Comparative evaluation of identification systems for testing methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus

Evaluation of new agglutination test for identification of oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

A new agglutination test (Monostaph +; Bionor, Skien, Norway) has been developed. This new agglutination test has been compared with two other agglutination tests for the identification of 128 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and 82 coagulase-negative staphylococci. The sensitivities of both Monostaph + and Pastorex Staph-Plus were excellent (98.7 and 97.4%, respectively) in detection of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The specificity was 96.4% (two Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates and one Staphylococcus hominis isolate were false positive).

Use of commercial particle agglutination systems for the rapid identification of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The performance of a recently introduced Staphylococcus aureus identification system (Slidex Staph-Kit) was compared with that of currently available systems (Immuno Scan Staphlatex, Staphyloslide, Staphaurex and SeroSTAT II) for the identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. The new system, which detects a capsular antigen common in MRSA, performed with equal or greater sensitivity than the other systems. None of the commercial systems was adversely affected by the methicillin susceptibility of the staphylococci when isolates were recovered from non-selective media. The greatest advantage of the anti-capsular monoclonal reagent was its improved performance on isolates recovered from selective media.

Comparative evaluation of five agglutination techniques and a new miniaturized system for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus

The speciation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant diagnostic problem when rapid identification methods such as slide agglutination tests, are used, because of the high proportion of false-negative reactions. 150 perfectly identified MRSA strains were tested on 5 commonly used agglutination reagents ("Bacto staph latex test", "Monostaph", "Pastorex staph", "Staphaurex", and "Staphyslide test") in comparison with a new micromethod ("RAPIDEC staph") which detects a type of staphylocoagulase within 2 hours by a fluorescence test. The "RAPIDEC staph" reagent enabled identification of all the MRSA while the agglutination tests gave poorer results: "Monostaph" correctly identified 64.6% of strains, "Staphyslide", 59.3%, "Bacto staph latex test", 44.6%, "Pastorex staph", 38.6% and "Staphaurex", 28.6%. These results show that agglutination slide tests are not reliable enough for the identification of MRSA which are more and more encountered in hospital wards. The authors recommend not to use slide agglutination methods. They suggest the tube test for coagulase which is the reference technique, although it is time-consuming and not well standardized. The results of this evaluation encourage the use of the "RAPIDEC staph" reagent since it is an easy-to-use, reliable technique for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Latex agglutination for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus recovered from selective media

The accuracy of combining latex agglutination with selective media for the identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was determined. Test strains were identified by latex agglutination on blood agar, the heat-stable thermonuclease test and broth microdilution MICs of oxacillin and included 97 MRSA, 56 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, 52 methicillin resistant, and 49 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus species. Isolates were grown on trypticase-soy agar with 5% sheep red blood cells (TSAB), Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA), mannitol-salt agar (MSA), and four media designed for the selective growth of MRSA:TSAB with clindamycin and gentamicin, MHA with oxacillin, MSA with oxacillin, and lipovitellin-salt-mannitol agar (LVSM) with 1 microgram oxacillin disks applied. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for the combination of latex agglutination with selective media for the identification of MRSA was 96%, 99% and 98% respectively.

Staphylococcus aureus strains which are not identified by rapid agglutination methods are of capsular serotype 5

A total of 183 recent Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates were tested with three commercially available rapid agglutination methods. The capsular polysaccharide type and resistance to oxacillin of these isolates were also determined. Seven isolates were not identified correctly by agglutination methods. All isolates not identified by the rapid methods were of capsular serotype 5, and of these isolates, six were resistant to oxacillin. The results suggest that these agglutination kits can be improved by the use of antibodies reactive with S. aureus capsular polysaccharide.

Evaluation of a direct identification method for Staphylococcus aureus from blood culture broth

We evaluated the reliability of Staphaurex (Wellcome Diagnostics, Dartford, England) for the direct identification of staphylococci from blood culture broth with evidence of positivity and a suggestive Gram-stained smear. Our evaluation indicates that this application is of limited sensitivity, thus reducing the value of a negative test. However, since the test is highly specific, a positive test is significant in predicting the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus.

Problems with rapid agglutination methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus when Staphylococcus saprophyticus is being tested

Six rapid agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus were evaluated by using 62 strains of S. aureus, 63 strains of S. saprophyticus, and 67 strains of other coagulase-negative staphylococci. S. saprophyticus was responsible for 19 of 26 false-positive results and 20 uninterpretable reactions. Thus, urinary staphylococcal isolates that are positive by rapid agglutination tests may require other confirmatory tests for the identification of possible S. saprophyticus.

Prospective microbiologic surveillance in control of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

A prospective microbiological surveillance (PMS) program was developed in a comprehensive hospital-wide effort for control of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This PMS program entailed: active identification of colonized and infected patients; application of a screening microbiologic system for MRSA; isolation of colonized and infected patients; antibiotic decolonization of MRSA; and educational efforts. The PMS program was studied over three and one half years for its contribution to infection control of MRSA, early identification of nosocomial MRSA outbreaks, use of the highest yield surveillance culture sites, and cost effectiveness. Following initiation of the PMS program in December 1982, during an MRSA outbreak, the frequency of new MRSA cases declined from 14 to none by the end of a 3-month pilot study. The frequency of new MRSA cases stabilized at approximately 2 per month until October 1983, when the PMS system allowed prompt detection of a new outbreak of 11 cases. Following isolation and antibiotic decolonization, the frequency of cases again declined to 3 per month. A third outbreak in December 1985 again was promptly detected and controlled. Infection to colonization ratio decreased from a maximum of 1.5 during outbreaks to a minimum of 0.17 after outbreaks. Wounds and tracheostomy sites provided the greatest yield of detection of new cases of MRSA. During one 15-month period, 35 of the 43 new cases were detected initially at wounds and tracheostomy sites. No new MRSA cases were detected by a positive axillary or nares site alone. The estimated quarterly cost of outbreaks and infection paralleled the quarterly frequency of new MRSA cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reliability of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to oxacillin

Commercial latex agglutination tests (LATs) for the simultaneous detection of clumping factor and protein A are gaining increased acceptance as a means of identifying Staphylococcus aureus. We evaluated two LATs (Accu-Staph; Carr-Scarborough, Decatur, Ga.; Staphaurex; Wellcome, Dartford, England) with particular emphasis on their ability to correctly identify oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. We tested 59 oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, 136 oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus, and 92 coagulase-negative staphylococcal strains with the two LATs and with thermonuclease, slide clumping factor, tube coagulase, and protein A hemagglutination tests. Clumping factor and protein A were present in 96.9 and 82.1% of our S. aureus strains, respectively. Accu-Staph correctly identified 92.8% and Staphaurex correctly identified 91.3% of S. aureus strains. No significant difference in LAT positivity rates, presence of clumping factor, or presence of protein A was found between oxacillin-resistant and -susceptible S. aureus. Overall, there were 31 false-negative LATs for 20 S. aureus strains, 14 with Accu-Staph and 17 with Staphaurex. Ninety-five percent of these strains possessed either clumping factor or protein A or both when these factors were determined independently. There were five false-positive LATs for four strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci (three Staphylococcus epidermidis and one Staphylococcus warneri), four with Accu-Staph and one with Staphaurex. Clumping factor was present in one S. warneri strain. Thus, the specificities of Accu-Staph, Staphaurex, and the clumping factor test were 95.6, 98.9, and 98.9%, respectively. Our results indicated that LATs identify oxacillin-resistant and -susceptible S. aureus equally well; however, they offer no greater sensitivity or specificity than the clumping factor test for identification of S. aureus.