Comparison of the VIDAS RSV assay and the Abbott Testpack RSV with direct immunofluorescence for detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates

Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are extensively used in clinical laboratories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of RADTs for diagnosis of RSV infection and to determine factors associated with accuracy estimates. We searched EMBASE and PubMed for diagnostic-accuracy studies of commercialized RSV RADTs. Studies reporting sensitivity and specificity data compared to a reference standard (reverse transcriptase PCR [RT-PCR], immunofluorescence, or viral culture) were considered. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, diagnostic-accuracy estimates, and study quality. Accuracy estimates were pooled using bivariate random-effects regression models. Heterogeneity was investigated with prespecified subgroup analyses. Seventy-one articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, RSV RADT pooled sensitivity and specificity were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76% to 83%) and 97% (95% CI, 96% to 98%), respectively. Positive- and negative-likelihood ratios were 25.5 (95% CI, 18.3 to 35.5) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.24), respectively. Sensitivity was higher in children (81% [95% CI, 78%, 84%]) than in adults (29% [95% CI, 11% to 48%]). Because of this disparity, further subgroup analyses were restricted to pediatric data (63 studies). Test sensitivity was poorest using RT-PCR as a reference standard and highest using immunofluorescence (74% versus 88%; P < 0.001). Industry-sponsored studies reported significantly higher sensitivity (87% versus 78%; P = 0.01). Our results suggest that the poor sensitivity of RSV RADTs in adults may preclude their use in this population. Furthermore, industry-sponsored studies and those that did not use RT-PCR as a reference standard likely overestimated test sensitivity.

Viral diagnosis by antigen detection techniques

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of viral infections can be obtained in the early stages of a disease by detection of viral antigens directly in the clinical specimen. This has become an important tool for rapid virus diagnosis.

METHODS

Antigens produced during virus infections can be detected either in cells collected from the site of infection by immunohistological investigation or in secretions and blood by solid phase immunoassays (IA). Viruses causing acute respiratory infections can be diagnosed in cells from the respiratory tract, viruses causing vesicular eruptions in epithelial cells from skin scrapings, rabies virus in nerve cells of the brain or epithelial cells from skin and cornea and cytomegalovirus (CMV) matrix antigen, pp65, can be detected in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) by immunofluorescence (IF) or immunoperoxidase techniques. The quality of specimens can be easily checked during the reading of results. Some IAs for antigen detection, such as detection of HBsAg and HIV p24 antigen in blood are standardized and sensitive. Others give less sensitive results because of the variation of quality of the clinical specimen. The latex agglutination tests are mainly used for rapid detection of virus or viral antigens in faeces: rota-and adenoviruses; the method may not be very sensitive but yields a result within a few minutes. Assays detecting viral nucleic acids are more sensitive than antigen detection tests because of a tremendous amplification of gene segments obtained by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). So far such assays are time consuming and expensive and are mainly used in specific clinical situations.

RESULTS

After introduction of specific monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), the antigen detection techniques are increasingly used. the need for quality control, trained staff, and standardized reagents and methods for specimen collection and preparation is now being appreciated. IF for viral respiratory viruses is used for diagnosis and epidemiological studies all over the world. Likewise, IF is still the method most often used for rabies diagnosis. For CMV, the pp65 matrix antigen is shown to be a sensitive marker closely correlated with clinical symptoms. Its detection by the IF technique has proven to be superior to other techniques for prediction of CMV pneumonia in bone marrow transplant patients. IAs are currently used in fully automated systems for large scale diagnosis based on antigen detection in serum specimens. Increase of antibody specificity on the solid phase by use of Mabs directed against the most abundant viral antigen in the clinical specimen shortens the reaction time; this has been employed in most of the constantly appearing new rapid diagnosis kits based on the immunoassay principle.

CONCLUSION

Although, in virology, more sensitive results are obtained by the gene detection method, PCR, directly in clinical samples, viral antigen detection tests are, after the introduction of Mabs for diagnostic purposes, increasingly used because of their low demand on laboratory equipment, their rapid and early result and relatively low cost. Antigen detection is successfully used directly in clinical specimens for rapid diagnosis of many viral infections as well as for identification of tissue culture isolated viruses. With Mab-based IAs the reaction time is shortened and new rapid, almost 'instant test' kits are appearing on the market.

Evaluation of the QuickLab RSV test, a new rapid lateral-flow immunoassay for detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigen

Rapid respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) diagnosis is vital to the prevention of nosocomial RSV infections. We evaluated a new rapid lateral-flow RSV immunoassay, the QuickLab RSV test, that requires use of only one reagent. We compared QuickLab to the Directigen RSV (DIR) assay, which requires six reagents, and direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) testing. DFA results were considered the "gold standard." For 133 nasopharyngeal aspirates tested, DFA results were 77 (57.8%) positive, 47 (35.3%) negative, and 9 (6.8%) indeterminate. The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of QuickLab and DIR tests were 93.3% (70 of 75) and 80.8% (59 of 73), 95.6% (43 of 45) and 100.0% (46 of 46), 97.2% (70 of 72) and 100.0% (59 of 59), and 89.6% (43 of 48) and 76.7% (46 of 60), respectively. QuickLab was significantly (P = 0.02) more sensitive than DIR; the difference in specificities was not significant. DFA was more sensitive than DIR (P < 0.001) but not more sensitive than QuickLab (P = 0.45). The results of DIR testing were initially uninterpretable and required retesting with 15% of the specimens compared to 3% of QL results (P < 0.001). We conclude that the QuickLab RSV test has sensitivity similar to that of the DFA assay and better than that of the DIR assay. QuickLab testing is also simpler to perform and interpret than both DFA and DIR testing.

Reliable detection of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children for adequate hospital infection control management

By using a rapid test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) detection (Abbott TestPack RSV), a number of patients were observed, showing repeatedly positive results over a period of up to 10 weeks. A prospective study was initiated to compare the rapid test with an antigen capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and a nested reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) protocol for detection of RSV serotypes A and B. Only respiratory samples from children exhibiting the prolonged presence of RSV (> or =5 days) as determined by the rapid test were considered. A total of 134 specimens from 24 children was investigated by antigen capture EIA and nested RT-PCR. Using RT-PCR as the reference method, we determined the RSV rapid test to have a specificity of 63% and a sensitivity of 66% and the antigen capture EIA to have a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 69% for acute-phase samples and the homologous virus serotype A. In 7 (29%) of 24 patients, the positive results of the RSV rapid test could not be confirmed by either nested RT-PCR or antigen capture EIA. In these seven patients a variety of other respiratory viruses were detected. For general screening the RSV rapid test was found to be a reasonable tool to get quick results. However, its lack of specificity in some patients requires confirmation by additional tests to rule out false-positive results and/or detection of other respiratory viruses.

Microwave-accelerated direct immunofluorescent staining for respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A virus

A microwave-accelerated direct immunofluorescence staining method which requires only 20 min from specimen receipt to interpretation is as effective as conventional methods for detecting respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A virus antigens in clinical specimens. The time required compares favorably with that for the less sensitive Abbott Test Pack RSV.

Aerosolized immunoglobulin treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants

BACKGROUND

Recent studies in animals with experimental respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection indicate that passive immunization by intranasal or intratracheal application of gamma-globulins (immunoglobulins) may be beneficial for treatment of infants with lower respiratory tract infection caused by RSV.

METHODS

We conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter study involving 68 infants with proven RSV infection admitted to 5 pediatric centers in Switzerland from November 1, 1992, through April 30, 1993. Treatment was carried out with aerosolized human IgG (Sandoglobulin) by assisted ventilation. On the day of hospital admission a single dose of 0.1 g of IgG per kg of body weight in a 5% solution or an identical amount of placebo, each delivered in 2 parts, was given.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ substantially in their response to the aerosol received. The rate of improvement for symptoms of respiratory tract infection, oxygen requirement and length of hospital stay were comparable for both groups. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in the frequency of apneic spells observed in the treatment group by Day 3 posttreatment. Aerosol therapy was generally well-tolerated in nonintubated infants, but some severe side effects (increased oxygen requirements in two patients, pneumothorax in one patient) were observed in two of three intubated and ventilated infants treated with IgG.

CONCLUSIONS

Aerosolized immunoglobulin in the dosage used had no substantial beneficial effect on RSV bronchiolitis. Despite these findings passive immunotherapy for treatment of RSV-induced lower respiratory tract infection deserves further evaluation before being discarded as ineffective.