The pattern of chromosome folding in interphase is outlined by the linear gene density profile

Different Tumor Types Share a Common Nuclear Map of Chromosome Territories

Different tumor types are characterized by unique histopathological patterns including distinctive nuclear architectures. I hypothesized that the difference in nuclear appearance is reflected in different nuclear maps of chromosome territories, the discrete regions occupied by individual chromosomes in the interphase nucleus. To test this hypothesis, I used interchromosomal translocations (ITLs) as an analytical tool to map chromosome territories in 11 different tumor types from the TCGA PanCancer database encompassing 6003 tumors with 5295 ITLs. For each chromosome I determined the number and percentage of all ITLs for any given tumor type. Chromosomes were ranked according to the frequency and percentage of ITLs per chromosome. The ranking showed similar patterns for all tumor types. Chromosomes 1, 8, 11, 17, and 19 were ranked in the top quarter, accounting for 35.2% of 5295 ITLs, whereas chromosomes 13, 15, 18, 21, and X were in the bottom quarter, accounting for only 10.5% ITLs. The correlation between the chromosome ranking in the total group of 6003 tumors and the ranking in individual tumor types was significant, ranging from P < .0001 to .0033. Thus, contrary to my hypothesis, different tumor types share a common nuclear map of chromosome territories. Based on the large number of ITLs in 11 different types of malignancy one can discern a shared pattern of chromosome territories in cancer and propose a probabilistic model of chromosomes 1, 8, 11, 17, 19 in the center of the nucleus and chromosomes 13, 15, 18, 21, X at the periphery.

3D genome organisation in Drosophila

Ever since Thomas Hunt Morgan's discovery of the chromosomal basis of inheritance by using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism, the fruit fly has remained an essential model system in studies of genome biology, including chromatin organisation. Very much as in vertebrates, in Drosophila, the genome is organised in territories, compartments and topologically associating domains (TADs). However, these domains might be formed through a slightly different mechanism than in vertebrates due to the presence of a large and potentially redundant set of insulator proteins and the minor role of dCTCF in TAD boundary formation. Here, we review the different levels of chromatin organisation in Drosophila and discuss mechanisms and factors that might be involved in TAD formation. The dynamics of TADs and enhancer-promoter interactions in the context of transcription are covered in the light of currently conflicting results. Finally, we illustrate the value of polymer modelling approaches to infer the principles governing the three-dimensional organisation of the Drosophila genome.

Differentiating cancer cells reveal early large-scale genome regulation by pericentric domains

Finding out how cells prepare for fate change during differentiation commitment was our task. To address whether the constitutive pericentromere-associated domains (PADs) may be involved, we used a model system with known transcriptome data, MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with the ErbB3 ligand heregulin (HRG), which induces differentiation and is used in the therapy of cancer. PAD-repressive heterochromatin (H3K9me3), centromere-associated-protein-specific, and active euchromatin (H3K4me3) antibodies, real-time PCR, acridine orange DNA structural test (AOT), and microscopic image analysis were applied. We found a two-step DNA unfolding after 15–20 and 60 min of HRG treatment, respectively. This behavior was consistent with biphasic activation of the early response genes (c-fos - fosL1/myc) and the timing of two transcriptome avalanches reported in the literature. In control, the average number of PADs negatively correlated with their size by scale-free distribution, and centromere clustering in turn correlated with PAD size, both indicating that PADs may create and modulate a suprachromosomal network by fusing and splitting a constant proportion of the constitutive heterochromatin. By 15 min of HRG treatment, the bursting unraveling of PADs from the nucleolus boundary occurred, coinciding with the first step of H3K4me3 chromatin unfolding, confirmed by AOT. The second step after 60 min of HRG treatment was associated with transcription of long noncoding RNA from PADs and peaking of fosL1/c-myc response. We hypothesize that the bursting of PAD clusters under a critical silencing threshold pushes the first transcription avalanche, whereas the destruction of the PAD network enables genome rewiring needed for differentiation repatterning, mediated by early response bivalent genes.

How does chromatin package DNA within nucleus and regulate gene expression?

The human body is made up of 60 trillion cells, each cell containing 2 millions of genomic DNA in its nucleus. How is this genomic deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] organised into nuclei? Around 1880, W. Flemming discovered a nuclear substance that was clearly visible on staining under primitive light microscopes and named it 'chromatin'; this is now thought to be the basic unit of genomic DNA organization. Since long before DNA was known to carry genetic information, chromatin has fascinated biologists. DNA has a negatively charged phosphate backbone that produces electrostatic repulsion between adjacent DNA regions, making it difficult for DNA to fold upon itself. In this article, we will try to shed light on how does chromatin package DNA within nucleus and regulate gene expression?

Spatial Genome Organization and Its Emerging Role as a Potential Diagnosis Tool

In eukaryotic cells the genome is highly spatially organized. Functional relevance of higher order genome organization is implied by the fact that specific genes, and even whole chromosomes, alter spatial position in concert with functional changes within the nucleus, for example with modifications to chromatin or transcription. The exact molecular pathways that regulate spatial genome organization and the full implication to the cell of such an organization remain to be determined. However, there is a growing realization that the spatial organization of the genome can be used as a marker of disease. While global genome organization patterns remain largely conserved in disease, some genes and chromosomes occupy distinct nuclear positions in diseased cells compared to their normal counterparts, with the patterns of reorganization differing between diseases. Importantly, mapping the spatial positioning patterns of specific genomic loci can distinguish cancerous tissue from benign with high accuracy. Genome positioning is an attractive novel biomarker since additional quantitative biomarkers are urgently required in many cancer types. Current diagnostic techniques are often subjective and generally lack the ability to identify aggressive cancer from indolent, which can lead to over- or under-treatment of patients. Proof-of-principle for the use of genome positioning as a diagnostic tool has been provided based on small scale retrospective studies. Future large-scale studies are required to assess the feasibility of bringing spatial genome organization-based diagnostics to the clinical setting and to determine if the positioning patterns of specific loci can be useful biomarkers for cancer prognosis. Since spatial reorganization of the genome has been identified in multiple human diseases, it is likely that spatial genome positioning patterns as a diagnostic biomarker may be applied to many diseases.

Tissue-of-origin-specific gene repositioning in breast and prostate cancer

Genes have preferential non-random spatial positions within the cell nucleus. The nuclear position of a subset of genes differ between cell types and some genes undergo repositioning events in disease, including cancer. It is currently unclear whether the propensity of a gene to reposition reflects an intrinsic property of the locus or the tissue. Using quantitative FISH analysis of a set of genes which reposition in cancer, we test here the tissue specificity of gene repositioning in normal and malignant breast or prostate tissues. We find tissue-specific organization of the genome in normal breast and prostate with 40 % of genes occupying differential positions between the two tissue types. While we demonstrate limited overlap between gene sets that repositioned in breast and prostate cancer, we identify two genes that undergo disease-related gene repositioning in both cancer types. Our findings indicate that gene repositioning in cancer is tissue-of-origin specific.

Functional implications of genome topology

Although genomes are defined by their sequence, the linear arrangement of nucleotides is only their most basic feature. A fundamental property of genomes is their topological organization in three-dimensional space in the intact cell nucleus. The application of imaging methods and genome-wide biochemical approaches, combined with functional data, is revealing the precise nature of genome topology and its regulatory functions in gene expression and genome maintenance. The emerging picture is one of extensive self-enforcing feedback between activity and spatial organization of the genome, suggestive of a self-organizing and self-perpetuating system that uses epigenetic dynamics to regulate genome function in response to regulatory cues and to propagate cell-fate memory.

Hierarchies in eukaryotic genome organization: Insights from polymer theory and simulations

Eukaryotic genomes possess an elaborate and dynamic higher-order structure within the limiting confines of the cell nucleus. Knowledge of the physical principles and the molecular machinery that govern the 3D organization of this structure and its regulation are key to understanding the relationship between genome structure and function. Elegant microscopy and chromosome conformation capture techniques supported by analysis based on polymer models are important steps in this direction. Here, we review results from these efforts and provide some additional insights that elucidate the relationship between structure and function at different hierarchical levels of genome organization.

Chromosome territories

Chromosome territories (CTs) constitute a major feature of nuclear architecture. In a brief statement, the possible contribution of nuclear architecture studies to the field of epigenomics is considered, followed by a historical account of the CT concept and the final compelling experimental evidence of a territorial organization of chromosomes in all eukaryotes studied to date. Present knowledge of nonrandom CT arrangements, of the internal CT architecture, and of structural interactions with other CTs is provided as well as the dynamics of CT arrangements during cell cycle and postmitotic terminal differentiation. The article concludes with a discussion of open questions and new experimental strategies to answer them.

DNA codes and information: formal structures and relational causes

Recently the terms "codes" and "information" as used in the context of molecular biology have been the subject of much discussion. Here I propose that a variety of structural realism can assist us in rethinking the concepts of DNA codes and information apart from semantic criteria. Using the genetic code as a theoretical backdrop, a necessary distinction is made between codes qua symbolic representations and information qua structure that accords with data. Structural attractors are also shown to be entailed by the mapping relation that any DNA code is a part of (as the domain). In this framework, these attractors are higher-order informational structures that obviate any "DNA-centric" reductionism. In addition to the implications that are discussed, this approach validates the array of coding systems now recognized in molecular biology.

The radial arrangement of the human chromosome 7 in the lymphocyte cell nucleus is associated with chromosomal band gene density

In the nuclei of human lymphocytes, chromosome territories are distributed according to the average gene density of each chromosome. However, chromosomes are very heterogeneous in size and base composition, and can contain both very gene-dense and very gene-poor regions. Thus, a precise analysis of chromosome organisation in the nuclei should consider also the distribution of DNA belonging to the chromosomal bands in each chromosome. To improve our understanding of the chromatin organisation, we localised chromosome 7 DNA regions, endowed with different gene densities, in the nuclei of human lymphocytes. Our results showed that this chromosome in cell nuclei is arranged radially with the gene-dense/GC-richest regions exposed towards the nuclear interior and the gene-poorest/GC-poorest ones located at the nuclear periphery. Moreover, we found that chromatin fibres from the 7p22.3 and the 7q22.1 bands are not confined to the territory of the bulk of this chromosome, protruding towards the inner part of the nucleus. Overall, our work demonstrates the radial arrangement of the territory of chromosome 7 in the lymphocyte nucleus and confirms that human genes occupy specific radial positions, presumably to enhance intra- and inter-chromosomal interaction among loci displaying a similar expression pattern, and/or similar replication timing.

Are postnatal hemangioblasts generated by dedifferentiation from committed hematopoietic stem cells?

Cell dedifferentiation occurs in different cell systems. In spite of a relative paucity of data it seems reasonable to assume that cell dedifferentiation exists in reversible equilibrium with differentiation, to which cells resort in response to intercellular signals. The current literature is indeed compatible with the concept that dedifferentiation is guided by structural rearrangements of nuclear chromatin, directed by epigenetic cell memory information available as silenced genes stored on heterochromatin, and that gene transcription exists in reversible "fluctuating continua" during parental cell cycles. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms of cell dedifferentiation and suggest for hematopoietic development that postnatal hemangioblasts are generated by dedifferentiation of committed hematopoietic stem cells.

Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function

Genomes are more than linear sequences. In vivo they exist as elaborate physical structures, and their functional properties are strongly determined by their cellular organization. I discuss here the functional relevance of spatial and temporal genome organization at three hierarchical levels: the organization of nuclear processes, the higher-order organization of the chromatin fiber, and the spatial arrangement of genomes within the cell nucleus. Recent insights into the cell biology of genomes have overturned long-held dogmas and have led to new models for many essential cellular processes, including gene expression and genome stability.

Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations

Chromosomal translocations and genomic instability are universal hallmarks of tumor cells. While the molecular mechanisms leading to the formation of translocations are rapidly being elucidated, a cell biological understanding of how chromosomes undergo translocations in the context of the cell nucleus in vivo is largely lacking. The recent realization that genomes are non-randomly arranged within the nuclear space has profound consequences for mechanisms of chromosome translocations. We review here the emerging principles of spatial genome organization and discuss the implications of non-random spatial genome organization for the genesis and specificity of cancerous chromosomal translocations.

Cell-type specific proximity of centromeric domains of one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11 in nuclei of cerebellar Purkinje neurons

In Purkinje neurons of the mouse cerebellum, the centromeres of several chromosomes are placed in close proximity to form a distinct pattern of clusters and exhibit reproducible spatial redistributions during development. In granule neurons, an adjacent cell type in the cerebellum, the pattern, size, and number of centromeric aggregations are different from those of Purkinje neurons. The present work was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the same chromosomes form part of one aggregate in a cell-type-specific manner. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome-specific paracentromeric probes was used to identify centromeric regions of individual chromosomes in cerebellar Purkinje and granule neurons of the adult mouse. When pairs of centromeric probes were used in two-color FISH, one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11 were routinely found close to each other in Purkinje neurons but not in granule neurons. This finding of specific proximity was limited to the pair 2 and 11, out of the ten chromosome pairs that were randomly selected and studied. Our results indicate that, in adult Purkinje neurons, a cell-type-specific spatial proximity is present between centromeric domains of one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11.