GATA elements are necessary for the activity and tissue specificity of the T-cell receptor beta-chain transcriptional enhancer

Multilayered specification of the T-cell lineage fate

T-cell development from stem cells has provided a highly accessible and detailed view of the regulatory processes that can go into the choice of a cell fate in a postembryonic, stem cell-based system. But it has been a view from the outside. The problems in understanding the regulatory basis for this lineage choice begin with the fact that too many transcription factors are needed to provide crucial input: without any one of them, T-cell development fails. Furthermore, almost all the factors known to provide crucial functions during the climax of T-lineage commitment itself are also vital for earlier functions that establish the pool of multilineage precursors that would normally feed into the T-cell specification process. When the regulatory genes that encode them are mutated, the confounding effects on earlier stages make it difficult to dissect T-cell specification genetically. Yet both the positive and the negative regulatory events involved in the choice of a T-cell fate are actually a mosaic of distinct functions. New evidence has emerged recently that finally provides a way to separate the major components that fit together to drive this process. Here, we review insights into T-cell specification and commitment that emerge from a combination of molecular, cellular, and systems biology approaches. The results reveal the regulatory structure underlying this lineage decision.

Genomic analysis reveals extensive gene duplication within the bovine TRB locus

Background

Diverse TR and IG repertoires are generated by V(D)J somatic recombination. Genomic studies have been pivotal in cataloguing the V, D, J and C genes present in the various TR/IG loci and describing how duplication events have expanded the number of these genes. Such studies have also provided insights into the evolution of these loci and the complex mechanisms that regulate TR/IG expression. In this study we analyze the sequence of the third bovine genome assembly to characterize the germline repertoire of bovine TRB genes and compare the organization, evolution and regulatory structure of the bovine TRB locus with that of humans and mice.

Results

The TRB locus in the third bovine genome assembly is distributed over 5 scaffolds, extending to ~730 Kb. The available sequence contains 134 TRBV genes, assigned to 24 subgroups, and 3 clusters of DJC genes, each comprising a single TRBD gene, 5–7 TRBJ genes and a single TRBC gene. Seventy-nine of the TRBV genes are predicted to be functional. Comparison with the human and murine TRB loci shows that the gene order, as well as the sequences of non-coding elements that regulate TRB expression, are highly conserved in the bovine. Dot-plot analyses demonstrate that expansion of the genomic TRBV repertoire has occurred via a complex and extensive series of duplications, predominantly involving DNA blocks containing multiple genes. These duplication events have resulted in massive expansion of several TRBV subgroups, most notably TRBV6, 9 and 21 which contain 40, 35 and 16 members respectively. Similarly, duplication has lead to the generation of a third DJC cluster. Analyses of cDNA data confirms the diversity of the TRBV genes and, in addition, identifies a substantial number of TRBV genes, predominantly from the larger subgroups, which are still absent from the genome assembly. The observed gene duplication within the bovine TRB locus has created a repertoire of phylogenetically diverse functional TRBV genes, which is substantially larger than that described for humans and mice.

Conclusion

The analyses completed in this study reveal that, although the gene content and organization of the bovine TRB locus are broadly similar to that of humans and mice, multiple duplication events have led to a marked expansion in the number of TRB genes. Similar expansions in other ruminant TR loci suggest strong evolutionary pressures in this lineage have selected for the development of enlarged sets of TR genes that can contribute to diverse TR repertoires.

Cytokines and transcription factors that regulate T helper cell differentiation: new players and new insights

The differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into subsets of T helper cells is a pivotal process with major implications for host defense and the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases. Though the basic paradigm was discovered more than 15 years ago, new discoveries continue to be made that offer fresh insights into the regulation of this process. T helper (TH)1 cells produce interferon (IFN)-gamma, promoting cell-mediated immunity and control of intracellular pathogens. We now know that TH1 differentiation is regulated by transcription factors such as T-bet, Stat1, and Stat4, as well as cytokines such as IL-12, IL-23, IL-27, type I IFNs, and IFN-gamma. In contrast, TH2 cells produce IL-4, which promotes allergic responses and is important in host defense against helminths. The transcription factors Stat6, GATA-3, c-Maf, NFATs, and the cytokine IL-4 promote TH2 differentiation. These key regulators of TH differentiation are the subject of this review.

Cytokines and transcription factors that regulate T helper cell differentiation: new players and new insights

The differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into subsets of T helper cells is a pivotal process with major implications for host defense and the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases. Though the basic paradigm was discovered more than 15 years ago, new discoveries continue to be made that offer fresh insights into the regulation of this process. T helper (TH)1 cells produce interferon (IFN)-gamma, promoting cell-mediated immunity and control of intracellular pathogens. We now know that TH1 differentiation is regulated by transcription factors such as T-bet, Stat1, and Stat4, as well as cytokines such as IL-12, IL-23, IL-27, type I IFNs, and IFN-gamma. In contrast, TH2 cells produce IL-4, which promotes allergic responses and is important in host defense against helminths. The transcription factors Stat6, GATA-3, c-Maf, NFATs, and the cytokine IL-4 promote TH2 differentiation. These key regulators of TH differentiation are the subject of this review.

Structure and specificity of GATA proteins in Th2 development

Development of Th2 subset of CD4+ T cells involves the interleukin-4 (IL-4)- and Stat6-dependent increase in GATA-3 expression during primary activation. Recently we reported that the phenotypic stability and factor independence of Th2 cells involves acquisition of an intracellular pathway that maintains GATA-3 expression. Evidence from retroviral expression studies implied that this pathway involved an autoactivation of GATA-3 expression, since Stat6-deficient T cells induced endogenous GATA-3 when infected with GATA-3-expressing retroviruses. That study left unresolved the issue of whether GATA-3 autoactivation was direct or indirect. Several other Th2-specific transcription factors have been described, including c-Maf and JunB. We therefore examined the ability of these other transcription factors to induce GATA-3 expression and promote Th2 development. Neither c-Maf nor JunB induced Th2 development in Stat6-deficient CD4+ T cells, in contrast to GATA-3. Consistent with this indication of a possible direct autoactivation pathway, we also observed that heterologous GATA family proteins GATA-1, GATA-2, and GATA-4 were also capable of inducing GATA-3 expression in developing Stat6-deficient T cells and promote Th2 development. Mutational analysis revealed evidence for two distinct mechanisms of GATA-3 action. IL-4 induction by GATA-3 required each of the functional domains to be present, whereas repression of gamma interferon could occur even when mutants of GATA-3 lacking the second transactivation domain, TA2, were expressed. The GATA-dependent induction of the GATA-3 but not the other GATA genes in T cells suggests that T-cell-specific cis elements within the GATA-3 locus likely cooperate with a general GATA recognition motif to allow GATA-3-dependent autoactivation.

Definition of a T-cell receptor beta gene core enhancer of V(D)J recombination by transgenic mapping

V(D)J recombination in differentiating lymphocytes is a highly regulated process in terms of both cell lineage and the stage of cell development. Transgenic and knockout mouse studies have demonstrated that transcriptional enhancers from antigen receptor genes play an important role in this regulation by activating cis-recombination events. A striking example is the T-cell receptor beta-chain (TCRbeta) gene enhancer (Ebeta), which in the mouse consists of at least seven nuclear factor binding motifs (betaE1 to betaE7). Here, using a well-characterized transgenic recombination substrate approach, we define the sequences within Ebeta required for recombination enhancer activity. The Ebeta core is comprised of a limited set of motifs (betaE3 and betaE4) and an additional previously uncharacterized 20-bp sequence 3' of the betaE4 motif. This core element confers cell lineage- and stage-specific recombination within the transgenic substrates, although it cannot bypass the suppressive effects resulting from transgene integration in heterochromatic centromeres. Strikingly, the core enhancer is heavily occupied by nuclear factors in immature thymocytes, as shown by in vivo footprinting analyses. A larger enhancer fragment including the betaE1 through betaE4 motifs but not the 3' sequences, although active in inducing germ line transcription within the transgenic array, did not retain the Ebeta recombinational activity. Our results emphasize the multifunctionality of the TCRbeta enhancer and shed some light on the molecular mechanisms by which transcriptional enhancers and associated nuclear factors may impact on cis recombination, gene expression, and lymphoid cell differentiation.

A Developmental Stage-Specific Promoter Directs Germline Transcription of DβJβ Gene Segments in Precursor T Lymphocytes

The tissue- and stage-specific assembly of Ag receptor genes is regulated by transcriptional control elements positioned within Ig and TCR loci. To further understand the role of cis-acting elements in these regulatory mechanisms, we have characterized a transcriptional promoter that drives germline expression of TCRβ gene segments in vivo. The activity of this promoter, termed PDβ, is restricted to a highly conserved 400-bp region located directly upstream from Dβ1-coding sequences. Maximal PDβ activity requires a TATA element situated within the Dβ1 recombination signal sequences and consensus binding sites for the ubiquitous SP1 and the T cell-specific GATA-3 transcription factors. When linked to active enhancer elements, PDβ directs transcription in most cell types; however, the TCRβ enhancer (Eβ) stimulates PDβ function specifically in precursor T lymphocytes. These findings suggest that PDβ/Eβ interactions may contribute to differential regulation of regions within the TCRβ locus during thymocyte development.

Regulatory Elements in the Promoter of a Murine TCRD V Gene Segment

TCRD V segments rearrange in an ordered fashion during human and murine thymic development. Recombination requires the accessibility of substrate gene segments, and transcriptional enhancers and promoters have been shown to regulate the accessible chromatin configuration. We therefore investigated the regulation of TCRD V rearrangements by characterizing the promoter of the first TCRD V segment to be rearranged, DV101S1, under the influence of its own enhancer. Sequences required for full promoter activity were identified by transient transfections of normal and mutated promoters into a human γδ lymphoma, and necessary elements fall between −86 and +66 nt, relative to the major transcription start site. They include a cAMP responsive element (CRE) at −62, an Ets site at −39, a TATA box at −26, the major transcriptional start site sequence (−8 to −5 and −2 to +11), and a downstream sequence (+12 to +33). Gel shift analyses and in vitro DNase I footprinting showed that nuclear proteins bind to the functionally relevant CRE, Ets, +1 to +10 sequence, and the +17 to +21 sequence. Nuclear proteins also bind to an E box at −52, and GATA-3 binds to a GATA motif at −5, as shown by Ab ablation-supershift experiments, but mutations that abrogated protein binding to these sites failed to affect DV101S1 promoter activity. We conclude that not all protein-binding sites within the DV101S1 minimal promoter are important for enhancer driven TCRD gene transcription. Further, the possibility remains that the GATA and E box sites function in enhancer independent DV101S1 germline transcription.

A conserved tissue-specific structure at a human T-cell receptor beta-chain core promoter

The T-cell receptor (TCR) beta-chain promoters have been characterized as nonstructured basal promoters that carry a single conserved ubiquitous cyclic AMP-responsive element. Our investigation of the human TCR beta gene uncovers a surprisingly complex and tissue-specific structure at the TCR Vbeta 8.1 promoter. The core of the promoter (positions -42 to +11) is recognized by the lymphoid cell-specific transcription factors Ets-1, LEF1, and AML1 as well as by CREB/ATF-1, as is demonstrated in gel shift and footprinting experiments. With the exception of LEF1, these factors activate transcription in T cells. Binding sites at the core region show little conservation with consensus sites. Nonetheless, CREB, Ets-1, and AML1 bind and activate cooperatively and very efficiently through the nonconsensus binding sites at the core promoter region. Moderate ubiquitous activation is further induced by CREB/ATF and Sp1 factors through proximal upstream elements. The tissue-specific core promoter structure is apparently conserved in other T-cell-specifically expressed genes such as the CD4 gene. Our observations suggest that both the enhancer and the promoter have a complex tissue-specific structure whose functional interplay potentiates T-cell-specific transcription.