Juxtaposition of two distant, serine-arginine-rich protein-binding elements is required for optimal polyadenylation in Rous sarcoma virus

Molecular Mechanisms for CFIm-Mediated Regulation of mRNA Alternative Polyadenylation

Alternative mRNA processing is a critical mechanism for proteome expansion and gene regulation in higher eukaryotes. The SR family proteins play important roles in splicing regulation. Intriguingly, mammalian genomes encode many poorly characterized SR-like proteins, including subunits of the mRNA 3'-processing factor CFIm, CFIm68 and CFIm59. Here we demonstrate that CFIm functions as an enhancer-dependent activator of mRNA 3' processing. CFIm regulates global alternative polyadenylation (APA) by specifically binding and activating enhancer-containing poly(A) sites (PASs). Importantly, the CFIm activator functions are mediated by the arginine-serine repeat (RS) domains of CFIm68/59, which bind specifically to an RS-like region in the CPSF subunit Fip1, and this interaction is inhibited by CFIm68/59 hyper-phosphorylation. The remarkable functional similarities between CFIm and SR proteins suggest that interactions between RS-like domains in regulatory and core factors may provide a common activation mechanism for mRNA 3' processing, splicing, and potentially other steps in RNA metabolism.

Evidence that a threshold of serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins recruits CFIm to promote rous sarcoma virus mRNA 3' end formation

The weak polyadenylation site (PAS) of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) is activated by the juxtaposition of SR protein binding sites within the spatially separate negative regulator of splicing (NRS) element and the env RNA splicing enhancer (Env enhancer), which are far upstream of the PAS. Juxtaposition occurs by formation of the NRS - 3' ss splicing regulatory complex and is thought to provide a threshold of SR proteins that facilitate long-range stimulation of the PAS. We provide evidence for the threshold model by showing that greater than three synthetic SR protein binding sites are needed to substitute for the Env enhancer, that either the NRS or Env enhancer alone promotes polyadenylation when the distance to the PAS is decreased, and that SR protein binding sites promote binding of the polyadenylation factor cleavage factor I (CFIm) to the weak PAS. These observations may be relevant for cellular PASs.

Posttranscriptional regulation of retroviral gene expression: primary RNA transcripts play three roles as pre-mRNA, mRNA, and genomic RNA

After reverse transcription of the retroviral RNA genome and integration of the DNA provirus into the host genome, host machinery is used for viral gene expression along with viral proteins and RNA regulatory elements. Here, we discuss co-transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of retroviral gene expression, comparing simple and complex retroviruses. Cellular RNA polymerase II synthesizes full-length viral primary RNA transcripts that are capped and polyadenylated. All retroviruses generate a singly spliced env mRNA from this primary transcript, which encodes the viral glycoproteins. In addition, complex viral RNAs are alternatively spliced to generate accessory proteins, such as Rev, which is involved in posttranscriptional regulation of HIV-1 RNA. Importantly, the splicing of all retroviruses is incomplete; they must maintain and export a fraction of their primary RNA transcripts. This unspliced RNA functions both as the major mRNA for Gag and Pol proteins and as the packaged genomic RNA. Different retroviruses export their unspliced viral RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by either Tap-dependent or Rev/CRM1-dependent routes. Translation of the unspliced mRNA involves frame-shifting or termination codon suppression so that the Gag proteins, which make up the capsid, are expressed more abundantly than the Pol proteins, which are the viral enzymes. After the viral polyproteins assemble into viral particles and bud from the cell membrane, a viral encoded protease cleaves them. Some retroviruses have evolved mechanisms to protect their unspliced RNA from decay by nonsense-mediated RNA decay and to prevent genome editing by the cellular APOBEC deaminases.

Regulation of retroviral polyadenylation

Cellular and viral preRNAs are extensively cotranscriptionally modified. These modifications include the processing of the 3' end. Most preRNAs are polyadenylated, which is required for nuclear export, RNA stability, and efficient translation. Integrated retroviral genomes are flanked by 3' and 5' long terminal repeats (LTRs). Both LTRs are identical on the nucleotide level, but 3' processing has to be limited to the 3'LTR. Otherwise, polyadenylation at the 5'LTR would result in prematurely terminated, noncoding viral RNAs. Retroviruses have developed a variety of different mechanisms to restrict polyadenylation to the 3'LTR, although the overall structure of the LTRs is similar among all retroviruses. In general, these mechanisms can be divided into three main groups: (1) activation of polyadenylation only at the 3' end by encoding the essential polyadenylation signal in the unique 3 region; (2) suppression of polyadenylation at the 5'LTR by downstream elements such as the major splice donor; and (3) the usage of weak polyadenylation sites, which results in some premature polyadenylated noncoding RNAs and in read-through transcripts at the 3'LTR. All these mechanisms exhibit intrinsic problems, and retroviruses have evolved additional regulatory elements to promote polyadenylation at the 3'LTR only. In this review, we describe the molecular regulation of retroviral polyadenylation and highlight the different mechanisms used for polyadenylation control.

The RNA-binding landscapes of two SR proteins reveal unique functions and binding to diverse RNA classes

Background

The SR proteins comprise a family of essential, structurally related RNA binding proteins. The complexity of their RNA targets and specificity of RNA recognition in vivo is not well understood. Here we use iCLIP to globally analyze and compare the RNA binding properties of two SR proteins, SRSF3 and SRSF4, in murine cells.

Results

SRSF3 and SRSF4 binding sites mapped to largely non-overlapping target genes, and in vivo consensus binding motifs were distinct. Interactions with intronless and intron-containing mRNAs as well as non-coding RNAs were detected. Surprisingly, both SR proteins bound to the 3' ends of the majority of intronless histone transcripts, implicating SRSF3 and SRSF4 in histone mRNA metabolism. In contrast, SRSF3 but not SRSF4 specifically bound transcripts encoding numerous RNA binding proteins. Remarkably, SRSF3 was shown to modulate alternative splicing of its own as well as three other transcripts encoding SR proteins. These SRSF3-mediated splicing events led to downregulation of heterologous SR proteins via nonsense-mediated decay.

Conclusions

SRSF3 and SRSF4 display unique RNA binding properties underlying diverse cellular regulatory mechanisms, with shared as well as unique coding and non-coding targets. Importantly, CLIP analysis led to the discovery that SRSF3 cross-regulates the expression of other SR protein family members.