Comparative evaluation of semiautomated COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis B virus (HBV) monitor test and manual microwell plate-based AMPLICOR HBV MONITOR test

Comparative characterization of two tests for measurement of hepatitis B virus DNA in the blood serum and plasma, based on the use of two different detection methods

Two tests for measurements of hepatitis B virus DNA in human serum and plasma, VERSANT HBV 3.0 (based on the use of branched DNA chains) and Biotitre-B (a real-time PCR variant), were compared. Serum specimens from patients (n=56) with documented viral hepatitis were tested. For specimens with DNA values in the linear range in both tests the correlations were evaluated by Pearson's method. The sensitivity of the two tests, and reproducibility of the results of HBV DNA measurements were evaluated using a panel of recombinant virus DNA dilutions with a step of 1 lg HBV DNA copies per ml (from 7 to 3 lg). Three measurements for each concentration of the reference sample were carried out in each test. Clinical specificity of the two tests was evaluated by the analysis of HBV-negative serum samples, collected from donors not reactive by HBsAg and anti-HBc (n=60). Of 56 samples with documented infection, the results of testing by VERSANT HBV 3.0 and Biotitre-B did not agree in 4 (7.1%) samples. Pearson's correlation coefficient of for results obtained in VERSANT HBV 3.0 and Biotitre-B in linear range for both tests was 0.712. Evaluation of reproducibility of the tests using a panel of recombinant HBV DNA showed higher reproducibility of VERSANT HBV 3.0 test with coefficient of variations from 0.79 to 2.79% vs. 2.39-10.69% for Biotitre-B reference test. All 60 serum samples from donors areactive by HBsAg and anti-HBc were negative by HBV DNA when tested by VERSANT HBV 3.0 and Biotitre-B. Hence, clinical specificity of both tests was 100%. The results indicate high specificity of both tests and good agreement of their results, the reproducibility of VERSANT HBV 3.0 test being higher.

Comparison of real-time PCR assays for monitoring serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels during antiviral therapy

The performance characteristics of the RealART and Molecular Beacons assays were compared with those of the Digene Hybrid Capture II assay (ultrasensitive). The results of the RealART and Digene Hybrid assays were related (r = 0.94; P < 0.001) and diverged by 2 orders of magnitude. The RealART assay can be used to effectively monitor serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels.

Real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus genotypes A to G

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA play an important role in diagnosing and monitoring HBV infection as well as assessing therapeutic response. The great variability among HBV genotypes and the enormous range of clinical HBV DNA levels present challenges for PCR-based amplification techniques. In this study, we describe the development, evaluation, and validation of a novel real-time PCR assay designed to provide accurate quantification of DNA from all eight HBV genotypes in patient plasma specimens. A computer algorithm was used to design degenerate real-time PCR primers and probes based upon a large number (n = 340) of full-length genomic sequences including HBV genotypes A to H from Europe, Africa, Asia, and North and South America. Genotype performance was tested and confirmed using 59 genotype A to G specimens from two commercially available worldwide genotype panels. This assay has a dynamic range of at least 8 log(10) without the need for specimen dilution, good clinical intra- and interassay precision, and excellent correlation with the Bayer Diagnostics VERSANT HBV DNA 3.0 (branched DNA) assay (r = 0.93). Probit analysis determined the 95% detection level was 56 IU/ml, corresponding to 11 copies per PCR well. The high sensitivity, wide linear range, good reproducibility, and genotype inclusivity, combined with a small sample volume requirement and low cost, make this novel quantitative HBV real-time PCR assay particularly well suited for application to large clinical and epidemiological studies.

Expertise of laboratories in viral load quantification, genotyping, and precore mutant determination for hepatitis B virus in a multicenter study

A national evaluation study was performed in 14 specialized laboratories with the objective of assessing their capacities to provide (i) hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral loads (VL), (ii) HBV genotypes, and(iii) identification of precore/core mutants. The panel consisted of 12 HBV DNA-positive samples with VLs from 2.8 to 9.1 log(10) copies/ml, different HBV genotypes (A to F), and 3 mutant and 9 wild-type samples at nucleotide 1896. The coefficients of variation of the mean VLs ranged from 2.4% to 10.4% with the Cobas HBV Monitor assay, from 1.8% to 5.5% with the Cobas TaqMan 48, from 1.5 to 26.2% with RealArt HBV PCR, and from 0 to 7% with branched DNA (bDNA). The Cobas Monitor assay underestimated the VLs of genotype F samples, with differences ranging from 1.4 to 2.4 log(10) copies/ml. The accuracies of genotype determinations ranged from 33% to 100%, and those of precore mutant determinations ranged from 25 to 100%. This study showed some drawbacks of two widely used assays: (i) Cobas Monitor has a narrow dynamic range and underestimates genotype F sample VLs and (ii) bDNA shows poor sensitivity and may fail to identify patients with low VLs. With higher performance in terms of analytical sensitivity combined with a larger dynamic range and an ability to quantify the main genotypes equally, real-time PCR methods appear more appropriate for accurate monitoring of HBV DNA quantification. Furthermore, the clinical implications of HBV genotyping and the determination of precore/core mutants need to be clearly stated to justify the standardization of these methods.

Evaluation of the COBAS TaqMan 48 real-time PCR system for quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of the new real-time PCR COBAS TaqMan 48 analyzer, comparing it to the existing COBAS AMPLICOR HBV MONITOR based on conventional PCR technology. The study used 104 samples from different patients. No differences were found in the sensitivity of the tests. There was an excellent correlation between the sample with a viral load within the dynamic range of the two tests (r = 0.938). The COBAS TaqMan test has a wider linear range, and this fact enables quantifying of the viral load without diluting the sample.

Evaluation of the COBAS amplicor HBV monitor assay and comparison with the ultrasensitive HBV hybrid capture 2 assay for quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor test (Roche Diagnostics), which measures hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitatively, were evaluated and compared with the Ultrasensitive HBV Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Digene Corporation) assay. Linearity and within-run precision were assessed for both methods by using eight HBV DNA-positive samples serially diluted to obtain a range of <100 to 500,000 HBV DNA copies/ml and run in triplicate. Agreement between the methods was studied with 100 clinical samples. HC2 assay performance near the limit of detection was investigated through repeat testing of 149 samples with HC2 and testing of 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml by Amplicor assay and a qualitative PCR assay. The linearity experiment for Amplicor had regression of observed values compared to expected values (y = 1.073x - 0.247; R(2) = 0.993, n = 32; for HC2, y = 0.855x + 0.759, R(2) = 0.729, n = 18). Within-run standard deviation of log HBV DNA copies/ml ranged from 0.003 to 0.348 (Amplicor) and 0.027 to 0.253 (HC2). Agreement assessed by Deming regression was poor [Amplicor = 1.197(HC2) - 0.961; R(2) = 0.799, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.710, n = 94]. Near the lower limit of detection, 32 of 149 repeat HC2 results were <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml. Of the 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml, HBV DNA was not detected in 15 samples, while HBV DNA was detected by at least one PCR method in 12 samples. Amplicor is linear from 200 to 200,000 HBV DNA copies/ml with undiluted samples, and this range can be expanded through dilution. Inconsistent HC2 results near the limit of detection justify use of a grey zone.

Biological qualification of blood units: considerations about the effects of sample's handling and storage on stability of nucleic acids

BACKGROUND

In transfusional setting introduction of nucleic amplification technique (NAT) for HBV-DNA, HCV-RNA and HIV-RNA in biological qualification of blood units suggest some problems. At first the opportunity to operate on mini-pool, at second the need to store the samples at +4 degrees C. The authors therefore have tried to estimate the impact of these conditions on the operativity of NAT testing in the transfusional setting.

METHODS

The following parameters has been estimated: distribution of viral-load in untreated subjects, stability of nucleic acids during storage at +4 degrees C, stability of nucleic acids after repeated cycles of freezing and defrosting, robustness of the test to the cross-contamination, definition of the detection-limit (95%). Quantitative tests has been performed by using the following kits: Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor, Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor, Cobas Amplicor HIV Monitor; the qualitative tests has been performed by using the following kits: Ampliscreen HBV, Ampliscreen HCV 2,0, Ampliscreen HIV 1,5 all supplied by Roche Molecular System (Brancburg, NJ).

RESULTS

Viral load in untreated subjects showed wide variation for HBV, HCV and HIV. HBV has been demonstrated much stable to the conservation +4 degrees C also until 168 h while for HCV and HIV a greater decrease of the viral-load was observed. For all and three virus the conservation to +4 degrees C until 72 h does not seem to involve meaningful fall in the viral-load. A remarkable reduction of the viral-load has been observed after five cycles of freezing and defrosting. All the tests showed a good robustness to cross-contamination. The detection-limit (95%) was 8 U/ml for HBV, 21 U/ml for HCV and 27 copy/ml for HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

Samples for NAT testing, can be stored until 72 h to +4 degrees C without appreciable lowering of the viral-load. Repeated cycles of changes of state should be avoided. The tests showed a good robustness to cross-contamination. NAT tests for biological qualification of blood units had a minimal sensibility around 50 (copy/unit/ml). In our experience the detection-limit (95%) was 21 U/ml for HCV, 27 copies/ml for HIV, 8 U/ml for HBV. The availability of NAT test for HBV-DNA, HCV-RNA e HIV-RNA, sensitive and reliable, together with epidemiological data, suggest the opportunity to place side by side, in the biological qualification of the blood units, to add the tests for HBV-DNA and HIV-RNA to the test for HCV-RNA mandatory by low, in Italy in the biological qualification of blood units.

Rapid quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA by automated sample preparation and real-time PCR

Monitoring of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in serum by molecular methods has become the standard for assessment of the replicative activity of HBV. Several molecular assays for the detection and quantification of HBV DNA have been described. However, they usually lack automated sample preparation. Moreover, those assays, which are based on PCR, are limited by a short dynamic range (2 to 3 log units). In the present study, the use of RealArt HBV LC PCR Reagents in conjunction with automated extraction on the COBAS AMPLIPREP analyzer was evaluated. Members of an HBV proficiency program panel were tested; linearity, interassay, and intra-assay variations were determined. The performance of the assay in a routine clinical laboratory was evaluated with a total of 117 clinical specimens. When members of the HBV proficiency program panel were tested by the new molecular assay, the results were found to be within +/-0.5 log unit of the results obtained by reference laboratories. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve over more than 6 log units. The interassay variation of the RealArt HBV LC PCR Reagents by use of the automated sample preparation protocol ranged from 16 to 73%, and the intra-assay variation ranged from 9 to 40%. When clinical samples were tested by the new assay with the automated sample preparation protocol and the results were compared with those obtained by the COBAS AMPLICOR HBV MONITOR Test with manual sample preparation, the results for 76% of all samples with positive results by both tests were found to be within +/-0.5 log unit and the results for another 18% were found to be within between 0.5 and 1.0 log unit. In conclusion, the real-time PCR assay with automated sample preparation proved to be suitable for the routine molecular laboratory and required less hands-on time.

Inhibitory effect of oxymatrine on serum hepatitis B virus DNA in HBV transgenic mice

AIM: To study the inhibitory effect of oxymatrine on serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in HBV transgenic mice.

METHODS: HBV transgenic mice model was established by microinjection, and identified by HBV DNA integration and replication. Transgenic mice with replicating HBV were divided into 3 groups, and injected with normal saline (group A, n = 9), 50 mg/kg (group B, n = 8) and 100 mg/kg (group C, n = 9) oxymatrine intraperitoneally once a day for 30 d, respectively. Quantitation of serum HBV DNA in HBV transgenic mice was performed by competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in combination with DNA hybridization quantitative detection technique before and after treatment.

RESULTS: Compared with pre-treatment, the serum HBV DNA in group A (F = 1.04, P = 0.9612) and group B (F = 1.13, P = 0.8739) had no changes after treatment. However, in group C serum HBV DNA was significantly decreased (F = 13.97, P = 0.0012). The serum HBV DNA after treatment was lower in group C than in groups B and A (F = 8.65, P = 0.0068; F = 12.35, P = 0.0018; respectively). The serum HBV DNA after treatment was lower in group B than in group A, but there was no statistical significance (F = 1.43, P = 0.652).

CONCLUSION: Oxymatrine has inhibitory effects on serum HBV DNA in HBV transgenic mice.

Serum HBV DNA as a marker of efficacy during therapy for chronic HBV infection: analysis and review of the literature

Currently, compounds under evaluation for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are evaluated with liver histology as the primary end point for efficacy. However, because of practical limitations in serial liver biopsies, there is a need for alternate markers to assess efficacy over shorter periods of time. Considering the direct correlation between viral replication and disease progression during human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection, we explored whether such a correlation exists for HBV infection. We reviewed the literature and conducted an analysis to investigate the relationship between absolute or treatment-induced changes in HBV DNA levels and other accepted markers of disease activity. A total of 26 prospective studies met our selection criteria, including 33 evaluable treatment arms. The study treatments consisted of nucleosides and/or interferon regimens and control arms. We found statistically significant and consistent correlations between viral load level or change and histologic grading and biochemical and serologic response. Our analysis suggests that a treatment-induced reduction in HBV DNA level can be used for assessing efficacy of treatment regimens. Further, we observed that quantitative HBV DNA has a broader dynamic range than histology, allowing demonstration of differences between 2 active treatments of unequal potency. The analysis showed stronger results in studies using nucleoside regimens and in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients. In conclusion, the goal of anti-HBV therapy should be profound and durable viral suppression, as defined by very sensitive assays. Additional prospective studies are needed to precisely determine the desirable level of viremia to attain.

Rapid diagnosis in pediatric infectious diseases: the past, the present and the future

The focus of rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases of children in the last decade has shifted from variations of the conventional laboratory techniques of antigen detection, microscopy and culture to that of molecular diagnosis of infectious agents. Pediatricians will need to be able to interpret the use, limitations and results of molecular diagnostic techniques as they are increasingly integrated into routine clinical microbiology laboratory protocols. PCR is the best known and most successfully implemented diagnostic molecular technology to date. It can detect specific infectious agents and determine their virulence and antimicrobial genotypes with greater speed, sensitivity and specificity than conventional microbiology methods. Inherent technical limitations of PCR are present, although they are reduced in laboratories that follow suitable validation and quality control procedures. Variations of PCR together with advances in nucleic acid amplification technology have broadened its diagnostic capabilities in clinical infectious disease to now rival and even surpass traditional methods in some situations. Automation of all components of PCR is now possible. The completion of the genome sequencing projects for significant microbial pathogens, in combination with PCR and DNA chip technology, will revolutionize the diagnosis and management of infectious diseases.

European proficiency testing program for molecular detection and quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA

External quality control of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA detection remains an important issue. This study reports and compares the results obtained from two different proficiency panels for both the qualitative and quantitative assessment of HBV DNA. The panels were designed by the European Union Quality Control Concerted Action, prepared by Boston Biomedica, Inc., and distributed in May 1999 (panel 1) and February 2000 (panel 2). Each contained two negative samples and six positive samples with 10(3) to 10(7) copies/ml (panel 1) or 10(3) to 2 x 10(6) copies of HBV DNA per ml (panel 2). For panel 1, 42 laboratories submitted 20 qualitative (all in-house PCRs) and 37 quantitative (87% commercial assays) data sets. For panel 2, 51 laboratories submitted 25 qualitative (all in-house PCRs) and 47 quantitative (94% commercial assays) data sets. Five data sets (8.8%) in panel 1 and two data sets (2.8%) in panel 2 contained totals of six and two false-positives, respectively, corresponding to false-positive result rates of 5.3% for panel 1 and 1.4% for panel 2. The false-negative result rates of 10.5% for panel 1 and 17.4% for panel 2 were dependent on the detection levels of the assays employed as well as panel composition. In the qualitative analysis of all data sets, 47.4% (panel 1) and 51.4% (panel 2) had all samples correct. An adequate or better score (all correct or only the weak-positive sample missed) was obtained with 77.2% of the panel 1 samples and 68.1% of the panel 2 samples. In the quantitative analysis, 57.1% (panel 1) and 42.6% (panel 2) of the data sets achieved an adequate or better score (positive results within the acceptable range of the geometric mean +/- 0.5 log(10) of all positive results). These results demonstrate that while the qualitative performance of HBV detection has considerably improved compared to that of a previously published HBV proficiency study, the detection levels of many commercial quantitative assays are still too high to allow adequate quantitation of all relevant clinical samples.

Second-generation Hybrid capture test and Amplicor monitor test generate highly correlated hepatitis B virus DNA levels

The performance of the Digene Hybrid Capture II HBV DNA Test HC II and the Roche Cobas Amplicor Monitor Test (Cobas-HBV) was evaluated on 252 serum samples. One hundred and seventy-three samples were HBV DNA positive and 75 HBV DNA negative by both assays. Four samples were HBV DNA positive by Cobas-HBV only. Linear regression analysis showed that the HBV DNA concentrations obtained from both assays were significantly related (n=173, r=0.976, P<0.0001). The results of the study show that Hybrid capture II and Cobas-HBV could be used equally in the management for patients with chronic HBV infection.