Clinical Evaluation of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Helicobacter pylori and Genotypic Markers of Clarithromycin Resistance Directly from Stool

Implications of lncRNAs in Helicobacter pylori-associated gastrointestinal cancers: underlying mechanisms and future perspectives

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a harmful bacterium that is difficult to conveniently diagnose and effectively eradicate. Chronic H. pylori infection increases the risk of gastrointestinal diseases, even cancers. Despite the known findings, more underlying mechanisms are to be deeply explored to facilitate the development of novel prevention and treatment strategies of H. pylori infection. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are RNAs with more than 200 nucleotides. They may be implicated in cell proliferation, inflammation and many other signaling pathways of gastrointestinal cancer progression. The dynamic expression of lncRNAs indicates their potential to be diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. In this paper, we comprehensively summarize the processes of H. pylori infection and the treatment methods, review the known findings of lncRNA classification and functional mechanisms, elucidate the roles of lncRNAs in H. pylori-related gastrointestinal cancer, and discuss the clinical perspectives of lncRNAs.

Helicobacter pylori Secondary Antibiotic Resistance after One or More Eradication Failure: A Genotypic Stool Analysis Study

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibiotic resistance is the leading cause for unsuccessful eradication therapy. After one or more failures, the chance of encountering secondary antibiotic resistance increases. The aim of this study was to characterize genotypic secondary resistance in a cohort of southern Italian H. pylori patients with at least one previous failure. Such patients collected stool samples using a dedicated kit (THD fecal testTM), and bacterial DNA was extracted and amplified using RT-PCR. Resistance to clarithromycin, amoxicillin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, and tetracycline was assessed using a high-resolution melting curve. We enrolled 50 patients. A total of 72% of patients failed one previous antibiotic course, 16% failed two, 10% failed three, and 2% failed four. The rate of secondary antibiotic resistance was 16% for clarithromycin, 18% for metronidazole, 14% for amoxicillin, 14% for levofloxacin, and 2% for tetracycline. Among the eight clarithromycin-resistant patients, five (62.5%) previously received a clarithromycin-based regimen. The same rate was 33.3% (3/9) for metronidazole. The only tetracycline-resistant patient had received Pylera. In conclusion, our data seem to show that, even though secondary resistance is not very high, resistance to clarithromycin could be very likely related to previous exposure to this antibiotic.

Testing for Helicobacter pylori in an era of antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori has reached alarming levels and is compromising traditional empiric treatment of H. pylori. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is routinely performed for infectious diseases when there is a risk of resistance and is now recommended to guide therapy for H. pylori. This mini-review overviews the current diagnostics for H. pylori with a focus on tests that enable susceptibility-guided treatment, including molecular tests performed directly on stool and endoscopically collected specimens.

High incidence of antibiotic resistance amongst isolates of Helicobacter pylori collected in Nottingham, UK, between 2001 and 2018

Introduction. Helicobacter pylori is the leading cause of peptic ulcers and gastric cancer. The most common treatment regimens use combinations of two or three antibiotics and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to suppress stomach acid. The World Health Organization designated clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori as a high priority pathogen for drug development, due to increasing antibiotic resistance globally.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. There is no routine surveillance of H. pylori primary antimicrobial sensitivities in the UK, and published data are lacking.Aim. This study aimed to characterize antimicrobial sensitivities of isolates collected in Nottingham, UK, between 2001 and 2018.Methodology. Gastric biopsy samples were collected, with informed written consent and ethics approval, from 162 patients attending the Queen's Medical Centre in Nottingham for an upper GI tract endoscopy. Antibiotic sensitivity was assessed using E-Tests and a more cost-effective disc diffusion test.Results. The clarithromycin, amoxicillin and levofloxacin disc diffusion tests provided identical results to E-Tests on a subset of 30 isolates. Disparities were observed in the metronidazole test results, however. In total, 241 isolates from 162 patients were tested using at least one method. Of all isolates, 28 % were resistant to clarithromycin, 62 % to metronidazole and 3 % to amoxicillin, which are used in first-line therapies. For those antibiotics used in second- and third-line therapies, 4 % were resistant to levofloxacin and none of the isolates were resistant to tetracycline. Resistance to more than one antibiotic was found in 27 % of isolates. The frequency of patients with a clarithromycin-resistant strain increased dramatically over time: from 16 % between 2001 and 2005 to 40 % between 2011 and 2018 (P=0.011). For the same time periods, there was also an increase in those with a metronidazole-resistant strain (from 58 to 78 %; P=0.05). The frequencies of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance were higher in isolates from patients who had previously received eradication therapy, compared to those who had not (40 % versus 77 %, and 80 % versus 92 %, respectively). Of 79 pairs of isolates from the antrum and corpus regions of the same patient's stomach, only six had differences in their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles.Conclusion. Although there was high and increasing resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole, there was no resistance to tetracycline and the frequencies of amoxicillin and levofloxacin resistance were very low.

Advances on diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infections

The association of Helicobacter pylori to several gastric diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer, and its high prevalence worldwide, raised the necessity to use methods for a proper and fast diagnosis and monitoring the pathogen eradication. Available diagnostic methods can be classified as invasive or non-invasive, and the selection of the best relies on the clinical condition of the patient, as well as on the sensitivity, specificity, and accessibility of the diagnostic test. This review summarises all diagnostic methods currently available, including the invasive methods: endoscopy, histology, culture, and molecular methods, and the rapid urease test (RUT), as well as the non-invasive methods urea breath test (UBT), serological assays, biosensors, and microfluidic devices and the stool antigen test (SAT). Moreover, it lists the diagnostic advantages and limitations, as well as the main advances for each methodology. In the end, research on the development of new diagnostic methods, such as bacteriophage-based H. pylori diagnostic tools, is also discussed.

Efficacy of quadruple therapy with clarithromycin based on faecal molecular antimicrobial susceptibility tests as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: a protocol of a single-centre, single-blind, randomised clinical trial in China

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori is the most well-known risk factor for gastric cancer. Antibiotic resistance is the main reason for the failure of H. pylori eradication, and understanding the antibiotic resistance before treatment may be the main determinant of successful eradication of H. pylori. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of quadruple therapy based on faecal molecular antimicrobial susceptibility tests for the first-line eradication of H. pylori infection.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial, enrolling 855 patients with H. pylori infection. Patients are randomised to three groups for a 14-day treatment: group A: amoxicillin- and clarithromycin-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) (rabeprazole 10 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg and colloidal bismuth 200 mg two times per day); group B: clarithromycin medication history-based BQT (rabeprazole 10 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, furazolidone 100 mg (with clarithromycin medication history)/clarithromycin 500 mg (without clarithromycin medication history) and colloidal bismuth 200 mg two times per day); group C: antimicrobial susceptibility test-based BQT (rabeprazole 10 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg (clarithromycin-sensitive)/furazolidone 100 mg (clarithromycin resistant) and colloidal bismuth 200 mg two times per day). The primary end point is the eradication rate. The secondary end points are the incidence of adverse events and compliance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Number 20230103). The results will be published in the appropriate peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05718609.

Focusing on Helicobacter pylori infection in the elderly

As a confirmed carcinogen, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the main cause of inflammatory diseases of the upper digestive tract and even gastric cancer. There is a high prevalence of H. pylori infection among the elderly population, which may cause adverse clinical outcomes. Particularly noteworthy is that guidelines or expert consensus presently available on H. pylori infection overlook the management of the elderly population as a special group. A brief overview of H. pylori in the elderly is as follows. The detection of H. pylori infection can be divided into invasive and non-invasive techniques, and each technique has its advantages and shortcomings. There may be more side effects associated with eradication treatment in elderly individuals, especially for the frail population. Physical conditions and risk-benefit assessments of the elderly should be considered when selecting therapeutic strategies for H. pylori eradication. Unless there are competing factors, elderly patients should receive H. pylori eradication regimens to finally reduce the formation of gastric cancer. In this review, we summarize the latest understanding of H. pylori in the elderly population to provide effective managements and treatment measures.

Individualized diagnosis and eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection based on gene detection of clarithromycin resistance in stool specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Empiric therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection results in significantly increased antibiotic resistance and decreased eradication efficacy. The genotypic testing of clarithromycin resistance from stool specimens is a promising method for individualized diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to determine the status of research and application on this method through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and WAN FANG database were searched for relevant literature. The quality of included diagnostic articles was evaluated using the quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A bivariate random-effect model was conducted to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of genotypic testing of clarithromycin resistance.

RESULTS

A total of 16 diagnostic-related were included and analyzed after exclusions. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic meta-analysis were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-0.96) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98). The genotypic testing in stool samples had heterogeneous sensitivity (Q = 37.82, p < .01, I²  = 37.82) and specificity (Q = 60.34, p < .01, I²  = 93.72) in detecting clarithromycin resistance. Purification method, stool sample weight, real-time PCR, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing as reference accounted for the heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity, while patient age, purification method, stool sample weight, and real-time PCR for the heterogeneity of pooled specificity.

CONCLUSION

The genotypic testing of clarithromycin resistance from stool specimens is an accurate, convenient, noninvasive, and rapid detection technology, providing a definitive diagnosis of clarithromycin resistance and guiding the rational antibiotic selection.

The State of the Art of Molecular Fecal Investigations for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) Antibiotic Resistances

A new paradigm shift for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection would be timely due to a progressive increase in antibiotic resistance. Such a shift in the perspective of the H. pylori approach should include the preliminary assessment of antibiotic resistance. However, the availability of sensitivity tests is not widespread and the guidelines have always indicated empirical treatments without taking into account the need to make sensitivity tests accessible, i.e., the necessary starting point for improving results in different geographical areas. Currently, the traditional tools for this purpose (culture) are based on performing an invasive investigation (endoscopy) and often involve technical difficulties; thus, they were only confined to the settings where multiple attempts at eradication have failed. In contrast, genotypic resistance testing of fecal samples using molecular biology methods is much less invasive and more acceptable to patients. The purpose of this review is to update the state of the art of molecular fecal susceptibility testing for the management of this infection and to extensively discuss the potential benefits of their large-scale deployment, i.e., novel pharmacological opportunities.

Tailored Treatment Based on Helicobacter pylori Genetic Markers of Resistance Is Associated With Higher Eradication Success

INTRODUCTION

Increasing antimicrobial resistance with Helicobacter pylori infection has focused efforts to tailor eradication therapy based on identifying genetic markers of resistance to predict antimicrobial susceptibility.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we report the effect of routine inclusion of antimicrobial susceptibility testing and recommendations for eradication therapy with gastric specimens with H. pylori .

RESULTS

The use of a recommended treatment regimen based on genetic markers of resistance was associated with an 84% rate of eradication success and 4.4 greater odds of eradication relative to unrecommended treatment.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study describing the use of H. pylori genetic resistance testing as standard of care.

Evaluation of a Molecular Mosprie Assay for Detection of Helicobacter pylori and Resistance to Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens should be guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the molecular-based Mosprie assay for detecting H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin using gastric biopsies.

METHODS

A total of 185 culture-positive frozen gastric biopsies were included for Mosprie assay and also for 23S rRNA and gyrA gene sequencing. The susceptibility results by the Mosprie assay were compared with the E-test results retrospectively retrieved. The discordant results were analyzed by sequencing of the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes.

RESULTS

Susceptibility concordance between the Mosprie assay and E-test for clarithromycin and levofloxacin was 97.30% (180/185) and 88.11% (163/185), respectively. The full agreement between clarithromycin genotypes by Mosprie assay and the 23S rRNA sequencing results was observed in the 5 samples with discordant Mosprie assay and E-test results. However, for levofloxacin, of the 16 discordant samples with resistant phenotype but a susceptible genotype by Mosprie assay, 6 were found to have levofloxacin resistance-related gyrA gene mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid and reliable Mosprie assay can be recommended for H. pylori susceptibility testing of clarithromycin and levofloxacin on gastric biopsies. Future technical improvements are needed in detecting levofloxacin resistance-associated gene mutations.

Effect of metronidazole resistance on Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines suggest bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) or concomitant therapy (CT) as first-line therapy in our geographic area. Both schedules contain metronidazole. We aimed to evaluate the effect of metronidazole resistance to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy.

METHODS

We recruited treatment-naïve subjects with H. pylori infection who received either CT or BQT during January 2020 and December 2021. Before therapy, a fecal sample was collected using the THD fecal test device from each patient. H. pylori DNA was extracted and mutations of rdxA and frxA genes and A2143G for metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance were investigated using real-time polymerase chain reaction with a high-resolution melting curve.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were enrolled, including 29 received BQT and 67 received CT. The overall eradication rate was 94.8% (100% for BQT and 92.5% for CT). Metronidazole resistance was found in 18 (18.8%) subjects, while clarithromycin resistance was found in 19 (19.8%). All 18 patients with metronidazole resistance achieved successful eradication (five treated with BQT and 13 with CT). The eradication rate in metronidazole-sensitive strains was 93.6%. Of these, 24 received BQT with 100% success, and 54 had CT with five failures (successful eradication in 90.7%). Two patients with treatment failure were resistant to clarithromycin, and the remaining three were susceptible to both clarithromycin and metronidazole. No statistical significance was observed in the eradication rate between metronidazole-resistant and -sensitive strains (100% vs 93.6%, P = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

Metronidazole resistance does not influence the eradication rate of BQT and CT regimens in our geographical area, even if such results need to confirmed in a larger sample.

Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Comparison between Korea and the United States

Helicobacter pylori has been well known to cause gastritis, peptic ulcers, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, and gastric cancer. The importance of H. pylori eradication has been emphasized; however, the management of H. pylori infection is difficult in clinical practice. In both Eastern and Western countries, there has been a constant interest in confirming individuals who should be tested and treated for H. pylori infection and developing methods to diagnose H. pylori infection. Many studies have been implemented to successfully eradicate H. pylori, and various combinations of eradication regimens for H. pylori infection have been suggested worldwide. Based on the findings of previous studies, a few countries have published their own guidelines that are appropriate for their country; however, these country-specific guidelines may differ depending on the circumstances in each country. Evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice updates for the treatment of H. pylori infection have been published in Korea and the United States in 2021. This review will summarize the similarities and differences in the management of H. pylori infection in Korea and the United States, focusing on indications, diagnosis, and treatments based on recent guidelines and recommendations in both countries.

Emphasizing the importance of successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori on initial treatment

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the most important risk factor for gastric cancer and plays an initiating role in the development of intestinal-type gastric cancer. Eradication of H. pylori significantly reduces the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer. International expert consensus recommends eradication treatment for all infected individuals unless competing considerations. However, large-scale H. pylori eradication treatments have led to increasing rates of resistance to multiple antibiotics, together with factors such as coccoid transformation, host CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms, and inappropriate treatment regimens, resulting in a gradual decline in H. pylori eradication rates. Currently, empirical and repeated eradication of H. pylori treatment is common in clinical practice, which will certainly lead to a further increase in antibiotic resistance, resulting in a great waste of medical resources and an increased psychological burden on patients and their relatives. Therefore, successful eradication of H. pylori on initial treatment should be given high priority, and the implementation of personalized treatment is essential.

New Strategy for the Detection and Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infections in Primary Care Guided by a Non-Invasive PCR in Stool: Protocol of the French HepyPrim Study

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infects half of the world population and is responsible for gastric, duodenal ulcers and gastric cancer. The eradication of Hp cures ulcers and prevents ulcer recurrences and gastric cancer. Antibiotic resistance of Hp, and particularly clarithromycin resistance, is the primary cause of treatment failure and is a major concern identified by the WHO as a high priority requiring research into new strategies. Treatments guided by the detection of antibiotic resistance have proven their medical and economical superiority. However, this strategy is severely hampered by the invasive nature of the fibroscopy, since antibiotic resistance detection requires gastric biopsies. The eradication of Hp involves primary care physicians. The objective of this study will be to evaluate the feasibility of a strategy for the management of Hp infection in primary care by a recently developed non-invasive procedure and its non-inferiority in eradication rates compared with the strategy recommended by the French National Authority of Health. The non-invasive procedure is a PCR on stool to detect Hp infection and mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin allowing a treatment guided by the results of the PCR. We present the protocol of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled interventional study in two arms.

Helicobacter pylori diagnosis and therapy in the era of antimicrobial stewardship

The diagnosis and therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection have undergone major changes based on the use the principles of antimicrobial stewardship and increased availability of susceptibility profiling. H. pylori gastritis now recognized as an infectious disease, as such there is no placebo response allowing outcome to be assessed in relation to the theoretically obtainable cure rate of 100%. The recent recognition of H. pylori as an infectious disease has changed the focus to therapies optimized to reliably achieve high cure rates. Increasing antimicrobial resistance has also led to restriction of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, or metronidazole to susceptibility-based therapies. Covid-19 resulted in the almost universal availability of polymerase chain reaction testing in hospitals which can be repurposed to utilize readily available kits to provide rapid and inexpensive detection of clarithromycin resistance. In the United States, major diagnostic laboratories now offer H. pylori culture and susceptibility testing and American Molecular Laboratories offers next-generation sequencing susceptibility profiling of gastric biopsies or stools for the six commonly used antibiotics without need for endoscopy. Current treatment recommendations include (a) only use therapies that are reliably highly effective locally, (b) always perform a test-of-cure, and (c) use that data to confirm local effectiveness and share the results to inform the community regarding which therapies are effective and which are not. Empiric therapy should be restricted to those proven highly effective locally. The most common choices are 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy and rifabutin triple therapy. Prior guidelines and treatment recommendations should only be used if proven locally highly effective.

Helicobacter pylori infection: from standard to alternative treatment strategies

Helicobacter pylori is the major component of the gastric microbiome of infected individuals and one of the aetiological factors of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. The increasing resistance to antibiotics worldwide has made the treatment of H. pylori infection a challenge. As a way to overhaul the efficacy of currently used H. pylori antibiotic-based eradication therapies, alternative treatment strategies are being devised. These include probiotics and prebiotics as adjuvants in H. pylori treatment, antimicrobial peptides as alternatives to antibiotics, photodynamic therapy ingestible devices, microparticles and nanoparticles applied as drug delivery systems, vaccines, natural products, and phage therapy. This review provides an updated synopsis of these emerging H. pylori control strategies and discusses the advantages, hurdles, and challenges associated with their development and implementation. An effective human vaccine would be a major achievement although, until now, projects regarding vaccine development have failed or were discontinued. Numerous natural products have demonstrated anti-H. pylori activity, mostly in vitro, but further clinical studies are needed to fully disclose their role in H. pylori eradication. Finally, phage therapy has the potential to emerge as a valid alternative, but major challenges remain, namely the isolation of more H. pylori strictly virulent bacterio(phages).

Methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori from stool sample: current options and developments

Accurate detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and determination of antibiotics have significant meaning in clinical practice. The detection methods can be categorized into two types, invasive and non-invasive, but nowadays we use the urease breath test most frequently which is non-invasive. However, many developing countries cannot meet the requirements for having specialized equipment and they lack trained personnel. Also, for the children, it is difficult to make them cooperate for the test. Methods that detect Helicobacter pylori from stool sample can be a promising alternative for detection used in children and mass screening. Stool antigen tests have several advantages such as rapidity, simplicity, and cheapness, though their results may be influenced by the heterogenicity of antigens, the nature of biochemical techniques, and the amount of antigen presented in the stool. PCR-based methods can specifically detect Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance by targeting specific gene sequence, but they also are limited by the requirements of facilities and experts, the existence of inhibitory substance, and interference from the dead bacteria. Some novel methods also deserve our attention. Here we summarized the results of researches about methods using stool sample and we hope our work can help clinicians choose the appropriate test in clinical practice.