Unique properties of the large antigen of hepatitis delta virus

Hepatitis D Virus Replication

This work reviews specific related aspects of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) reproduction, including virion structure, the RNA genome, the mode of genome replication, the delta antigens, and the assembly of HDV using the envelope proteins of its helper virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV). These topics are considered with perspectives ranging from a history of discovery through to still-unsolved problems. HDV evolution, virus entry, and associated pathogenic potential and treatment of infections are considered in other articles in this collection.

Lysine-71 in the large delta antigen of hepatitis delta virus clade 3 modulates its localization and secretion

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is an RNA virus and eight clades of HDV have been identified. HDV clade 3 (HDV-3) is isolated only in the northern area of South America. The outcome of HDV-3 infection is associated with severe fulminant hepatitis. Variations in the large delta antigen (LDAg) between HDV clade 1 (HDV-1) and HDV-3 have been proposed to contribute to differences in viral secretion efficiency, but which changes might be relevant remains unclear. The control of subcellular localization of LDAg has been reported to be associated with post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation and isoprenylation. We have observed evidence for acetylation on the LDAg of HDV-3 (LDAg-3) and LDAg of HDV-1 (LDAg-1). Green fluorescent protein-fused LDAg-3 (GFP-LD3) was used to investigate the cellular distribution and secretion of the protein. Sequence alignment of LDAg amino acids suggested that lysine-71 of LDAg-3 could be an acetylation site. Expression of a mutant form of LDAg-3 with an arginine-substitution at lysine-71 (GFP-LD3K71R) showed a distribution of the protein predominantly in the cytoplasm instead of the nucleus. Western blot analyses of secreted empty viral particles (EVPs) revealed a higher amount of secreted GFP-LD3K71R compared to GFP-LD3. Furthermore, the ectopic expression of p300, a histone acetyltransferase, led to a reduction of GFP-LD3 in EVPs. By contrast, expression of three histone deacetylases (HDAC-4, -5, and -6) facilitated the secretion of GFP-LD3. Combined, our observations support the hypothesis that the acetylation status of LDAg-3 plays a role in regulating LDAg-3's localization inside the nucleus or cytoplasm, and its secretion.

Functional and clinical significance of hepatitis D virus genotype II infection

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection is one of the important etiologies of fulminant hepatitis and may aggravate the clinical course of chronic HBV infection to cirrhosis and liver failure. HDV was classified into three genotypes. Recent molecular phylogenetic analysis of HDV suggests at least seven major clades. The genotype I HDV is widely spread, genotype II is found in East Asia and genotype III HDV is prevalent in South America. The genomic size is 1682-1685 nucleotides (nt) for genotype II, and 1676 nt for genotype IV (IIb). The divergence in HDV nucleic acid sequences between genotype II and other genotypes varies from 13.8% to 35.3%. The divergences in the HDAg-coding region may range from 17.8% to 29.8% between genotype II and other genotypes. There is no genotypic or size restriction on the interactions of either the small or the large hepatitis delta antigens (HDAgs) between genotypes I and II, and there is also no genotypic incompatibility during co-package of HDAgs of different genotypes into virus like particles. There appears no apparent universal genotypic restriction of the transactivation of genotype I HDV RNA replication by small HDAg of genotype II. In contrast, there appears more genotypic restriction for genotype I small HDAgs to transactivate genotype II HDV RNA replication. Of the functional domains of HDAg, the 19 amino acids at the carboxyl-end of the large HDAg show the greatest divergences (70%-80%) between genotypes I and II. The viral packaging efficiencies of genotype I HDV isolates are usually higher than those of genotype II. The 19 amino acids at the carboxyl-end seem to be the most important determinant for viral packaging efficiencies. The editing efficiencies of the genotype I HDV are also higher than those of the genotype II. Genotype II HDV infection is relatively less frequently associated with fulminant hepatitis at the acute stage and less unfavorable outcomes [cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)] at the chronic stage as compared to genotype I. It appears that the clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients with genotype IV (IIb) HDV infection are more like those of patients with genotype II HDV infection. Persistent replication of HBV or HDV was associated with higher adverse outcomes (cirrhosis, HCC or mortality) compared to those who cleared both viruses from the sera. HBV of the genotype C is also a significant factor associated with adverse outcomes (cirrhosis, HCC or mortality) in patients with chronic hepatitis D in addition to genotype I HDV and age. However, most patients with chronic HDV infection have low or undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels. During longitudinal follow-up, genotype I HDV is the most important determinant associated with survival.

Post-translational modification of delta antigen of hepatitis D virus

The hepatitis delta virus (HDV) genome has only one open reading frame, which encodes the viral small delta antigen. After RNA editing, the same open reading frame is extended 19 amino acids at the carboxyl terminus and encodes the large delta antigen. These two viral proteins escort the HDV genome through different cellular compartments for the complicated phases of replication, transcription and, eventually, the formation of progeny virions. To orchestrate these events, the delta antigens have to take distinct cues to traffic to the right compartments and make correct molecular contacts. In eukaryotes, post-translational modification (PTM) is a major mechanism of dictating the multiple functions of a single protein. Multiple PTMs, including phosphorylation, isoprenylation, acetylation, and methylation, have been identified on hepatitis delta antigens. In this chapter we review these PTMs and discuss their functions in regulating and coordinating the life cycle of HDV.

Restoration in vivo of defective hepatitis delta virus RNA genomes

The 1679-nt single-stranded RNA genome of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is circular in conformation. It is able to fold into an unbranched rodlike structure via intramolecular base-pairing. This RNA is replicated by host RNA polymerase II (Pol II). Such transcription is unique, because Pol II is known only for its ability to act on DNA templates. The present study addressed the ability of the HDV RNA replication to tolerate insertions of up to 1000 nt of non-HDV sequence either at an end of the rodlike RNA structure or at a site embedded within the rod. The insertions did not interfere with the ability of primary transcripts to be processed in vivo by ribozyme cleavage and ligation. The insertions greatly reduced the ability of genomes to replicate. However, when total RNA from such transfected cells was used to transfect new recipient cells, replicating HDV RNAs could be detected by Northern analyses. The size of the emerged RNAs was consistent with loss of the inserted sequences. RT-PCR, cloning, and sequencing showed that recovery involved removal of inserted sequences with or without small deletions of adjacent RNA sequences. Such restoration of the RNA genome is consistent with a model requiring intramolecular template-switching (RNA recombination) during RNA-directed transcription, in combination with biological selection for maintenance of the rodlike structure of the template.

Action of inhibitors on accumulation of processed hepatitis delta virus RNAs

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) replication involves processing and accumulation of three RNA species: the genome, its exact complement (the antigenome), and a polyadenylated mRNA that acts as a template for the small delta antigen (deltaAg), the only protein of HDV and essential for genome replication. In a recently reported experimental system, addition of tetracycline induced synthesis of a DNA-directed source of deltaAg, producing within 24 h a significant increase in accumulation of newly transcribed and processed HDV RNAs. This induction was used here to study the action of various inhibitors on accumulation. For example, potent and HDV-specific inhibition, in the absence of detected host toxicity, could be obtained with ribavirin, mycophenolic acid, and viramidine. An interpretation is that these inhibitors reduced the available GTP pool, leading to a specific inhibition of the synthesis and accumulation of HDV RNA-directed RNA species. In contrast, no inhibition was observed with L-FMAU (2'-fluoro-5-methyl-beta-L-arabinofuranosyl-uridine), alpha interferon, or pegylated alpha interferon. After modifications to the experimental system, it was also possible to examine the effects of three known host RNA polymerase inhibitors on HDV genome replication: amanitin, 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB), and actinomycin. Of most interest, amanitin at low doses blocked accumulation of HDV RNA-directed mRNA but had less effect on HDV genomic and antigenomic RNAs. Additional experiments indicated that this apparent resistance to amanitin inhibition of genomic and antigenomic RNA relative to mRNA may not reflect a difference in the transcribing polymerase but rather relative differences in the processing and stabilization of nascent RNA transcripts.

Roles of carboxyl-terminal and farnesylated residues in the functions of the large hepatitis delta antigen

The large hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg-L) mediates hepatitis delta virus (HDV) assembly and inhibits HDV RNA replication. Farnesylation of the cysteine residue within the HDAg-L carboxyl terminus is required for both functions. Here, HDAg-L proteins from different HDV genotypes and genotype chimeric proteins were analyzed for their ability to incorporate into virus-like particles (VLPs). Observed differences in efficiency of VLP incorporation could be attributed to genotype-specific differences within the HDAg-L carboxyl terminus. Using a novel assay to quantify the extent of HDAg-L farnesylation, we found that genotype 3 HDAg-L was inefficiently farnesylated when expressed in the absence of the small hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg-S). However, as the intracellular ratio of HDAg-S to HDAg-L was increased, so too was the extent of HDAg-L farnesylation for all three genotypes. Single point mutations within the carboxyl terminus of HDAg-L were screened, and three mutants that severely inhibited assembly without affecting farnesylation were identified. The observed assembly defects persisted under conditions where the mutants were known to have access to the site of VLP assembly. Therefore, the corresponding residues within the wild-type protein are likely required for direct interaction with viral envelope proteins. Finally, it was observed that when HDAg-S was artificially myristoylated, it could efficiently inhibit HDV RNA replication. Hence, a general association with membranes enables HDAg to inhibit replication. In contrast, although myristoylated HDAg-S was incorporated into VLPs far more efficiently than HDAg-S or nonfarnesylated HDAg-L, it was incorporated far less efficiently than wild-type HDAg-L; thus, farnesylation was required for efficient assembly.

Varied immunity generated in mice by DNA vaccines with large and small hepatitis delta antigens

Whether the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) DNA vaccine can induce anti-HDV antibodies has been debatable. The role of the isoprenylated motif of hepatitis delta antigens (HDAg) in the generation of immune responses following DNA-based immunization has never been studied. Plasmids p2577L, encoding large HDAg (L-HDAg), p2577S, expressing small HDAg (S-HDAg), and p25L-211S, encoding a mutant form of L-HDAg with a cysteine-to-serine mutation at codon 211, were constructed in this study. Mice were intramuscularly injected with the plasmids. The anti-HDV antibody titers, T-cell proliferation responses, T-helper responses, and HDV-specific, gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)-producing CD8(+) T cells were analyzed. Animals immunized with p2577S showed a strong anti-HDV antibody response. Conversely, only a low titer of anti-HDV antibodies was detected in mice immunized with p2577L. Epitope mapping revealed that the anti-HDV antibodies generated by p2577L vaccination hardly reacted with epitope amino acids 174 to 194, located at the C terminus of S-HDAg. All of the HDAg-encoding plasmids could induce significant T-cell proliferation responses and generate Th1 responses and HDV-specific, IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells. In conclusion, HDAg-specific antibodies definitely exist following DNA vaccination. The magnitudes of the humoral immune responses generated by L-HDAg- and S-HDAg-encoding DNA vaccines are different. The isoprenylated motif can mask epitope amino acids 174 to 195 of HDAg but does not interfere with cellular immunity following DNA-based immunization. These findings are important for the choice of a candidate HDV DNA vaccine in the future.

Novel features of dFMR1, the Drosophila orthologue of the fragile X mental retardation protein

FMRP belongs to a family of widely expressed proteins that contain RNA-binding domains. Although lack of human FMRP results in mental retardation, correlated with subtle synaptic changes, the precise role of FMRP remains elusive. The Drosophila genome contains a single gene homologous to the FXR family. We show that dFMR1 is subjected to transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation during development and that it homomerizes, like its human counterpart. dFMR1 profile of expression recapitulates that of the human FXR protein family: it is highly enriched in muscles, in central nervous system and in gonads. In the larval brain, anti-dFMR1 also recognizes mushroom bodies, a centre that mediates learning and memory. These features make the fly an ideal system to analyse the role of the FXR family and to identify genes in the FMRP pathway.

Varied assembly and RNA editing efficiencies between genotypes I and II hepatitis D virus and their implications

The mechanisms that link genotypes of hepatitis D virus (HDV) with clinical outcomes have not yet been elucidated. Genotypic variations are unevenly distributed along the sequences of hepatitis delta antigens (HDAgs). Of these variations, the packaging signal at the C-terminus has a divergence of 74% between genotypes I and II. In this report, we address the issue of whether these high variations between genotypes affect assembly efficiency of HDV particles and editing efficiency of RNA. Viral package systems of transfection with expression plasmids of hepatitis B surface antigen and HDAgs or whole genomes of HDV consistently indicate that the package efficiency of genotype I HDV is higher than that of genotype II. Segment swapping of large-form HDAg indicates that the C-terminal 19-residue region plays a key role for the varied assembly efficiencies. Also, the editing efficiency of genotype I HDV is higher than that of genotype II. The nucleotide and structural changes surrounding the editing site may explain why genotype II HDV has a low RNA editing efficiency. The findings of in vitro assembly systems were further supported by the observations that patients infected with genotype II had significantly lower alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, more favorable outcomes (P <.05), and a trend to have lower serum HDV RNA levels as compared with those infected with genotype I HDV (P =.094). In conclusion, genotype II HDV secretes fewer viral particles than genotype I HDV does, which in turn may reduce the extent of infection of hepatocytes and result in less severe hepatic inflammation.

The HDV large-delta antigen fused with GFP remains functional and provides for studying its dynamic distribution

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) requires the isoprenylated large delta antigen (LDAg) for interaction with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) to allow packaging and secretion out of the host cell. Phosphorylated LDAg has been found but, as yet, neither localization of LDAg within the nucleus nor any other function has been correlated with modification. In this study, we transfected HuH-7 or HeLa cells with plasmids encoding various lengths of LDAg [designated GFP-LD and GFP-LD(31-214) for full length and a deletion, respectively] or non-isoprenylated mutants of these [designated GFP-LDM and GFP-LD(31-214)M] fused to the green fluorescent protein (GFP). These fusion proteins were then characterized and it was found that: (i) the addition of the GFP did not interfere with the functioning of the full-length or N-terminally deleted LDAgs when interacting with HBsAg for secretion; (ii) the HDV small antigen (SDAg) together with the GFP-LD, but not the GFP-LD(31-214), could be cosecreted by HBsAg; and (iii) the GFP-LD, but not the GFP-LD(31-214), exerted a dominant-negative role on HDV genome replication. Analyses of transiently transfected cells and postmitotic permanent cells revealed the sequential appearance of GFP-LD in the nucleoplasm, then in the nucleolus, and finally in nuclear speckles (NS). Isoprenylation of LDAg seems to be important for targeting to and accumulating in the NS, which was evident from the dynamic and static localization of the non-isoprenylation mutant (GFP-LDM) and the distribution of wild-type (GFP-LD) when treated with an isoprenylation inhibitor, lovastatin, for more than 48 h. Permanently expressing GFP-LD cells allowed us to show the dynamic redistribution of dephosphorylated GFP-LD from the nucleolus to the SC-35 containing NS in the presence of dichlororibofuranosyl benzimidazole (DRB) and then the translocation back of the GFP-LD to the nucleolus within 2 h after removal of DRB. Our studies thus suggest that the various versions of the GFP-LD fusion protein, having the same function as their nonfusion counterparts, can be a powerful tool for the study of the dynamic localization of LDAg when correlated with the functional modification of this protein.

Interactions between hepatitis delta virus proteins

The 195- and 214-amino-acid (aa) forms of the delta protein (deltaAg-S and deltaAg-L, respectively) of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) differ only in the 19-aa C-terminal extension unique to deltaAg-L. deltaAg-S is needed for genome replication, while deltaAg-L is needed for particle assembly. These proteins share a region at aa 12 to 60, which mediates protein-protein interactions essential for HDV replication. H. Zuccola et al. (Structure 6:821-830, 1998) reported a crystal structure for a peptide spanning this region which demonstrates an antiparallel coiled-coil dimer interaction with the potential to form tetramers of dimers. Our studies tested whether predictions based on this structure could be extrapolated to conditions where the peptide was replaced by full-length deltaAg-S or deltaAg-L, and when the assays were not in vitro but in vivo. Nine amino acids that are conserved between several isolates of HDV and predicted to be important in multimerization were mutated to alanine on both deltaAg-S and deltaAg-L. We found that the predicted hierarchy of importance of these nine mutations correlated to a significant extent with the observed in vivo effects on the ability of these proteins to (i) support in trans the replication of the HDV genome when expressed on deltaAg-S and (ii) act as dominant-negative inhibitors of replication when expressed on deltaAg-L. We thus infer that these biological activities of deltaAg depend on ordered protein-protein interactions.