Introns are essential for growth-regulated expression of the mouse thymidylate synthase gene

Inhibition of the mammalian transcription factor LSF induces S-phase-dependent apoptosis by downregulating thymidylate synthase expression

The thymidylate synthase (TS) gene, which is induced at the G(1)-S transition in growth-stimulated cells, encodes an enzyme that is essential for DNA replication and cell survival. Here we demonstrate that LSF (LBP-1c, CP2) binds to sites within the TS promoter and intronic regions that are required for this induction. Mutation of the LSF binding sites inhibits G(1)-S induction of mRNA derived from a TS minigene. Furthermore, expression of dominant-negative LSF (LSFdn) prevents the increase in TS enzyme levels during G(1)-S, and induces apoptosis in growth- stimulated mouse and human cell lines. Such apoptosis can be prevented either by circumventing the TS requirement through addition of low concentrations of thymidine, or by coexpression of the TS gene driven by a heterologous promoter. Induction of apoptosis by LSFdn parallels the process known as thymineless death, which is induced by the TS inhibitor and chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorodeoxyuridine. Thus, LSF is a novel regulatory factor that supports progression through S-phase by targeting a single gene that is critical for cell survival.

Efficient 3'-end formation of human beta-globin mRNA in vivo requires sequences within the last intron but occurs independently of the splicing reaction

The second intron (betaIVS-II) of the human beta-globin gene is essential for the accumulation of stable cytoplasmic mRNA and is implicated in promoting efficient 3'-end formation. This report presents quantitative comparisons between betaIVS-II mutants at physiological levels of expression from within a natural chromatin context in vivo which further defines it's function. In marked contrast to a beta-globin gene lacking a second intron, two mutants defective in splicing (small size or a splice donor mutation), still undergo essentially normal levels of 3'-end formation and in the absence of exon skipping. Therefore, 3' cleavage of beta-globin transcripts requires the presence of betaIVS-II sequences, but not the splicing reaction. The placement of betaIVS-II in the IVS-I position did not reduce the efficiency of 3' cleavage indicating that the distance between the necessary element(s) in this intron and the polyadenylation recognition site is not a crucial factor. Subsequent placement of betaIVS-I in the intron II position, reduced the efficiency of 3'-end formation to only 16% of normal. A direct replacement of intron II by the heterologous introns betaIVS-I or alpha-globin IVS-II, only partially substitute (16 and 30% respectively) for betaIVS-II. Hybrid introns show that efficient 3'-end formation is strongly enhanced by the presence of the terminal 60 nt of betaIVS-II. These data imply that the last intervening sequence of multiple intron containing genes is a principal determinant of the efficiency of 3'-end formation and may act as a post-transcriptional regulatory step in gene expression.

Regulated expression and RNA processing of transcripts from the Srp20 splicing factor gene during the cell cycle

Eukaryotic splicing factors belonging to the SR family are essential splicing factors consisting of an N-terminal RNA-binding region and a C-terminal RS domain. They are believed to be involved in alternative splicing of numerous transcripts because their expression levels can influence splice site selection. We have characterized the structure and transcriptional regulation of the gene for the smallest member of the SR family, SRp20 (previously called X16). The mouse gene encoding SRp20, termed Srp20, consists of one alternative exon and six constitutive exons and was mapped to a 2-centimorgan interval on chromosome 17. When cells are transfected with SRp20 genomic DNA, both standard and alternatively spliced transcripts and corresponding proteins are produced. Interestingly, in starved (G0) cells, the amount of SRp20 mRNA containing the alternative exon is large, whereas the amount of the standard SRp20 mRNA without the alternative exon is small. When starved cells are stimulated with serum, the alternative form is lost and the standard form is induced. These results suggest that splicing could be regulated during the cell cycle and that this could be, at least in part, due to regulated expression of SR proteins. Consistent with this, experiments with synchronized cells showed an induction of SRp20 transcripts in late G1 or early S. We have also characterized the promoter of SRp20. It lies within a GC-rich CpG island and contains two consensus binding sites for E2F, a transcription factor thought to be involved in regulating the cell cycle. These motifs may be functional since reporter constructs with the SRp20 promoter can be stimulated by cotransfection with E2F expression plasmids.

Splicing signals are required for S-phase regulation of the mouse thymidylate synthase gene

The thymidylate synthase (TS) gene is expressed at a much higher level in cells undergoing DNA replication than in nondividing cells. In growth-stimulated mammalian cells, TS mRNA content increases 10 to 20-fold as cells progress from G1 through S phase. However, the rate of transcription of the TS gene does not increase during this interval, indicating that the gene is regulated at the posttranscriptional level. We have shown that both the promoter of the mouse TS gene and TS introns are necessary (although neither is sufficient) for S-phase-specific regulation of TS mRNA content. In the present study, we examined in more detail the role of introns in regulating TS mRNA levels in growth-stimulated cells. TS minigenes that contain normal or modified introns were stably transfected into mouse 3T6 fibroblasts, and the regulation of the minigenes was compared with that of the endogenous TS gene. TS minigenes that contain TS intron 1 or 2 maintain S-phase regulation. Deletion of most of the interior of the introns had only minor effects on regulation. However, when splicing of the intron was inhibited by alteration of the splice donor and acceptor sites, the minigene was expressed at a constant level following growth stimulation. Minigenes consisting of the TS promoter linked to either a luciferase or a human beta-globin indicator gene were growth regulated when spliceable introns were included in the minigenes. However, when the introns were eliminated, the minigenes were expressed at a constant level. These observations indicate that the splicing reaction itself, rather than a control sequence within the intron, is important for growth-regulated expression of the TS gene. Possible mechanisms to account for the dual requirement for the TS promoter and intron splicing for proper regulation of the TS gene are discussed.

Regulation of mouse thymidylate synthase gene expression in growth-stimulated cells: upstream S phase control elements are indistinguishable from the essential promoter elements

Expression of the mammalian thymidylate synthase (TS) gene in growth-stimulated cells is closely coordinated with entry into S phase. Previous studies with transfected TS minigenes have shown that sequences upstream of the coding region as well as an intron in the transcribed region are both necessary for proper regulation of TS mRNA content in growth-stimulated cells. The goal of the present study was to identify the upstream regulatory elements. Minigenes consisting of TS 5' flanking sequences linked to the TS coding region (interrupted by introns 1 and 2) were stably transfected into mouse 3T6 cells. Deletion and site-directed mutagenesis of the 5' flanking region revealed that there is a close correspondence between the upstream sequences that are necessary for S phase regulation and the 30 nucleotide region that is essential for promoter activity. These observations raised the possibility that regulation of the TS gene occurs at the transcriptional level. However, nuclear run-on assays showed that the rate of transcription of the TS gene changed very little during the G1-S phase transition. Furthermore, when the TS promoter was linked to an intron-less luciferase indicator gene, there was no change in expression following growth-stimulation. Therefore it appears that the TS gene is controlled primarily at the posttranscriptional level, and that the TS essential promoter region is necessary (although not sufficient) for proper S phase regulation.

Bidirectional promoter of the mouse thymidylate synthase gene

The promoter of the mouse thymidylate synthase (TS) gene lacks both a TATAA box and an initiator element and directs transcriptional initiation at multiple sites over a 90 nucleotide initiation window. Earlier studies defined an essential region near the 5' end of the initiation window that is required for promoter activity. The essential region contains possible binding sites for Sp1 and Ets transcription factors. In the present study we show that this essential region stimulates transcription with approximately equal strength in both directions. Transcription is initiated over a broad initiation window in the reverse direction. The same elements are important for the reverse promoter and for the normal TS promoter. Sequences upstream of the essential region partially suppress expression in the reverse direction. The TS 5' flanking region, in either the normal or inverted orientation, directs S phase-specific expression of a TS minigene. This raises the possibility that an upstream gene and the TS gene may be coordinately induced at the G1/S phase boundary by a common set of control elements.

Stimulation of gene expression by introns: conversion of an inhibitory intron to a stimulatory intron by alteration of the splice donor sequence

Efficient expression of many mammalian genes depends on the presence of at least one intron. We previously showed that addition of almost any of the introns from the mouse thymidylate synthase (TS) gene to an intronless TS minigene led to a large increase in expression. However, addition of intron 4 led to a reduction in minigene expression. The goal of the present study was to determine why TS intron 4 was unable to stimulate expression. Insertion of intron 4 into an intron-dependent derivative of the ribosomal protein L32 gene did not lead to a significant increase in expression, suggesting that its inability to stimulate expression was due to sequences within the intron. Deleting most of the interior of intron 4, improving the putative branch point, removing purines from the pyrimidine stretch at the 3' end of the intron, or removing possible alternative splice acceptor or donor sites within the intron each had little effect on the level of expression. However, when the splice donor sequence of intron 4 was modified so that it was perfectly complementary to U1 snRNA, the modified intron 4 stimulated expression approximately 6-fold. When the splice donor site of TS intron 1 (a stimulatory intron) was changed to that of TS intron 4, the modified intron 1 was spliced very inefficiently and lost the ability to stimulate mRNA production. Our observations support the idea that introns can stimulate gene expression by a process that depends directly on the splicing reaction.