Unreliability of disc diffusion test for screening for reduced penicillin susceptibility in Neisseria meningitidis

Antibiotic resistant meningococci in Europe: Any need to act?

Meningococcal disease is a serious and rapidly progressing illness. It is therefore very important to monitor changes in the level of antibiotic susceptibility among clinical isolates. Different aspects such as interpretation of laboratory results, determination of breakpoints predicting treatment failure as well as definition of susceptibility levels in clinical samples using molecular methods are critical points for the surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Neisseria meningitidis. Within the strategic framework outlined by the EU.MenNet project, several objectives were identified to analyze 'The spread of antibiotic resistant meningococci in Europe', including the extent of antimicrobial resistance, its association with particular meningococcal lineages and geographical areas, as well as molecular characterization of the mechanisms involved, particularly in penicillin resistance. A heterogeneous figure for the frequency of intermediate resistance to penicillin appears across Europe. This heterogeneity may reflect different clonal lineages and/or uneven access to antibiotics in each country. In addition, the use of different criteria for the methodology used for definition cannot be avoided. The description of five specific changes associated with intermediate resistance to penicillin also allows the design of PCR-based tools to objectify results and for application in clinical samples.

Resistance testing of meningococci: the recommendations of the European Monitoring Group on Meningococci

One of the most controversial topics concerning Neisseria meningitidis is the definition of antimicrobial resistance. A process of harmonization, promoted by the European Monitoring Group on Meningococci (EMGM), is already in progress. There are several aspects of the MIC definition for meningococcal strains for which a consensus is needed, as follows. (1) What methods can be used? At present, both the Etest and agar dilution methods are recommended by the EMGM. Microdilution, also a recommended method, is not used across Europe. (2) What media produce the most reliable data? The use of Mueller-Hinton medium supplemented with 5% blood is recommended for the MIC determination of N. meningitidis by both Etest and agar dilution method. (3) What is the minimum set of antimicrobial agents to be tested? A minimum set should include rifampicin, ciprofloxacin (or another quinolone), penicillin, ampicillin and ceftriaxone. (4) What are the most suitable breakpoints for definition? There is no widely accepted robust evidence base for the definition of breakpoints. Although progress has been made in achieving a standardized methodology, we are still far from obtaining common breakpoints for antimicrobial resistance definition. These differences will imply inability for building a common epidemiologic figure about drug resistance.

Multilaboratory evaluation of disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria meningitidis isolates

In 2005, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute published MIC interpretive criteria for 13 antimicrobial agents used for either therapy or prophylaxis of Neisseria meningitidis infections. The MIC method includes the use of lysed horse blood-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth with incubation in 5% CO2 for 20 to 24 h. Since some clinical laboratories might prefer the option of disk diffusion testing for infrequently encountered isolates a multicenter collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of a disk diffusion method for testing isolates of N. meningitidis. Interpretive criteria were developed for 12 antimicrobial agents. Four laboratories tested a common collection of 50 meningococcal strains and then tested 25 unique isolates per laboratory. Isolates were tested using Mueller-Hinton sheep blood agar plates incubated for 20 to 24 h in 5% CO2; they were also tested by the reference broth microdilution method in parallel. Pooling of the MIC and disk diffusion data from the common and unique isolates provided a sufficient sample size to develop susceptible, intermediate, and resistant zone diameter interpretive criteria using the error rate-bounded method for the following agents: chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and rifampin. Due to the lack of resistant strains at the present time, "susceptible only" interpretive criteria were proposed for cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, meropenem, azithromycin, and minocycline. The numbers of minor interpretive errors with penicillin and ampicillin disk tests were unacceptably high and precluded recommended testing of those agents by the disk method. However, amdinocillin, an agent that preferentially binds to the altered penicillin binding protein responsible for diminished penicillin susceptibility, has potential utility as a surrogate screening reagent for ampicillin resistance. A disk diffusion breakpoint was derived for nalidixic acid to serve as a surrogate marker for gyrase A mutations associated with diminished fluoroquinolone susceptibility. Disk diffusion testing with meningococci can be performed in a reproducible manner with several antimicrobial agents and represents a practical and cost-effective option for testing sporadic clinical isolates or for surveillance purposes by resource-limited laboratories.

Interlaboratory comparison of agar dilution and Etest methods for determining the MICs of antibiotics used in management of Neisseria meningitidis infections

Previous studies have shown that there is considerable variation in the methods and media used to determine the susceptibility of Neisseria meningitidis to antimicrobial agents in different countries. In this study, national and regional reference laboratories used a standardized methodology to determine the MICs of antibiotics used in the management of meningococcal infection. Fourteen laboratories participated in the study, determining the susceptibility to penicillin G, rifampin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin of a collection of 17 meningococci, of which 11 strains were previously defined as having intermediate resistance to penicillin (Pen(I)) by sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the penA gene. The MIC was determined by agar dilution and Etest with Mueller-Hinton agar (MH), MH supplemented with sheep blood (MH+B), and MH supplemented with heated (chocolated) blood. Several laboratories encountered problems obtaining confluent growth with unsupplemented MH. MH+B was considered to give the most congruent and reproducible results among the study laboratories. The modal MIC for MH+B for each antibiotic and method was calculated to define the MIC consensus, allowing assessment of each individual laboratory's data in relation to the others. The agreement in each antibiotic/method/medium combination was defined as the percentage of laboratories with a result within one dilution of the modal result. For the whole study, an agreement of 90.6% was observed between agar dilution and Etest methods. The agreement in each laboratory/antibiotic/method combination ranged from 98.2% to 69.7%, with six laboratories demonstrating agreement higher than 90% and 11 more than 80%. The ability of the laboratories to detect the Pen(I) isolates ranged from 18.2% to 100%. The apparent difficulty in interpreting susceptibility to rifampin, particularly with the Etest method, is very interesting.

Value of Etest penicillin V and penicillin G strips for penicillin susceptibility testing of Neisseria meningitidis

The NCCLS agar dilution method and Etest are currently accepted methods for susceptibility testing of Neisseria meningitidis to penicillin. We determined the MIC of penicillin V and penicillin G by both the agar dilution method and Etest using 43 strains of N. meningitidis. Although results for reference strains were within the accepted quality control range of penicillin MICs for both drugs, differences of two to three dilutions were seen between the two antibiotics with both methods. Penicillin V results cannot correctly predict the susceptibility to penicillin G for N. meningitidis if penicillin G breakpoints are used for penicillin V. However, adjusting the penicillin V breakpoints two dilutions higher (i.e., S < or = 0.25 and R > or = 8 microg/ml), concordance could be achieved for susceptibility categorization by the two compounds. An agreement of 98% +/- 1 dilution was obtained between Etest and the reference method when using penicillin G strips. We conclude that Etest with penicillin G strips is a convenient and reliable alternative method for determining the MICs of penicillin for N. meningitidis.