Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O load in plasma by measuring reverse transcriptase activity

Measuring enzymatic HIV-1 susceptibility to two reverse transcriptase inhibitors as a rapid and simple approach to HIV-1 drug-resistance testing

Simple and cost-effective approaches for HIV drug-resistance testing are highly desirable for managing increasingly expanding HIV-1 infected populations who initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART), particularly in resource-limited settings. Non-nucleoside reverse trancriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens with an NRTI backbone containing lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) are preferred first ART regimens. Failure with these drug combinations typically involves the selection of NNRTI- and/or 3TC/FTC- resistant viruses. Therefore, the availability of simple assays to measure both types of drug resistance is critical. We have developed a high throughput screening test for assessing enzymatic resistance of the HIV-1 RT in plasma to 3TC/FTC and NNRTIs. The test uses the sensitive “Amp-RT” assay with a newly-developed real-time PCR format to screen biochemically for drug resistance in single reactions containing either 3TC-triphosphate (3TC-TP) or nevirapine (NVP). Assay cut-offs were defined based on testing a large panel of subtype B and non-subtype B clinical samples with known genotypic profiles. Enzymatic 3TC resistance correlated well with the presence of M184I/V, and reduced NVP susceptibility was strongly associated with the presence of K103N, Y181C/I, Y188L, and G190A/Q. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting resistance were 97.0% and 96.0% in samples with M184V, and 97.4% and 96.2% for samples with NNRTI mutations, respectively. We further demonstrate the utility of an HIV capture method in plasma by using magnetic beads coated with CD44 antibody that eliminates the need for ultracentifugation. Thus our results support the use of this simple approach for distinguishing WT from NNRTI- or 3TC/FTC-resistant viruses in clinical samples. This enzymatic testing is subtype-independent and can assist in the clinical management of diverse populations particularly in resource-limited settings.

Evaluation of performance across the dynamic range of the Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay as compared to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 and AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 using serial dilutions of 39 group M and O viruses

Performance of the Abbott m2000 instrument system and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay was evaluated using a panel of 37 group M (subtypes A-D, F, G, CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG and unique recombinant forms) and 2 group O virus isolates. Testing was performed on 273 sample dilutions and compared to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (bDNA) and AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 (Monitor v1.5) test results. RealTime HIV-1, bDNA, and Monitor v1.5 tests quantified 87%, 78%, and 81% of samples, respectively. RealTime HIV-1 detected an additional 31 samples at < 40 copies/mL. For group M, RealTime HIV-1 dilution profiles and viral loads were highly correlated with bDNA and Monitor v1.5 values; 87% and 89% of values were within 0.5 log(10) copies/mL. In contrast, the group O viruses were not detected by Monitor v1.5 and were substantially underquantified by approximately 2 log(10) copies/mL in bDNA relative to the RealTime HIV-1 assay. Sequence analysis revealed that RealTime HIV-1 primer/probe binding sites are highly conserved and exhibit fewer nucleotide mismatches relative to Monitor v1.5. The automated m2000 system and RealTime HIV-1 assay offer the advantages of efficient sample processing and throughput with reduced "hands-on" time while providing improved sensitivity, expanded dynamic range and reliable quantification of genetically diverse HIV-1 strains.

Plasma virion reverse transcriptase activity and heat dissociation-boosted p24 assay for HIV load in Burkina Faso, West Africa

BACKGROUND

In resource-limited settings, the requirement for inexpensive, easy-to-perform viral load monitoring has increased with greater antiretroviral drug availability.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate feasibility, in Burkina Faso, of a simple assay for plasma HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) activity quantification compared to heat dissociation-boosted (HDB) p24 antigen and RNA-based quantifications in plasma samples from HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

: Plasma viraemia was quantified by RT activity, HDB-p24 and RNA copies in 84 samples from 70 HIV-1 group M-infected patients (82% non-B subtype, 93% treatment naive), including serial samples from nine patients.

RESULTS

RT activity detected 86% of plasma samples containing measurable RNA copies; corresponding to 0, 93 and 100% of samples with 1.7-4.0 log(10), 4.1-4.8 log(10) and 4.9-6.7 log(10) RNA copies/ml, respectively. HDB-p24 detected 77% of plasma samples containing measurable RNA copies; corresponding to 27, 80 and 86% of samples with 1.7-4.0 log(10), 4.1-4.8 log(10) and 4.9-6.7 log(10) RNA copies/ml, respectively. Measurement error based on one-way analysis of variance between RT activity and HDB-p24 values with RNA copies showed good agreement with RT activity (ME, <10%), however poorer agreement was obtained with HDB-p24 values (ME, >10%). Patient follow up showed a similar pattern of viraemia with RNA and RT activity assays.

CONCLUSION

Field trials in Burkina Faso support the practical use of plasma RT activity assay as an affordable alternative for HIV viral load determination in regions where RNA detection remains difficult to perform. HDB-p24 use requires further evaluation before being considered as an alternative method in African HIV-infected patient follow up.

Relationships between infectious titer, capsid protein levels, and reverse transcriptase activities of diverse human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates

Most studies on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication kinetics or fitness must rely on a particular assay to initially standardize inocula from virus stocks. The most accurate measure of infectious HIV-1 titers involves a limiting dilution-infection assay and a calculation of the dose required for 50% infectivity of susceptible cells in tissue culture (TCID(50)). Surrogate assays are now commonly used to measure the amount of p24 capsid, the endogenous reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, or the amount of viral genomic RNA in virus particles. However, a direct comparison of these surrogate assays and actual infectious HIV-1 titers from TCID(50) assays has not been performed with even the most conserved laboratory strains, let alone the highly divergent primary HIV-1 isolates of different subtypes. This study indicates that endogenous RT activity, not p24 content or viral RNA load, is the best surrogate measure of infectious HIV-1 titer in both cell-free supernatants and viruses purified on sucrose cushions. Sequence variation between HIV-1 subtypes did not appear to affect the function or activity of the RT enzyme in this endogenous assay but did affect the detection of p24 capsid by both enzyme immunoassays and Western blots. Clear groupings of non-syncytium-inducing (NSI), CCR5-tropic (R5), and SI/CXCR4-tropic (X4) HIV-1 isolates were observed when we compared the slopes derived from correlations of RT activity with infectious titers. Finally, the replication efficiency or fitness of both the NSI/R5 and SI/X4 HIV-1 isolates was not linked to the titers of the virus stocks.

HIV-1 viral load determination based on reverse transcriptase activity recovered from human plasma

We describe a procedure (ExaVir Load) to carry out human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) viral load testing using reverse transcriptase (RT) recovered from HIV-1 virions in plasma. Samples from individuals infected with HIV-1 were treated with a sulphydryl-reactive agent to inactivate endogenous polymerases. Virions were then immobilised on a gel and washed in individual mini columns to remove RT-inhibiting antibodies, antiviral drugs, and other RT inhibitors. Immobilised virions were lysed finally, and the viral RT eluted. The amount of RT recovered was quantified by a sensitive RT activity assay using either colorimetry or fluorimetry to detect DNA produced by RT. The "RT load" values of 390 samples from 302 HIV-1 patients living in Sweden were compared to results obtained with an HIV-1 RNA viral load assay. The correlation between the two tests was r = 0.90, P < 0.0001. Four of 202 samples from healthy blood donors gave low positive values in the RT test. All samples in a panel with 10 HIV-1 subtypes were positive by the RT load. The RT load test provides a technically less demanding and cost-effective alternative to methods based on nucleic acid amplification. Being insensitive to genetic drift occurring in HIV, the assay should be of particular use in resource-limited settings, where different subtypes and recombinant HIV strains occur.

A Rapid Phenotypic Assay for Detecting Multiple Nucleoside Analogue Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Resistant HIV-1 in Plasma

Zidovudine and other nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), like zalcitabine and didanosine used for treatment of individuals infected with HIV-1, can select for viruses with Q151M and other associated mutations (for example, A62V, S68G, V75I, F77L, F116Y) in the reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme. These mutations confer resistance to multiple nucleoside analogues, and thereby compromise the efficacy of this class of drugs. Presently available phenotypic assays for detection of multiple nucleoside analogue resistant (MNR) HIV-1 require testing for each NRTI individually. Here we report an enzymatic RT assay that uses resistance to zidovudine triphosphate (zidovudine-TP) as a diagnostic biochemical marker of MNR HIV-1. This assay exploits the different biochemical mechanisms for zidovudine-resistance conferred by either Q151M or T215Y/F mutations and the inability of conventional RT assays to detect T215Y/F-associated zidovudine resistance. The assay detects RT activity directly in plasma by using Amp-RT, an ultra-sensitive PCR-based RT assay. We show that enzymatic resistance to zidovudine-TP is specific to MNR RT and is distinguishable from both wild-type (WT) and RT containing classical zidovudine-resistant mutations (D67N, K70R, T215Y/F, K219Q). Compared to WT, MNR HIV-1 RT had 5- to 36-fold increases in the concentration of drug required to inhibit 50% (IC50) of RT activity, depending on the presence of Q151M alone or with additional MNR mutations. A screening assay utilizing 1 μM zidovudine-TP was developed and validated on 14 reference isolates, 37 plasma specimens, and seven patient-derived viruses. Twenty-three specimens were found to have reduced susceptibility to zidovudine-TP, and all had Q151M. In contrast, 21 specimens were sensitive to zidovudine-TP, of which 12 had WT genotypes, four had T215Y/F, and five had T69S-insertions along with T215Y/F mutations. This RT-based phenotypic assay provides a specific and rapid tool for the direct identification and monitoring of Q151M-associated MNR HIV-1 in plasma.

Comparative performance of three viral load assays on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates representing group M (subtypes A to G) and group O: LCx HIV RNA quantitative, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5, and Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA version 3.0

The performance of the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative (LCx HIV), AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 (MONITOR v1.5), and Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA version 3.0 (bDNA v3.0) viral load assays was evaluated with 39 viral isolates (3 A, 7 B, 6 C, 4 D, 8 E, 4 F, 1 G, 4 mosaic, and 2 group O). Quantitation across the assay dynamic ranges was assessed using serial fivefold dilutions of the viruses. In addition, sequences of gag-encoded p24 (gag p24), pol-encoded integrase, and env-encoded gp41 were analyzed to assign group and subtype and to assess nucleotide mismatches at primer and probe binding sites. For group M isolates, quantification was highly correlated among all three assays. In contrast, only the LCx HIV assay reliably quantified group O isolates. The bDNA v3.0 assay detected but consistently underquantified group O viruses, whereas the MONITOR v1.5 test failed to detect group O viruses. Analysis of target regions revealed fewer primer or probe mismatches in the LCx HIV assay than in the MONITOR v1.5 test. Consistent with the high level of nucleotide conservation is the ability of the LCx HIV assay to quantify efficiently human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M and the genetically diverse group O.