Evaluation of the Becton Dickinson Directigen test for respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates

Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are extensively used in clinical laboratories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of RADTs for diagnosis of RSV infection and to determine factors associated with accuracy estimates. We searched EMBASE and PubMed for diagnostic-accuracy studies of commercialized RSV RADTs. Studies reporting sensitivity and specificity data compared to a reference standard (reverse transcriptase PCR [RT-PCR], immunofluorescence, or viral culture) were considered. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, diagnostic-accuracy estimates, and study quality. Accuracy estimates were pooled using bivariate random-effects regression models. Heterogeneity was investigated with prespecified subgroup analyses. Seventy-one articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, RSV RADT pooled sensitivity and specificity were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76% to 83%) and 97% (95% CI, 96% to 98%), respectively. Positive- and negative-likelihood ratios were 25.5 (95% CI, 18.3 to 35.5) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.24), respectively. Sensitivity was higher in children (81% [95% CI, 78%, 84%]) than in adults (29% [95% CI, 11% to 48%]). Because of this disparity, further subgroup analyses were restricted to pediatric data (63 studies). Test sensitivity was poorest using RT-PCR as a reference standard and highest using immunofluorescence (74% versus 88%; P < 0.001). Industry-sponsored studies reported significantly higher sensitivity (87% versus 78%; P = 0.01). Our results suggest that the poor sensitivity of RSV RADTs in adults may preclude their use in this population. Furthermore, industry-sponsored studies and those that did not use RT-PCR as a reference standard likely overestimated test sensitivity.

Routine diagnosis of seven respiratory viruses and Mycoplasma pneumoniae by enzyme immunoassay

A composite EIA, using 8-well microstrips, was used for the rapid detection of seven respiratory viruses and M. pneumoniae. The viruses included influenza A and B, parainfluenza 1, 2 and 3, adenovirus and respiratory syncytial virus. During the 61 month period--June 1988 to June 1993--17326 respiratory specimens, submitted from three states, were tested by this EIA. The specimens were mainly from a paediatric population (hospitals and private physicians). RSV was the predominant virus detected, followed by adenovirus, parainfluenza 3, M. pneumoniae, influenza A, parainfluenza 2, influenza B and parainfluenza 1. The use of blocking antibodies confirmed the identification of the agents, in particular with samples showing absorbance values greater than the cutoff with more than one infectious agent. Different methods for processing specimens in order to obtain a uniform suspension, and interpretation of non-specific reactions, are discussed. The assays showed an average sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 99%, compared to virus culture. This EIA system provided an efficient method for the rapid diagnosis of viral and mycoplasmal infections in a busy diagnostic laboratory.

Detection of respiratory syncytial virus infection in nasal aspirate samples by flow cytometry

Hypotheses: (i) Flow cytometry has the potential for rapid detection of respiratory viral antigens. (ii) This technique can be applied to viral diagnosis in clinical samples.

Objectives and study design: (i) To study the identification of six common respiratory viral pathogens by flow cytometry, in virus infected and uninfected cultured cells, as models of positive and negative clinical samples. (ii) To compare flow cytometry with the established techniques of viral isolation and immunofluorescent microscopy in the diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in 68 naso-pharyngeal aspirates taken from children and sent to the virology laboratory for routine virological diagnosis.

Results: (i) For each virus analysed, populations of infected and non-infected cells were clearly discernable, confirming potential for this method in rapid viral diagnosis in clinical samples. (ii) Two definitions were employed for a sample to be positive by flow cytometry, these were compared with the combined established techniques. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of flow cytometry were 41%, 98%, 92% and 71% for the first definition and 74%, 88%, 80% and 84% for the second definition respectively.

Conclusions: As tested in this study, flow cytometry is less sensitive than established techniques as well as recently developed rapid diagnostic techniques for the diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Further evaluation of the potential of flow cytometry in rapid viral diagnosis is warranted.

Stability of respiratory syncytial virus antigen due to buffer treatment for direct detection in nasopharyngeal specimens with enzyme immunoassay

We developed an enzyme immunoassay (direct EIA; Enzygnost RSV[Ag]) for the direct detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antigen in nasopharyngeal specimens (NPS). The test procedure is the same as our recently described direct EIA for detection of influenza A and B virus antigens in NPS. For practical purposes it is of advantage to differentiate respiratory viruses on the same microtitration plate in the same run. The test shows no limitations by sample consistency, and results are obtained within 4 hr. In contrast to other test systems, sonification is not necessary. This is due to the sample buffer STD. We studied the influence of sample buffer STD on the stability of RSV (strain Long) antigen at different temperatures over a period of 7 days. PBS-BSA-buffer served as control. The treatment and storage of RSV (strain Long) with sample buffer STD at room temperature or at 4 degrees C showed no decrease of antigen detectability. The antigen is very stable in contrast to the storage of RSV (strain Long) in PBS-BSA buffer during the observation period of 7 days. Consequently, when NPS are stored in sample buffer STD, results of direct EIA are independent from the time of transport and temperature within 7 days. Thirty-eight NPS from infants with confirmed RSV infection were investigated. Confirmation was performed by virus isolation (n = 29) or with commercially available enzyme immunoassays or immunofluorescence test (n = 9). The direct EIA showed a specificity of 99.3% (n = 140) and a sensitivity of 95% (n = 38).

Evaluation of three rapid enzyme immunoassays and cell culture for detection of respiratory syncytial virus

Three rapid enzyme immunoassay techniques for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigen (Becton Dickinson Directigen RSV, Abbott RSV Testpack and Abbott RSV EIA) and cell culture were evaluated in a total of 250 nasal washings. The sensitivity and specificity were 62% and 76% respectively for Directigen, 64% and 86% for RSV Testpack, and 76% and 81% for RSV EIA, taking cell culture as the reference method. Agreement between cell culture and EIA techniques was 79% (70 positive and 128 negative results). All three EIA techniques gave positive results in 69 samples (52 positive and 17 negative in the cell culture). In 121 samples all three EIA techniques gave negative results (103 negative and 18 positive in the cell culture). Using the cell culture technique 46 strains other than respiratory syncytial virus were isolated.

Reliability of two new test kits for rapid diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection

Two new rapid enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for detecting respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Directigen (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems) and TestPack (Abbott Diagnostics) were compared with virus isolation and direct immunofluorescence by using fresh specimens. The sensitivities of both EIAs were low (72 to 73%), but when initial specimens were used, TestPack had a high sensitivity (92%) in contrast to that of Directigen (76%). Because of its high sensitivity and specificity, TestPack can be used for diagnosis of RSV in acute disease.