Utility of paired blood cultures and smears in diagnosis of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infections in AIDS patients

Diagnosis of disseminated mycobacterial infection: testing a simple and inexpensive method for use in developing countries

With the development of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic, the isolation of mycobacteria from blood has become a common problem for clinical laboratories. In this study two methods were used for the recovery of mycobacteria from blood specimens obtained from AIDS patients: (1) direct inoculation of a biphasic medium, and (2) a non-commercial lysis-centrifugation method. A total of 3 consecutive blood samples were taken at 15-minute intervals from each of 50 AIDS patients with clinical suspicion of disseminated mycobacterial disease. Mycobacterium growth was noted in 70/138 blood specimens from 30 (60%) patients. These cultures yielded Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 19 (63%) and Mycobacterium avium complex organisms in 11 (37%) patients. Cultures using the lysis-centrifugation method were positive in 54% of the patients while cultures using biphasic medium were positive in 44% (P > 0.05). The positivity for M. avium complex was higher with lysis-centrifugation (91%) than with biphasic medium (45.4%) (P < 0.05). However, the positivities for M. tuberculosis with the lysis-centrifugation method (89.5%) and direct inoculation in biphasic medium (100%) were similar (P > 0.05). The use of a non-commercial lysis-centrifugation technique is inexpensive, reliable, and can be an alternative method for the diagnosis of mycobacteraemia in developing countries.

The new diagnostic mycobacteriology laboratory

Recent surveys in the USA show that many mycobacteriology laboratories continue to use less-than-optimum culture and susceptibility testing methods. This seems to be true for European countries as well. The past few years have brought significant changes to the clinical tuberculosis laboratory. High-performance liquid chromatography and direct detection of acid-fast bacilli in clinical specimens aim at the same goal: increased sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic approach and reduction of turnaround time. This review outlines a brief comparison between contemporary traditional methods and the latest developments in the direct detection of acid-fast bacilli. If patient care and public health are always considered paramount, regardless of admission time, hospital type, etc., the current concept of services has several shortcomings. One way to manage this situation is to sort and allocate specimens according to a system of priorities. There is a growing realization that no single method by itself is the best. To streamline the best choice for laboratory diagnosis, an additional dynamic acid-fast network is presented: 'Point-of-Care,' 'Fast Track,' and 'Specialty' laboratories. The physician interacts with all three types of laboratories, so ongoing communication between the physician and the laboratory is essential. Laboratorians must work together in the formation of this dynamic acid-fast network to improve service rendered for our patients.