Promoter-proximal poly(A) sites are processed efficiently, but the RNA products are unstable in the nucleus

Putting an 'End' to HIV mRNAs: capping and polyadenylation as potential therapeutic targets

Like most cellular mRNAs, the 5′ end of HIV mRNAs is capped and the 3′ end matured by the process of polyadenylation. There are, however, several rather unique and interesting aspects of these post-transcriptional processes on HIV transcripts. Capping of the highly structured 5′ end of HIV mRNAs is influenced by the viral TAT protein and a population of HIV mRNAs contains a trimethyl-G cap reminiscent of U snRNAs involved in splicing. HIV polyadenylation involves active repression of a promoter-proximal polyadenylation signal, auxiliary upstream regulatory elements and moonlighting polyadenylation factors that have additional impacts on HIV biology outside of the constraints of classical mRNA 3’ end formation. This review describes these post-transcriptional novelties of HIV gene expression as well as their implications in viral biology and as possible targets for therapeutic intervention.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat increases the expression of cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 73-kilodalton subunit modulating cellular and viral expression

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Tat protein, which is essential for HIV gene expression and viral replication, is known to mediate pleiotropic effects on various cell functions. For instance, Tat protein is able to regulate the rate of transcription of host cellular genes and to interact with the signaling machinery, leading to cellular dysfunction. To study the effect that HIV-1 Tat exerts on the host cell, we identified several genes that were up- or down-regulated in tat-expressing cell lines by using the differential display method. HIV-1 Tat specifically increases the expression of the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) 73-kDa subunit (CPSF3) without affecting the expression of the 160- and 100-kDa subunits of the CPSF complex. This complex comprises four subunits and has a key function in the 3'-end processing of pre-mRNAs by a coordinated interaction with other factors. CPSF3 overexpression experiments and knockdown of the endogenous CPSF3 by mRNA interference have shown that this subunit of the complex is an important regulatory protein for both viral and cellular gene expression. In addition to the known CPSF3 function in RNA polyadenylation, we also present evidence that this protein exerts transcriptional activities by repressing the mdm2 gene promoter. Thus, HIV-1-Tat up-regulation of CPSF3 could represent a novel mechanism by which this virus increases mRNA processing, causing an increase in both cell and viral gene expression.

The yin and yang of the exosome

Recent studies of the eukaryotic ribosomal RNA processing pathway have identified a complex of ten riboexonucleases called the exosome that plays a central role in the precise formation of the 3' ends of several types of RNAs. The exosome also destroys excess ribosomal RNA precursors and unused intermediates and degrades poly(A)-mRNAs in the cytoplasm. In the nucleus, the complex appears to function in a regulated mRNA surveillance system that degrades transcripts in response to defects in the mRNA processing and export pathways. How the cell regulates the nucleolytic prowess of the exosome to ensure correct and timely synthesis and destruction of RNAs is a central focus of current research.

Influence of the small leader exons 2 and 3 on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gene expression

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) uses an elaborate alternative splicing pattern for the generation of both the 1.8-kb as well as the 4-kb classes of mRNA. An additional diversity of transcripts in both classes is created by the optional inclusion of the small exons 2 and 3 in the leader sequence. To analyze a possible influence of these leader exons on HIV-1 gene expression, several series of expression vectors with different leaders were constructed, expressing either Rev and Env or a heterologous coding sequence, i.e., the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) ORF. Transfection experiments of HeLa-T4(+) cells revealed for all series of constructs that mRNA as well as protein expression was stimulated by the presence of exon 2 and reduced by exon 3. The function of the leader exons 2 and 3 is neither dependent on the regulatory proteins Tat or Rev nor on viral coding sequences. Neither transcription rates nor stability of polyadenylated RNAs were found to be responsible for the different levels of steady-state mRNA. When either exon 2 or 3 was inserted into a heterologous intron, processing of the primary transcripts generated identical mRNA species while maintaining the differences in exon 2/3-dependent mRNA steady-state levels. These results may be explained by exon-specific nuclear RNA degradation rates, as also indicated by results from an in vitro degradation assay using a HeLa nuclear extract.

Formation of mRNA 3' ends in eukaryotes: mechanism, regulation, and interrelationships with other steps in mRNA synthesis

Formation of mRNA 3' ends in eukaryotes requires the interaction of transacting factors with cis-acting signal elements on the RNA precursor by two distinct mechanisms, one for the cleavage of most replication-dependent histone transcripts and the other for cleavage and polyadenylation of the majority of eukaryotic mRNAs. Most of the basic factors have now been identified, as well as some of the key protein-protein and RNA-protein interactions. This processing can be regulated by changing the levels or activity of basic factors or by using activators and repressors, many of which are components of the splicing machinery. These regulatory mechanisms act during differentiation, progression through the cell cycle, or viral infections. Recent findings suggest that the association of cleavage/polyadenylation factors with the transcriptional complex via the carboxyl-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) large subunit is the means by which the cell restricts polyadenylation to Pol II transcripts. The processing of 3' ends is also important for transcription termination downstream of cleavage sites and for assembly of an export-competent mRNA. The progress of the last few years points to a remarkable coordination and cooperativity in the steps leading to the appearance of translatable mRNA in the cytoplasm.

Formation of mRNA 3' ends in eukaryotes: mechanism, regulation, and interrelationships with other steps in mRNA synthesis

Formation of mRNA 3' ends in eukaryotes requires the interaction of transacting factors with cis-acting signal elements on the RNA precursor by two distinct mechanisms, one for the cleavage of most replication-dependent histone transcripts and the other for cleavage and polyadenylation of the majority of eukaryotic mRNAs. Most of the basic factors have now been identified, as well as some of the key protein-protein and RNA-protein interactions. This processing can be regulated by changing the levels or activity of basic factors or by using activators and repressors, many of which are components of the splicing machinery. These regulatory mechanisms act during differentiation, progression through the cell cycle, or viral infections. Recent findings suggest that the association of cleavage/polyadenylation factors with the transcriptional complex via the carboxyl-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) large subunit is the means by which the cell restricts polyadenylation to Pol II transcripts. The processing of 3' ends is also important for transcription termination downstream of cleavage sites and for assembly of an export-competent mRNA. The progress of the last few years points to a remarkable coordination and cooperativity in the steps leading to the appearance of translatable mRNA in the cytoplasm.

Upstream and downstream sequence elements determine the specificity of the rice tungro bacilliform virus promoter and influence RNA production after transcription initiation

The contribution of sequences upstream and downstream of the transcription start site to the strength and specificity of the promoter of rice tungro bacilliform virus was analysed in transgenic rice plants. The promoter is strongly stimulated by downstream sequences which include an intron and is active in all vascular and epidermal cells. Expression in the vascular tissue requires a promoter element located between -100 and -164 to which protein(s) from rice nuclear extracts bind. Elimination of this region leads to specificity for the epidermis. Due to the presence of a polyadenylation signal in the intron, short-stop RNA is produced from the promoter in addition to full-length primary transcript and its spliced derivatives. The ratio between short-stop RNA and full-length or spliced RNA is determined by upstream promoter sequences, suggesting the assembly of RNA polymerase complexes with different processivity on this promoter.

The role of herpes simplex virus ICP27 in the regulation of UL24 gene expression by differential polyadenylation

Herpes simplex virus specifies two sets of transcripts from the UL24 gene, short transcripts (e.g., 1.4 kb), processed at the UL24 poly(A) site, and long transcripts (e.g., 5.6 kb), processed at the UL26 poly(A) site. The 1.4- and 5.6-kb transcripts initiate from the same promoter but are expressed with early and late kinetics, respectively. Measurements of transcript levels following actinomycin D treatment of infected cells revealed that the 1.4- and 5.6-kb UL24 transcripts have similar stabilities, consistent with UL24 transcript kinetics being regulated by differential polyadenylation rather than by differential stabilities. Although the UL24 poly(A) site, which gives rise to short transcripts, is encountered first during processing, long transcripts processed at the UL26 site are equally or more abundant; thus, operationally, the UL24 site is weak. Using a series of viral ICP27 mutants, we investigated whether ICP27, which has been suggested to stimulate the usage of weak poly(A) sites, stimulates 1.4-kb transcript accumulation. We found that accumulation of 1.4-kb transcripts did not require ICP27 during viral infection. Rather, ICP27 was required for full expression of 5.6-kb transcripts, and the decrease in 5. 6-kb transcripts relative to 1.4-kb transcripts was not due solely to reduced DNA synthesis. Our results indicate that temporal expression of UL24 transcripts can be regulated by differential polyadenylation and that although ICP27 is not required for processing at the operationally weak UL24 poly(A) site, it does modulate 5.6-kb transcript levels at a step subsequent to transcriptional initiation.