The yeast alpha 2 protein can repress transcription by RNA polymerases I and II but not III

Regulating Expression of Mistranslating tRNAs by Readthrough RNA Polymerase II Transcription

Transfer RNA (tRNA) variants that alter the genetic code increase protein diversity and have many applications in synthetic biology. Since the tRNA variants can cause a loss of proteostasis, regulating their expression is necessary to achieve high levels of novel protein. Mechanisms to positively regulate transcription with exogenous activator proteins like those often used to regulate RNA polymerase II (RNAP II)-transcribed genes are not applicable to tRNAs as their expression by RNA polymerase III requires elements internal to the tRNA. Here, we show that tRNA expression is repressed by overlapping transcription from an adjacent RNAP II promoter. Regulating the expression of the RNAP II promoter allows inverse regulation of the tRNA. Placing either Gal4- or TetR–VP16-activated promoters downstream of a mistranslating tRNA^Ser variant that misincorporates serine at proline codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae allows mistranslation at a level not otherwise possible because of the toxicity of the unregulated tRNA. Using this inducible tRNA system, we explore the proteotoxic effects of mistranslation on yeast cells. High levels of mistranslation cause cells to arrest in the G1 phase. These cells are impermeable to propidium iodide, yet growth is not restored upon repressing tRNA expression. High levels of mistranslation increase cell size and alter cell morphology. This regulatable tRNA expression system can be applied to study how native tRNAs and tRNA variants affect the proteome and other biological processes. Variations of this inducible tRNA system should be applicable to other eukaryotic cell types.

Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes

The Ssn6-Tup1 repressor forms one of the largest and most important gene-regulatory circuits in budding yeast. This circuit, which appears conserved in flies, worms and mammals, exemplifies how a 'global' repressor (i.e. a repressor that regulates many genes in the cell) can be highly selective in the genes it represses. It also explains how, given the appropriate signal, specific subsets of these genes can be derepressed. Ssn6-Tup1 seems especially robust, bringing about a high level of repression irrespective of its precise placement on DNA or of specific features of the DNA control regions of its target genes. This high degree of repression probably results from several distinct mechanisms acting together.

A variety of RNA polymerases II and III-dependent promoter classes is repressed by factors containing the Krüppel-associated/finger preceding box of zinc finger proteins

KRAB/FPB (Krüppel-associated/finger preceding box) domains are small, portable transcriptional repression motifs, encoded by hundreds of vertebrates C2-H2-type zinc finger genes. We report that KRAB/FPB domains feature an unprecedented, highly promiscuous DNA-binding dependent transcriptional repressing activity. Indeed, template bound chimeric factors containing KRAB/FPB modules actively repress in vivo the transcription of distinct promoter classes that depend on different core elements, recruit distinct basal transcriptional apparatuses and are transcribed either by RNA polymerase II or III. The promoter types repressed in transient assays in a dose- and DNA-binding dependent, but position- and orientation-independent manner, by GAL4-KRAB/FPB fusions include an RNA polymerase II-dependent small nuclear RNA promoter (U1) as well as RNA polymerase III-dependent class 2 (adenovirus VA1), class 3 (human U6) and atypical (human 7SL) promoters. Down-modulation of all of these templates depended on factors containing the A module of the KRAB/FPB domain. Data provide further insights into the properties and mode of action of this widespread repression motif, and support the notion that genes belonging to distinct classes may be repressed in vivo by KRAB/FPB containing zinc finger proteins. The exquisitely DNA-binding dependent transcriptional promiscuity exhibited by KRAB/FPB domains may provide a unique model system for studying the mechanism by which a promoter recruited repression motif can down-modulate a large variety of promoter types.

Genetics of transcriptional regulation in yeast: connections to the RNA polymerase II CTD

Transcriptional regulation is important in all eukaryotic organisms for cell growth, development, and responses to environmental change. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or bakers' yeast, has provided a powerful system for genetic analysis of transcriptional regulation, and findings from the study of this model system have proven broadly applicable to higher organisms. Transcriptional regulation requires the interactions of regulatory proteins with various components of the transcription machinery. Recently, genetic analysis of a diverse set of transcriptional regulatory responses has converged with studies of the function of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) to reveal regulatory roles for proteins associated with the CTD. These proteins, designated Srb/mediator proteins, are broadly involved in both positive and negative regulatory responses in vivo. This review focuses on the connections between genetic analysis of transcriptional regulation and the functions of the Srb/mediator proteins associated with the RNA polymerase II CTD.

Transcriptional repression directed by the yeast alpha 2 protein in vitro

The alpha 2 protein, a homeodomain protein involved in specifying cell type in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a transcriptional repressor. alpha 2 binds cooperatively with Mcm1, a serum response factor-related protein, to the a-specific gene operator. The alpha 2-Mcm1 complex in turn recruits Ssn6 and Tup1 to the operator, and we believe that these latter two proteins are responsible for the transcriptional repression. Placement of the a-specific gene operator in any of a variety of positions upstream of a test promoter leads to repression of that promoter in vivo. In this respect, the a-specific gene operator resembles a negatively acting enhancer. Here we describe the in vitro reconstitution of this example of negative control from a distance. We observe repression in vitro in the absence of exogenously added activator protein and on templates that lack binding sites for known activator proteins, and we infer that alpha 2-directed repression acts on the general transcription machinery.