Expression of Murine CD80 by Herpes Simplex Virus 1 in Place of Latency-Associated Transcript (LAT) Can Compensate for Latency Reactivation and Anti-apoptotic Functions of LAT

The anti-apoptotic function of HSV-1 LAT in neuronal cell cultures but not its function during reactivation correlates with expression of two small non-coding RNAs, sncRNA1&2

Multiple functions are associated with HSV-1 latency associated transcript (LAT), including establishment of latency, virus reactivation, and antiapoptotic activity. LAT encodes two sncRNAs that are not miRNAs and previously it was shown that they have antiapoptotic activity in vitro. To determine if we can separate the antiapoptotic function of LAT from its latency-reactivation function, we deleted sncRNA1 and sncRNA2 sequences in HSV-1 strain McKrae, creating ΔsncRNA1&2 recombinant virus. Deletion of the sncRNA1&2 in ΔsncRNA1&2 virus was confirmed by complete sequencing of ΔsncRNA1&2 virus and its parental virus. Replication of ΔsncRNA1&2 virus in tissue culture or in the eyes of WT infected mice was similar to that of HSV-1 strain McKrae (LAT-plus) and dLAT2903 (LAT-minus) viruses. The levels of gB DNA in trigeminal ganglia (TG) of mice latently infected with ΔsncRNA1&2 virus was intermediate to that of dLAT2903 and McKrae infected mice, while levels of LAT in TG of latently infected ΔsncRNA1&2 mice was significantly higher than in McKrae infected mice. Similarly, the levels of LAT expression in Neuro-2A cells infected with ΔsncRNA1&2 virus was significantly higher than in McKrae infected cells. Reactivation in TG of ΔsncRNA1&2 infected mice was similar to that of McKrae and time of reactivation in both groups were significantly faster than dLAT2903 infected mice. However, levels of apoptosis in Neuro-2A cells infected with ΔsncRNA1&2 virus was similar to that of dLAT2903 and significantly higher than that of McKrae infected cells. Our results suggest that the antiapoptotic function of LAT resides within the two sncRNAs, which works independently of its latency-reactivation function and it has suppressive effect on LAT expression in vivo and in vitro.

Absence of CD80 reduces HSV-1 replication in the eye and delays reactivation but not latency levels

Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infections are among the most frequent serious viral eye infections in the U.S. and are a major cause of viral-induced blindness. HSV-1 infection is known to induce T cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation that play crucial roles in the development of virus-induced inflammatory lesions, leading to eye disease and causing chronic corneal damage. CD80 is a co-stimulatory molecule and plays a leading role in T cell differentiation. Previous efforts to limit lesion severity by controlling inflammation at the cellular level led us to ask whether mice knocked out for CD80 would show attenuated virus replication following reactivation. By evaluating the effects of CD80 activity on primary and latent infection, we found that in the absence of CD80, virus replication in the eyes and virus reactivation in latent trigeminal ganglia were both significantly reduced. However, latency in latently infected CD80-/- mice did not differ significantly from that in wild-type (WT) control mice. Reduced virus replication in the eyes of CD80-/- mice correlated with significantly expanded CD11c gene expression as compared to WT mice. Taken together, our results indicate that suppression of CD80 could offer significant beneficial therapeutic effects in the treatment of Herpes Stromal Keratitis (HSK).IMPORTANCEOf the many problems associated with recurrent ocular infection, reducing virus reactivation should be a major goal of controlling ocular herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection. In this study, we have shown that the absence of CD80 reduces HSV-1 reactivation, which marks the establishment of a previously undescribed mechanism underlying viral immune evasion that could be exploited to better manage HSV infection.

Stacking the odds: Multiple sites for HSV-1 latency

A hallmark of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is the establishment of latent virus in peripheral sensory ganglia of the latently infected host. We and others originally reported that the latency-associated transcript (LAT) is the only abundantly expressed viral gene in neurons within trigeminal ganglia (TG) of a latently infected host. Here, we investigated the possible contribution of various cells [i.e., B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), fibroblasts, glial cells, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), macrophages, microglia, monocytes, natural killer cells, neurons, neutrophils, and T cells] isolated from TG of latently infected mice. Our results demonstrated that all of these cell types contain LAT, with DCs, neurons, and ILCs having the most LAT⁺ cells. These results suggest that HSV-1 can establish a quiescent/latent infection in a subset of nonneuronal cells, which enhances the chances that the virus will survive in its host.

Blocking Autophagy in M1 Macrophages Enhances Virus Replication and Eye Disease in Ocularly Infected Transgenic Mice

Autophagy plays a critical role in clearing, disassembling, and recycling damaged cells, thus limiting inflammation. The HSV-1 γ34.5 gene is involved in neurovirulence and immune evasion by blocking autophagy in infected cells.

Knockout of signal peptide peptidase in the eye reduces HSV-1 replication and eye disease in ocularly infected mice

We previously reported that knocking out signal peptide peptidase (SPP), a glycoprotein K (gK) binding partner, in mouse peripheral sensory neurons reduced latency-reactivation in infected mice without affecting primary virus replication or eye disease. Since virus replication in the eye plays an essential role in eye disease, we generated a conditional knockout mouse lacking SPP expression in the eye by crossing Pax6 (paired box 6)-Cre mice that have intact Pax6 expression with SPPflox/flox mice. Significantly less SPP protein expression was detected in the eyes of Pax6-SPP-/- mice than in WT control mice. HSV-1 replication in the eyes of Pax6-SPP-/- mice was significantly lower than in WT control mice. Levels of gB, gK, and ICP0 transcripts in corneas, but not trigeminal ganglia (TG), of Pax6-SPP-/- infected mice were also significantly lower than in WT mice. Corneal scarring and angiogenesis were significantly lower in Pax6-SPP-/- mice than in WT control mice, while corneal sensitivity was significantly higher in Pax6-SPP-/- mice compared with WT control mice. During acute viral infection, absence of SPP in the eye did not affect CD4 expression but did affect CD8α and IFNγ expression in the eye. However, in the absence of SPP, latency-reactivation was similar in Pax6-SPP-/- and WT control groups. Overall, our results showed that deleting SPP expression in the eyes reduced primary virus replication in the eyes, reduced CD8α and IFNγ mRNA expression, reduced eye disease and reduced angiogenesis but did not alter corneal sensitivity or latency reactivation to HSV-1 infection. Thus, blocking gK binding to SPP in the eye may have therapeutic potential by reducing both virus replication in the eye and eye disease associated with virus replication.

Small Noncoding RNA (sncRNA1) within the Latency-Associated Transcript Modulates Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Virulence and the Host Immune Response during Acute but Not Latent Infection

HSV-1 latency-associated transcript (LAT) plays a major role in establishing latency and reactivation; however, the mechanism by which LAT controls these processes is largely unknown. In this study, we sought to establish the role of the small noncoding RNA1 (sncRNA1) encoded within LAT during HSV-1 ocular infection. Our results suggest that sncRNA1 has a protective role during acute ocular infection by modulating the innate immune response to infection.

Multifunctional Non-Coding RNAs Mediate Latent Infection and Recurrence of Herpes Simplex Viruses

Herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) often cause latent infection for a lifetime, leading to repeated recurrence. HSVs have been engineered as oncolytic HSVs. The mechanism of the latent infection and recurrence remains largely unknown, which brings great challenges and limitations to eliminate HSVs in clinic and engineer safe oHSVs. Here, we systematically reviewed the latest development of the multi-step complex process of HSV latency and reactivation. Significantly, we first summarized the three HSV latent infection pathways, analyzed the structure and expression of the LAT1 and LAT2 of HSV-1 and HSV-2, proposed the regulation of LAT expression by four pathways, and dissected the function of LAT mediated by five LAT products of miRNAs, sRNAs, lncRNAs, sncRNAs and ORFs. We further analyzed that application of HSV LAT deletion mutants in HSV vaccines and oHSVs. Our review showed that deleting LAT significantly reduced the latency and reactivation of HSV, providing new ideas for the future development of safe and effective HSV therapeutics, vaccines and oHSVs. In addition, we proposed that RNA silencing or RNA interference may play an important role in HSV latency and reactivation, which is worth validating in future.

Essential role of M1 macrophages in blocking cytokine storm and pathology associated with murine HSV-1 infection

Ocular HSV-1 infection is a major cause of eye disease and innate and adaptive immunity both play a role in protection and pathology associated with ocular infection. Previously we have shown that M1-type macrophages are the major and earliest infiltrates into the cornea of infected mice. We also showed that HSV-1 infectivity in the presence and absence of M2-macrophages was similar to wild-type (WT) control mice. However, it is not clear whether the absence of M1 macrophages plays a role in protection and disease in HSV-1 infected mice. To explore the role of M1 macrophages in HSV-1 infection, we used mice lacking M1 activation (M1^-/- mice). Our results showed that macrophages from M1^-/- mice were more susceptible to HSV-1 infection in vitro than were macrophages from WT mice. M1^-/- mice were highly susceptible to ocular infection with virulent HSV-1 strain McKrae, while WT mice were refractory to infection. In addition, M1^-/- mice had higher virus titers in the eyes than did WT mice. Adoptive transfer of M1 macrophages from WT mice to M1^-/- mice reduced death and rescued virus replication in the eyes of infected mice. Infection of M1^-/- mice with avirulent HSV-1 strain KOS also increased ocular virus replication and eye disease but did not affect latency-reactivation seen in WT control mice. Severity of virus replication and eye disease correlated with significantly higher inflammatory responses leading to a cytokine storm in the eyes of M1^-/- infected mice that was not seen in WT mice. Thus, for the first time, our study illustrates the importance of M1 macrophages specifically in primary HSV-1 infection, eye disease, and survival but not in latency-reactivation.

Macrophages circulating in the blood or present in different tissues constitute an important barrier against infection. We previously showed that the absence of M2 macrophages does not impact HSV-1 infectivity in vivo. However, in this study we demonstrated an essential role of M1 macrophages in protection from primary HSV-1 replication, death, and eye disease but not in latency-reactivation.

A Review of the Multipronged Attack of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 on the Host Transcriptional Machinery

During lytic infection, herpes simplex virus (HSV) 1 induces a rapid shutoff of host RNA synthesis while redirecting transcriptional machinery to viral genes. In addition to being a major human pathogen, there is burgeoning clinical interest in HSV as a vector in gene delivery and oncolytic therapies, necessitating research into transcriptional control. This review summarizes the array of impacts that HSV has on RNA Polymerase (Pol) II, which transcribes all mRNA in infected cells. We discuss alterations in Pol II holoenzymes, post-translational modifications, and how viral proteins regulate specific activities such as promoter-proximal pausing, splicing, histone repositioning, and termination with respect to host genes. Recent technological innovations that have reshaped our understanding of previous observations are summarized in detail, along with specific research directions and technical considerations for future studies.

Suppression of CD80 expression by ICP22 affect HSV-1 replication and CD8+IFNγ+ infiltrates in the eye of infected mice but not latency-reactivation

Previously, we reported that herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) ICP22 binds to the CD80 promoter and suppresses its expression in vitro and in vivo. To better understand the impact of ICP22 binding to CD80 on HSV-1 infectivity and pathogenicity, we mapped the region of ICP22 required to bind the CD80 promoter to a 40-amino-acid (aa) region of ICP22. We constructed a recombinant HSV-1 expressing a truncated form of ICP22 that lacks these 40 aa, which does not bind to the CD80 promoter (KOS-ICP22Δ40) and retains the ability to replicate efficiently in rabbit skin cells, in contrast to ICP22-null virus. The replication of this recombinant virus in vitro and in vivo was higher than that of the ICP22-null virus, but virus replication kinetics were lower than those of the wild-type (WT) control virus. Similar to ICP22-null virus, the KOS-ICP22Δ40 mutant virus increased CD80 expression in dendritic cells (DCs) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) expression in CD8⁺ T cells but not CD4⁺ T cells in infected mouse corneas. In contrast to the significantly reduced virus replication in the eyes of ocularly infected mice, the levels of latency reactivation were similar between KOS-ICP22Δ40 virus and WT virus. Thus, blocking ICP22 binding to the CD80 promoter using a recombinant virus expressing a truncated ICP22 that lacks CD80 promoter binding appears to reduce virus replication and enhance CD8⁺IFN-γ⁺ infiltrates in corneas of infected mice, with no effect on latency reactivation.

IMPORTANCE Direct binding of HSV-1 ICP22 to the CD80 promoter downregulates the expression of the costimulatory molecule CD80 but not CD86. In this study, we fine mapped the region of ICP22 required for binding to the CD80 promoter and constructed a recombinant virus containing a deletion in ICP22 that failed to bind to the CD80 promoter. This recombinant virus replicated less efficiently in vitro and in vivo than did the WT control virus, although CD80-expressing CD11c⁺ cells and IFN-γ-expressing CD8⁺ T cells were increased. Interestingly, the levels of latency and reactivation in the two viruses were similar despite lower virus replication in the eyes of infected mice. Therefore, blocking the interaction of ICP22 with the CD80 promoter could be used to temper the immune response.

Absence of CD28-CTLA4-PD-L1 Costimulatory Molecules Reduces Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Reactivation

We previously reported that herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) ICP22 binds to CD80 and suppresses CD80 expression in vitro and in vivo. Similar to ICP22, the cellular costimulatory molecules CD28, CTLA4, and PD-L1 also bind to CD80. In this study, we asked whether, similar to ICP22-null virus, the absence of these costimulatory molecules will reduce HSV-1 infectivity. To test our hypothesis, CD28^−/−, CD28^−/− CTLA4^−/−, PD-L1^−/−, and wild-type control BALB/c mice were ocularly infected with HSV-1 strain KOS. Levels of virus replication in the eye, corneal scarring (CS), latency, and reactivation in infected mice were determined. Expression of different genes in the trigeminal ganglia (TG) of latently infected mice was also determined by NanoString and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). In the absence of costimulatory molecules, latency levels were higher than those in wild-type control mice, but despite higher latency, a significant number of TG from infected knockout mice did not reactivate. Reduced reactivation correlated with downregulation of 26 similar cellular genes that are associated with inflammatory signaling and innate immune responses. These results suggest that lower reactivation directly correlates with lower expression of interferon signaling. Thus, despite having different modes of actions, we identified a similar function for CD28, CTLA4, and PD-L1 in HSV-1 reactivation that is dependent on their interactions with CD80. Therefore, blocking these interactions could be a therapeutic target for HSV-1-induced reactivation.

Multifaceted Roles of ICP22/ORF63 Proteins in the Life Cycle of Human Herpesviruses

Herpesviruses are extremely successful parasites that have evolved over millions of years to develop a variety of mechanisms to coexist with their hosts and to maintain host-to-host transmission and lifelong infection by regulating their life cycles. The life cycle of herpesviruses consists of two phases: lytic infection and latent infection. During lytic infection, active replication and the production of numerous progeny virions occur. Subsequent suppression of the host immune response leads to a lifetime latent infection of the host. During latent infection, the viral genome remains in an inactive state in the host cell to avoid host immune surveillance, but the virus can be reactivated and reenter the lytic cycle. The balance between these two phases of the herpesvirus life cycle is controlled by broad interactions among numerous viral and cellular factors. ICP22/ORF63 proteins are among these factors and are involved in transcription, nuclear budding, latency establishment, and reactivation. In this review, we summarized the various roles and complex mechanisms by which ICP22/ORF63 proteins regulate the life cycle of human herpesviruses and the complex relationships among host and viral factors. Elucidating the role and mechanism of ICP22/ORF63 in virus-host interactions will deepen our understanding of the viral life cycle. In addition, it will also help us to understand the pathogenesis of herpesvirus infections and provide new strategies for combating these infections.

Increased phagocytosis in the presence of enhanced M2-like macrophage responses correlates with increased primary and latent HSV-1 infection

After HSV-1 infection, macrophages infiltrate early into the cornea, where they play an important role in HSV-1 infection. Macrophages are divided into M1 or M2 groups based on their activation. M1 macrophages are pro-inflammatory, while M2 macrophages are anti-inflammatory. Macrophage phenotypes can shift between M1 or M2 in vitro and in vivo following treatment with specific cytokines. In this study we looked at the effect of M2 macrophages on HSV-1 infectivity using mice either lacking M2 (M2-/-) or overexpressing M2 (M2-OE) macrophages. While presence or absence of M2 macrophages had no effect on eye disease, we found that over expression of M2 macrophages was associated with increased phagocytosis, increased primary virus replication, increased latency, and increased expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, in mice lacking M2 macrophages following infection phagocytosis, replication, latency, and cytokine expression were similar to wild type mice. Our results suggest that enhanced M2 responses lead to higher phagocytosis, which affected both primary and latent infection but not reactivation.

Immune Response to Herpes Simplex Virus Infection and Vaccine Development

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are among the most common viral infections and usually last for a lifetime. The virus can potentially be controlled with vaccines since humans are the only known host. However, despite the development and trial of many vaccines, this has not yet been possible. This is normally attributed to the high latency potential of the virus. Numerous immune cells, particularly the natural killer cells and interferon gamma and pathways that are used by the body to fight HSV infections have been identified. On the other hand, the virus has developed different mechanisms, including using different microRNAs to inhibit apoptosis and autophagy to avoid clearance and aid latency induction. Both traditional and new methods of vaccine development, including the use of live attenuated vaccines, replication incompetent vaccines, subunit vaccines and recombinant DNA vaccines are now being employed to develop an effective vaccine against the virus. We conclude that this review has contributed to a better understanding of the interplay between the immune system and the virus, which is necessary for the development of an effective vaccine against HSV.