Effect of rifampin on the development of ribonucleic acid bacteriophage Q

Replication of RNA bacteriophages in the presence of rifamycin

Replication of RNA bacteriophages in the presence of rifamycin was studied in different Escherichia coli strains that vary in RNase content but are not isogenic: AB259 RNase+, Q13 RNase I- PNPase-, AB105 RNase I- RNase III-. It was found that rifamycin did not affect characteristics of phage replication such as the general pattern of viral RNA synthesis and intracellular development of the phage. These characteristics are strain specific and independent of the cell growth rate, which defines only phage release. The inhibition of cell division by rifamycin interfered with the release of the phage and thus produced an apparent effect of rifamycin on phage replication.

Effect of rifampicin on the infectivity of RNA bacteriophage f2

RNA bacteriophage f2, treated in vitro with rifampicin, loses infectivity dramatically. Rifampicin interacts with phage RNA, binding to a few specific sites. Inhibition of phage RNA infectivity occurs at 10-100 times lower molar excess of rifampicin than inhibition of infectivity of intact phage particles. Thus the phage capsid acts as a barrier, diminishing interaction of the drug with phage RNA.

Discriminative effect of rifampin of RNA replication of various RNA bacteriophages

Rifampin interferes exclusively with RNA replication in vivo of the group I phages MS2, f2, and R17, whereas QbetaRNA replication is unaffected by the drug. In addition, rifampin has a discriminative effect of group I phage RNA replication. In the experimental system employed by us the antibiotic differentially interferes with the synthesis of minus RNA strands in f2, whereas it has almost no effect on the synthesis of progeny plus strands. In MS2, the drug differentially arrests the synthesis of progeny plus strands and almost fails to affect the synthesis of minus RNA strands. In R17 both steps of its RNA replication are affected by rifampin, although each step is only partially (approximately 50%) inhibited. The relation of the present results to the possible role of bacterial proteins and tertiary structure of phage RNA in the process of template recognition is discussed.