Mutually exclusive binding of two cellular factors within a critical promoter region of the gene for the IE110k protein of herpes simplex virus

HSV1 latent transcription and non-coding RNA: A critical retrospective

Virologists have invested great effort into understanding how the herpes simplex viruses and their relatives are maintained dormant over the lifespan of their host while maintaining the poise to remobilize on sporadic occasions. Piece by piece, our field has defined the tissues in play (the sensory ganglia), the transcriptional units (the latency-associated transcripts), and the responsive genomic region (the long repeats of the viral genomes). With time, the observed complexity of these features has compounded, and the totality of viral factors regulating latency are less obvious. In this review, we compose a comprehensive picture of the viral genetic elements suspected to be relevant to herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1) latent transcription by conducting a critical analysis of about three decades of research. We describe these studies, which largely involved mutational analysis of the notable latency-associated transcripts (LATs), and more recently a series of viral miRNAs. We also intend to draw attention to the many other less characterized non-coding RNAs, and perhaps coding RNAs, that may be important for consideration when trying to disentangle the multitude of phenotypes of the many genetic modifications introduced into recombinant HSV1 strains.

Role of nuclear factor Y in stress-induced activation of the herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0 promoter

Herpesviruses are characterized by the ability to establish lifelong latent infections and to reactivate periodically, leading to recurrent disease. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) genome is maintained in a quiescent state in sensory neurons during latency, which is characterized by the absence of detectable viral protein synthesis. Cellular factors induced by stress may act directly on promoters within the latent viral genome to induce the transcription of viral genes and trigger reactivation. In order to identify which viral promoters are induced by stress and elucidate the cellular mechanism responsible for the induction, we generated a panel of HSV-1 promoter-luciferase constructs and measured their response to heat shock. Of the promoters tested, those of ICP0 and ICP22 were the most strongly upregulated after heat shock. Microarray analysis of lytically infected cells supported the upregulation of ICP0 and ICP22 promoters by heat shock. Mutagenic analysis of the ICP0 promoter identified two regions necessary for efficient heat-induced promoter activity, both containing predicted nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) sites, at bases -708 and -75 upstream of the transcriptional start site. While gel shift analysis confirmed NF-Y binding to both sites, only the site at -708 was important for efficient heat-induced activity. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis of selected viral transcripts in the presence of dominant-negative NF-Y confirmed the requirement for NF-Y in the induction of the ICP0 but not the ICP22 promoter by heat shock in lytically infected cells. These findings suggest that the immediate-early ICP0 gene may be among the first genes to be induced during the early events in HSV-1 reactivation, that NF-Y is important for this induction, and that other factors induce the ICP22 promoter.

Analysis of herpes simplex virus ICP0 promoter function in sensory neurons during acute infection, establishment of latency, and reactivation in vivo

We have begun an analysis of the functional architecture of the ICP0 promoter in neurons in vivo with the ultimate goal of determining how this gene is regulated during reactivation in vivo. Promoter/reporter mutants in which the Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase (beta-Gal) gene was driven by various permutations of the ICP0 promoter were employed to permit the analysis of promoter function without the added complications that would arise due to inappropriate regulation of ICP0 protein levels. A whole-ganglion immunohistochemical staining procedure (N. M. Sawtell, J. Virol. 77:4127-4138, 2003) was used for direct comparisons of the expression of the promoter/reporter gene to expression of the native protein in the same cell. In this way, the expression of the putative wild-type promoter could be validated and results for mutant promoters could be compared to expression of the native gene. We found that a DNA fragment from bp -562 through the methionine start codon of the ICP0 gene contained all sequences required for properly regulated ICP0 expression in diverse cell types (including sensory neurons of the trigeminal ganglia [TG]) in vitro and in vivo, as indicated by colocalization of ICP0 and beta-Gal. Truncation of the ICP0 promoter to bp -145 or -129 resulted in the loss of immediate-early (alpha) kinetics. The truncated promoters expressed high levels of the reporter gene with leaky late (gamma1) kinetics in vitro and in some cell types in vivo. Unexpectedly, the truncated promoters did not express in TG neurons. Thus, TAATGARAT or other sequences upstream of bp -145 in the ICP0 promoter are required for basal expression of ICP0 in neurons but are not required for basal expression in other cells in vivo. There was a >95% concordance between reporter and native protein expression detected with the 562-bp promoter in neurons during the acute stage. However, this was not the case during reactivation from latency in vivo, as nearly twice as many neurons contained detectable beta-Gal as contained detectable ICP0. This same 562-bp promoter/reporter cassette, when placed in the context of a latency-associated transcript (LAT) null mutant, resulted in >95% concordance of expression of beta-Gal and ICP0 during reactivation in vivo. These last results strongly suggest that there is a posttranscriptional constraint on the expression of ICP0 protein during reactivation from latency and that this constraint is mediated by LAT.

Herpes simplex virus 1 ICP0 co-localizes with a SUMO-specific protease

Early during infection, the herpes simplex regulatory protein ICP0 promotes the proteasome-dependent degradation of a number of cellular proteins and the loss of a number of SUMO-1-modified protein isoforms, including PML. Recently, ICP0 has been shown to induce the accumulation of conjugated ubiquitin and function as a ubiquitin E3 ligase. However, certain aspects of the biochemistry, cell biology and the links between SUMO-1 conjugation/deconjugation and protein degradation remain unclear. For example, it is not currently known whether SUMO-1 deconjugation is a prerequisite for ubiquitination or degradation and, if so, by what mechanism this may occur. To help address these questions, a SUMO-specific protease (SENP1) was cloned and its expression and localization in relation to ICP0 examined. A cell line was established which constitutively expresses SUMO-1 to facilitate studies of localization and biochemistry. SENP1 localized to the nucleus mainly in discrete subdomains, a subset of which co-localized with the PML bodies. Both ICP0 and SENP1 protease promoted the loss of SUMO-1 from the nucleus, observed both for the endogenous species and the cell line expressing the epitope-tagged SUMO-1. The tagged SUMO-1 was recruited into high molecular mass conjugates in the cell line, and expression of SENP1 promoted loss of these species, including the modified species of PML. Finally, in co-transfection experiments ICP0 promoted the recruitment of SENP1 to nuclear domains, a result which was also observed early during infection. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to the function of ICP0.

Neurons differentially activate the herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early gene ICP0 and ICP27 promoters in transgenic mice

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) immediate-early (IE) proteins are required for the expression of viral early and late proteins. It has been hypothesized that host neuronal proteins regulate expression of HSV-1 IE genes that in turn control viral latency and reactivation. We investigated the ability of neuronal proteins in vivo to activate HSV-1 IE gene promoters (ICP0 and ICP27) and a late gene promoter (gC). Transgenic mice containing IE (ICP0 and ICP27) and late (gC) gene promoters of HSV-1 fused to the Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase coding sequence were generated. Expression of the ICP0 and ICP27 reporter transgenes was present in anatomically distinct subsets of neurons in the absence of viral proteins. The anatomic locations of beta-galactosidase-positive neurons in the brains of ICP0 and ICP27 reporter transgenic mice were similar and included cerebral cortex, lateral septal nucleus, cingulum, hippocampus, thalamus, amygdala, and vestibular nucleus. Trigeminal ganglion neurons were positive for beta-galactosidase in adult ICP0 and ICP27 reporter transgenic mice. The ICP0 reporter transgene was differentially regulated in trigeminal ganglion neurons depending upon age. beta-galactosidase-labeled cells in trigeminal ganglia and cerebral cortex of ICP0 and ICP27 reporter transgenic mice were confirmed as neurons by double labeling with antineurofilament antibody. Nearly all nonneuronal cells in ICP0 and ICP27 reporter transgenic mice and all neuronal and nonneuronal cells in gC reporter transgenic mice were negative for beta-galactosidase labeling in the absence of HSV-1. We conclude that factors in neurons are able to differentially regulate the HSV-1 IE gene promoters (ICP0 and ICP27) in transgenic mice in the absence of viral proteins. These findings are important for understanding the regulation of the latent and reactivated stages of HSV-1 infection in neurons.

Transcriptional regulation of herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0 promoter by virion protein 16

HSV regulatory proteins ICP0 and VP16 independently regulate transcription of the ICP0 gene during virus infection. In this study, we tried to determine the possible regulatory mechanism of ICP0 expression during virus infection. Among eight putative VP16 binding sites present in the ICP0 regulatory sequence, the most upstream one alone was sufficiently responsive to VP16-mediated activation. When the G/C-rich sequence present in front of the last TAATGARAT sequence of the ICP0 promoter was either deleted or point mutated, the activational effect of VP16 on the promoter was completely abolished. Furthermore, according to the gel mobility shift assay using a labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide derived from the G/C-rich sequence in the ICP0 promoter, specific protein binding to the probe was clearly demonstrated and was approximately fivefold upregulated by HSV-1 infection. Therefore, the G/C-rich sequence might play a critical role in VP16-mediated activation of the ICP0 promoter and the effect may be a result of the enhanced binding of a protein to the G/C-rich sequence during virus infection.

Potential role for luman, the cellular homologue of herpes simplex virus VP16 (alpha gene trans-inducing factor), in herpesvirus latency

The cascade of herpes simplex virus (HSV) gene expression that results in viral replication begins with the activation of viral immediate-early (IE) genes by the virion-associated protein VP16. VP16 on its own is inefficient at associating with complexes formed on IE gene promoters and depends upon the cellular factor HCF for its activity. In this respect VP16 mimics the host basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein Luman, which also requires HCF for activating transcription. Our objective is to explore interactions between Luman and HCF and to determine if they play a role in the biology of herpesviruses. In this report we show that in cultured cells ectopically expressed Luman was retained in the cytoplasm, where it colocalized with Calnexin, a protein normally associated with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Retention of Luman in the ER depends on a hydrophobic segment of the protein that probably serves as a transmembrane domain. Deletion of this domain changed the intracellular location of Luman so that most of the mutant protein was in the nucleus of cells. While HCF was present in the nucleus of most cells, in cells expressing Luman it was retained in the cytoplasm where the two proteins colocalized. This cytoplasmic association of Luman and HCF could also be demonstrated in neurons in trigeminal ganglia removed from cattle soon after death. Cells in tissue culture that expressed Luman, but not a mutant form of the protein that fails to bind HCF, were resistant to a productive infection with HSV type 1 (HSV-1). We hypothesize that similar Luman-HCF interactions in sensory neurons in trigeminal ganglia result in the suppression of viral replication and the establishment of latency. Interestingly, Luman could activate the promoters of IE110 and LAT, two genes that are critical for reactivation of HSV-1 from latency. This suggests a role for Luman in the reactivation process as well.

Early expression of herpes simplex virus (HSV) proteins and reactivation of latent infection

During the last decade, new data accumulated describing the early events during herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) replication occurring before capsid formation and virion envelopment. The HSV virion carries its own specific transcription initiation factor (alpha-TIF), which functions together with other components of the cellular transcriptase complex to mediate virus-specific immediate early (IE) transcription. The virus-coded IE proteins are the transactivator and regulatory elements modulating early transcription and subsequent translation of nonstructural virus-coded proteins needed mainly for viral DNA synthesis and for the supply of corresponding nucleoside components. They also cooperate at the late transcription and translation of the virion (capsid, tegument and envelope) proteins. In addition, the transactivator IE proteins down-regulate their own transcription, while others facilitate viral mRNA processing or interfere with the presentation of newly synthesized virus antigens. Establishment of latency is closely related to the transcription of a separate category of transcripts, termed latency-associated (LAT). Formation of LATs occurs mainly in nondividing neurons which are metabolically less active and express lower levels of cellular transcription factors (nonpermissive cells). Expression of the stable non-spliced (2 kb), and especially of stable spliced (1.5 and 1.45 kb) LATs is a prerequisite for HSV reactivation. Different HSV genomes (from various HSV strains) do not undergo IE transcription at the same rate. Restricted IE transcription and the absence of viral DNA synthesis favors LAT formation and persistence of the silenced genome. Uneven levels of LAT expression and differences in the metabolic state of carrier neurons influence the reactivation competence. Under artificial or natural activation conditions, sufficient amounts of IE transactivator proteins and proteins promoting nucleoside metabolism are synthesized even in the absence of the viral alpha-TIF facilitating reactivation.

Cytodifferentiating agents affect the replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 in the absence of functional VP16

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant in1814 encodes an altered form of the virion protein VP16 that is unable to transactivate immediate-early (IE) transcription. As a consequence of the mutation, in1814 initiates productive replication inefficiently after infection of tissue culture cells. Previous studies showed that this defect could be overcome by the inclusion in the culture medium of hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA), a compound that promotes the differentiation of murine erythroleukemia cells (MELCs). The effects of additional agents known to induce differentiation of MELCs were investigated. N'-Methylnicotinamide, at concentrations optimal for the induction of MELCs, complemented the replication of in1814 and stimulated IE gene expression. Suberoyl bishydroxamic acid and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, which induce differentiation of MELCs at micromolar concentrations, did not complement in1814 but specifically blocked the action of HMBA. The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A, which also induces differentiation of MELCs, antagonized the effect of HMBA in a manner similar to that of suberoyl bishydroxamic acid and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid. The results demonstrate that the requirement for VP16 activity is dependent on the metabolic state of the host cell and that the pathways leading to complementation of in1814 and differentiation of MELCs are overlapping but not identical.

Brachyury-related transcription factor Tbx2 and repression of the melanocyte-specific TRP-1 promoter

Previous work has demonstrated that two key melanocyte-specific elements termed the MSEu and MSEi play critical roles in the expression of the melanocyte-specific tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TRP-1) promoter. Both the MSEu and MSEi, located at position -237 and at the initiator, respectively, bind a melanocyte-specific factor termed MSF but are also recognized by a previously uncharacterized repressor, since mutations affecting either of these elements result in strong up-regulation of TRP-1 promoter activity in melanoma cells. Here we demonstrate that repression mediated by the MSEu and MSEi also operates in melanocytes. We also report that both the MSEu and MSEi are recognized by the brachyury-related transcription factor Tbx2, a member of the recently described T-box family, and that Tbx2 is expressed in melanocyte and melanoblast cell lines but not in melanoblast precursor cells. Although Tbx2 and MSF each recognize the TRP-1 MSEu and MSEi motifs, it is binding by Tbx-2, not binding by MSF, that correlates with repression. Several lines of evidence tend to point to the brachyury-related transcription factor Tbx2 as being the repressor of TRP-1 expression: both the MSEu and MSEi bind Tbx2, and mutations in either element that result in derepression of the TRP-1 promoter diminish binding by Tbx2; the TRP-1 promoter, but not the tyrosinase, microphthalmia, or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) promoter, is repressed by Tbx2 in cotransfection assays; a high-affinity consensus brachyury/Tbx2-binding site is able to constitutively repress expression of the heterologous IE110 promoter; and a low-affinity brachyury/Tbx2 binding site is able to mediate Tbx2-dependent repression of the G3PDH promoter. Although we cannot rule out the presence of an additional, as yet unidentified factor playing a role in the negative regulation of TRP-1 in vivo, the evidence presented here suggests that Tbx2 most likely is the previously unidentified repressor of TRP-1 expression and as such is likely to represent the first example of transcriptional repression by a T-box family member.

A survey of 178 NF-Y binding CCAAT boxes

The CCAAT box is one of the most common elements in eukaryotic promoters, found in the forward or reverse orientation. Among the various DNA binding proteins that interact with this sequence, only NF-Y (CBF, HAP2/3/4/5) has been shown to absolutely require all 5 nt. Analysis of a database with 178 bona fide NF-Y binding sites in 96 unrelated promoters confirms this need and points to specific additional flanking nucleotides (C, Pu, Pu on the 5'-side and C/G, A/G, G,A/C, G on the 3'-side) required for efficient binding. The frequency of CCAAT boxes appears to be relatively higher in TATA-less promoters, particularly in the reverse ATTGG orientation. In TATA-containing promoters the CCAAT box is preferentially located in the -80/-100 region (mean position -89) and is not found nearer to the Start site than -50. In TATA-less promoters it is usually closer to the +1 signal (at -66 on average) and is sometimes present in proximity to the Cap site. The consensus and location of NF-Y binding sites parallel almost perfectly a previous general statistical study on CCAAT boxes in 502 unrelated promoters. This is an indication that NF-Y is the major, if not the sole, CCAAT box recognizing protein and that it might serve different roles in TATA-containing and TATA-less promoters.

Construction and characterization of herpes simplex virus type 1 mutants with conditional defects in immediate early gene expression

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant in 1814 contains an insertion mutation in the coding sequence for the virion transactivator protein VP16 and is thus impaired for the activation of immediate early (IE) gene expression. This virus was modified further by introducing the Moloney murine leukemia virus LTR promoter in place of the upstream sequences controlling expression of the IE regulatory protein ICPO, to yield mutant in 1820. In almost all cell types tested, in 1820 initiated infection less efficiently than in 1814, behaving as if lacking both VP16 and ICPO functions, but in BHK cells in 1820 was less impaired than in 1814. A rescuant of in 1820 at the VP16 locus, in 1825, also exhibited a host range phenotype, initiating replication as efficiently as wild-type HSV-1 in BHK cells but inefficiently in other cell types. In 1825 was unable to complement an ICPO null mutant in restricted cells, demonstrating that the promoter exchange prevented the expression of ICPO protein in functionally significant amounts. The novel host range properties of in 1820 provided a basis for the construction of additional viruses conditionally impaired for IE gene expression and assessment of their value as prototype vectors. Production of an HSV-1 mutant multiply defective in the expression of IE gene products was achieved by introduction of the temperature-sensitive mutation of HSV-1 tsK, which inactivates the IE transcription activator ICP4 at nonpermissive temperatures, into in 1820 to produce in 1820K. This mutant could be propagated effectively in BHK cells at 31 degrees but was effectively devoid of the major regulators ICPO, ICP4, and VP16 in other cells types at 38.5 degrees. Cultures could withstand infection with 5 PFU of in 1820K per cell without detectable cytopathology and could be reseeded to form colonies at approximately 90% efficiency. A derivative of in 1820K containing the Escherichia coli lacZ gene controlled by the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) major IE promoter expressed low but detectable levels of beta-galactosidase in almost all cells after infection of cultures at 5 PFU per cell and incubation at 38.5 degrees. Cultures infected with 5 PFU per cell of an in 1820K derivative expressing neomycin phosphotransferase (npt) controlled by the HCMV IE promoter were resistant to killing by the antibiotic G418 for up to 3 days, and cell survival correlated with the retention of functional levels of npt. Mutants based on in 1820K can thus express foreign gene products in virtually all cells in a culture under conditions in which cytotoxicity is eliminated, demonstrating that progressive reduction of IE gene expression is an important step in the design of HSV-1-derived vectors.

Conformational alteration of Oct-1 upon DNA binding dictates selectivity in differential interactions with related transcriptional coactivators

VP16 (termed VP16-H here) of herpes simplex virus (HSV) belongs to a family of related regulatory proteins which includes VP16-B of bovine herpesvirus (BHV). We show that VP16-B, while also being a powerful transactivator of transcription dependent on Oct-1 binding sites in its target promoters, has virtually no activity on a defined VP16-H-responsive, octamer-containing target promoter. While Oct-1 binds equally well to the VP16-B-responsive and -nonresponsive sites, VP16-B interacts with Oct-1 only when Oct-1 is bound to the BHV octamer site and not when it is bound to the HSV site. We show from the analysis of chimeric proteins that the ability of VP16-B to discriminate between the Oct-1 forms depends on features of its N-terminal region. We also show from an analysis of chimeric DNA motifs that sequences that lie 3' to the POU domain-contacting region of the HSV octamer site play a role in making it unresponsive to VP16-B. Finally, we show by high-resolution hydroxyl radical footprint analysis that the conformation of Oct-l is different on the two sites. These results augment our previous report on an allosteric effect of DNA signals on the conformation of bound proteins and indicate that different conformations of the same DNA binding protein can be recognized selectively by related members of interacting regulatory proteins. The possible implications of our observations for selective gene regulation by Oct-1, a ubiquitous transcription factor, and other multimember transcription families are discussed.

Repression of I-A beta gene expression by the transcription factor PU.1

The PU.1 protein is an ets-related transcription factor that is expressed in macrophages and B lymphocytes. We present evidence that PU.1 binds to the promoter of the I-A beta gene, i.e. a PU box located next to the Y box. Transfection of PU.1 in B lymphocytes or in interferon-gamma-treated macrophages represses I-A beta gene expression. The inhibitory effect of PU.1 was obtained with the DNA binding domain of the protein, but not with the activation domain. Using the gel shift retardation assay we found that in vitro transcribed/translated NF-YA and NF-YB bind to the Y box of the I-A beta promoter. When PU.1 was added to the assay, a supershifted DNA band was found, indicating that PU.1 and NFY proteins bind to the same DNA molecule. We conclude that I-A beta gene expression is repressed by PU.1 binding to the PU box domain.

Repression of major histocompatibility complex I-A beta gene expression by dbpA and dbpB (mYB-1) proteins

The induction of major histocompatibility complex class II gene expression is mediated by three DNA elements in the promoters of these genes (W, X, and Y boxes). The Y box contains an inverted CCAAT box sequence, and the binding activity to the CAAT box is mediated by factor NF-Y, which is composed of subunits NF-YA and NF-YB. We have found that transfection of either dbpA or dbpB (mYB-1) or both inhibits I-A beta gene expression. Although the genes for some members of the Y-box family of binding proteins have been isolated by screening an expression library using the Y-box sequence, under our conditions no binding of dbpA or dbpB to the Y box of the I-A beta or I-E alpha promoter was detected. This suggested that repression of I-A beta gene expression by dbpA and dbpB was not due to competition for binding to the Y-box sequence. The results suggest two other mechanisms by which dbpA and dbpB can inhibit transcription from the I-A beta promoter. When dbpA was added, the binding of NF-YA to DNA increased, which could be explained by interaction between these two proteins whose purpose is to increase the binding affinity of NF-YA for DNA. However, this complex was unable to stimulate transcription from the I-A beta promoter. Thus, dbpA competed for the interaction between NF-YA and NF-YB by binding to NF-YA. When dbpB factor was added together with NF-YA and NF-YB, the binding of the NF-YA--NF-YB complex was reduced. This suggested that dbpB may complete with NF-YB for interaction with NF-YA. These results provide an example of how dbpA and dbpB may regulate transcription of promoters that utilize NF-Y as a transcription factor.