2A protease is not a prerequisite for poliovirus replication

An efficient trans complementation system for in vivo replication of defective poliovirus mutants

The picornavirus genome encodes a large, single polyprotein that is processed by viral proteases to form an active replication complex. The replication complex is formed with the viral genome, host proteins, and viral proteins that are produced/translated directly from each of the viral genomes (viral proteins provided in cis). Efficient complementation in vivo of replication complex formation by viral proteins provided in trans, thus exogenous or ectopically expressed viral proteins, remains to be demonstrated. Here, we report an efficient trans complementation system for the replication of defective poliovirus (PV) mutants by a viral polyprotein precursor in HEK293 cells. Viral 3AB in the polyprotein, but not 2BC, was processed exclusively in cis. Replication of a defective PV replicon mutant, with a disrupted cleavage site for viral 3Cpro protease between 3Cpro and 3Dpol (3C/D[A/G] mutant) could be rescued by a viral polyprotein provided in trans. Only a defect of 3Dpol activity of the replicon could be rescued in trans; inactivating mutations in 2CATPase/hel, 3B, and 3Cpro of the replicon completely abrogated the trans-rescued replication. An intact N-terminus of the 3Cpro domain of the 3CDpro provided in trans was essential for the trans-active function. By using this trans complementation system, a high-titer defective PV pseudovirus (PVpv) (>107 infectious units per mL) could be produced with the defective mutants, whose replication was completely dependent on trans complementation. This work reveals potential roles of exogenous viral proteins in PV replication and offers insights into protein/protein interaction during picornavirus infection.

IMPORTANCE

Viral polyprotein processing is an elaborately controlled step by viral proteases encoded in the polyprotein; fully processed proteins and processing intermediates need to be correctly produced for replication, which can be detrimentally affected even by a small modification of the polyprotein. Purified/isolated viral proteins can retain their enzymatic activities required for viral replication, such as protease, helicase, polymerase, etc. However, when these proteins of picornavirus are exogenously provided (provided in trans) to the viral replication complex with a defective viral genome, replication is generally not rescued/complemented, suggesting the importance of viral proteins endogenously provided (provided in cis) to the replication complex. In this study, I discovered that only the viral polymerase activity of poliovirus (PV) (the typical member of picornavirus family) could be efficiently rescued by exogenously expressed viral proteins. The current study reveals potential roles for exogenous viral proteins in viral replication and offers insights into interactions during picornavirus infection.

The EV71 2A protease occupies the central cleft of SETD3 and disrupts SETD3-actin interaction

SETD3 is an essential host factor for the replication of a variety of enteroviruses that specifically interacts with viral protease 2A. However, the interaction between SETD3 and the 2A protease has not been fully characterized. Here, we use X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy to determine the structures of SETD3 complexed with the 2A protease of EV71 to 3.5 Å and 3.1 Å resolution, respectively. We find that the 2A protease occupies the V-shaped central cleft of SETD3 through two discrete sites. The relative positions of the two proteins vary in the crystal and cryo-EM structures, showing dynamic binding. A biolayer interferometry assay shows that the EV71 2A protease outcompetes actin for SETD3 binding. We identify key 2A residues involved in SETD3 binding and demonstrate that 2A's ability to bind SETD3 correlates with EV71 production in cells. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in EV71 infected and 2A expressing cells indicate that 2A interferes with the SETD3-actin complex, and the disruption of this complex reduces enterovirus replication. Together, these results reveal the molecular mechanism underlying the interplay between SETD3, actin, and viral 2A during virus replication.

Comprehensive Elucidation of the Role of L and 2A Security Proteins on Cell Death during EMCV Infection

The EMCV L and 2A proteins are virulence factors that counteract host cell defense mechanisms. Both L and 2A exhibit antiapoptotic properties, but the available data were obtained in different cell lines and under incomparable conditions. This study is aimed at checking the role of these proteins in the choice of cell death type in three different cell lines using three mutants of EMCV lacking functional L, 2A, and both proteins together. We have found that both L and 2A are non-essential for viral replication in HeLa, BHK, and RD cell lines, as evidenced by the viability of the virus in the absence of both functional proteins. L-deficient infection led to the apoptotic death of HeLa and RD cells, and the necrotic death of BHK cells. 2A-deficient infection induced apoptosis in BHK and RD cells. Infection of HeLa cells with the 2A-deficient mutant was finalized with exclusive caspase-dependent death with membrane permeabilization, morphologically similar to pyroptosis. We also demonstrated that inactivation of both proteins, along with caspase inhibition, delayed cell death progression. The results obtained demonstrate that proteins L and 2A play a critical role in choosing the path of cell death during infection, but the result of their influence depends on the properties of the host cells.

A safe and reliable neutralization assay based on pseudovirus to measure neutralizing antibody titer against poliovirus

With the promotion of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine (IPV) and live attenuated oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV), the global reported cases of poliomyelitis have reduced sharply from 0.35 million in 1988 to 74 in 2015. The Polio Eradication & Endgame Strategic Plan published by WHO in 2013 included the strategy of implementation of poliovirus safe handling and containment measures to minimize the risks of facility-associated reintroduction of virus into the polio-free community to prevent the re-import of poliovirus. Toward this strategy, we produced replication-incompetent pseudovirus of poliovirus type 1, 2, 3 attenuated strains by constructing poliovirus capsid expression vectors and poliovirus replicon then transfecting HEK293T cells and developed a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay (pNA) to determine neutralizing antibody titer which is more secure, time-saving and reliable than conventional neutralization assay (cNA). By using anti-poliovirus rat serum, we demonstrated excellent correlation between neutralizing antibody titers measured by cNA and pNA. It was concluded that pNA can be a potential alternative to replace cNA as a safe and time-saving system for titer determination after live poliovirus's safekeeping.

Structures and Corresponding Functions of Five Types of Picornaviral 2A Proteins

Among the few non-structural proteins encoded by the picornaviral genome, the 2A protein is particularly special, irrespective of structure or function. During the evolution of the Picornaviridae family, the 2A protein has been highly non-conserved. We believe that the 2A protein in this family can be classified into at least five distinct types according to previous studies. These five types are (A) chymotrypsin-like 2A, (B) Parechovirus-like 2A, (C) hepatitis-A-virus-like 2A, (D) Aphthovirus-like 2A, and (E) 2A sequence of the genus Cardiovirus. We carried out a phylogenetic analysis and found that there was almost no homology between each type. Subsequently, we aligned the sequences within each type and found that the functional motifs in each type are highly conserved. These different motifs perform different functions. Therefore, in this review, we introduce the structures and functions of these five types of 2As separately. Based on the structures and functions, we provide suggestions to combat picornaviruses. The complexity and diversity of the 2A protein has caused great difficulties in functional and antiviral research. In this review, researchers can find useful information on the 2A protein and thus conduct improved antiviral research.

Phosphatidylinositol-4 kinase III beta and oxysterol-binding protein accumulate unesterified cholesterol on poliovirus-induced membrane structure

Studies on anti-picornavirus compounds have revealed an essential role of a novel cellular pathway via host phosphatidylinositol-4 kinase III beta (PI4KB) and oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) family I in poliovirus (PV) replication. However, the molecular role for this pathway in PV replication has yet to be determined. Here, viral and host proteins modulating production of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P) and accumulation of unesterified cholesterol (UC) in cells were analyzed and the role of the PI4KB/OSBP pathway in PV replication characterized. Virus protein 2BC was identified as a novel interactant of PI4KB. PI4KB and VCP/p97 bind to a partially overlapped region of 2BC with different sensitivity to a 2C inhibitor. Production of PI4P and accumulation of UC were enhanced by virus protein 2BC, but suppressed by virus proteins 3A and 3AB. In PV-infected cells, a PI4KB inhibitor suppressed production of PI4P, and both a PI4KB inhibitor and an OSBP ligand suppressed accumulation of UC on virus-induced membrane structure. Inhibition of PI4KB activity caused dissociation of OSBP from virus-induced membrane structure in PV-infected cells. Synthesis of viral nascent RNA in PV-infected cells was not affected in the presence of PI4KB inhibitor and OSBP ligand; however, transient pre-treatment of PV-infected cells with these inhibitors suppressed viral RNA synthesis. These results suggest that virus proteins modulate PI4KB activity and provide PI4P for recruitment of OSBP to accumulate UC on virus-induced membrane structure for formation of a virus replication complex.

Cytopathic effects: virus-modulated manifestations of innate immunity?

The capacity to injure infected cells is a widespread property of viruses. Usually, this cytopathic effect (CPE) is ascribed to viral hijacking of cellular resources to fulfill viral needs. However, evidence is accumulating that CPE is not necessarily directly coupled to viral reproduction but may largely be due to host defensive and viral antidefensive activities. A major part in this virus–cell interaction appears to be played by a putative host-encoded program with multiple competing branches, leading to necrotic, apoptotic, and, possibly, other types of cell suicide. Manifestations of this program are controlled and modulated by host, viral, and environmental factors.

Suppression of injuries caused by a lytic RNA virus (mengovirus) and their uncoupling from viral reproduction by mutual cell/virus disarmament

Viruses often elicit cell injury (cytopathic effect [CPE]), a major cause of viral diseases. CPE is usually considered to be a prerequisite for and/or consequence of efficient viral growth. Recently, we proposed that viral CPE may largely be due to host defensive and viral antidefensive activities. This study aimed to check the validity of this proposal by using as a model HeLa cells infected with mengovirus (MV). As we showed previously, infection of these cells with wild-type MV resulted in necrosis, whereas a mutant with incapacitated antidefensive ("security") viral leader (L) protein induced apoptosis. Here, we showed that several major morphological and biochemical signs of CPE (e.g., alterations in cellular and nuclear shape, plasma membrane, cytoskeleton, chromatin, and metabolic activity) in cells infected with L(-) mutants in the presence of an apoptosis inhibitor were strongly suppressed or delayed for long after completion of viral reproduction. These facts demonstrate that the efficient reproduction of a lytic virus may not directly require development of at least some pathological alterations normally accompanying infection. They also imply that L protein is involved in the control of many apparently unrelated functions. The results also suggest that the virus-activated program with competing necrotic and apoptotic branches is host encoded, with the choice between apoptosis and necrosis depending on a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic conditions. Implementation of this defensive suicidal program could be uncoupled from the viral reproduction. The possibility of such uncoupling has significant implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of viral diseases.

The multifaceted poliovirus 2A protease: regulation of gene expression by picornavirus proteases

After entry into animal cells, most viruses hijack essential components involved in gene expression. This is the case of poliovirus, which abrogates cellular translation soon after virus internalization. Abrogation is achieved by cleavage of both eIF4GI and eIF4GII by the viral protease 2A. Apart from the interference of poliovirus with cellular protein synthesis, other gene expression steps such as RNA and protein trafficking between nucleus and cytoplasm are also altered. Poliovirus 2A^pro is capable of hydrolyzing components of the nuclear pore, thus preventing an efficient antiviral response by the host cell. Here, we compare in detail poliovirus 2A^pro with other viral proteins (from picornaviruses and unrelated families) as regard to their activity on key host factors that control gene expression. It is possible that future analyses to determine the cellular proteins targeted by 2A^pro will uncover other cellular functions ablated by poliovirus infection. Further understanding of the cellular proteins hydrolyzed by 2A^pro will add further insight into the molecular mechanism by which poliovirus and other viruses interact with the host cell.

Viral security proteins: counteracting host defences

Viral reproduction involves not only replication but also interactions with host defences. Although various viral proteins can take part in counteracting innate and adaptive immunity, many viruses possess a subset of proteins that are specifically dedicated to counter-defensive activities. These proteins are sometimes referred to as 'virulence factors', but here we argue that the term 'security proteins' is preferable, for several reasons.

The concept of security proteins of RNA-containing viruses can be considered using the leader (L and L^*) and 2A proteins of picornaviruses as examples. The picornaviruses are a large group of human and animal viruses that include important pathogens such as poliovirus, hepatitis A virus and foot-and-mouth disease virus. The genomes of different picornaviruses have a similar organization, in which the genes for L and 2A occupy fixed positions upstream and downstream of the capsid genes, respectively.

Both L and 2A are extremely heterogeneous with respect to size, sequence and biochemical properties. The similarly named proteins can be completely unrelated to each other in different viral genera, and the variation can be striking even among members of the same genus. A subset of picornaviruses lacks L altogether.

The properties and functions of L and 2A of many picornaviruses are unknown, but in those viruses that have been investigated sufficiently it has been found that these proteins can switch off various aspects of host macromolecular synthesis and specifically suppress mechanisms involved in innate immunity. Thus, notwithstanding their unrelatedness, the security proteins carry out similar biological functions. It is proposed that other picornavirus L and 2A proteins that have not yet been investigated should also be primarily involved in security activities.

The L, L^* and 2A proteins are dispensable for viral reproduction, but their elimination or inactivation usually renders the viruses less pathogenic. The phenotypic changes associated with inactivation of security proteins are much less pronounced in cells or organisms that have innate immunity deficiencies. In several examples, the decreased fitness of a virus in which a security protein has been inactivated could be rescued by the experimental introduction of an unrelated security protein.

It can be argued that L and 2A were acquired by different picornaviruses independently, and possibly by exploiting different mechanisms, late in the evolution of this viral family.

It is proposed that the concept of security proteins is of general relevance and can be applied to viruses other than picornaviruses. The hallmarks of security proteins are: structural and biochemical unrelatedness in related viruses or even absence in some of them; dispensability of the entire protein or its functional domains for viral viability; and, for mutated versions of the proteins, fewer detrimental effects on viral reproduction in immune-compromised hosts than in immune-competent hosts.

Viral security proteins are structurally and biochemically unrelated proteins that function to counteract host defences. Here, Agol and Gmyl consider the impact of the picornavirus security proteins on viral reproduction, pathogenicity and evolution.

Interactions with host defences are key aspects of viral infection. Various viral proteins perform counter-defensive functions, but a distinct class, called security proteins, is dedicated specifically to counteracting host defences. Here, the properties of the picornavirus security proteins L and 2A are discussed. These proteins have well-defined positions in the viral polyprotein, flanking the capsid precursor, but they are structurally and biochemically unrelated. Here, we consider the impact of these two proteins, as well as that of a third security protein, L^*, on viral reproduction, pathogenicity and evolution. The concept of security proteins could serve as a paradigm for the dedicated counter-defensive proteins of other viruses.