LC CMV whole blood [WB] assay versus Cobas plasma [PL], and κ=0.57; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.65 for the Cobas WB assay versus Cobas PL), although the difference was not statistically significant. Using a combination gold standard (i.e., a true positive was a specimen that was positive by two or more methods), the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were 78.8% and 99.3% for the LC CMV assay, 85.2% and 98.1% for the Cobas CMV WB assay, and 100% and 90.5% for Cobas CMV PL assay, respectively. A comparison of the CMV viral load trends in both plasma and whole blood from a few patients with multiple positive successive samples showed similar slopes, with differences in the slope ranging from 0.01 to 0.22. However, the absolute value for individual viral load differed markedly with whole-blood viral loads, being on average 0.5- to 1.22-log higher than those in plasma. The Cobas CMV assay provides a valid option for the monitoring of viral loads in transplant patients. Due to its increased sensitivity, the detection of CMV DNA in patients with low viral loads (i.e., those below limit of quantification [LOQ]) is increased with the Cobas CMV assay in plasma specimens. Longitudinal prospective studies will be needed to examine the clinical significance of these low-level viral loads.

An update on the management and prevention of cytomegalovirus infection following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

ABSTRACT 

A significant progress has been made in deciphering critical aspects of the biology and immunology of CMV infection in the allogeneic stem cell transplantation setting. Genetic traits predisposing to active CMV infection and CMV end-organ disease have begun to be delineated. Reliable molecular assays for CMV DNA load quantitation in body fluids have been developed. Elucidation of immune mechanisms affording control of CMV infection will help to improve the management of active CMV infection. Finally, the advent of new CMV-specific antivirals and promising vaccine prototypes as well as the development of fine procedures for large-scale ex vivo generation of functional CMV-specific T cells for adoptive T cell transfer therapies will certainly minimize the negative impact of CMV on survival in these patients.

Antibodies specific for nucleic acids and applications in genomic detection and clinical diagnostics

Detection of nucleic acids using antibodies is uncommon. This is in part because nucleic acids are poor immunogens and it is difficult to elicit antibodies having high affinity to each type of nucleic acid while lacking cross-reactivity to others. We describe the origins and applications of a variety of anti-nucleic acid antibodies, including ones reacting with modified nucleosides and nucleotides, single-stranded DNA, double-stranded DNA, RNA, DNA:RNA hybrids, locked-nucleic acids or peptide nucleic acid:nucleic acid hybrids. Carefully selected antibodies can be excellent reagents for detecting bacteria, viruses, small RNAs, microRNAs, R-loops, cancer cells, stem cells, apoptotic cells and so on. The detection may be sensitive, simple, rapid, specific, reproducible, quantitative and cost-effective. Current microarray and diagnostic methods that depend on cDNA or cRNA can be replaced by using antibody detection of nucleic acids. Therefore, development should be encouraged to explore new utilities and create a robust arsenal of new anti-nucleic acid antibodies.

Quantification of cytomegalovirus viral load

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a member of the Herpesviridae family, is worldwide distributed. After the primary infection, CMV induces a latent infection with possible reactivation(s). It is responsible for severe to life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised patients and in foetuses and newborns of infected mothers. For monitoring CMV load, classical techniques based on rapid culture or pp65 antigenemia are progressively replaced by quantitative nuclear acid tests (QNAT), easier to implement and standardize. A large variety of QNAT are available from laboratory-developed assays to fully-automated commercial tests. The indications of CMV quantification include CMV infection during pregnancy and in newborns, and viral surveillance of grafted and non-grafted immunocompromised patients, patients with bowel inflammatory diseases and those hospitalised in intensive care unit. A close cooperation between virologists and clinicians is essential for optimizing the benefit of CMV DNA monitoring.

Comparative evaluation of the QIAsymphony RGQ system with the easyMAG/R-gene combination for the quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA load in whole blood

Background

The detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in blood is a key feature of the virological surveillance of immunocompromised patients.

Methods

The QIAsymphony RGQ system (QIAGEN S.A.S., France) combines the extraction/distribution steps on QIAsymphony SP/AS instruments with amplification on a Rotor-Gene Q RT-PCR machine. This system was compared to a strategy combining an extraction step on the NUCLISENS easyMAG platform (bioMérieux) with the CMV R-gene kit (Argene) on 100 whole blood specimens collected from immunocompromised patients of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France.

Results

The overall agreement between the two strategies was 86% (kappa coefficient of 0.67); the 14 discrepant results corresponded to low DNA loads. The 62 samples found positive with both tests were correlated (Pearson r coefficient of 0.70, P < 0.01) despite an over quantitation of 0.25 log₁₀ copies/ml with the easyMAG/Argene strategy (P < 0.001). Very close results were also obtained with a commercial panel of 10 samples with CMV loads ranging from 2.36 to 6.41 log₁₀ copies/ml. The inter-run and intra-run variability was consistently lower with the QIAGEN platform.

Conclusions

These results validate the performance of the QIAsymphony RGQ system for the routine quantitation of CMV DNA. This fully-automated platform reduces the hands-on time and improves standardization, traceability and quality control assessment.

Comparative evaluation of three automated systems for DNA extraction in conjunction with three commercially available real-time PCR assays for quantitation of plasma Cytomegalovirus DNAemia in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients

Limited data are available on the performance of different automated extraction platforms and commercially available quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) methods for the quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in plasma. We compared the performance characteristics of the Abbott mSample preparation system DNA kit on the m24 SP instrument (Abbott), the High Pure viral nucleic acid kit on the COBAS AmpliPrep system (Roche), and the EZ1 Virus 2.0 kit on the BioRobot EZ1 extraction platform (Qiagen) coupled with the Abbott CMV PCR kit, the LightCycler CMV Quant kit (Roche), and the Q-CMV complete kit (Nanogen), for both plasma specimens from allogeneic stem cell transplant (Allo-SCT) recipients (n = 42) and the OptiQuant CMV DNA panel (AcroMetrix). The EZ1 system displayed the highest extraction efficiency over a wide range of CMV plasma DNA loads, followed by the m24 and the AmpliPrep methods. The Nanogen PCR assay yielded higher mean CMV plasma DNA values than the Abbott and the Roche PCR assays, regardless of the platform used for DNA extraction. Overall, the effects of the extraction method and the QRT-PCR used on CMV plasma DNA load measurements were less pronounced for specimens with high CMV DNA content (>10,000 copies/ml). The performance characteristics of the extraction methods and QRT-PCR assays evaluated herein for clinical samples were extensible at cell-based standards from AcroMetrix. In conclusion, different automated systems are not equally efficient for CMV DNA extraction from plasma specimens, and the plasma CMV DNA loads measured by commercially available QRT-PCRs can differ significantly. The above findings should be taken into consideration for the establishment of cutoff values for the initiation or cessation of preemptive antiviral therapies and for the interpretation of data from clinical studies in the Allo-SCT setting.

Molecular detection of herpesviruses

In routine molecular diagnostics, detection of herpesviruses has made a major impact. Infection with herpesviruses is indicated by demonstrating the presence of the virus in selected specimens. Rapid and reliable detection of herpesvirus DNA helps to decrease the lethality as well as the sequelae of herpesvirus infection in patients at risk. This chapter discusses specimen types and both laboratory-developed and commercially available assays useful for molecular detection of herpesviruses. To meet the need for reliable laboratory results, it is advisable to employ maximum automated and standardized kits based on reagents and standards of reproducible high quality. In the routine diagnostic laboratory, introduction of IVD/CE and/or FDA-labeled tests is preferred.

Interlaboratory comparison of cytomegalovirus viral load assays

To assess interlaboratory variability in qualitative and quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load (VL) testing, we distributed a panel of samples to 33 laboratories in the USA, Canada and Europe who performed testing using commercial reagents (n = 17) or laboratory-developed assays (n = 18). The panel included two negatives, seven samples constructed from purified CMV nucleocapsids in plasma (2.0-6.0 log(10) copies/mL) and three clinical plasma samples. Interlaboratory variation was observed in both actual (range, 2.0-4.0 log(10) copies/mL) and self-reported lower limits of detection (range, 1.0-4.0 log(10) copies/mL). Variation observed in reported results for individual samples ranged from 2.0 log(10) (minimum) to 4.3 log(10) (maximum)(.) Variation was greatest at low VLs. Assuming +/- 0.5 log(10) relative to the expected result represents an acceptable result, 57.6% of results fell within this range. Use of commercially available reagents and procedures was associated with less variability compared with laboratory-developed assays. Interlaboratory variability on replicate samples was significantly greater than intralaboratory variability (p < 0.0001). The significant interlaboratory variability in CMV VL observed may be impacting patient care and limiting interinstitutional comparisons. The creation of an international reference standard for CMV VL assay calibration would be an important step in quality improvement of this laboratory tool.

Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

The performance of a plasma real-time PCR (cytomegalovirus [CMV] PCR kit; Abbott Diagnostics) was compared with that of the antigenemia assay for the surveillance of active CMV infection in 42 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) recipients. A total of 1,156 samples were analyzed by the two assays. Concordance between the two assays was 82.2%. Plasma DNA levels correlated with the number of pp65-positive cells, particularly prior to the initiation of preemptive therapy. Fifty-seven episodes of active CMV infection were detected in 37 patients: 18 were defined solely by the PCR assay and four were defined on the basis of the antigenemia assay. Either a cutoff of 288 CMV DNA copies/ml or a 2.42-log(10) increase of DNAemia levels between two consecutive PCR positive samples was an optimal value to discriminate between patients requiring preemptive therapy and those not requiring therapy on the basis of the antigenemia results. The real-time PCR assay allowed an earlier diagnosis of active CMV infection and was a more reliable marker of successful clearance of CMV from the blood. Analysis of the kinetics of DNAemia levels at a median of 7 days posttreatment allowed the prediction of the response to CMV therapy. Two patients developed CMV colitis. The PCR assay tested positive both before the onset of symptoms and during the disease period. The plasma real-time PCR from Abbott is more suitable than the antigenemia assay for monitoring active CMV infection in Allo-SCT recipients and may be used for guiding preemptive therapy in this clinical setting.