Postcleavage sequence specificity in V(D)J recombination

RAG1/2 induces double-stranded DNA breaks at non-Ig loci in the proximity of single sequence repeats in developing B cells

In developing B cells, V(D)J gene recombination is initiated by the RAG1/2 endonuclease complex, introducing double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) in V, D, and J genes and resulting in the formation of the hypervariable parts of immunoglobulins (Ig). Persistent or aberrant RAG1/2 targeting is a potential threat to genome integrity. While RAG1 and RAG2 have been shown to bind various regions genome-wide, the in vivo off-target DNA damage instigated by RAG1/2 endonuclease remains less well understood. In the current study, we identified regions containing RAG1/2-induced DNA breaks in mouse pre-B cells on a genome-wide scale using a global DNA DSB detection strategy. We detected 1489 putative RAG1/2-dependent DSBs, most of which were located outside the Ig loci. DNA sequence motif analysis showed a specific enrichment of RAG1/2-induced DNA DSBs at GA- and CA-repeats and GC-rich motifs. These findings provide further insights into RAG1/2 off-target activity. The ability of RAG1/2 to introduce DSBs on the non-Ig loci during the endogenous V(D)J recombination emphasizes its genotoxic potential in developing lymphocytes.

Genomic rearrangements induced by unscheduled DNA double strand breaks in somatic mammalian cells

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly toxic lesions that can lead to profound genome rearrangements and/or cell death. They routinely occur in genomes due to endogenous or exogenous stresses. Efficient repair systems, canonical non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination exist in the cell and not only ensure the maintenance of genome integrity but also, via specific programmed DNA double-strand breaks, permit its diversity and plasticity. However, these repair systems need to be tightly controlled because they can also generate genomic rearrangements. Thus, when DSB repair is not properly regulated, genome integrity is no longer guaranteed. In this review, we will focus on non-programmed genome rearrangements generated by DSB repair, in somatic cells. We first discuss genome rearrangements induced by homologous recombination and end-joining. We then discuss recently described rearrangement mechanisms, driven by microhomologies, that do not involve the joining of DNA ends but rather initiate DNA synthesis (microhomology-mediated break-induced replication, fork stalling and template switching and microhomology-mediated template switching). Finally, we discuss chromothripsis, which is the shattering of a localized region of the genome followed by erratic rejoining.

Genomic organization of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) T cell receptor alpha/delta locus and analysis of expressed products

In testing the hypothesis that all jawed vertebrate classes employ immunoglobulin heavy chain V (IgHV) gene segments in their T cell receptor (TCR)δ encoding loci, we found that some basic characterization was required of zebrafish TCRδ. We began by annotating and characterizing the TCRα/δ locus of Danio rerio based on the most recent genome assembly, GRCz10. We identified a total of 141 theoretically functional V segments which we grouped into 41 families based upon 70 % nucleotide identity. This number represents the second greatest count of apparently functional V genes thus far described in an antigen receptor locus with the exception of cattle TCRα/δ. Cloning, relative quantitative PCR, and deep sequencing results corroborate that zebrafish do express TCRδ, but these data suggest only at extremely low levels and in limited diversity in the spleens of the adult fish. While we found no evidence for IgH-TCRδ rearrangements in this fish, by determining the locus organization we were able to suggest how the evolution of the teleost α/δ locus could have lost IgHVs that exist in sharks and frogs. We also found evidence of surprisingly low TCRδ expression and repertoire diversity in this species.

RAG Represents a Widespread Threat to the Lymphocyte Genome

The RAG1 endonuclease, together with its cofactor RAG2, is essential for V(D)J recombination but is a potent threat to genome stability. The sources of RAG1 mis-targeting and the mechanisms that have evolved to suppress it are poorly understood. Here, we report that RAG1 associates with chromatin at thousands of active promoters and enhancers in the genome of developing lymphocytes. The mouse and human genomes appear to have responded by reducing the abundance of "cryptic" recombination signals near RAG1 binding sites. This depletion operates specifically on the RSS heptamer, whereas nonamers are enriched at RAG1 binding sites. Reversing this RAG-driven depletion of cleavage sites by insertion of strong recombination signals creates an ectopic hub of RAG-mediated V(D)J recombination and chromosomal translocations. Our findings delineate rules governing RAG binding in the genome, identify areas at risk of RAG-mediated damage, and highlight the evolutionary struggle to accommodate programmed DNA damage in developing lymphocytes.

V(D)J recombination: mechanisms of initiation

V(D)J recombination assembles immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes during lymphocyte development through a series of carefully orchestrated DNA breakage and rejoining events. DNA cleavage requires a series of protein-DNA complexes containing the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and recombination signals that flank the recombining gene segments. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the function and domain organization of the RAG proteins, the composition and structure of RAG-DNA complexes, and the pathways that lead to the formation of these complexes. We also consider the functional significance of RAG-mediated histone recognition and ubiquitin ligase activities, and the role played by RAG in ensuring proper repair of DNA breaks made during V(D)J recombination. Finally, we propose a model for the formation of RAG-DNA complexes that involves anchoring of RAG1 at the recombination signal nonamer and RAG2-dependent surveillance of adjoining DNA for suitable spacer and heptamer sequences.

Non-consensus heptamer sequences destabilize the RAG post-cleavage complex, making ends available to alternative DNA repair pathways

V(D)J recombination entails double-stranded DNA cleavage at the antigen receptor loci by the RAG1/2 proteins, which recognize conserved recombination signal sequences (RSSs) adjoining variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments. After cleavage, RAG1/2 remain associated with the coding and signal ends (SE) in a post-cleavage complex (PCC), which is critical for their proper joining by classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Certain mutations in RAG1/2 destabilize the PCC, allowing DNA ends to access inappropriate repair pathways such as alternative NHEJ, an error-prone pathway implicated in chromosomal translocations. The PCC is thus thought to discourage aberrant rearrangements by controlling repair pathway choice. Since interactions between RAG1/2 and the RSS heptamer element are especially important in forming the RAG-SE complex, we hypothesized that non-consensus heptamer sequences might affect PCC stability. We find that certain non-consensus heptamers, including a cryptic heptamer implicated in oncogenic chromosomal rearrangements, destabilize the PCC, allowing coding and SEs to be repaired by non-standard pathways, including alternative NHEJ. These data suggest that some non-consensus RSS, frequently present at chromosomal translocations in lymphoid neoplasms, may promote genomic instability by a novel mechanism, disabling the PCC’s ability to restrict repair pathway choice.

Recent insights into the formation of RAG-induced chromosomal translocations

Chromosomal translocations are found in many types of tumors, where they may be either a cause or a result of malignant transformation. In lymphoid neoplasms, however, it is dear that pathogenesis is initiated by any of a number of recurrent DNA rearrangements. These particular translocations typically place an oncogene under the regulatory control of an Ig or TCR gene promoter, dysregulating cell growth, differentiation, or apoptosis. Given that physiological DNA rearrangements (V(D)J and class switch recombination) are integral to lymphocyte development, it is critical to understand how genomic stability is maintained during these processes. Recent advances in our understanding of DNA damage signaling and repair have provided clues to the kinds of mechanisms that lead to V(D)J-mediated translocations. In turn, investigations into the regulation of V(D)J joining have illuminated a formerly obscure pathway of DNA repair known as alternative NHEJ, which is error-prone and frequently involved in translocations. In this chapter we consider recent advances in our understanding of the functions of the RAG proteins, RAG interactions with DNA repair pathways, damage signaling and chromosome biology, all of which shed light on how mistakes at different stages of V(D)J recombination might lead to leukemias and lymphomas.

Recombinase, chromosomal translocations and lymphoid neoplasia: targeting mistakes and repair failures

A large number of lymphoid malignancies is characterized by specific chromosomal translocations, which are closely linked to the initial steps of pathogenesis. The hallmark of these translocations is the ectopic activation of a silent proto-oncogene through its relocation at the vicinity of an active regulatory element. Due to the unique feature of lymphoid cells to somatically rearrange and mutate receptor genes, and to the corresponding strong activity of the immune enhancers/promoters at that stage of cell development, B- and T-cell differentiation pathways represent propitious targets for chromosomal translocations and oncogene activation. Recent progress in the understanding of the V(D)J recombination process has allowed a more accurate definition of the translocation mechanisms involved, and has revealed that V(D)J-mediated translocations result both from targeting mistakes of the recombinase, and from illegitimate repair of the V(D)J recombination intermediates. Surprisingly, V(D)J-mediated translocations turn out to be restricted to two specific sub-types of lymphoid malignancies, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias, and a restricted set of mature B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

Coding joint diversity in mature and immature B-cell lines

Antigen receptor gene rearrangement is regulated by many factors in B and T lymphocytes. The sequences of the gene segments themselves, their associated recombination signal sequences (RSS), expression of the RAG genes and the chromatin accessibility of the particular gene segments to be rearranged all influence the outcome of recombination and thus antigen receptor diversity. In the present study, we have evaluated the effect of variations in RAG activity level on the junctional diversity of coding joint sequences. Using the pre-B-like 204-1-8 and the mature B DR3 cell lines under different transfection conditions, we were able to investigate recombination activity levels that varied 100-fold. We evaluated the sequences of the coding joints for junctional diversity resulting from nucleotide addition or deletion. Surprisingly, we found that the sequence of coding joints of these recombinants did not exhibit significant variation despite the large difference in recombination frequency. Our results indicate that the fidelity of the joining phase of V(D)J recombination is not jeopardized by varying RAG activity.

Antigen receptor genes and the evolution of a recombinase

Antigen receptor genes exist in the germline in a "split" configuration and are assembled in developing B and T lymphocytes by V(D)J recombination. This site-specific recombination reaction is initiated by a complex containing the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and completed by general DNA repair factors. RAG1 and RAG2, like the adaptive immune system itself, are found exclusively in jawed vertebrates, and are thought to have entered the vertebrate genome by horizontal transmission as components of a transposable element. This review discusses the structure of antigen receptor genes and the mechanisms by which they are assembled and diversified, and then goes on to consider the evolutionary implications of the arrival of the hypothetical "RAG transposon".

The bounty of RAGs: recombination signal complexes and reaction outcomes

V(D)J recombination is a form of site-specific DNA rearrangement through which antigen receptor genes are assembled. This process involves the breakage and reunion of DNA mediated by two lymphoid cell-specific proteins, recombination activating genes RAG-1 and RAG-2, and ubiquitously expressed architectural DNA-binding proteins and DNA-repair factors. Here I review the progress toward understanding the composition, assembly, organization, and activity of the protein-DNA complexes that support the initiation of V(D)J recombination, as well as the molecular basis for the sequence-specific recognition of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) that are the targets of the RAG proteins. Parallels are drawn between V(D)J recombination and Tn5/Tn10 transposition with respect to the reactions, the proteins, and the protein-DNA complexes involved in these processes. I also consider the relative roles of the different sequence elements within the RSS in recognition, cleavage, and post-cleavage events. Finally, I discuss alternative DNA transactions mediated by the V(D)J recombinase, the protein-DNA complexes that support them, and factors and forces that control them.

Recombination-activating gene proteins: more regulation, please

Developing B and T cells assemble gene segments in order to create the variable regions of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors required by our adaptive immune response. The chemistry of this recombination pathway requires a specific nuclease and a more general repair pathway for double-strand breaks. A complex of the recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins provides the nuclease activity. In fact, RAG1 and RAG2 probably coordinate many steps involving the coding and signaling DNA sequences. Studies using deletion and truncation mutants of the RAG proteins demonstrate that each of these contain a functional core region, representing about two-thirds of the polypeptides. While the core regions are sufficient to catalyze recombination in test systems, the full-length proteins seem to show more complicated behaviors in vivo. A plausible explanation is that regions outside the core help in the proper regulation of recombination. The non-core region of RAG1 has been found to contain a ubiquitin ligase. Regulatory functions may contribute to autoregulation of the proteins involved, fidelity of the reaction, protection of the cell from translocations, coordination of recombination with the cell cycle, and possibly modification of the chromatin structure of target DNA.

In vitro and in vivo studies on the generation of the primary T-cell receptor repertoire

The primary T-cell receptor repertoire is generated by somatic rearrangement of discontinuous gene segments. The shape of the combinatorial repertoire is stereotypical and, in part, evolutionarily conserved among mammals. Rearrangement is initiated by specific interactions between the recombinase and the recombination signals (RSs) that flank the gene segments. Conserved sequence variations in the RS, which modulate its interactions with the recombinase, appear to be a major factor in shaping the primary repertoire. In vitro, biochemical studies have revealed distinct steps in these complex recombinase-RS interactions that may determine the final frequency of gene segment rearrangement. These studies offer a plausible model to explain gene segment selection, but new, more physiological approaches will have to be developed to verify and refine the mechanism by which the recombinase targets the RS in its endogenous chromosomal context in vivo.

Computational tools for understanding sequence variability in recombination signals

The recombination signals (RSs) that guide V(D)J rearrangement are remarkably diverse. In mice, fewer than 16% of RSs carry consensus heptamers and nonamers and none also contain a consensus spacer sequence. It is increasingly clear that this variability regulates recombination: genetic variability in RSs may help enforce allelic exclusion, determine the general nature of antigen receptor repertoires, and mitigate autoreactivity in B lymphocytes. The great diversity of RSs has largely precluded, however, empiric determinations of how RS sequence affects recombination. For example, 4(39) unique 23-RSs are possible or approximately 3 x 10(23) sequences; some 7 x 10(13) unique 23-RSs can be produced just by changes in the spacer. In contrast, the recombination activities of only 100 or so RSs have been measured, and it is unlikely that the activities of even a tiny fraction of extant RSs can be determined. We have addressed the problem of how sequence determines the efficiency of RS templates by generating computational models that describe the correlation structure of mouse RSs. These models successfully predict RS activity and identify functional, cryptic RSs (cRSs). These models permit studies to identify RSs and cRSs for empiric study and constitute a tool useful for understanding RS structure and function.

Full-length RAG-2, and not full-length RAG-1, specifically suppresses RAG-mediated transposition but not hybrid joint formation or disintegration

RAG-1 and RAG-2 initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA breaks at recombination signal sequences flanking a pair of antigen receptor gene segments. Occasionally, the RAG proteins mediate two other alternative DNA rearrangements in vivo: the rejoining of signal and coding ends and the transposition of signal ends into unrelated DNA. In contrast, truncated, catalytically active "core" RAG proteins readily catalyze these reactions in vitro, suggesting that full-length RAG proteins directly or indirectly suppress these undesired reactions in vivo. To discriminate between direct and indirect suppression models, full-length RAG proteins were purified and characterized in vitro. From mammalian cells, full-length RAG-1 is readily purified with core RAG-2 but not full-length RAG-2 and vice versa. Despite differences in DNA binding activity, recombinase containing either core or full-length RAG-1 or RAG-2 possess comparable cleavage, rejoining, and end-processing activity, as well as similar usage preferences for canonical versus cryptic recombination signals. However, recombinase containing full-length RAG-2, but not full-length RAG-1, exhibits dramatically reduced transposition activity in vitro. These data suggest RAG-mediated transposition and rejoining are differentially regulated by the full-length RAG proteins in vivo (the former directly by RAG-2 and the latter indirectly through other factors) and argue that noncore portions of the RAG proteins have little or no direct influence over V(D)J recombinase site specificity.

V(D)J Recombination Frequencies Can Be Profoundly Affected by Changes in the Spacer Sequence

Each V, D, and J gene segment is flanked by a recombination signal sequence (RSS), composed of a conserved heptamer and nonamer separated by a 12- or 23-bp spacer. Variations from consensus in the heptamer or nonamer at specific positions can dramatically affect recombination frequency, but until recently, it had been generally held that only the length of the spacer, but not its sequence, affects the efficacy of V(D)J recombination. In this study, we show several examples in which the spacer sequence can significantly affect recombination frequencies. We show that the difference in spacer sequence alone of two V(H)S107 genes affects recombination frequency in recombination substrates to a similar extent as the bias observed in vivo. We show that individual positions in the spacer can affect recombination frequency, and those positions can often be predicted by their frequency in a database of RSS. Importantly, we further show that a spacer sequence that has an infrequently observed nucleotide at each position is essentially unable to support recombination in an extrachromosmal substrate assay, despite being flanked by a consensus heptamer and nonamer. This infrequent spacer sequence RSS shows only a 2-fold reduction of binding of RAG proteins, but the in vitro cleavage of this RSS is approximately 9-fold reduced compared with a good RSS. These data demonstrate that the spacer sequence should be considered to play an important role in the recombination efficacy of an RSS, and that the effect of the spacer occurs primarily subsequent to RAG binding.

DNA-Rag Protein Interactions in the Control of Selective D Gene Utilization in the TCRβ Locus

Ordered assembly of Ag receptor genes by VDJ recombination is a key determinant of successful lymphocyte differentiation and function. Control of gene rearrangement has been traditionally viewed as a result of complex reorganization of the nucleochromatin mediated by several nuclear factors. Selective recombination of the variable (V) genes to the diversity (D), but not joining (J), gene segments within the TCRbeta locus has been shown to be controlled by recombination signal (RS) sequences that flank the gene segments. Through ex vivo and in vitro recombination assays, we demonstrate that the Rag proteins can discriminate between the RS of the D and J genes and enforce selective D gene incorporation into the TCRbeta variable domain in the absence of other nuclear factors or chromatin structure. DNA binding studies indicate that discrimination is not simply caused by higher affinity binding of the Rag proteins to the isolated 12RS of the D as opposed to the J genes. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that the 12RS within the TCRbeta locus is functionally inferior to the consensus 12RS. We propose that selective gene segment usage is controlled at the level of differential assembly and/or stability of synaptic RS complexes, and that evolutionary "deterioration" of the RS motifs may have been important to allow the VDJ recombinase to exert autonomous control over gene segment use during gene rearrangement.

A recombinase diversified: new functions of the RAG proteins

The RAG proteins were long thought to serve merely as a nuclease, initiating recombination by cleaving DNA. Recent work has shown, however, that these proteins are essential for many steps in the recombination pathway, such as opening hairpins and joining broken DNA ends, and that they can also act as a transposase, targeting distorted DNA structures such as hairpins.

V(D)J-mediated translocations in lymphoid neoplasms: a functional assessment of genomic instability by cryptic sites

Most lymphoid malignancies are initiated by specific chromosomal translocations between immunoglobulin (Ig)/T cell receptor (TCR) gene segments and cellular proto-oncogenes. In many cases, illegitimate V(D)J recombination has been proposed to be involved in the translocation process, but this has never been functionally established. Using extra-chromosomal recombination assays, we determined the ability of several proto-oncogenes to target V(D)J recombination, and assessed the impact of their recombinogenic potential on translocation rates in vivo. Our data support the involvement of 2 distinct mechanisms: translocations involving LMO2, TAL2, and TAL1 in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), are compatible with illegitimate V(D)J recombination between a TCR locus and a proto-oncogene locus bearing a fortuitous but functional recombination site (type 1); in contrast, translocations involving BCL1 and BCL2 in B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (B-NHL), are compatible with a process in which only the IgH locus breaks are mediated by V(D)J recombination (type 2). Most importantly, we show that the t(11;14)(p13;q32) translocation involving LMO2 is present at strikingly high frequency in normal human thymus, and that the recombinogenic potential conferred by the LMO2 cryptic site is directly predictive of the in vivo level of translocation at that locus. These findings provide new insights into the regulation forces acting upon genomic instability in B and T cell tumorigenesis.

The RAG proteins in V(D)J recombination: more than just a nuclease

V(D)J recombination is the process that generates the diversity among T cell receptors and is one of three mechanisms that contribute to the diversity of antibodies in the vertebrate immune system. The mechanism requires precise cutting of the DNA at segment boundaries followed by rejoining of particular pairs of the resulting termini. The imprecision of aspects of the joining reaction contributes significantly to increasing the variability of the resulting functional genes. Signal sequences target DNA recombination and must participate in a highly ordered protein-DNA complex in order to limit recombination to appropriate partners. Two proteins, RAG1 and RAG2, together form the nuclease that cleaves the DNA at the border of the signal sequences. Additional roles of these proteins in organizing the reaction complex for subsequent steps are explored.

A C-terminal region of RAG1 contacts the coding DNA during V(D)J recombination

The site-specific DNA rearrangement process, called V(D)J recombination, creates much of the diversity of immune receptor molecules in the adaptive immune system. Central to this reaction is the organization of the protein-DNA complex containing the proteins RAG1 and RAG2 and their DNA targets. A long-term goal is to appreciate the three-dimensional relationships between the proteins and DNA that allow the assembly of the appropriate reaction intermediates, resulting in concerted cleavage and directed rejoining of the DNA ends. Previous cross-linking approaches have mapped RAG1 contacts on the DNA. RAG1 protein contacts the DNA at the conserved heptamer and nonamer sequences as well as at the coding DNA adjacent to the heptamer. Here we subject RAG1, covalently cross-linked to DNA substrates, to partial cyanogen bromide degradation or trypsin proteolysis in order to map contacts on the protein. We find that coding-sequence contacts occur near the C terminus of RAG1, while contacts made within the recombination signal sequence occur nearer the N terminus of the core region of RAG1. A deletion protein lacking the C-terminal DNA-contacting region is still capable of making the N-terminal contacts. This suggests that the two binding interactions may exist on two separate domains of the protein. A trypsin cleavage pattern of the native protein supports this conclusion. A two-domain model for RAG1 is evaluated with respect to the larger recombination complex.

Separation-of-function mutants reveal critical roles for RAG2 in both the cleavage and joining steps of V(D)J recombination

The only established physiological function of the V(D)J recombinase, comprising RAG1 and RAG2, is to perform DNA cleavage. The molecular roles of RAG2 in cleavage, the mechanisms used to join the broken DNA ends, and the identity of nuclease(s) that open the hairpin coding ends have been unknown. Site-directed mutagenesis targeting each conserved basic amino acid in RAG2 revealed several separation-of-function mutants that address these questions. Analysis of these mutants reveals that RAG2 helps recognize or cleave distorted DNA intermediates and plays an essential role in the joining step of V(D)J recombination. Moreover, the discovery that some mutants block RAG-mediated hairpin opening in vitro provides a critical link between this biochemical activity and coding joint formation in vivo.

Joining-deficient RAG1 mutants block V(D)J recombination in vivo and hairpin opening in vitro

The RAG proteins cleave at V(D)J recombination signal sequences then form a postcleavage complex with the broken ends. The role of this complex in end processing and joining, if any, is undefined. We have identified two RAG1 mutants proficient for DNA cleavage but severely defective for coding and signal joint formation, providing direct evidence that RAG1 is critical for joining in vivo and strongly suggesting that the postcleavage complex is important in end joining. We have also identified a RAG1 mutant that is severely defective for both hairpin opening in vitro and coding joint formation in vivo. These data suggest that the hairpin opening activity of the RAG proteins plays an important physiological role in V(D)J recombination.