Octamer and SPH motifs in the U1 enhancer cooperate to activate U1 RNA gene expression

The ubiquitous transcriptional protein ZNF143 activates a diversity of genes while assisting to organize chromatin structure

Zinc Finger Protein 143 (ZNF143) is a pervasive C2H2 zinc-finger transcriptional activator protein regulating the efficiency of eukaryotic promoter regions. ZNF143 is able to activate transcription at both protein coding genes and small RNA genes transcribed by either RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III. Target genes regulated by ZNF143 are involved in an array of different cellular processes including both cancer and development. Although a key player in regulating eukaryotic genes, the molecular mechanism by with ZNF143 binds and activates genes transcribed by two different polymerases is still relatively unknown. In addition to its role as a transcriptional regulator, recent genomics experiments have implicated ZNF143 as a potential co-factor involved in chromatin looping and establishing higher order structure within the genome. This review focuses primarily on possible activation mechanisms of promoters by ZNF143, with less emphasis on the role of ZNF143 in cancer and development, and its function in establishing higher order chromatin contacts within the genome.

Identification of a SPH element in the distal region of a human U6 small nuclear RNA gene promoter and characterization of the SPH binding factor in HeLa cell extracts

Vertebrate small nuclear RNA (snRNA) gene promoters contain a distal, enhancer-like region that is composed of an octamer motif adjacent to at least one other element. Here we show that a human U6 snRNA distal region contains a SPH motif previously found in several chicken snRNA gene enhancers and the 5'-flanking region of vertebrate selenocysteine tRNA genes. SPH binding factor (SBF) was detected in either chicken or HeLa cell extracts that could bind SPH elements in a species-independent manner. Both human and chicken SBF required divalent cation to bind effectively to DNA. DNase I footprinting experiments indicated that human SBF specifically protected the human U6 SPH element. Furthermore, a SBF polypeptide of approximately 85 kDa was detected in both HeLa and chicken extracts following ultraviolet light-mediated cross-linking to human U6 or chicken U4 SPH elements. A part of the human U6 SPH element was quite sensitive to mutation, as demonstrated by both specific protein binding and transcription assays. From these data it is apparent that the distal regions of some RNA polymerase III- and RNA polymerase II-transcribed small RNA promoters are virtually identical in composition, and their mechanisms of transcriptional activation are possibly quite similar.

The transcriptional activator ZNF143 is essential for normal development in zebrafish

Background

ZNF143 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that stimulates transcription of both small RNA genes by RNA polymerase II or III, or protein-coding genes by RNA polymerase II, using separable activating domains. We describe phenotypic effects following knockdown of this protein in developing Danio rerio (zebrafish) embryos by injection of morpholino antisense oligonucleotides that target znf143 mRNA.

Results

The loss of function phenotype is pleiotropic and includes a broad array of abnormalities including defects in heart, blood, ear and midbrain hindbrain boundary. Defects are rescued by coinjection of synthetic mRNA encoding full-length ZNF143 protein, but not by protein lacking the amino-terminal activation domains. Accordingly, expression of several marker genes is affected following knockdown, including GATA-binding protein 1 (gata1), cardiac myosin light chain 2 (cmlc2) and paired box gene 2a (pax2a). The zebrafish pax2a gene proximal promoter contains two binding sites for ZNF143, and reporter gene transcription driven by this promoter in transfected cells is activated by this protein.

Conclusions

Normal development of zebrafish embryos requires ZNF143. Furthermore, the pax2a gene is probably one example of many protein-coding gene targets of ZNF143 during zebrafish development.

Differential alterations in metabolic pattern of the spliceosomal uridylic acid-rich small nuclear RNAs (UsnRNAs) during malignant transformation of 20-methylcholanthrene-induced mouse CNCI-PM-20 embryonic fibroblasts

Differential alterations of the spliceosomal Uridylic acid rich small nuclear RNAs (UsnRNAs) (U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6) are reported to be associated with cellular proliferation and development, but definitive information is scarce and also elusive. An attempt is made in this study to analyze the metabolic patterns of major spliceosomal UsnRNAs, during tumor development, in an in vitro carcinogenesis model of 20-methylcholanthrene (MCA)-transformed Swiss Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast (MEF), designated as CNCI-PM-20. MEF cells, after treatment with 20-MCA, progressed through a sequence of passages with distinct and heritable changes, finally becoming neoplastic at passage-42 (P42). A differential expression pattern of major UsnRNAs was observed during this process. The abundance of U1 was 20% below control (P1) at passage-20 (P20), followed by a gradual increase up until P42 (approximately 12% above the P1 value). The abundance of U2 was more or less constant during the cellular transformation. U4 showed a trend of increase, with above 30% abundance than control at P20, followed by a significant increase at P36 and P42 (1.5- and 2-fold, respectively, P-value <0.01). U5 also followed an identical pattern, with an increase of 70% compared to control (P-value <0.05) at P42. Interestingly, U6 gradually decreased from P20 onwards up until P42, with 22% at P20 and 67% at P42 (P-value <0.01). An overall significant quantitative alteration in abundance of U4, U5, and U6, observed in our study, contributes to the understanding of the fact that, the metabolism of major spliceosomal UsnRNAs is differentially regulated during the process of neoplastic transformation.

Zebrafish U6 small nuclear RNA gene promoters contain a SPH element in an unusual location

Promoters for vertebrate small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes contain a relatively simple array of transcriptional control elements, divided into proximal and distal regions. Most of these genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (e.g., U1, U2), whereas the U6 gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase III. Previously identified vertebrate U6 snRNA gene promoters consist of a proximal sequence element (PSE) and TATA element in the proximal region, plus a distal region with octamer (OCT) and SphI postoctamer homology (SPH) elements. We have found that zebrafish U6 snRNA promoters contain the SPH element in a novel proximal position immediately upstream of the TATA element. The zebrafish SPH element is recognized by SPH-binding factor/selenocysteine tRNA gene transcription activating factor/zinc finger protein 143 (SBF/Staf/ZNF143) in vitro. Furthermore, a zebrafish U6 promoter with a defective SPH element is inefficiently transcribed when injected into embryos.

Differential Alterations in Metabolic Pattern of the Spliceosomal UsnRNAs during Pre-Malignant Lung Lesions Induced by Benzo(a)pyrene: Modulation by Tea Polyphenols

The differential alterations of the spliceosomal UsnRNAs (U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6) were reported to be associated with cellular proliferation and development. The attempt was made in this study to analyze the metabolic pattern of the spliceosomal UsnRNAs during the development of pre-malignant lung lesions induced in experimental mice model system by benzo(a)pyrene (BP) and also to see how tea polyphenols, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and epicatechin gallate (ECG), modulate the metabolism of these UsnRNAs during the lung carcinogenesis. No significant changes in the level of the UsnRNAs were seen in the inflammatory lung lesions at 9th week due to treatment of BP. However, there was significant increase in the level of U1 ( approximately 2.5 fold) and U5 ( approximately 47%) in the hyperplastic lung lesions at 17th week. But in the mild dysplastic lung lesions at 26th week, the level of UsnRNAs did not change significantly. Whereas, in the dysplastic lung lesions at 36th week there was significant increase in the level of the U2 ( approximately 2 fold), U4 ( approximately 2.5 fold) and U5 ( approximately 2 fold). Due to the EGCG and ECG treatment the lung lesions at 9th week appeared normal and in the 17th, 26th, and 36th week it appeared as hyperplasia. The level of the UsnRNAs was significantly low in the lung lesions at 9th week (only U2 and U4 by EGCG), at 17th week (only U1 by EGCG/ECG), at 26th week (U1 by ECG; U2, U4 and U5 by EGCG/ECG) and at 36th week (U1 by ECG, U2 and U4 by EGCG/ECG). Whereas, there was significant increase in the level of U5 (by EGCG/ECG) and U6 (by EGCG only) in the lung lesions at 36th and 26th week respectively. This indicates that the metabolism of the spliceosomal UsnRNAs differentially altered during the development of pre-malignant lung lesions by BP as well as during the modulation of the lung lesions by the tea polyphenols.

The Drosophila U1 and U6 gene proximal sequence elements act as important determinants of the RNA polymerase specificity of small nuclear RNA gene promoters in vitro and in vivo

Transcription of genes coding for metazoan spliceosomal snRNAs by RNA polymerase II (U1, U2, U4, U5) or RNA polymerase III (U6) is dependent upon a unique, positionally conserved regulatory element referred to as the proximal sequence element (PSE). Previous studies in the organism Drosophila melanogaster indicated that as few as three nucleotide differences in the sequences of the U1 and U6 PSEs can play a decisive role in recruiting the different RNA polymerases to transcribe the U1 and U6 snRNA genes in vitro. Those studies utilized constructs that contained only the minimal promoter elements of the U1 and U6 genes in an artificial context. To overcome the limitations of those earlier studies, we have now performed experiments that demonstrate that the Drosophila U1 and U6 PSEs have functionally distinct properties even in the environment of the natural U1 and U6 gene 5'-flanking DNAs. Moreover, assays in cells and in transgenic flies indicate that expression of genes from promoters that contain the "incorrect" PSE is suppressed in vivo. The Drosophila U6 PSE is incapable of recruiting RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription from the U1 promoter region, and the U1 PSE is unable to recruit RNA polymerase III to transcribe the U6 gene.

Maximization of selenocysteine tRNA and U6 small nuclear RNA transcriptional activation achieved by flexible utilization of a Staf zinc finger

Transcriptional activators Staf and Oct-1 play critical roles in the activation of small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and snRNA-type gene transcription. Recently, we established that Staf binding to the human U6 snRNA (hU6) and Xenopus selenocysteine tRNA (xtRNA(Sec)) genes requires different sets of the seven C2-H2 zinc fingers. In this work, using a combination of oocyte microinjection, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and missing nucleoside experiments with wild-type and mutant promoters, we demonstrate that the hU6 gene requires zinc fingers 2-7 for Staf binding and Oct-1 for maximal transcriptional activity. In contrast, the xtRNA(Sec) gene needs the binding of the seven Staf zinc fingers, but not Oct-1, for optimal transcriptional capacity. Mutation in the binding site for Staf zinc finger 1 in the tRNA(Sec) promoter reduced both Staf binding and transcriptional activity. Conversely, introduction of a zinc finger 1 binding site in the hU6 promoter increased Staf binding but interfered with the simultaneous Staf and Oct-1 binding, thus reducing transcriptional activity. Collectively, these results show that the differential utilization of Staf zinc finger 1 represents a new, critical determinant of the transcriptional activation mechanism for the Xenopus tRNA(Sec) and human U6 snRNA genes.

Effect of anthracycline antitumor antibiotics (adriamycin and nogalamycin) and cycloheximide on the biosynthesis and processing of major UsnRNAs

In the present study, anthracycline antitumor antibiotics (e.g. adriamycin and nogalamycin), the potent RNA synthesis inhibitors and cycloheximide, the protein synthesis inhibitor, have been used to understand the events of biosynthesis and processing of major UsnRNAs (U1-U6). The anthracyclines inhibit the UsnRNAs biosynthesis (in terms of labelling) differentially in a dose dependent manner. The inhibitory effect of adriamycin and nogalamycin reached plateau at a concentration of 2.5 micrograms/ 10(6) cells/ml and 0.1 microgram/10(6) cells/ml respectively and indicates that nogalamycin is more inhibitory than adriamycin. The inhibition of the UsnRNAs synthesis (in terms of labelling) became maximum within 30 min of incubation and remained unaltered even after 2 h. Thus, it shows that the anthracyclines preferentially inhibit the initiation of the UsnRNA genes' transcription as it has been seen in cases of other large RNAs' synthesis by some other laboratories. The higher inhibitory effect of the anthracyclines on the biosynthesis of U5 and U6 compared to other UsnRNAs indicates the presence of more binding sites on the U5 and U6 snRNA genes. In presence of the anthracyclines, there was high retention of cytoplasmic major pre-UsnRNAs/ UsnRNAs which indicates that the elongation of the UsnRNA synthesis is probably impaired along with initiation; because for the proper processing of the pre-UsnRNAs, formation of the correct secondary structure of that pre-UsnRNA is necessary. Cycloheximide showed some differential effect on the pol II transcribed UsnRNAs (U1-U5) biosynthesis (in terms of labelling) however it has no effect on the pol III transcribed U6 snRNA. It implies that in the pol II transcribed UsnRNAs, some transacting labile factors, either activator or inhibitor, are involved. Whereas, the processing of the UsnRNAs (either pol II or pol III transcribed) was affected more or less in a similar fashion in presence of cycloheximide, indicating the involvement of some transacting labile factors in this event.

Identification of proximal sequence element nucleotides contributing to the differential expression of variant U4 small nuclear RNA genes

The two U4 genes in the chicken genome code for distinct sequence variants of U4 small nuclear RNA that are differentially expressed during development. Whereas U4B RNA is constitutively expressed, U4X RNA is specifically down-regulated relative to U4B in a tissue-specific manner during development. To investigate mechanisms controlling the differential expression of the U4B and U4X genes, chimeric U4 genes were constructed and their transcriptional activities assayed by injection into Xenopus oocytes or by transfection of CV-1 cells. The proximal regulatory region of the U4B gene and the enhancers of both the U4B and U4X genes functioned efficiently in each expression system. However, the proximal region of the U4X gene was inactive. To localize and identify the responsible nucleotides, reciprocal point mutations were introduced into the U4X and U4B proximal regulatory regions. The results indicate that the U4X gene contains a suboptimal proximal sequence element, and that this results primarily from the identities of the nucleotides at positions -61 and -57 relative to the transcription start site.

Changes in UsnRNA biosynthesis during rat liver regeneration

Partial hepatectomy (P.H.) induces a partially synchronized growth response of liver under normal regulation of growth. In this phase changes in cellular morphology, radial distribution pattern of cells and other biological as well as major biochemical changes are well documented. Here, we have shown that the cellular content of UsnRNAs altered during this proliferative phase as well. The level of spliceosomal UsnRNAs (U1, U2, U4-U6) gradually decreased by 30-50% upto 48 hrs of P.H. followed by gradual increase to reach the normal level within one month of P.H. The U3 snRNA level on the other hand, was nearly equal to that in normal liver at 48 hrs of P.H. but in 24 and 72 hrs of P.H. its level was high (4 fold) in contrast to that in other UsnRNAs. Thus, it is clear from our data that the level of all the six UsnRNAs decreased during 48 hrs of P.H. compared to that after first 24 hrs. This has been correlated in the kinetics of UsnRNAs' synthesis (in terms of labelling) in isolated hepatocytes, where the rate of labelling of all the six UsnRNAs increased 20-30% in 24 hrs regenerating hepatocytes (R.H.) followed by sharp decrease by 30-50% within next 24 hrs, compared to that in the normal hepatocytes. But from 72 hrs onwards in R.H. the rate of labelling of all the six UsnRNAs again increased by 30-50% (compared to that in normal hepatocytes) followed by decrease of their labelling-rate to reach the normal level in R.H. within one month of P.H.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Changes in UsnRNA biosynthesis during rat liver regeneration

Partial hepatectomy (P.H.) induces a partially synchronized growth response of liver under normal regulation of growth. In this phase changes in cellular morphology, radial distribution pattern of cells and other biological as well as major biochemical changes are well documented [24]. Here, we have shown that the cellular content of UsnRNAs altered during this proliferative phase as well. The level of spliceosomal UsnRNAs (U1, U2, U4-U6) gradually decreased by 30-50% upto 48 hrs of P.H. followed by gradual increase to reach the normal level within one month of P.H. The U3 snRNA level on the other hand, was nearly equal to that in normal liver at 48 hrs of P.H. but in 24 and 72 hrs of P.H. its level was high (4 fold) in contrast to that in other UsnRNAs. Thus, it is clear from our data that the level of all the six UsnRNAs decreased during 48 hrs of P.H. compared to that after first 24 hrs. This has been correlated in the kinetics of UsnRNAs' synthesis (in terms of labelling) in isolated hepatocytes, where the rate of labelling of all the six UsnRNAs increased 20-30% in 24 hrs regenerating hepatocytes (R.H.) followed by sharp decrease by 30-50% within next 24 hrs, compared to that in the normal hepatocytes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A factor with Sp1 DNA-binding specificity stimulates Xenopus U6 snRNA in vivo transcription by RNA polymerase III

We have previously shown that transcription of the Xenopus U6 snRNA gene by RNA polymerase III is stimulated in injected Xenopus oocytes by an activator element termed the DSE, which contains an octamer sequence. Data presented here reveal that the DSE contains, in addition, a GC-rich sequence capable of binding Sp1. Both elements are required to obtain wild-type levels of U6 transcription in vivo. The Xenopus U6 DSE exhibits optimal activation properties only when positioned at its normal location upstream from the start site. The U6 Sp1 motif binds the mammalian Sp1 transcriptional activator independently of the Oct-1 protein in vitro. Those mutations that lead to a reduced transcription level in vivo abolish the binding of Sp1 in vitro. Thus, transcriptional stimulation through the Xenopus U6 Sp1 motif is likely to be mediated by a protein with DNA-binding specificity identical to mammalian Sp1. These findings support the notion that RNA polymerase II and III transcription complexes share transactivators.

Differential protein-DNA interactions at the promoter and enhancer regions of developmentally regulated U4 snRNA genes

In the chicken genome there are two closely-linked genes, U4B and U4X, that code for different sequence variants of U4 small nuclear RNA (snRNA). Both genes are expressed with nearly equal efficiency in the early embryo, but U4X gene expression is specifically down-regulated relative to U4B as development proceeds. At the present time, little is known about the mechanisms that regulate differential expression of snRNA genes. We have now identified a novel chicken factor, PPBF, that binds sequence-specifically in vitro to the proximal regulatory region of the U4X gene, but not to the proximal region of the U4B gene. PPBF is itself regulated during development and may therefore be a key factor involved in differentially regulating U4X gene transcription relative to U4B. The U4X and U4B enhancers contain distinct sequence variants of two essential motifs (octamer and SPH). The Oct-1 transcription factor binds with similar affinities to both the U4X and U4B octamer motifs. However, a second essential snRNA enhancer-binding protein, SBF, has a 20- to 30-fold lower affinity for the SPH motif in the U4X enhancer than for the homologous SPH motif in the U4B enhancer. A potential role therefore exists for SBF, as well as PPBF, in the preferential down-regulation of the U4X RNA gene during chicken development.

Sequence, organization and transcriptional analysis of a gene encoding a U1 snRNA from the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum

AmU1, a DNA fragment containing a U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA)-encoding gene, was isolated from the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Although this U1 snRNA, produced in axolotl oocytes, exhibits the lowest degree of sequence conservation among vertebrates, its secondary structure is maintained by a number of compensatory base changes. The proximal sequence element (PSE) is only weakly similar to that of the previously characterized Xenopus laevis PSE. Exchanging either the entire upstream regions with their X. laevis U1 (XlU1) homologues or only the PSE with the XlU1 PSE increases the transcription rate of the AmU1 gene to a level similar to that of the XlU1 gene. However, while allowing the AmU1 gene to be transcribed with high efficiency in X. laevis oocytes, the strict swapping of the 12-bp constituting the XlU1 PSE does not confer competitive ability to the AmU1 gene. We present evidence that the PSE is the major, but not the only element responsible for the low template activity of the AmU1 gene in X. laevis oocytes and our data suggest that other sequences, perhaps flanking the PSE, might also influence the binding of factor(s) participating in the assembly of the transcription complex.

Induction of an altered DNA conformation by an inversion rearrangement in the 5'-flanking DNA of a U1 RNA gene

The anomalous electrophoretic behavior of a 686 base pair restriction fragment containing an in vitro-generated inversion mutation within the enhancer region of a chicken U1 RNA gene was investigated. This DNA fragment migrated with an abnormally slow mobility in polyacrylamide gels but migrated normally in agarose gels relative to the wild type fragment of identical size and base composition. In polyacrylamide gels, the degree of retardation was enhanced at low temperature, a phenomenon associated with bent DNA. A putative site of bending was localized at or near one end of the inverted region. These data suggest that the altered DNA conformation results from the juxtaposition of two normally remote DNA sequences.