Comparison of 10 enzyme immunoassays for detection of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 2 in West African sera

Vitamin D receptor (BsmI) gene polymorphism and allele frequency among chronic kidney disease patients in south Indian population

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) axis plays an important role in multiple physiological renal functions. BsmI gene is one among the VDR gene plays a vital role in maintaining this VDR axis and any polymorphism in VDR gene will cause dysfunction of renal tissues. The main objective of the study is to study the link between BsmI VDR gene polymorphism and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). This was a case-control study, which includes 100 cases and 100 controls. BsmI gene analysis was done by polymerase chain reaction - restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Among 100 CKD study participants, BB (wild-type) genotype of BsmI gene was present in 7 patients (7%), Bb (heterozygous) genotype was present in 23 patients (23%) and bb (mutant) genotype was present in 70 patients (70%). And among 100 controls, 92 subjects were found to have BB genotype and 8 subjects were found to have Bb genotype and none of subjects were found to have bb genotypes. CKD patients with Bb and bb genotypes were found to have significantly elevated serum urea, creatinine and decreased Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) when compared to the BB genotype of BsmI gene. 'b' allele of BsmI gene, Bb and bb genotypes of BsmI gene plays a greater role in Guanine/Adenine single nucleotide polymorphism of BsmI gene in CKD.

A comparative meta-analysis on the variability in test performance among FDA-licensed enzyme immunosorbent assays for HIV antibody testing

BACKGROUND

Although independently published studies have compared diagnostic test performance among various manufactured enzyme immunosorbent assays (EIAs) used in HIV antibody testing, none have attempted to formally synthesize such results through a comparative meta-analysis. In particular, no estimates of post-FDA approval test performance, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, and their associated variability within each manufacturer, has been reported in the literature, along with an analysis of the relative differences in manufacturer test performance in practice (after FDA approval).

METHODS

Retrieval of studies was done using several searching strategies, while retrieval of manufacturer information was done through package inserts and direct contacts. Comparisons of HIV antibody test performance across manufacturers and within a single manufacturer were made based on 16 estimates (from 11 articles) and 33 estimates (from 19 articles), respectively. A generalized linear model, based upon Bayes estimates of sensitivity and specificity, was used to assess the impact of several study-level covariates on the performance of these EIAs, with overall estimates of manufacturer test performance and associated variability obtained based on generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Estimates of test performance were obtained across studies, with a significant (P < 0.01) difference between manufacturers. The test performance of each manufacturer significantly interacted (P < 0.05) with the following study-level covariates: type of population screened, year of diagnostic testing and study quality. Among a single manufacturer, Abbott, significant improvement in estimates of test sensitivity (P < 0.01) and specificity (P < 0.01) was observed with each newly produced antibody kit.

CONCLUSION

Estimates on the relative differences in test performance within each manufacturer may be used for guiding decisions on the choice of EIA test kit for HIV antibodies, given the type of population screened, as well as cost and time considerations. In addition, the results of this meta-analysis may be used in modeling HIV prevalence when used as prior information within a Bayesian framework or for standardizing test results among various manufacturers.

Diagnostic virology

Diagnostic virology has now entered the mainstream of medical practice. Multiple methods are used for the laboratory diagnosis of viral infections, including viral culture, antigen detection, nucleic acid detection, and serology. The role of culture is diminishing as new immunologic and molecular tests are developed that provide more rapid results and are able to detect a larger number of viruses. This review provides specific recommendations for the diagnostic approach to clinically important viral infections.

Evaluation of an agglutination HIV-1 + 2 antibody assay

Studies have shown that an HIV (HIV-PA) agglutination assay (Serodia) for the detection of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be as sensitive and as specific as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, since this HIV assay was designed to detect antibody to the HIV-1 virus, a substantial number of HIV-2 positive sera are missed by this assay. Since the HIV-2 has now been found throughout the world this test is becoming less suitable. The new HIV-1 + 2 assay version (HIV-1 + 2 PA) was evaluated in 300 sera, which contained 50 HIV-1, 40 HIV-2 and 10 HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody positive samples, and a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99%, respectively, was obtained. Whereas all HIV-2 positive sera were detected by the new HIV-1 + 2 version, 26% (13/50) were missed by the old version of the agglutination test. It is concluded that the HIV-1 + 2 PA assay is a promising instrument free assay which can be used for screening purposes in areas where both HIV-1 and HIV-2 are present.

Evaluation of testing algorithms following the use of combination HIV-1/HIV-2 EIA for screening purposes

The licensure of combination human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and type 2 (HIV-1/HIV-2) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) by the Food and Drug Administration has been accompanied by a recommendation that U.S. blood banks begin testing the nation's blood supply for HIV-2 by June 1, 1992. The performance of a recently licensed combination HIV-1/HIV-2 EIA (Genetic Systems) was evaluated using 3100 sera collected in the United States. A total of 2,049 sera were obtained from populations with low risk for HIV infections, and 1,051 sera from populations with high-risk behaviors. The combination EIA, in comparison with monospecific EIA, was found to be 100% sensitive for HIV-1 for both populations. The high-risk population had an HIV-1 seroprevalence rate of 17.4%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.3%. The low-risk population had an HIV-1 seroprevalence of 0.05% with a PPV of 8%. The incorporation of the combination EIA in various testing algorithms was also evaluated, and recommendations are given with consideration for the type of screening and populations involved.

AIDS: Part I

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is caused by infection with a pathogenic human retrovirus known as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Approximately 1 million people are currently infected with HIV in the United States, with 8 to 10 million infected individuals worldwide. The virus is transmitted predominantly through genital sexual contact, although orogenital spread has been rarely reported. Heterosexual transmission has been most common in the Third World, whereas male homosexual transmission has predominated in the United States and western Europe. Transmission through homosexual contact has been steadily declining over the past 5 years as transmission through illicit intravenous drug use and promiscuous unprotected heterosexual activity has increased. Sexually transmitted diseases that cause inflammatory or ulcerative lesions of the genital tract act as important cofactors in increasing the risk of transmission through sexual contact. Perinatal transmission of HIV occurs in approximately 30% of infants born to infected mothers. Transmission to infants through breast-feeding has also been documented. Health care workers have been infected with HIV through accidental high-risk percutaneous or mucous membrane exposures, albeit at a low transmission rate of 0.3%. Infection of patients by infected health care professionals is a rare event, having been reported only once in 10 years of the epidemic. Infection with HIV results in a chronic lifelong infection. The major targets for HIV are CD4+ T-helper lymphocytes and cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage. Infection of the T-helper lymphocyte ultimately results in the death of the cell. Over time (measured in years), a progressive destruction of the T-helper lymphocyte population occurs, which results in profound immune suppression. Infection of monocytes/macrophages is not cidal, but these cells do have functional alterations as a result of the infection, which may contribute to the immune deficiency. In addition, chronically infected tissue macrophages may act as an important reservoir for HIV, particularly in the central nervous system. Infection of the T-helper lymphocytes and monocytes/macrophages is mediated through attachment of HIV through a specific binding interaction between CD4 expressed in the plasma membrane of these cells and a surface glycoprotein on the virus, gp120. Once the virus nucleocapsid (core particle) enters the cytoplasm of the target cell, the viral RNA genome is reverse transcribed by a reverse transcriptase enzyme into proviral DNA. This proviral DNA migrates into the nucleus where it integrates into the host cellular genome, which results in a chronically infected cell.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Evaluation of a line immunoassay for simultaneous confirmation of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2

An anti-HIV-1/HIV-2 line immunoassay (LIA), using peptides and recombinant antigens was evaluated against commercially available Western blot tests for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies. Two thousand one hundred and ten sera of European, African, and South American origin were used in the evaluation. The panel included 1066 sera with antibodies to HIV-1, 192 sera with antibodies to HIV-2, and 64 sera with antibodies to both. Using Western blot results interpreted according to the WHO criteria as a reference standard, the overall specificity obtained by this LIA was 100% and the sensitivity was 99.77% (97.51-100% for 95% confidence limits) when sera dually reactive in Western blot were included. Of the three sera negative in the LIA but positive in HIV-1 WB, two could be retested in a radioimmunoprecipitation assay and were negative. When dually reactive sera in the Western blot (WHO) were included, the LIA yielded 9.9% indeterminate results as compared with 15.5% for both assays (chi 2 = 29.30; p less than 0.001). Although only one HIV-2 specific peptide antigen (gp36) was used, the LIA yielded a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 100% as compared with the HIV-2 Western blot assay. When indeterminate results were included, the overall agreement between the LIA and the HIV-1 and HIV-2 Western blot (WHO criteria) was 89.9% and 90.1% respectively. These results indicate that the LIA provides reliable simultaneous detection of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2, and at a cost which is substantially lower than the cost of Western blot tests.

Specificity of new peptide immunoassays versus other immunoassays and agglutination tests for detection of HIV antibody in African sera

The specificity of three HIV EIAs using synthetic peptides was evaluated and compared with that of four commercial EIAs using recombinant proteins or whole virus lysates of HIV-1 or of HIV-1 and HIV-2, and of two tests based on agglutination of sensitized particles. A total of 734 West African sera were screened. The best results were obtained with tests using recombinant proteins. HIV tests using synthetic peptides able to distinguish between HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies showed comparable specificity, but some false negative results represent a major handicap of these peptide EIAs in screening for HIV antibodies.

A microELISA system for the detection of both anti-HIV-1 and anti-HIV-2 antibodies

Current anti-HIV-1 screening tests combine an excellent anti-HIV-1 sensitivity with a sensitivity of only 28-93% for anti-HIV-2 positive plasma or serum samples. The reactivity of anti-HIV-2 sera in anti-HIV-1 screening tests is based mainly on the immunological cross-reactivity of the GAG and POL proteins of HIV-1 and HIV-2. We describe here a sandwich immunoassay, in which HIV-1 viral lysate is combined with an HIV-2 ENV synthetic peptide, corresponding to the immunodominant envelope epitope, as the coating antigens on microELISA plates. This immunoassay has a sensitivity of 100% for anti-HIV-1 (128 sera tested) and 100% for anti-HIV-2 (109 sera tested). Assay specificity with fresh human donor sera was 99.9% (2256 sera tested).

Laboratory diagnosis of HIV infection

Laboratory diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is complicated by absence of data on sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of the various tests as they apply to children. The presence of maternal anti-HIV passively transmitted across the placenta also confounds diagnosis. The authors review currently available data on the detection of HIV, HIV genome, and HIV gene products, as well as the diagnostic value of detecting serologic and cellular responses to HIV in infants and children.

Comparative evaluation of 36 commercial assays for detecting antibodies to HIV

Summarized are the results of an assessment of the major operational characteristics of 36 commercially available assays for detection of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and/or type 2 (HIV-2). For this purpose, 20 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), 11 simple immunoassays with visual reading, four supplemental assays, and one discriminatory assay were assessed using a panel of 537 sera (65% of which were of African, 26% of European, and 9% of South American origin); the prevalence of HIV-1 was 39.1% and of HIV-2, 15.7%. The following operational parameters of the assays were investigated: ease of performance; suitability for use in small blood collection centres; sensitivity and specificity; positive predictive values at different prevalences; inter-reader variability for simple assays whose results were read visually; the proportion of indeterminate results; and, for some of the ELISA assays, delta-values, as quantitative measures of sensitivity and specificity. The results will be of use to health policy decision-makers, managers of national AIDS prevention and control programmes, directors of blood banks, and laboratory specialists in the selection of appropriate HIV antibody assays.

Discrimination of HIV-2 infection from HIV-1 infection by western blot and radioimmunoprecipitation analysis

Serum and plasma samples were collected from blood donors who were confirmed positive for antibodies to HIV-1 in the United States, and from blood donors and individuals in West Africa and Portugal who were positive for antibodies to HIV-1, HIV-2, or both. Western blots and sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPA) utilizing native HIV-1 and HIV-2 proteins were performed on these specimens to determine the ability of these procedures to discriminate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. Extensive serologic cross reactivity between HIV-1 and HIV-2 p24 was found in both populations. Antibody reactivity to the envelope protein gp120 was able to discriminate 20 of 20 (100%) U.S. specimens as HIV-1 infections. In specimens from West Africa and Portugal, Western blot and RIPA were in complete agreement on 33 of 42 samples (78.6%). Among these 33 specimens, 10 were found to be reactive for antibodies to HIV-1 only, 10 were reactive to HIV-2 only, and 13 were considered to be dually reactive, having antibodies reactive with both HIV-1 gp120 and HIV-2 gp120. Nine of the 42 specimens were discordant by Western blot and RIPA classification, being dually reactive by one procedure and reactive with only one viral gp120 by the other technique. Because of the serological cross reactivities between HIV-1 and HIV-2, in certain populations it is difficult to ascertain whether an individual is infected with HIV-1, HIV-2, a new viral type, or whether the individual is infected simultaneously with multiple viruses. More specific tests such as viral isolation or molecular probes may be necessary to distinguish between infections with these viruses in certain populations.

Discrimination between antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in sera from northern Zaire

136 selected sera from Northern Zaire were screened for antibodies against HIV-1 and HIV-2 using the ELISA method. Reactive sera were confirmed with commercially available Western Blots and additional tests. A data base was used for evaluation of the results. The sera were collected in the town Isiro and in remote rural areas. 36 sera were reactive in the HIV-1 ELISA (ELAVIA-1), 19 of them were confirmed in the HIV-1 Western Blot (Biorad). 21 sera were reactive in the HIV-2 ELISA, but they were not confirmed as HIV-2-specific in three HIV-2 Western Blots (Diagnostics Pasteur, Biorad, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut).

Retroviral infections transmitted by blood transfusion

Modifications in donor screening and the introduction of laboratory testing of donated blood for anti-HIV-1 and anti-HTLV-I have resulted in a significant reduction in the risks of retroviral infections from blood transfusion. Presently, the American Red Cross detects an average of eight carriers of human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 (HIV-1) per 100,000 otherwise acceptable blood donors (0.008 percent), compared with an average of 35 per 100,000 (0.035 percent) when testing for HIV-1 antibodies began in 1985. Surveillance studies in the United States indicate a small likelihood that HIV-2 carriers will pass current screening procedures and be accepted as blood donors. Even if an HIV-2-infected person were to be accepted as a blood donor, there is a 42-92 percent likelihood that this person's blood would be detected as infective for HIV-2 and excluded because of serological cross-reactions that occur in the EIA for HIV-1 antibodies. During 1989, which was the first year that donated blood was routinely tested for antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus, type I (HTLV-I) in the United States, approximately nine in 100,000 donors (0.009 percent) were confirmed positive for antibodies to HTLV-I, and their donated blood was excluded. Subsequent testing has revealed that a significant number of these persons whose sera was reactive by the HTLV-I EIA were, in fact, infected by HTLV-II. Epidemiological studies of human retroviral infections (HIV-1, HIV-2, HTLV-I, and HTLV-II) continue to provide important data and direction for improving criteria for qualifying blood donors.

Performance of six different commercial assays to demonstrate antibodies to HIV-2 among immigrants from high-endemic areas

Four HIV-2 and 8 HIV-1 infections were detected when serum specimens from 422 persons from high-endemic areas were examined with 6 different commercial ELISA tests. 41 specimens showed a positive result in at least one of the assays. 12 of these were confirmed as anti-HIV positive. One of the anti-HIV-2 specimens was negative in the Abbott recombinant HIV-1 test but positive in the ELAVIA II and the 4 HIV-1/HIV-2 combination tests. The 4 HIV-2 positive individuals originated from West Africa.

Laboratory diagnosis of the first cases of HIV-2 infection in Canada

Until recently the geographic distribution of infection due to human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) had excluded North America. We report the first two cases of such infection in Canada. Both people came from endemic areas of western Africa and were asymptomatic. The results of a commercial enzyme immunoassay specific for HIV-1 antibody were positive in both cases, but those of the Western blot technique were indeterminate. The Western blot technique specific for HIV-2 antibody and the indirect fluorescent antibody test were used to verify the presence of HIV-2 antibody.

Differential diagnosis of human retrovirus infections in the laboratory

Several human retroviruses have been discovered in the past decade, the majority of which have been implicated as etiological agents of severe disease entities. Thus, there is a clear need for accurate identification of human retroviruses in the laboratory. In this review, the classification and general properties of human retroviruses are outlined. Methods for detecting the presence of antibodies are reviewed. In addition, the principles of methods used for isolating and identifying retroviruses are discussed. Finally, techniques which detect the presence of retroviruses directly in clinical specimens without prior amplification in culture are summarized. Clearly, the ability to differentiate and recognize the different types of retrovirus is important for the proper treatment of diseases caused by these viruses.