AR1 is an integral part of the adenovirus type 2 E1A-CR3 transactivation domain

Multiple domains in the 50 kDa form of E4F1 regulate promoter-specific repression and E1A trans-activation

The 50 kDa N-terminal product of the cellular transcription factor E4F1 (p50E4F1) mediates E1A289R trans-activation of the adenovirus E4 gene, and suppresses E1A-mediated transformation by sensitizing cells to cell death. This report shows that while both E1A289R and E1A243R stimulate p50E4F1 DNA binding activity, E1A289R trans-activation, as measured using GAL-p50E4F1 fusion proteins, involves a p50E4F1 transcription regulatory (TR) region that must be promoter-bound and is dependent upon E1A CR3, CR1 and N-terminal domains. Trans-activation is promoter-specific, as GAL-p50E4F1 did not stimulate commonly used artificial promoters and was strongly repressive when competing against GAL-VP16. p50E4F1 and E1A289R stably associate in vivo using the p50E4F1 TR region and E1A CR3, although their association in vitro is indirect and paradoxically disrupted by MAP kinase phosphorylation of E1A289R, which stimulates E4 trans-activation in vivo. Multiple cellular proteins, including TBP, bind the p50E4F1 TR region in vitro. The mechanistic implications for p50E4F1 function are discussed.

Adenovirus E1A Activation Domain Regulates H3 Acetylation Affecting Varied Steps in Transcription at Different Viral Promoters

Despite a wealth of data associating promoter and enhancer region histone N-terminal tail lysine acetylation with transcriptional activity, there are relatively few examples of studies that establish causation between these histone posttranslational modifications and transcription. While hypoacetylation of histone H3 lysines 18 and 27 is associated with repression, the step(s) in the overall process of transcription that is blocked at a hypoacetylated promoter is not clearly established in most instances. Studies presented here confirm that the adenovirus 2 large E1A protein activation domain interacts with p300, as reported previously (P. Pelka, J. N. G. Ablack, J. Torchia, A. S. Turnell, R. J. A. Grand, J. S. Mymryk, Nucleic Acids Res 37:1095–1106, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn1057), and that the resulting acetylation of H3K18/27 affects varied steps in transcription at different viral promoters.

How histone acetylation promotes transcription is not clearly understood. Here, we confirm an interaction between p300 and the adenovirus 2 large E1A activation domain (AD) and map the interacting regions in E1A by observing colocalization at an integrated lacO array of fusions of LacI-mCherry to E1A fragments with YFP-p300. Viruses with mutations in E1A subdomains were constructed and analyzed for kinetics of early viral RNA expression and association of acetylated H3K9, K18, K27, TBP, and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) across the viral genome. The results indicate that this E1A interaction with p300 is required for H3K18 and H3K27 acetylation at the E2early, E3, and E4 promoters and is required for TBP and Pol II association with the E2early promoter. In contrast, H3K18/27 acetylation was not required for TBP and Pol II association with the E3 and E4 promoters but was required for E4 transcription at a step subsequent to Pol II preinitiation complex assembly.

IMPORTANCE Despite a wealth of data associating promoter and enhancer region histone N-terminal tail lysine acetylation with transcriptional activity, there are relatively few examples of studies that establish causation between these histone posttranslational modifications and transcription. While hypoacetylation of histone H3 lysines 18 and 27 is associated with repression, the step(s) in the overall process of transcription that is blocked at a hypoacetylated promoter is not clearly established in most instances. Studies presented here confirm that the adenovirus 2 large E1A protein activation domain interacts with p300, as reported previously (P. Pelka, J. N. G. Ablack, J. Torchia, A. S. Turnell, R. J. A. Grand, J. S. Mymryk, Nucleic Acids Res 37:1095–1106, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn1057), and that the resulting acetylation of H3K18/27 affects varied steps in transcription at different viral promoters.

Hacking the Cell: Network Intrusion and Exploitation by Adenovirus E1A

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses are dependent on their infected hosts for survival. Consequently, viruses are under enormous selective pressure to utilize available cellular components and processes to their own advantage. As most, if not all, cellular activities are regulated at some level via protein interactions, host protein interaction networks are particularly vulnerable to viral exploitation. Indeed, viral proteins frequently target highly connected “hub” proteins to “hack” the cellular network, defining the molecular basis for viral control over the host. This widespread and successful strategy of network intrusion and exploitation has evolved convergently among numerous genetically distinct viruses as a result of the endless evolutionary arms race between pathogens and hosts. Here we examine the means by which a particularly well-connected viral hub protein, human adenovirus E1A, compromises and exploits the vulnerabilities of eukaryotic protein interaction networks. Importantly, these interactions identify critical regulatory hubs in the human proteome and help define the molecular basis of their function.

Adenovirus L-E1A activates transcription through mediator complex-dependent recruitment of the super elongation complex

The adenovirus large E1A (L-E1A) protein is a prototypical transcriptional activator, and it functions through the action of a conserved transcriptional activation domain, CR3. CR3 interacts with a mediator subunit, MED23, that has been linked to the transcriptional activity of CR3. Our unbiased proteomic analysis revealed that human adenovirus 5 (HAdv5) L-E1A was associated with many mediator subunits. In MED23-depleted cells and in Med23 knockout (KO) cells, L-E1A was deficient in association with other mediator subunits, suggesting that MED23 links CR3 with the mediator complex. Short interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of several mediator subunits suggested differential effects of various subunits on transcriptional activation of HAdv5 early genes. In addition to MED23, mediator subunits such as MED14 and MED26 were also essential for the transcription of HAdv5 early genes. The L-E1A proteome contained MED26-associated super elongation complex. The catalytic component of the elongation complex, CDK9, was important for the transcriptional activity of L-E1A and HAdv5 replication. Our results suggest that L-E1A-mediated transcriptional activation involves a transcriptional elongation step, like HIV Tat, and constitutes a therapeutic target for inhibition of HAdv replication.

Cellular GCN5 is a novel regulator of human adenovirus E1A-conserved region 3 transactivation

The largest isoform of adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) contains a unique region termed conserved region 3 (CR3). This region activates viral gene expression by recruiting cellular transcription machinery to the early viral promoters. Recent studies have suggested that there is an optimal level of E1A-dependent transactivation required by human adenovirus (hAd) during infection and that this may be achieved via functional cross talk between the N termini of E1A and CR3. The N terminus of E1A binds GCN5, a cellular lysine acetyltransferase (KAT). We have identified a second independent interaction of E1A with GCN5 that is mediated by CR3, which requires residues 178 to 188 in hAd5 E1A. GCN5 was recruited to the viral genome during infection in an E1A-dependent manner, and this required both GCN5 interaction sites on E1A. Ectopic expression of GCN5 repressed transactivation by both E1A CR3 and full-length E1A. In contrast, RNA interference (RNAi) depletion of GCN5 or treatment with the KAT inhibitor cyclopentylidene-[4-(4'-chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl]hydrazone (CPTH2) resulted in increased E1A CR3 transactivation. Moreover, activation of the adenovirus E4 promoter by E1A was increased during infection of homozygous GCN5 KAT-defective (hat/hat) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) compared to wild-type control MEFs. Enhanced histone H3 K9/K14 acetylation at the viral E4 promoter required the newly identified binding site for GCN5 within CR3 and correlated with repression and reduced occupancy by phosphorylated RNA polymerase II. Treatment with CPTH2 during infection also reduced virus yield. These data identify GCN5 as a new negative regulator of transactivation by E1A and suggest that its KAT activity is required for optimal virus replication.

The C-terminal region of E1A: a molecular tool for cellular cartography

The adenovirus E1A proteins function via protein–protein interactions. By making many connections with the cellular protein network, individual modules of this virally encoded hub reprogram numerous aspects of cell function and behavior. Although many of these interactions have been thoroughly studied, those mediated by the C-terminal region of E1A are less well understood. This review focuses on how this region of E1A affects cell cycle progression, apoptosis, senescence, transformation, and conversion of cells to an epithelial state through interactions with CTBP1/2, DYRK1A/B, FOXK1/2, and importin-α. Furthermore, novel potential pathways that the C-terminus of E1A influences through these connections with the cellular interaction network are discussed.

Comparison of E1A CR3-dependent transcriptional activation across six different human adenovirus subgroups

The largest E1A isoform of human adenovirus (Ad) includes a C-4 zinc finger domain within conserved region 3 (CR3) that is largely responsible for activating transcription of the early viral genes. CR3 interacts with multiple cellular factors, but its mechanism of action is modeled primarily on the basis of the mechanism for the prototype E1A protein of human Ad type 5. We expanded this model to include a representative member from each of the six human Ad subgroups. All CR3 domains tested were capable of transactivation. However, there were dramatic differences in their levels of transcriptional activation. Despite these functional variations, the interactions of these representative CR3s with known cellular transcriptional regulators revealed only modest differences. Four common cellular targets of all representative CR3s were identified: the proteasome component human Sug1 (hSug1)/S8, the acetyltransferases p300/CREB binding protein (CBP), the mediator component mediator complex subunit 23 (MED23) protein, and TATA binding protein (TBP). The first three factors appear to be critical for CR3 function. RNA interference against human TBP showed no significant reduction in transactivation by any CR3 tested. These results indicate that the cellular factors previously shown to be important for transactivation by Ad5 CR3 are similarly bound by the E1A proteins of other types. This was confirmed experimentally using a transcriptional squelching assay, which demonstrated that the CR3 regions of each Ad type could compete with Ad5 CR3 for limiting factors. Interestingly, a mutant of Ad5 CR3 (V147L) was capable of squelching wild-type Ad5 CR3, despite its failure to bind TBP, MED23, p300/CBP-associated factor (pCAF), or p300/CBP, suggestive of the possibility that an additional as yet unidentified cellular factor is required for transactivation by E1A CR3.

Requirements for E1A dependent transcription in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BACKGROUND

The human adenovirus type 5 early region 1A (E1A) gene encodes proteins that are potent regulators of transcription. E1A does not bind DNA directly, but is recruited to target promoters by the interaction with sequence specific DNA binding proteins. In mammalian systems, E1A has been shown to contain two regions that can independently induce transcription when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain. When expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, each of these regions of E1A also acts as a strong transcriptional activator. This allows yeast to be used as a model system to study mechanisms by which E1A stimulates transcription.

RESULTS

Using 81 mutant yeast strains, we have evaluated the effect of deleting components of the ADA, COMPASS, CSR, INO80, ISW1, NuA3, NuA4, Mediator, PAF, RSC, SAGA, SAS, SLIK, SWI/SNF and SWR1 transcriptional regulatory complexes on E1A dependent transcription. In addition, we examined the role of histone H2B ubiquitylation by Rad6/Bre1 on transcriptional activation.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis indicates that the two activation domains of E1A function via distinct mechanisms, identify new factors regulating E1A dependent transcription and suggest that yeast can serve as a valid model system for at least some aspects of E1A function.

Transcriptional control by adenovirus E1A conserved region 3 via p300/CBP

The human adenovirus type 5 (HAdV-5) E1A 13S oncoprotein is a potent regulator of gene expression and is used extensively as a model for transcriptional activation. It possesses two independent transcriptional activation domains located in the N-terminus/conserved region (CR) 1 and CR3. The protein acetyltransferase p300 was previously identified by its association with the N-terminus/CR1 portion of E1A and this association is required for oncogenic transformation by E1A. We report here that transcriptional activation by 13S E1A is inhibited by co-expression of sub-stoichiometric amounts of the smaller 12S E1A isoform, which lacks CR3. Transcriptional inhibition by E1A 12S maps to the N-terminus and correlates with the ability to bind p300/CBP, suggesting that E1A 12S is sequestering this limiting factor from 13S E1A. This is supported by the observation that the repressive effect of E1A 12S is reversed by expression of exogenous p300 or CBP, but not by a CBP mutant lacking actyltransferase activity. Furthermore, we show that transcriptional activation by 13S E1A is greatly reduced by siRNA knockdown of p300 and that CR3 binds p300 independently of the well-characterized N-terminal/CR1-binding site. Importantly, CR3 is also required to recruit p300 to the adenovirus E4 promoter during infection. These results identify a new functionally significant interaction between E1A CR3 and the p300/CBP acetyltransferases, expanding our understanding of the mechanism by which this potent transcriptional activator functions.

Comprehensive sequence analysis of the E1A proteins of human and simian adenoviruses

Despite extensive study of human adenovirus type 5 E1A, surprisingly little is known about the E1A proteins of other adenoviruses. We report here a comprehensive analysis of the sequences of 34 E1A proteins. These represent all six primate adenovirus subgroups and include all human representatives of subgroups A, C, E, and F, eight from subgroup B, nine from subgroup D, and seven simian adenovirus E1A sequences. We observed that many, but not all, functional domains identified in human adenovirus type 5 E1A are recognizably present in the other E1A proteins. Importantly, we identified highly conserved sequences without known activities or binding partners, suggesting that previously unrecognized determinants of E1A function remain to be uncovered. Overall, our analysis forms a solid foundation for future study of the activities and features of the E1A proteins of different serotypes and identifies new avenues for investigating E1A function.

Tumor-specific activation of hTERT-derived promoters by tumor suppressive E1A-mutants involves recruitment of p300/CBP/HAT and suppression of HDAC-1 and defines a combined tumor targeting and suppression system

Adenovirus (Ad) E1A proteins are transcriptional regulators with antioncogenic but also transforming properties. We have previously shown that transformation-defective Ad5 E1A-derivatives are excellent tumor suppressors. For tumor-specific expression of the E1A-derivatives we intend to use tumor specific human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) core promoters. Here, we show that Spm2 and other E1A proteins with an intact amino terminus activated all hTERT constructs 10-20-fold in malignant tumor cells but not in primary fibroblasts, without affecting the activity of endogenous telomerase. The transcription rate in tumor cells was in the range of transcription from the SV40 promoter, which qualifies an E1A-hTERT system as a putative tumor targeting/expression system. The activation of the hTERT promoter by E1A was enhanced upon deletion of the Wilms' tumor 1 negative regulatory element and maintained high after deletion of the adjacent c-Myc-responsive E-box, demonstrating an important role of the remaining sequences that contain several Sp1-motifs. E1A-mediated hTERT activation was independent from the presence of the conserved region 3 (CR3) of E1A but dependent on E1A's binding to p300/CBP and recruitment of its histone acetyltransferase activity. Moreover, E1A-Spm2 and histone deacetylase-1 behaved as antagonists with respect to the regulation of transcription from the hTERT promoter. Overall, hTERT promoter/E1A-Spm2 systems may turn out to be excellent tools for transcriptionally targeted anticancer gene therapy.

Molecular regulation and biological function of adenovirus early genes: the E4 ORFs

Over the past few years there have been a number of interesting advances in our understanding of the functions encoded by the adenovirus early transcription unit 4 (Ad E4). A large body of recent data demonstrates that E4 proteins encompass an unexpectedly diverse collection of functions required for efficient viral replication. E4 gene products operate through a complex network of protein interactions with key viral and cellular regulatory components involved in transcription, apoptosis, cell cycle control and DNA repair, as well as host cell factors that regulate cell signaling, posttranslational modifications and the integrity of nuclear multiprotein complexes known as nuclear bodies (NBs) or PML oncogenic domains (PODs). As understood at present, some of the lytic functions overlap with roles in oncogenic transformation of primary mammalian cells. These observations, together with findings that E4 proteins substantially affect cell toxicity and the immune response of the host have profound implications for the development of Ad vectors for gene therapy. In this article we will summarize recent findings regarding the diverse functions of E4 gene products in the context of earlier work. We will emphasize the interaction of E4 proteins with cellular and viral interaction partners, the role of these interactions for lytic virus growth and how these interactions may contribute to viral oncogenesis. Finally, we will discuss their role in Ad vector and adeno-associated virus infections.

Two domains within the adenovirus type 12 E1A unique spacer have disparate effects on the interaction of E1A with P105-Rb and the transformation of primary mouse cells

Transformation of primary rodent cells by functions of the adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) early region 1 (E1) is reduced severalfold compared with transformation by E1 of Ad2. We analyzed whether the unique spacer region of Ad12 E1A that borders the conserved region (CR) 2 and represents an oncogenic determinant of Ad12 E1A is involved in this impaired transformation property, putatively by modulating transformation-relevant biological E1A functions. We show that a mutant (E1ASpm1) that lacks 12 amino-terminal residues of the spacer binds p105-Rb and p130 as Ad12 E1A wild type (E1Awt), whereas a second spacer mutant (E1ASpm2) that lacks an adjacent stretch of six alanines exhibits highly reduced binding to p105-Rb. The binding of this mutant to the p130 pocket protein is, however, little impaired. E1ASpm1 diminishes the formation of the p105-Rb-E2F complex more efficiently than E1Awt or, least efficient, E1ASpm2. These properties of the spacer mutants to target and to disintegrate the p105-Rb-E2F complex correspond with their ability to transform primary mouse cells in combination with E1B: E1ASpm1 (plus Ad12 E1B)-transfected cells could be easily established as cell lines, comparable to Ad12 E1Awt- or Ad2 E1Awt-transfected cells. In contrast, cells transfected with E1ASpm2 or Ad12 E1AdelCR2 (lacking the entire CR2) died within 6-10 weeks after replating, although foci were formed in all cases. Of note, the E1ASpm1-transformed cells grow as fast as the Ad2 E1Awt-transformed cells, with a doubling rate of 15 h, whereas the doubling of the Ad12 E1Awt-transformed cells takes approximately 120 h. Moreover, in the established cell lines, the affinity of E1ASpm1 to p105-Rb was higher than with that of E1Awt. Our data suggest the presence of a transformation-suppressing domain within the carboxyl-terminal 12 residues of the Ad12 E1A-unique spacer, whereas the hydrophobic stretch of six alanines in the spacer is required for stable transformation.