Function of the intercistronic region of BRLF1-BZLF1 bicistronic mRNA in translating the zta protein of Epstein-Barr virus

Expression of Rta in B Lymphocytes during Epstein-Barr Virus Latency

Rta of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is thought to be expressed only during the lytic cycle to promote the transcription of lytic genes. However, we found that Rta is expressed in EBV-infected B cells during viral latency, at levels detectable by immunoblot analysis. Latent Rta expression cannot be attributed to spontaneous lytic activation, as we observed that more than 90% of Akata, P3HR1, and 721 cells latently infected by EBV express Rta. We further found that Rta is sequestered in the nucleolus during EBV latency through its interaction with MCRS2, a nucleolar protein. When Rta is sequestered in the nucleolus, it no longer activates RNA polymerase II-driven transcription, thus explaining why Rta expression during latency does not transactivate EBV lytic genes. Additional experiments showed that Rta can bind to 18S rRNA and become incorporated into ribosomes, and a transient transfection experiment showed that Rta promotes translation from an mRNA reporter. These findings reveal that Rta has novel functions beyond transcriptional activation during EBV latency and may have interesting implications for the concept of EBV latency.

MicroRNA miR-BART20-5p stabilizes Epstein-Barr virus latency by directly targeting BZLF1 and BRLF1

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus associated with various tumors. Rather than going through the lytic cycle, EBV maintains latency by limiting the expression of viral genes in tumors. Viral microRNAs (miRNAs) of some herpesviruses have been reported to directly target immediate early genes and suppress lytic induction. In this study, we investigated whether BamHI-A rightward transcript (BART) miRNAs targeted two EBV immediate early genes, BZLF1 and BRLF1. Bioinformatic analysis predicted that 12 different BART miRNAs would target BRLF1. Of these, the results of a luciferase reporter assay indicated that only one interacted with the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of BRLF1: miR-BART20-5p. miR-BART20-5p's effect on gene expression involved two putative seed match sites in the BRLF1 3' UTR, but a mutant version of the miRNA, miR-BART20-5pm, had no effect on expression. As expected from the fact that the entire 3' UTR of BZLF1 resides within the 3' UTR of BRLF1, miR-BART20-5p interacted with the 3' UTR of BZLF1 as well. BZLF1 and BRLF1 mRNA and protein expression was suppressed in cells of an AGS cell line infected with the recombinant Akata strain of EBV (AGS-EBV) transfected with a miR-BART20-5p mimic. The expression of various EBV early proteins was also suppressed by the miR-BART20-5p mimic. In contrast, BZLF1 and BRLF1 expression in AGS-EBV cells transfected with a miR-BART20-5p inhibitor was enhanced. Furthermore, progeny virus production was suppressed by the miR-BART20-5p mimic and enhanced by the miR-BART20-5p inhibitor in AGS-EBV cells induced for the lytic cycle. Our data suggest that miR-BART20-5p plays a key role in latency maintenance in EBV-associated tumors by directly targeting immediate early genes.

IMPORTANCE

Herpesviruses maintain latency using various mechanisms and establish lifelong infection in the host. From time to time, herpesviruses are reactivated and express immediate early genes which trigger a lytic cascade, leading to the production of progeny viruses. Recently, some herpesviruses have been shown to use their own microRNAs (miRNAs) to downregulate immediate early genes to inhibit the lytic cycle. This study presents evidence that EBV also downregulates two immediate early genes by miR-BART20-5p to suppress the lytic cycle and progeny virus production. Overall, this is the first study to report the direct regulation of EBV immediate early genes by an EBV miRNA, implying its likely importance in latency maintenance in EBV-associated tumors.

Alternative ways to think about mRNA sequences and proteins that appear to promote internal initiation of translation

Translation of some mRNAs is postulated to occur via an internal initiation mechanism which is said to be augmented by a variety of RNA-binding proteins. A pervasive problem is that the RNA sequences to which the proteins bind were not rigorously proven to function as internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs). Critical examination of the evidence reveals flaws that leave room for alternative interpretations, such as the possibility that IRES elements might function as cryptic promoters, splice sites, or sequences that modulate cleavage by RNases. The growing emphasis on IRES-binding proteins diverts attention from these fundamental unresolved issues. Many of the putative IRES-binding proteins are heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins that have recognized roles in RNA processing or stability and no recognized role in translation. Thus the mechanism whereby they promote internal initiation, if indeed they do, is not obvious. Some recent experiments were said to support the idea that IRES-binding proteins cause functionally important changes in folding of the RNA, but the evidence is not convincing when examined closely. The proteins that bind to some (not all) viral IRES elements include a subset of authentic initiation factors. This has not been demonstrated with any candidate IRES of cellular origin, however; and even with viral RNAs, the required chase experiment has not been done to prove that a pre-bound initiation factor actually mediates subsequent entry of ribosomes. In short, the focus on IRES-binding proteins has gotten us no closer to understanding the mechanism of internal initiation. Given the aforementioned uncertainty about whether other mechanisms (splicing, cryptic promoters) might underlie what-appears-to-be internal initiation, a temporary solution might be to redefine IRES to mean "internal regulatory expression sequence." This compromise would allow the sequences to be used for gene expression studies, for which they sometimes work, without asserting more than has been proven about the mechanism.