Preferential integration of adeno-associated virus type 2 into a polypyrimidine/polypurine-rich region within AAVS1

Recurrent AAV2-related insertional mutagenesis in human hepatocellular carcinomas

Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are liver tumors related to various etiologies, including alcohol intake and infection with hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) virus. Additional risk factors remain to be identified, particularly in patients who develop HCC without cirrhosis. We found clonal integration of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) in 11 of 193 HCCs. These AAV2 integrations occurred in known cancer driver genes, namely CCNA2 (cyclin A2; four cases), TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase; one case), CCNE1 (cyclin E1; three cases), TNFSF10 (tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10; two cases) and KMT2B (lysine-specific methyltransferase 2B; one case), leading to overexpression of the target genes. Tumors with viral integration mainly developed in non-cirrhotic liver (9 of 11 cases) and without known risk factors (6 of 11 cases), suggesting a pathogenic role for AAV2 in these patients. In conclusion, AAV2 is a DNA virus associated with oncogenic insertional mutagenesis in human HCC.

Impact of the MRN Complex on Adeno-Associated Virus Integration and Replication during Coinfection with Herpes Simplex Virus 1

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a helper-dependent parvovirus that requires coinfection with adenovirus (AdV) or herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) to replicate. In the absence of the helper virus, AAV can persist in an episomal or integrated form. Previous studies have analyzed the DNA damage response (DDR) induced upon AAV replication to understand how it controls AAV replication. In particular, it was shown that the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex, a major player of the DDR induced by double-stranded DNA breaks and stalled replication forks, could negatively regulate AdV and AAV replication during coinfection. In contrast, MRN favors HSV-1 replication and is recruited to AAV replication compartments that are induced in the presence of HSV-1. In this study, we examined the role of MRN during AAV replication induced by HSV-1. Our results indicated that knockdown of MRN significantly reduced AAV DNA replication after coinfection with wild-type (wt) HSV-1 or HSV-1 with the polymerase deleted. This effect was specific to wt AAV, since it did not occur with recombinant AAV vectors. Positive regulation of AAV replication by MRN was dependent on its DNA tethering activity but did not require its nuclease activities. Importantly, knockdown of MRN also negatively regulated AAV integration within the human AAVS1 site, both in the presence and in the absence of HSV-1. Altogether, this work identifies a new function of MRN during integration of the AAV genome and demonstrates that this DNA repair complex positively regulates AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1.

IMPORTANCE

Viral DNA genomes trigger a DNA damage response (DDR), which can be either detrimental or beneficial for virus replication. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a defective parvovirus that requires the help of an unrelated virus such as adenovirus (AdV) or herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) for productive replication. Previous studies have demonstrated that the cellular Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex, a sensor and regulator of the DDR, negatively regulates AAV replication during coinfection with AdV, which counteracts this effect by inactivating the complex. Here, we demonstrate that MRN positively regulates AAV replication during coinfection with HSV-1. Importantly, our study also indicates that MRN also favors integration of AAV genomes within the human AAVS1 site. Altogether, this work indicates that MRN differentially regulates AAV replication depending on the helper virus which is present and identifies a new function of this DNA repair complex during AAV integration.

Universal real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of adeno-associated virus serotype 2-derived inverted terminal repeat sequences

Viral vectors based on various naturally occurring adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotypes are among the most promising tools in human gene therapy. For the production of recombinant AAV (rAAV) vectors, researchers are focusing predominantly on cross-packaging an artificial AAV genome based on serotype 2 (AAV2) into capsids derived from other serotypes. Within the packaged genome the inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) are the only cis-acting viral elements required for rAAV vector generation and depict the lowest common denominator of all AAV2-derived vector genomes. Up to now, no quantitative PCR (qPCR) for the detection and quantification of AAV2 ITRs could be established because of their extensive secondary hairpin structure formation. Current qPCR-based methods are therefore targeting vector-encoded transgenes or regulatory elements. Herein we establish a molecular biological method that allows accurate and reproducible quantification of AAV2 genomes on the basis of an AAV2 ITR sequence-specific qPCR. Primers and labeled probe are located within the ITR sequence and have been designed to detect both wild-type AAV2 and AAV2-based vectors. This method is suitable for detecting single-stranded DNA derived from AAV2 vector particles and double-stranded DNA derived from vector plasmids. The limit of detection has been determined as 50 ITR sequence copies per reaction, by comparison with a plasmid standard. In conclusion, this method describes the first qPCR system facilitating the detection and quantification of AAV2 ITR sequences. Because this method can be used universally for all AAV2 genome-based vectors, it will significantly simplify rAAV2 vector titrations in the future.

Substitution of adeno-associated virus Rep protein binding and nicking sites with human chromosome 19 sequences

Background

Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) preferentially integrates its DNA at a ~2 kb region of human chromosome 19, designated AAVS1 (also known as MBS85). Integration at AAVS1 requires the AAV2 replication (Rep) proteins and a DNA sequence within AAVS1 containing a 16 bp Rep recognition sequence (RRS) and closely spaced Rep nicking site (also referred to as a terminal resolution site, or trs). The AAV2 genome is flanked by inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). Each ITR contains an RRS and closely spaced trs, but the sequences differ from those in AAVS1. These ITR sequences are required for replication and packaging.

Results

In this study we demonstrate that the AAVS1 RRS and trs can function in AAV2 replication, packaging and integration by replacing a 61 bp region of the AAV2 ITR with a 49 bp segment of AAVS1 DNA. Modifying one or both ITRs did not have a large effect on the overall virus titers. These modifications did not detectably affect integration at AAVS1, as measured by semi-quantitative nested PCR assays. Sequencing of integration junctions shows the joining of the modified ITRs to AAVS1 sequences.

Conclusions

The ability of these AAVS1 sequences to substitute for the AAV2 RRS and trs provides indirect evidence that the stable secondary structure encompassing the trs is part of the AAV2 packaging signal.

Functional differentiation between Rep-mediated site-specific integration and transcriptional repression of the adeno-associated viral p5 promoter

The adeno-associated virus (AAV) p5 promoter controls expression of Rep68 and Rep78, which are responsible for specific integration of the viral genome into the AAVS1 site of the human genome. The p5 promoter contains a Rep-binding element (RBE) sequence that acts as a substrate of the Rep proteins for both site-specific integration of p5 itself and transcriptional suppression of the p5 promoter. To differentiate these two Rep-mediated functions, we dissected the p5 core structure TATA/RBE/YY1+1 through a series of mutations. Mutations in the TATA box or YY1+1 region of p5IEE significantly reduced Rep-mediated site-specific integration (RMSSI) and p5 promoter transcriptional activity, but only the TATA box is involved in Rep-mediated transcriptional suppression (RMTS). Point mutations at nucleotides 266, 267, 268, 270, and 273 of the GAGTGAGC motif in p5 RBE significantly reduced RMSSI efficiency. However, only p5G270T lost the affinity of Rep binding and had significant reduction of RMTS. It appears that RMTS is determined by the affinity of p5RBE for Rep whereas RMSSI requires more stringent conditions. Thus, RMTS and RMSSI can be differentiated by point mutations in the p5 promoter, which is useful in gene therapy in a helper vector to drive Rep expression, as the mutant promoters seldom integrate themselves but remain the RMTS feature for reduced cytotoxicity caused by a high level of Rep protein.

Adeno-associated virus: a key to the human genome?

Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are widely spread throughout the human population, yet no pathology has been associated with infection. This fact, together with the availability of simple molecular techniques to alter the packaged viral genome, has made AAV a serious contender in the search for an ideal gene therapy delivery vehicle. However, our understanding of the intriguing features of this virus is far from exhausted and it is likely that the mechanisms underlying the viral lifestyle will reveal possible novel strategies that can be employed in future clinical approaches. One such aspect is the unique approach AAV has evolved in order to establish latency. In the absence of a cellular milieu that will support productive viral replication, wild-type AAV can integrate its genome site specifically into a locus on human chromosome 19 (termed AAVS1), where it resides without apparent effects on the host cell until cellular conditions are changed by outside influences, such as adenovirus super-infection, which will lead to the rescue of the viral genome and productive replication. This article will introduce the biology of AAV, the unique viral strategy of targeted genome integration and address relevant questions within the context of attempts to establish therapeutic approaches that will utilize targeted gene addition to the human genome.

Site-specific integration of adeno-associated virus involves partial duplication of the target locus

A variety of viruses establish latency by integrating their genome into the host genome. The integration event generally occurs in a nonspecific manner, precluding the prediction of functional consequences from resulting disruptions of affected host genes. The nonpathogenic adeno-associated virus (AAV) is unique in its ability to stably integrate in a site-specific manner into the human MBS85 gene. To gain a better understanding of the integration mechanism and the consequences of MBS85 disruption, we analyzed the molecular structure of AAV integrants in various latently infected human cell lines. Our study led to the observation that AAV integration causes an extensive but partial duplication of the target gene. Intriguingly, the molecular organization of the integrant leaves the possibility that a functional copy of the disrupted target gene could potentially be preserved despite the resulting rearrangements. A latently infected, Mbs85-targeted mouse ES cell line was generated to study the functional consequences of the observed duplication-based integration mechanism. AAV-modified ES cell lines continued to self-renew, maintained their multilineage differentiation potential and contributed successfully to mouse development when injected into blastocysts. Thus, our study reveals a viral strategy for targeted genome addition with the apparent absence of functional consequences.

Safety of adeno-associated viral vectors

Vectors based on recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are being extensively explored for gene therapy owing to some of their distinguishing characteristicss such as lack of pathogenicity, wide range of infectivity and ability to provide long-term transgene expression. For many of the same reasons, recombinant AAV (rAAV) vectors have also been used as vaccine carriers to elicit immune responses against their transgene products. Extensive studies of rAAV vectors in animal models and in the clinic have revealed some safety concerns relating to their construction and production, adverse events following delivery, potential integration of the vector’s genome into host cell genomes, and the impairment of rAAV-induced CD8+ T-cell responses, which could have dire consequences for rAAV-treated individuals. Further studies to advance our knowledge of the biology of AAV and rAAV vectors are deemed necessary to allow for their more successful application in the clinic.