Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Molecular Regulation of Circadian Chromatin

Circadian rhythms are generated by transcriptional negative feedback loops and require histone modifications and chromatin remodeling to ensure appropriate timing and amplitude of clock gene expression. Circadian modifications to histones are important for transcriptional initiation and feedback inhibition serving as signaling platform for chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Current models indicate circadian-regulated facultative heterochromatin (CRFH) is a conserved mechanism at clock genes in Neurospora, Drosophila, and mice. CRFH consists of antiphasic rhythms in activating and repressive modifications generating chromatin states that cycle between transcriptionally permissive and nonpermissive. There are rhythms in histone H3 lysine 9 and 27 acetylation (H3K9ac and H3K27ac) and histone H3 lysine 4 methylation (H3K4me) during activation; while deacetylation, histone H3 lysine 9 methylation (H3K9me) and heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) are hallmarks of repression. ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes control accessibility, nucleosome positioning/occupancy, and nuclear organization. In Neurospora, the rhythm in facultative heterochromatin is mediated by the frequency (frq) natural antisense transcript (NAT) qrf. While in mammals, histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferase (KMT1/SUV39), and components of nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) are part of the nuclear PERIOD complex (PER complex). Genomics efforts have found relationships among rhythmic chromatin modifications at clock-controlled genes (ccg) revealing circadian control of genome-wide chromatin states. There are also circadian clock-regulated lncRNAs with an emerging function that includes assisting in chromatin dynamics. In this review, we explore the connections between circadian clock, chromatin remodeling, lncRNAs, and CRFH and how these impact rhythmicity, amplitude, period, and phase of circadian clock genes.

Nucleosomes affect local transformation efficiency

Genetic transformation is a natural process during which foreign DNA enters a cell and integrates into the genome. Apart from its relevance for horizontal gene transfer in nature, transformation is also the cornerstone of today's recombinant gene technology. Despite its importance, relatively little is known about the factors that determine transformation efficiency. We hypothesize that differences in DNA accessibility associated with nucleosome positioning may affect local transformation efficiency. We investigated the landscape of transformation efficiency at various positions in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome and correlated these measurements with nucleosome positioning. We find that transformation efficiency shows a highly significant inverse correlation with relative nucleosome density. This correlation was lost when the nucleosome pattern, but not the underlying sequence was changed. Together, our results demonstrate a novel role for nucleosomes and also allow researchers to predict transformation efficiency of a target region and select spots in the genome that are likely to yield higher transformation efficiency.

In vivo effects of histone H3 depletion on nucleosome occupancy and position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Previous studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae established that depletion of histone H4 results in the genome-wide transcriptional de-repression of hundreds of genes. To probe the mechanism of this transcriptional de-repression, we depleted nucleosomes in vivo by conditional repression of histone H3 transcription. We then measured the resulting changes in transcription by RNA–seq and in chromatin organization by MNase–seq. This experiment also bears on the degree to which trans-acting factors and DNA–encoded elements affect nucleosome position and occupancy in vivo. We identified ∼60,000 nucleosomes genome wide, and we classified ∼2,000 as having preferentially reduced occupancy following H3 depletion and ∼350 as being preferentially retained. We found that the in vivo influence of DNA sequences that favor or disfavor nucleosome occupancy increases following histone H3 depletion, demonstrating that nucleosome density contributes to moderating the influence of DNA sequence on nucleosome formation in vivo. To identify factors important for influencing nucleosome occupancy and position, we compared our data to 40 existing whole-genome data sets. Factors associated with promoters, such as histone acetylation and H2A.z incorporation, were enriched at sites of nucleosome loss. Nucleosome retention was linked to stabilizing marks such as H3K36me2. Notably, the chromatin remodeler Isw2 was uniquely associated with retained occupancy and altered positioning, consistent with Isw2 stabilizing histone–DNA contacts and centering nucleosomes on available DNA in vivo. RNA–seq revealed a greater number of de-repressed genes (∼2,500) than previous studies, and these genes exhibited reduced nucleosome occupancy in their promoters. In summary, we identify factors likely to influence nucleosome stability under normal growth conditions and the specific genomic locations at which they act. We find that DNA–encoded nucleosome stability and chromatin composition dictate which nucleosomes will be lost under conditions of limiting histone protein and that this, in turn, governs which genes are susceptible to a loss of regulatory fidelity.

Chromatin is formed by wrapping 146 bp of DNA around a disc-shaped complex of proteins called histones. These protein–DNA structures are known as nucleosomes. Nucleosomes help to regulate gene transcription, because nucleosomes compete with transcription factors for access to DNA. The precise positioning and level of nucleosome occupancy are known to be vital for transcriptional regulation, but the mechanisms that regulate the position and occupancy of nucleosomes are not fully understood. Recently, many studies have focused on the role of DNA sequence and chromatin remodeling proteins. Here, we manipulate the concentration of histone proteins in the cell to determine which nucleosomes are most susceptible to changes in occupancy and position. We find that the chromatin-associated proteins Sir2 and Tup1, and the chromatin remodelers Isw2 and Rsc8, are associated with stabilized nucleosomes. Histone acetylation and incorporation of the histone variant H2A.z are the factors most highly associated with destabilized nucleosomes. Certain DNA sequence properties also contribute to stability. The data identify factors likely to influence nucleosome stability and show a direct link between changes in chromatin and changes in transcription upon histone depletion.

Low dosage of histone H4 leads to growth defects and morphological changes in Candida albicans

Chromatin function depends on adequate histone stoichiometry. Alterations in histone dosage affect transcription and chromosome segregation, leading to growth defects and aneuploidies. In the fungal pathogen Candida albicans, aneuploidy formation is associated with antifungal resistance and pathogenesis. Histone modifying enzymes and chromatin remodeling proteins are also required for pathogenesis. However, little is known about the mechanisms that generate aneuploidies or about the epigenetic mechanisms that shape the response of C. albicans to the host environment. Here, we determined the impact of histone H4 deficit in the growth and colony morphology of C. albicans. We found that C. albicans requires at least two of the four alleles that code for histone H4 (HHF1 and HHF22) to grow normally. Strains with only one histone H4 allele show a severe growth defect and unstable colony morphology, and produce faster-growing, morphologically stable suppressors. Segmental or whole chromosomal trisomies that increased wild-type histone H4 copy number were the preferred mechanism of suppression. This is the first study of a core nucleosomal histone in C. albicans, and constitutes the prelude to future, more detailed research on the function of histone H4 in this important fungal pathogen.

Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter?

Packaging of eukaryotic genomes into chromatin affects every process that occurs on DNA. The positioning of nucleosomes on underlying DNA plays a key role in the regulation of these processes, as the nucleosome occludes underlying DNA sequences. Here, we review the literature on mapping nucleosome positions in various organisms, and discuss how nucleosome positions are established, what effect nucleosome positioning has on control of gene expression, and touch on the correlations between chromatin packaging, sequence evolution, and the evolution of gene expression programs.

Chromatin-dependent transcription factor accessibility rather than nucleosome remodeling predominates during global transcriptional restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Several well-studied promoters in yeast lose nucleosomes upon transcriptional activation and gain them upon repression, an observation that has prompted the model that transcriptional activation and repression requires nucleosome remodeling of regulated promoters. We have examined global nucleosome positioning before and after glucose-induced transcriptional reprogramming, a condition under which more than half of all yeast genes significantly change expression. The majority of induced and repressed genes exhibit no change in promoter nucleosome arrangement, although promoters that do undergo nucleosome remodeling tend to contain a TATA box. Rather, we found multiple examples where the pre-existing accessibility of putative transcription factor binding sites before glucose addition determined whether the corresponding gene would change expression in response to glucose addition. These results suggest that selection of appropriate transcription factor binding sites may be dictated to a large extent by nucleosome prepositioning but that regulation of expression through these sites is dictated not by nucleosome repositioning but by changes in transcription factor activity.

Sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning

Eukaryotic DNA is organized into a macromolecular structure called chromatin. The basic repeating unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which consists of two copies of each of the four core histones and DNA. The nucleosomal organization and the positions of nucleosomes have profound effects on all DNA-dependent processes. Understanding the factors that influence nucleosome positioning is therefore of general interest. Among the many determinants of nucleosome positioning, the DNA sequence has been proposed to have a major role. Here, we analyzed more than 860,000 nucleosomal DNA sequences to identify sequence features that guide the formation of nucleosomes in vivo. We found that both a periodic enrichment of AT base pairs and an out-of-phase oscillating enrichment of GC base pairs as well as the overall preference for GC base pairs are determinants of nucleosome positioning. The preference for GC pairs can be related to a lower energetic cost required for deformation of the DNA to wrap around the histones. In line with this idea, we found that only incorporation of both signal components into a sequence model for nucleosome formation results in maximal predictive performance on a genome-wide scale. In this manner, one achieves greater predictive power than published approaches. Our results confirm the hypothesis that the DNA sequence has a major role in nucleosome positioning in vivo.

A Nucleosome-Free dG-dC-Rich Sequence Element Promotes Constitutive Transcription of the Essential Yeast RIO1 Gene

RIO1 is an essential gene that encodes a protein serine kinase and is transcribed constitutively at a very low level. Transcriptional activation of RIO1 dispenses with a canonical TATA box as well as with classical transactivators or specific DNA-binding factors. Instead, a dG-dC-rich sequence element, that is located 40 to 48 bp upstream the single site of mRNA initiation, is essential and presumably constitutes the basal promoter. In addition, we demonstrate here that this promoter element comprises a nucleosomefree gap which is centered at the dG-dC tract and flanked by two positioned nucleosomes. This element is both, necessary and sufficient, for basal transcription initiation at the RIO1 promoter and, thus, constitutes a novel type of core promoter element.

Reb1p-dependent DNA bending effects nucleosome positioning and constitutive transcription at the yeast profilin promoter

The molecular basis of constitutive gene activation is largely unknown. The yeast profilin gene (PFY1), encoding a housekeeping component of the actin cytoskeleton, is constitutively transcribed at a moderate level. The PFY1 promoter dispenses with classical transactivators and a consensus TATA box; however, it contains a canonic site for the abundant multifunctional nuclear factor rDNA enhancer-binding protein (Reb1p) combined with a dA.dT element. Reb1p binds specifically in vitro. Mutation of this site reduces PFY1 expression to about 35%. A nucleosome-free gap of about 190 bp is centered at the genomic Reb1p binding site in vivo and spans the presumptive core promoter and transcriptional initiation sites. Nucleosomes at the border of the gap are positioned. Mutation of the Reb1p motif in the genomic PFY1 promoter abolishes nucleosome positioning, fills the gap with a non-positioned nucleosome, and reduces transcription by a factor of 3. From permutation studies we conclude that Reb1p induces a strong bend into the DNA. Phasing analyses indicate that it is directed toward the major groove. The data suggest that Reb1p plays an architectural role on DNA and that Reb1p-dependent DNA bending leads to a DNA conformation that is incompatible with packaging into nucleosomes and concomitantly facilitates constitutive transcription. In the absence of other transcription activators, Reb1p excludes nucleosomes and moderately stimulates transcription by distorting DNA.

Permanent nucleosome exclusion from the Gal4p-inducible yeast GCY1 promoter

The promoter of the galactose-inducible yeast GCY1 gene allows high rates of basal transcription and is kept free of nucleosomes regardless of growth conditions. The general regulatory factor, Reb1p, as well as the nucleotide sequence of a single Gal4p-binding site, structurally cooperate to exclude nucleosomes from about 480 bp of DNA that spans the UAS(GAL), the Reb1p-binding site, the TATA-box, and the transcriptional initiation sites. Gal4p, which induces transcription of GCY1 about 25-fold in the presence of galactose, is not required for the alteration in chromatin configuration in the promoter upstream region since the hypersensitive site is unchanged when Gal4p is inactive or absent. As soon as either the Reb1p-binding site or the UAS(GAL) or both are mutated, nucleosomes slip into the promoter of GCY1 paralleled by a reduction of basal transcription activity to about 30% in either single mutant and to <10% in the double mutant. In the mutant of the Reb1p-binding site, induction by galactose/Gal4p restores a nucleosome-free state to an extent resembling the GCY1 wild-type promoter, showing that, in principle, activated Gal4p can exclude nucleosomes on its own. Northern blots of GCY1 transcripts confirm that Reb1p modulates basal transcription and has little influence on the galactose-induced state.

Priming the nucleosome: a role for HMGB proteins?

The high-mobility-group B (HMGB) chromosomal proteins are characterized by the HMG box, a DNA-binding domain that both introduces a tight bend into DNA and binds preferentially to a variety of distorted DNA structures. The HMGB proteins seem to act primarily as architectural facilitators in the manipulation of nucleoprotein complexes; for example, in the assembly of complexes involved in recombination and transcription. Recent genetic and biochemical evidence suggests that these proteins can facilitate nucleosome remodelling. One mechanism by which HMGB proteins could prime the nucleosome for migration is to loosen the wrapped DNA and so enhance accessibility to chromatin-remodelling complexes and possibly also to transcription factors. By constraining a tight loop of untwisted DNA at the edge of a nucleosome, an HMGB protein could induce movements in the contacts between certain core histones that would result in an overall change in nucleosome structure.

A chromatin-associated protein from pea seeds preferentially binds histones H3 and H4

Pisum sativum p16 is a protein present in the chromatin of ungerminated embryonic axes. The purification of p16 and the isolation of a cDNA clone of psp54, the gene encoding its precursor have been recently reported [Castillo, J., Rodrigo, M. I., Márquez, J. A., Zúñiga, A and Franco, L. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem.267, 2156-2165]. In the present paper, we present data showing that p16 is a nuclear protein. First, after subcellular fractionation, p16 was clearly found in nuclei, although the protein is also present in other organelles. Immunocytochemical methods also confirm the above results. p16 seems to be firmly anchored to chromatin, as only extensive DNase I digestion of nuclei allows its release. Far Western and pull-down experiments demonstrate a strong in vitro interaction between p16 and histones, especially H3 and H4, suggesting that p16 is tethered to chromatin through histones. Because the psp54 gene is specifically expressed during the late development of seed, the role of p16 might be related to the changes that occur in chromatin during the processes of seed maturation and germination.

Transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes

The past decade has seen an explosive increase in information about regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription, especially for protein-coding genes. The most striking advances in our knowledge of transcriptional regulation involve the chromatin template, the large complexes recruited by transcriptional activators that regulate chromatin structure and the transcription apparatus, the holoenzyme forms of RNA polymerase II involved in initiation and elongation, and the mechanisms that link mRNA processing with its synthesis. We describe here the major advances in these areas, with particular emphasis on the modular complexes associated with RNA polymerase II that are targeted by activators and other regulators of mRNA biosynthesis.

Life with nucleosomes: chromatin remodelling in gene regulation

In the past year, the role of chromatin has emerged at the forefront of transcription research. Discovery and characterisation of the chromatin modifying machinery have significantly advanced our understanding of the molecular activities that establish a transcriptionally competent substrate in vivo, and have underscored the importance of the part played by chromatin in the regulation of transcription.

Determinants of DNA binding and bending by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group protein NHP6A that are important for its biological activities. Role of the unique N terminus and putative intercalating methionine

The non-histone proteins 6A/B (NHP6A/B) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are high mobility group proteins that bind and severely bend DNA of mixed sequence. They exhibit high affinity for linear DNA and even higher affinity for microcircular DNA. The 16-amino acid basic segment located N-terminal to the high mobility group domain is required for stable complex formation on both linear and microcircular DNA. Although mutants lacking the N terminus are able to promote microcircle formation and Hin invertasome assembly at high protein concentrations, they are unable to form stable complexes with DNA, co-activate transcription, and complement the growth defect of Deltanhp6a/b mutants. A basic patch between amino acids 13 and 16 is critical for these activities, and a second basic patch between residues 8 and 10 is required for the formation of monomeric complexes with linear DNA. Mutational analysis suggests that proline 18 may direct the path of the N-terminal arm to facilitate DNA binding, whereas the conserved proline at position 21, tyrosine 28, and phenylalanine 31 function to maintain the tertiary structure of the high mobility group domain. Methionine 29, which may intercalate into DNA, is essential for NHP6A-induced microcircle formation of 75-bp but not 98-bp fragments in vitro, and for full growth complementation of Deltanhp6a/b mutants in vivo.

GCN5, a yeast transcriptional coactivator, induces chromatin reconfiguration of HIS3 promoter in vivo

Gcn5p, the nuclear histone acetyltransferase (HAT A), is a component of the multiprotein adaptor complex, ADA. Its role as a transcriptional coactivator is required for full induction of most of the genes regulated by GCN4. In this study we present experimental evidence demonstrating that, during gene activation, the nuclease sensitive region of HIS3 promoter, harbouring the poly (dA:dT) and the GCN4 binding site, is invaded by nucleosomes in a gcn5 disrupted strain. These data demonstrate, for the first time, that Gcn5p affects directly the chromatin organization of a chromosomal gene during its transcriptional activation.

Copper-regulatory domain involved in gene expression

Copper ion homeostasis in yeast is maintained through regulated expression of genes involved in copper ion uptake, Cu(I) sequestration, and defense against reactive oxygen intermediates. Positive and negative copper ion regulation is observed, and both effects are mediated by Cu(I)-sensing transcription factors. The mechanism of Cu(I) regulation is distinct for transcriptional activation versus transcriptional repression. Cu(I) activation of gene expression in S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata occurs through Cu-regulated DNA binding. The activation process involves Cu(I) cluster formation within the regulatory domain in Ace1 and Amt1. Cu(I) binding stabilizes a specific conformation capable of high-affinity interaction with specific DNA promoter sequences. Cu(I)-activated transcription factors are modular proteins in which the DNA-binding domain is distinct from the domain that mediates transcriptional activation. The all-or-nothing formation of the polycopper cluster permits a graded response of the cell to environmental copper. Cu(I) triggering may involve a metal exchange reaction converting Ace1 from a Zn(II)-specific conformer to a clustered Cu(I) conformer. The Cu(I) regulatory domain occurs in transcription factors from S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata. Sequence homologs are also known in Y. lipolytica and S. pombe, although no functional information is available for these candidate regulatory molecules. The presence of the Cu(I) regulatory domain in four distinct yeast strains suggests that this Cu-responsive domain may occur in other eukaryotes. Cu-mediated repression of gene expression in S. cerevisiae occurs through Cu(I) regulation of Mac1. Cu(I) binding to Mac1 appears to inhibit the transactivation domain. The Cu(I) specificity of this repression is likely to arise from formation of a polycopper thiolate cluster.

All four core histone N-termini contain sequences required for the repression of basal transcription in yeast

Nucleosomes prevent the recognition of TATA promoter elements by the basal transcriptional machinery in the absence of induction. However, while Saccharomyces cerevisiae histones H3 and H4 contain N-terminal regions involved in the activation and repression of GAL1 and in the expression of heterochromatin-like regions, the sequences involved in repressing basal transcription have not yet been identified. Here, we describe the mapping of new N-terminal domains, in all four core histones (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4), required for the repression of basal, uninduced transcription. Basal transcription was monitored by the use of a GAL1 promoter-URA3 reporter construct whose uninduced activity can be detected through cellular sensitivity to the drug, 5-fluoroorotic acid. We have found for each histone that the N-terminal sequences repressing basal activity are in a short region adjacent to the structured alpha-helical core. Analysis of minichromosome DNA topology demonstrates that the basal domains are required for the proper folding of DNA around the chromosomal particle. Deletion of the basal domain at each histone significantly decreases plasmid superhelical density, which probably reflects a release of DNA from the constraints of the nucleosome into the linker region. This provides a means by which basal factors may recognize otherwise repressed regulatory elements.

The affinity of nuclear factor 1 for its DNA site is drastically reduced by nucleosome organization irrespective of its rotational or translational position

A DNA-bending sequence has been used for in vitro reconstitution of nucleosomes in order to direct a nuclear factor 1 (NF-1) binding site into different nucleosome positions. By this strategy nucleosomes were obtained that had one of two rotational positions of the NF-1 binding site, one oriented toward the periphery and the other toward the histone octamer, translationally positioned 50 and 45 base pairs, respectively, from the nucleosome dyad. The affinity of partially purified NF-1 for these nucleosomal targets was compared with its affinity for free DNA by dimethylsulfate methylation protection and DNase I footprinting assays. The binding affinity of NF-1 to all nucleosomal targets was reduced 100-300-fold compared with its affinity for free DNA. The two rotational settings of the NF-1 site showed the same binding affinity for NF-1 as did other nucleosome constructs in which the NF-1 binding site was translationally positioned from 10 to 40 base pairs from the nucleosome dyad. We conclude that the nucleosomal inhibition of NF-1 binding is an inherent characteristic of NF-1 since another transcription factor, the glucocorticoid receptor, is able to bind to its DNA site in a nucleosome.

Mutations causing high basal level transcription that is independent of transcriptional activators but dependent on chromosomal position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Two single (bel2 and bel4) and two double (bel3 bel7 and bel5 be16) mutations causing enhanced transcription of a gene fusion, consisting of the open reading frame of PHO5 connected to the HIS5 promoter (HIS5p) integrated at the ura3 or leu2 locus, were isolated from a gcn4-disrupted mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The PHO5 gene, encoding repressible acid phosphatase, in the HIS5p-PHO5 construct was derepressed under amino acid starved conditions by the action of the transcriptional activator Gcn4p. The bel mutants showed temperature-sensitive cell growth and/or cell aggregation. All the mutants except bel4 also showed high levels of transcription of an intact PHO5 DNA integrated at the URA3 locus in the absence of the cognate transcriptional activator, Pho4p, and in the absence of upstream activating sequences of PHO5. The HIS5 and PHO5 genes at their original chromosomal positions were, however, not affected by the bel2 mutation. The BEL2 gene was found to be identical with SIN4/TSF3, mutations in which cause high levels of transcription of the HO and GAL genes in the absence of their respective transcriptional activators, Swi5p and Gal4p. The effect of the bel2/sin4/tsf3 mutation on PHO5 transcription was additive with the Pho4p function. Thus the effect of the bel2/sin4/tsf3 mutation is dependent on the position of PHO5 in the chromosome and independent of Pho4p and Gen4p activation.

Regulation of HIS4 expression by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN4 transcriptional regulator

The yeast SIN4 gene functions in the transcriptional activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Previous experiments suggest a sin4 mutation affects chromatin structure and thus alters transcriptional regulation. In this report we show that SIN4 is required for full expression of the HIS4, Ty1, and MAT alpha genes, in addition to the previously described SIN4-dependence of CTS1 expression. All of these genes contain within their promoters a binding site for the Rap1p transcriptional regulator. However, SIN4 does not play a direct role either in transcriptional activation or repression by Rap1p. The HIS4 gene can be activated by either of two pathways, the basal or the inducible pathway, and experiments are described that show that a sin4 mutation affects both pathways. It was shown previously that mutation of the Rap1p binding site in the HIS4 promoter causes a similar effect on HIS4 expression and that this promoter mutation also causes a change in chromatin structure. The SNF2/SWI2 gene is also required for full HIS4 expression, and we show that a sin4 snf2 double mutant is not synergistic compared to either single mutant. We show that nucleosomes are positioned at the HIS4 promoter and that this positioning is disrupted in a snf2 mutant but not in a sin4 mutant. These findings suggest that SIN4 plays a distinct role in transcriptional regulation.

Production of metallothionein in copper- and cadmium-resistant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Certain mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae show copper or cadmium resistance. Both copper- and cadmium-resistant strains produce the same metallothionein with 53 amino acid residues which causes metal detoxification by chelating copper or cadmium. The metal detoxification role is the only known function of the metallothionein in yeast. The MT is encoded by the CUP1 gene on chromosome VIII which is expressed by induction with metals. The CUP1 is amplified to 3-14 copies with 2 kb-tandem-repeat units in the metal-resistant strains, whereas the wild-type strain contains only a single copy of the CUP1. Although transcription of CUP1 is inducible by metals, the ACE1 protein serves a dual function as a sensor for copper and an inducer for CUP1 transcription in the copper-resistant strain. In the cadmium-resistant strain, the heat-shock factor having a point mutation may be the regulator for CUP1 transcription. Therefore, it has been clarified that production of MT in yeast is controlled by two systems, the amplification of CUP1 and its transcriptional regulation.

Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation

Recent genetic and biochemical studies have revealed critical information concerning the role of nucleosomes in eukaryotic gene regulation. Nucleosomes package DNA into a dynamic chromatin structure, and by assuming defined positions in chromatin, influence gene regulation. Nucleosomes can serve as repressors, presumably by blocking access to regulatory elements; consequently, the positions of nucleosomes relative to the location of cis-acting elements are critical. Some genes have a chromatin structure that is "preset," ready for activation, while others require "remodeling" for activation. Nucleosome positioning may be determined by multiple factors, including histone-DNA interactions, boundaries defined by DNA structure or protein binding, and higher-order chromatin structure.

Purification of yeast histones competent for nucleosome assembly in vitro

We have developed a procedure to purify nucleosomal assembly-competent histones as a mixture of H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 from isolated nuclei of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a purity of 70-80%. The mixture contained each of the histone subunits approximately at the equi-molar ratio. Plasmid pBR322 DNA was assembled into nucleosomes with the purified yeast histones in the presence of nucleoplasmin from unfertilized eggs of the frog Xenopus laevis. The efficiency of assembly of yeast histones was comparable to that of core histones purified from HeLa cells. The length of DNA fragment wrapping around a core histone particle and the molar ratio of histone components in an assembled nucleosome particle were estimated to be 150 +/- 10 bp long and H2A:H2B:H3:H4 = 1.0:0.9:0:9:1.0, respectively.

Isolation and characterization of the SUD1 gene, which encodes a global repressor of core promoter activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The SUD1 gene was identified during a hunt for mutants that are able to express an sta1 gene (encoding an extracellular glucoamylase) lacking an upstream activation sequence (UAS) for transcription. A null allele of sud1 alleviated the transcriptional defect of the UAS-less sta1 and also suppressed mutations in trans-acting genes (GAM1/SNF2 and GAM3/ADR6) required for transcription of STA1. The mutation also increased expression from various core promoters (CYC1, CUP1, HIS3, PUT1, and PUT2), suggesting that the SUD1 protein is a global transcriptional regulator that plays a negative role at or near the TATA element. However, the SUD1 function was ineffective on promoters containing a UAS from either STA1 or GAL10 under derepressed conditions. The sud1 mutation suppressed the salt-sensitive cell growth phenotype caused by elevated levels of the TATA-binding protein (SPT15), further suggesting a transcriptional role for SUD1. sud1 cells showed additional pleiotropic phenotypes: temperature-sensitive (ts) growth, reduced efficiencies of sporulation, and sensitivity to heat shock and nitrogen starvation. The SUD1 gene is predicted to encode a 64 kDa, hydrophilic protein.

Role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II

Recent studies on chromatin have concentrated on the relationship between its structure and gene activity. This topic, which addresses the fundamental mechanisms by which genes are expressed, has become a controversial issue, and the present data support the hypothesis that the structure of chromatin is an important component of transcriptional regulation. Notwithstanding, the complexity of this problem suggests that the current models are probably only a rough approximation of the truth.

Histones, nucleosomes and transcription

It is becoming increasingly clear that nucleosome structure is integrally involved in gene regulation. In particular, the study of inducible genes has shown that nucleosomes not only contribute to a repressed basal state, but can also be rearranged in response to induction. The mechanism of this process is just beginning to be elucidated, and genetic studies have implicated several proteins in the modulation of nucleosome structure.