Suppression of Type I Interferon Signaling by E1A via RuvBL1/Pontin

Molecular insights into type I interferon suppression and enhanced pathogenicity by species B human adenoviruses B7 and B14

Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) are small DNA viruses that generally cause mild disease. Certain strains, particularly those belonging to species B HAdVs, can cause severe pneumonia and have a relatively high mortality rate. Little is known about the molecular aspects of how these highly pathogenic species affect the infected cell and how they suppress innate immunity. The present study provides molecular insights into how species B adenoviruses suppress the interferon signaling pathway. Our study shows that these viruses, unlike HAdV-C2, are resistant to type I interferon. This resistance likely arises due to the highly efficient suppression of interferon-stimulated gene expression. Unlike in HAdV-C2, HAdV-B7 and B14 sequester STAT2 and RNA polymerase II from interferon-stimulated gene promoters in infected cells. This results in suppressed interferon- stimulated gene activation. In addition, we show that RuvBL1 and RuvBL2, cofactors important for RNA polymerase II recruitment to promoters and interferon-stimulated gene activation, are redirected to the cytoplasm forming high molecular weight complexes that, likely, are unable to associate with chromatin. Proteomic analysis also identified key differences in the way these viruses affect the host cell, providing insights into species B-associated high pathogenicity. Curiously, we observed that at the level of protein expression changes to the infected cell, HAdV-C2 and B7 were more similar than those of the same species, B7 and B14. Collectively, our study represents the first such study of innate immune suppression by the highly pathogenic HAdV-B7 and B14, laying an important foundation for future investigations.IMPORTANCEHuman adenoviruses form a large family of double-stranded DNA viruses known for a variety of usually mild diseases. Certain strains of human adenovirus cause severe pneumonia leading to much higher mortality and morbidity than most other strains. The reasons for this enhanced pathogenicity are unknown. Our study provides a molecular investigation of how these highly pathogenic strains might inactivate the interferon signaling pathway, highlighting the lack of sensitivity of these viruses to type I interferon in general while providing a global picture of how viral changes in cellular proteins drive worse disease outcomes.

ARGLU1 enhances promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II and stimulates DNA damage repair

Arginine and glutamate rich 1 (ARGLU1) is a poorly understood cellular protein with functions in RNA splicing and transcription. Computational prediction suggests that ARGLU1 contains intrinsically disordered regions and lacks any known structural or functional domains. We used adenovirus Early protein 1A (E1A) to probe for critical regulators of important cellular pathways and identified ARGLU1 as a significant player in transcription and the DNA damage response pathway. Transcriptional effects induced by ARGLU1 occur via enhancement of promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II pausing, likely by inhibiting the interaction between JMJD6 and BRD4. When overexpressed, ARGLU1 increases the growth rate of cancer cells, while its knockdown leads to growth arrest. Significantly, overexpression of ARGLU1 increased cancer cell resistance to genotoxic drugs and promoted DNA damage repair. These results identify new roles for ARGLU1 in cancer cell survival and the DNA damage repair pathway, with potential clinical implications for chemotherapy resistance.

Adenovirus E1A binding to DCAF10 targets proteasomal degradation of RUVBL1/2 AAA+ ATPases required for quaternary assembly of multiprotein machines, innate immunity, and responses to metabolic stress

IMPORTANCE

Inactivation of EP300/CREBB paralogous cellular lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) during the early phase of infection is a consistent feature of DNA viruses. The cell responds by stabilizing transcription factor IRF3 which activates transcription of scores of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), inhibiting viral replication. Human respiratory adenoviruses counter this by assembling a CUL4-based ubiquitin ligase complex that polyubiquitinylates RUVBL1 and 2 inducing their proteasomal degradation. This inhibits accumulation of active IRF3 and the expression of anti-viral ISGs, allowing replication of the respiratory HAdVs in the face of inhibition of EP300/CBEBBP KAT activity by the N-terminal region of E1A.

Almost famous: Human adenoviruses (and what they have taught us about cancer)

Papillomaviruses, polyomaviruses and adenoviruses are collectively categorized as the small DNA tumour viruses. Notably, human adenoviruses were the first human viruses demonstrated to be able to cause cancer, albeit in non-human animal models. Despite their long history, no human adenovirus is a known causative agent of human cancers, unlike a subset of their more famous cousins, including human papillomaviruses and human Merkel cell polyomavirus. Nevertheless, seminal research using human adenoviruses has been highly informative in understanding the basics of cell cycle control, gene expression, apoptosis and cell differentiation. This review highlights the contributions of human adenovirus research in advancing our knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer.

RuvB-Like Protein 2 Interacts with the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus and Affects Apoptosis That Is Counterbalanced by Type I Interferons

The NS1 protein of influenza A virus (IAV) plays important roles in viral pathogenesis and host immune response. Through a proteomic approach, we have identified RuvB-like proteins 1 and 2 (RuvBL1 and RuvBL2) as interacting partners of the NS1 protein of IAVs. Infection of human lung A549 cells with A/PR/8/34 (PR8) virus resulted in reductions in the protein levels of RuvBL2 but not RuvBL1. Further studies with RuvBL2 demonstrated that the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is RNA-independent, and RuvBL2 binds the RNA-binding domain of the NS1. Infection of interferon (IFN)-deficient Vero cells with wild-type or delNS1 PR8 virus reduced RuvBL2 protein levels and induced apoptosis; delNS1 virus caused more reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels and induced more apoptosis than did wild-type virus. Knockdown of RuvBL2 by siRNAs induced apoptosis and overexpression of RuvBL2 resulted in increased resistance to infection-induced apoptosis in Vero cells. These results suggest that a non-NS1 viral element or elements induce apoptosis by suppressing RuvBL2 protein levels, and the NS1 inhibits the non-NS1 viral element-induced apoptosis by maintaining RuvBL2 abundance in infected cells in the absence of IFN influence. In contrast to Vero cells, infection of IFN-competent A549 cells with PR8 virus caused reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels but did not induce apoptosis. Concomitantly, pretreatment of Vero cells with a recombinant IFN resulted in resistance to infection-induced apoptosis. These results demonstrate that the infection-induced, RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in infected cells is counterbalanced by IFN survival signals. Our results reveal a novel mechanism underlying the infection-induced apoptosis that can be modulated by the NS1 and type I IFN signaling in IAV-infected cells.

The infectivity of progeny adenovirus in the presence of neutralizing antibody

Human adenoviruses (Ads), common pathogens that cause upper respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, are blocked by neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). However, Ads are not fully eliminated even in hosts with nAbs. In this study, we assessed the infectivity of progeny Ad serotype 5 (Ad5) in the presence of nAb. The infectivity of Ad5 was evaluated according to the expression of the Ad genome and reporter gene. Infection by wild-type Ad5 and Ad5 vector continued to increase until 3 days after infection even in the presence of nAb. We established an assay for determining the infection levels of progeny Ad5 using a sorting system with magnetic beads and observed little difference in progeny Ad5 counts in the presence and absence of nAb 1 day after infection. Moreover, progeny Ad5 in the presence of nAb more effectively infected coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR)-positive cells than CAR-negative cells. We investigated the function of fiber proteins, which are the binding partners of CAR, during secondary infection, observing that fibre proteins spread from infected cells to adjacent cells in a CAR-dependent manner. In conclusion, this study revealed that progeny Ad5 could infect cells even in the presence of nAb, differing from the common features of the Ad5 infection cycle. Our findings may be useful for developing new therapeutic agents against Ad infection.

Adenoviral strategies to overcome innate cellular responses to infection

Viruses alter host cell processes to optimize their replication cycle. Human adenoviruses (Ad) encode proteins that promote viral macromolecular synthesis and counteract innate and adaptive responses to infection. The focus of this review is on how Ad evades innate cellular responses to infection, including an interferon (IFN) response and a DNA damage response (DDR). Ad blocks the IFN response by inhibiting cytoplasmic signaling pathways and the activation of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), as well as the functions of ISG products, such as PML. Ad also inhibits DDR sensors, for instance, the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex, and DDR effectors like DNA ligase IV. These innate cellular responses impact many different viruses, and studies on Ad have provided broad insight into these areas.

Adenovirus 5 E1A Interacts with E4orf3 To Regulate Viral Chromatin Organization

Human adenovirus expresses several early proteins that control various aspects of the viral replication program, including an orchestrated expression of viral genes. Two of the earliest viral transcriptional units activated after viral genome entry into the host cell nucleus are the E1 and E4 units, which each express a variety of proteins. Chief among these are the E1A proteins that function to reprogram the host cell and activate transcription of all other viral genes. The E4 gene encodes multiple proteins, including E4orf3, which functions to disrupt cellular antiviral defenses, including the DNA damage response pathway and activation of antiviral genes. Here we report that E1A directly interacts with E4orf3 via the conserved N terminus of E1A to regulate the expression of viral genes. We show that E4orf3 indiscriminately drives high nucleosomal density of viral genomes, which is restrictive to viral gene expression and which E1A overcomes via a direct interaction with E4orf3. We also show that during infection E1A colocalizes with E4orf3 to nuclear tracks that are associated with heterochromatin formation. The inability of E1A to interact with E4orf3 has a significant negative impact on overall viral replication, the ability of the virus to reprogram the host cell, and the levels of viral gene expression. Together these results show that E1A and E4orf3 work together to fine-tune the viral replication program during the course of infection and highlight a novel mechanism that regulates viral gene expression.IMPORTANCE To successfully replicate, human adenovirus needs to carry out a rapid yet ordered transcriptional program that executes and drives viral replication. Early in infection, the viral E1A proteins are the key activators and regulators of viral transcription. Here we report, for the first time, that E1A works together with E4orf3 to perfect the viral transcriptional program and identify a novel mechanism by which the virus can adjust viral gene expression by modifying its genome's nucleosomal organization via cooperation between E1A and E4orf3.

Identification of RUVBL1 and RUVBL2 as Novel Cellular Interactors of the Ebola Virus Nucleoprotein

Ebola virus (EBOV) is a filovirus that has become a global public health threat in recent years. EBOV is the causative agent of a severe, often fatal hemorrhagic fever. A productive viral infection relies on the successful recruitment of host factors for various stages of the viral life cycle. To date, several investigations have discovered specific host-pathogen interactions for various EBOV proteins. However, relatively little is known about the EBOV nucleoprotein (NP) with regard to host interactions. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate NP-host protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) was used to identify candidate NP cellular interactors. Candidate interactors RUVBL1 and RUVBL2, partner proteins belonging to the AAA+ (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) superfamily, were confirmed to interact with NP in co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and immunofluorescence (IF) experiments. Functional studies using a minigenome system revealed that the siRNA-mediated knockdown of RUVBL1 but not RUVBL2 moderately decreased EBOV minigenome activity. Super resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM) was used to identify an association between NP and components of the R2TP complex, which includes RUVBL1, RUVBL2, RPAP3, and PIH1D1, suggesting a potential role for the R2TP complex in capsid formation. Moreover, the siRNA-mediated knockdown of RPAP3 and subsequent downregulation of PIH1D1 was shown to have no effect on minigenome activity, further suggesting a role in capsid formation. Overall, we identify RUVBL1 and RUVBL2 as novel interactors of EBOV NP and for the first time report EBOV NP recruitment of the R2TP complex, which may provide novel targets for broad-acting anti-EBOV therapeutics.

Adenovirus 5 E1A-Mediated Suppression of p53 via FUBP1

Far-upstream element (FUSE) binding protein 1 (FUBP1) was originally identified as a regulator of the oncogene c-Myc via binding to the FUSE within the c-Myc promoter and activating the expression of the gene. Recent studies have identified FUBP1 as a regulator of transcription, translation, and splicing via its DNA and RNA binding activities. Here we report the identification of FUBP1 as a novel binding partner of E1A. FUBP1 binds directly to E1A via the N terminus (residues 1 to 82) and conserved region 3 (residues 139 to 204) of adenovirus 5 E1A. The depletion of FUBP1 via short interfering RNAs (siRNA) reduces virus growth and drives the upregulation of the cellular stress response by activating the expression of p53-regulated genes. During infection, FUBP1 is relocalized within the nucleus, and it is recruited to viral promoters together with E1A while at the same time being lost from the FUSE upstream of the c-Myc promoter. The depletion of FUBP1 affects viral and cellular gene expression. Importantly, in FUBP1-depleted cells, p53-responsive genes are upregulated, p53 occupancy on target promoters is enhanced, and histone H3 lysine 9 is hyperacetylated. This is likely due to the loss of the FUBP1-mediated suppression of p53 DNA binding. We also observed that E1A stabilizes the FUBP1-p53 complex, preventing p53 promoter binding. Together, our results identify, for the first time, FUBP1 as a novel E1A binding protein that participates in aspects of viral replication and is involved in the E1A-mediated suppression of p53 function.IMPORTANCE Viral infection triggers innate cellular defense mechanisms that have evolved to block virus replication. To overcome this, viruses have counterevolved mechanisms that ensure that cellular defenses are either disarmed or not activated to guarantee successful replication. One of the key regulators of cellular stress is the tumor suppressor p53 that responds to a variety of cellular stress stimuli and safeguards the integrity of the genome. During infection, many viruses target the p53 pathway in order to deactivate it. Here we report that human adenovirus 5 coopts the cellular protein FUBP1 to prevent the activation of the p53 stress response pathway that would block viral replication. This finding adds to our understanding of p53 deactivation by adenovirus and highlights its importance in infection and innate immunity.

Hacking the Cell: Network Intrusion and Exploitation by Adenovirus E1A

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses are dependent on their infected hosts for survival. Consequently, viruses are under enormous selective pressure to utilize available cellular components and processes to their own advantage. As most, if not all, cellular activities are regulated at some level via protein interactions, host protein interaction networks are particularly vulnerable to viral exploitation. Indeed, viral proteins frequently target highly connected “hub” proteins to “hack” the cellular network, defining the molecular basis for viral control over the host. This widespread and successful strategy of network intrusion and exploitation has evolved convergently among numerous genetically distinct viruses as a result of the endless evolutionary arms race between pathogens and hosts. Here we examine the means by which a particularly well-connected viral hub protein, human adenovirus E1A, compromises and exploits the vulnerabilities of eukaryotic protein interaction networks. Importantly, these interactions identify critical regulatory hubs in the human proteome and help define the molecular basis of their function.

The Influence of E1A C-Terminus on Adenovirus Replicative Cycle

Adenovirus Early 1A proteins (E1A) are crucial for initiation of the viral life cycle after infection. The E1A gene is encoded at the left end of the viral genome and consists of two exons, the first encoding 185 amino acids in the 289 residues adenovirus 5 E1A, while the second exon encodes 104 residues. The second exon-encoded region of E1A is conserved across all E1A isoforms except for the 55 residues protein, which has a unique C-terminus due to a frame shift following splicing into the second exon. This region of E1A contributes to a variety of processes including the regulation of viral and cellular gene expression, immortalization and transformation. Here we evaluated the contributions that different regions of the second exon of E1A make to the viral life cycle using deletion mutants. The region of E1A encoded by the second exon was found to be important for overall virus growth, induction of viral and cellular gene expression, viral genome replication and deregulation of the cell cycle. Efficient viral replication was found to require exon 2 and the nuclear localization signal, as loss of either resulted in severe growth deficiency. Induction of cellular DNA synthesis was also deficient with any deletion of E1A within the C-terminus even if these deletions were outside of conserved region 4. Overall, our study provides the first comprehensive insight into the contributions of the C-terminus of E1A to the replicative fitness of human adenovirus 5 in arrested lung fibroblasts.

The Adenovirus E1A C Terminus Suppresses a Delayed Antiviral Response and Modulates RAS Signaling

The N-terminal half of adenovirus e1a assembles multimeric complexes with host proteins that repress innate immune responses and force host cells into S-phase. In contrast, the functions of e1a's C-terminal interactions with FOXK, DCAF7, and CtBP are unknown. We found that these interactions modulate RAS signaling, and that a single e1a molecule must bind all three of these host proteins to suppress activation of a subset of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). These ISGs were otherwise induced in primary respiratory epithelial cells at 12 hr p.i. This delayed activation of ISGs required IRF3 and coincided with an ∼10-fold increase in IRF3 from protein stabilization. The induced IRF3 bound to chromatin and localized to the promoters of activated ISGs. While IRF3, STAT1/2, and IRF9 all greatly increased in concentration, there were no corresponding mRNA increases, suggesting that e1a regulates the stabilities of these key activators of innate immune responses, as shown directly for IRF3.

The adenovirus major core protein VII is dispensable for virion assembly but is essential for lytic infection

The Adenovirus (Ad) genome within the capsid is tightly associated with a virus-encoded, histone-like core protein—protein VII. Two other Ad core proteins, V and X/μ, also are located within the virion and are loosely associated with viral DNA. Core protein VII remains associated with the Ad genome during the early phase of infection. It is not known if naked Ad DNA is packaged into the capsid, as with dsDNA bacteriophage and herpesviruses, followed by the encapsidation of viral core proteins, or if a unique packaging mechanism exists with Ad where a DNA-protein complex is simultaneously packaged into the virion. The latter model would require an entirely new molecular mechanism for packaging compared to known viral packaging motors. We characterized a virus with a conditional knockout of core protein VII. Remarkably, virus particles were assembled efficiently in the absence of protein VII. No changes in protein composition were evident with VII⁻virus particles, including the abundance of core protein V, but changes in the proteolytic processing of some capsid proteins were evident. Virus particles that lack protein VII enter the cell, but incoming virions did not escape efficiently from endosomes. This greatly diminished all subsequent aspects of the infectious cycle. These results reveal that the Ad major core protein VII is not required to condense viral DNA within the capsid, but rather plays an unexpected role during virus maturation and the early stages of infection. These results establish a new paradigm pertaining to the Ad assembly mechanism and reveal a new and important role of protein VII in early stages of infection.

The Ad major core protein VII protects the viral genome from recognition by a cellular DNA damage response during the early stages of infection and alters cellular chromatin to block innate signaling mechanisms. The packaging of the Ad genome into the capsid is thought to follow the paradigm of dsDNA bacteriophage where viral DNA is inserted into a preassembled capsid using a packaging motor. How this process occurs if Ad packages a DNA-core protein complex is unknown. We analyzed an Ad mutant that lacks core protein VII and demonstrated that virus assembly and DNA packaging takes place normally, but that the mutant is deficient in the maturation of several capsid proteins and displays a defect in the escape of virions from the endosome. These results have profound implications for the Ad assembly mechanism and for the role of protein VII during infection.