Evaluation of the LightCycler Staphylococcus M GRADE kits on positive blood cultures that contained gram-positive cocci in clusters

Differentiation between Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species by real-time PCR including detection of methicillin resistants in comparison to conventional microbiology testing

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus has long been recognized as a major pathogen. Methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant strains of S. epidermidis (MRSE) are among the most prevalent multiresistant pathogens worldwide, frequently causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections.

METHODS

In the present pilot study, we tested a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to quickly differentiate Staphylococci and identify the mecA gene in a clinical setting.

RESULTS

Compared to the conventional microbiology testing the real-time PCR assay had a higher detection rate for both S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS; 55 vs. 32 for S. aureus and 63 vs. 24 for CoNS). Hands-on time preparing DNA, carrying out the PCR, and evaluating results was less than 5 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The assay is largely automated, easy to adapt, and has been shown to be rapid and reliable. Fast detection and differentiation of S. aureus, CoNS, and the mecA gene by means of this real-time PCR protocol may help expedite therapeutic decision-making and enable earlier adequate antibiotic treatment.

Laboratory detection of sepsis: biomarkers and molecular approaches

Sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Rapid diagnosis and therapeutic interventions are desirable to improve the overall mortality in patients with sepsis. However, gold standard laboratory diagnostic methods for sepsis, pose a significant challenge to rapid diagnosis of sepsis by physicians and laboratories. This article discusses the usefulness and potential of biomarkers and molecular test methods for a more rapid clinical and laboratory diagnosis of sepsis. Because new technologies are quickly emerging, physicians and laboratories must appreciate the key factors and characteristics that affect the clinical usefulness and diagnostic accuracy of these test methodologies.

Comparison of four methods for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus directly from BACTEC 9240 blood culture system

PURPOSE

Differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) from coagulase-negative staphylococci is very important in blood stream infections. Identification of S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from blood cultures takes generally 18-24 h after positive signaling on continuously monitored automated blood culture system. In this study, we evaluated the performance of tube coagulase test (TCT), slide agglutination test (Dry Spot Staphytect Plus), conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and LightCycler Staphylococcus MGrade kit directly from blood culture bottles to achieve rapid identification of S. aureus by using the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 129 BACTEC 9240 bottles growing gram-positive cocci suggesting Staphylococci were tested directly from blood culture broths (BCBs) with TCT, Dry Spot Staphytect Plus, conventional PCR and LightCycler Staphylococcus MGrade kit for rapid identification of S. aureus.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of the tests were 99, 68, 99 and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that 2 h TCT was found to be simple and inexpensive method for the rapid identification of S. aureus directly from positive blood cultures.

Are we ready for novel detection methods to treat respiratory pathogens in hospital-acquired pneumonia?

Hospital-acquired pneumonia represents one of the most difficult treatment challenges in infectious diseases. Many studies suggest that the timely administration of appropriate, pathogen-directed therapy can be lifesaving. Because results of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing can take 48 h or longer, physicians currently rely on clinical, epidemiological, and demographic factors to assist with the choice of empiric therapy for antibiotic-resistant pathogens. At present, a number of rapid molecular tests are being developed that identify pathogens and the presence of genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance (eg, GeneXpert [Cepheid], ResPlex [Qiagen], FilmArray [Idaho Technologies], and Microarray [Check-Points]). In this review, the potential impact that molecular diagnostics has to identify and characterize pathogens that cause hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia at an early stage is examined. In addition, a perspective on a novel technology, polymerase chain reaction followed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, is presented, and its prospective use in the diagnosis of pneumonia is also discussed. The complexities of the pulmonary microbiome represent a novel challenge to clinicians, but many questions still remain even as these technologies improve.

Comparison of three rapid and easy bacterial DNA extraction methods for use with quantitative real-time PCR

The development of fast and easy on-site molecular detection and quantification methods for hazardous microbes on solid surfaces is desirable for several applications where specialised laboratory facilities are absent. The quantification of bacterial contamination necessitates the assessment of the efficiency of the used methodology as a whole, including the preceding steps of sampling and sample processing. We used quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qrtPCR) for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus to measure the recovery of DNA from defined numbers of bacterial cells that were subjected to three different DNA extraction methods: the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit, Reischl et al.’s method and FTA® Elute. FTA® Elute significantly showed the highest median DNA extraction efficiency of 76.9% for E. coli and 108.9% for S. aureus. The Reischl et al. method and QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit inhibited the E. coli qrtPCR assay with a 10-fold decrease of detectable DNA. None of the methods inhibited the S. aureus qrtPCR assay. The FTA® Elute applicability was demonstrated with swab samples taken from the International Space Station (ISS) interior. Overall, the FTA® Elute method was found to be the most suitable to selected criteria in terms of rapidity, easiness of use, DNA extraction efficiency, toxicity, and transport and storage conditions.

Progression to bacteremia in critical care patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing Panton-Valentine leukocidin

The role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is unclear. PVL has been long associated with soft tissue infections and necrotizing pneumonia, but inconsistently with other site infections or mortality. The retrospective cohort study explores the association between PVL and bacteremia in colonized medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with surveillance isolates and blood cultures. A total of 840 patients were screened by nasal swab, with 266 patients found to be colonized and 46 with bacteremia. Colonization by PVL(+) MRSA increased the odds of bacteremia (odds ratio, 2.40; confidence interval, 1.23-4.57), and invasive infection developed earlier in these patients (relative risk, 0.44; confidence interval 0.25-0.85) compared to those colonized with PVL(0) MRSA. PVL was not associated with infections at other sites, length of ICU stay, or mortality. PVL decreases the time to bacteremia in colonized patients but does not otherwise contribute to disease course or clinical outcome.

Rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current status

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant cause of healthcare- and community-associated infections, and its prevalence continues to increase. These infections are associated with morbidity and excessive mortality compared with infections caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Numerous studies have cited the increased healthcare costs associated with MRSA infections. Infection control guidelines that combine active surveillance with aggressive patient management, such as patient isolation, decontamination, and other strategies, have been shown to reduce transmission and subsequent infections. The availability of rapid molecular diagnostics has strengthened infection control programs by providing results in hours rather than days, as the time required for culture-based methods. This review summarizes the current status of rapid diagnostic methods available for MRSA detection from nasal surveillance specimens, and assays available for rapid identification of MRSA from positive blood cultures containing Gram-positive cocci in clusters. Both amplification- and probe-based assays are highlighted and discussed in detail. Future technological advances are likely to see real-time assays that combine multiple gene targets for assessment of microbial identification, virulence detection, and mechanisms of resistance beyond mecA.