Protein-DNA cross-linking reveals dramatic variation in RNA polymerase II density on different histone repeats of Drosophila melanogaster

Ups and Downs of Poised RNA Polymerase II in B-Cells

Recent genome-wide analyses have uncovered a high accumulation of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) at the 5' end of genes. This elevated Pol II presence at promoters, referred to here as Poll II poising, is mainly (but not exclusively) attributed to temporal pausing of transcription during early elongation which, in turn, has been proposed to be a regulatory step for processes that need to be activated "on demand". Yet, the full genome-wide regulatory role of Pol II poising is yet to be delineated. To elucidate the role of Pol II poising in B cell activation, we compared Pol II profiles in resting and activated B cells. We found that while Pol II poised genes generally overlap functionally among different B cell states and correspond to the functional groups previously identified for other cell types, non-poised genes are B cell state specific. Focusing on the changes in transcription activity upon B cell activation, we found that the majority of such changes were from poised to non-poised state. The genes showing this type of transition were functionally enriched in translation, RNA processing and mRNA metabolic process. Interestingly, we also observed a transition from non-poised to poised state. Within this set of genes we identified several Immediate Early Genes (IEG), which were highly expressed in resting B cell and shifted from non-poised to poised state after B cell activation. Thus Pol II poising does not only mark genes for rapid expression in the future, but it is also associated with genes that are silenced after a burst of their expression. Finally, we performed comparative analysis of the presence of G4 motifs in the context of poised versus non-poised but active genes. Interestingly we observed a differential enrichment of these motifs upstream versus downstream of TSS depending on poising status. The enrichment of G4 sequence motifs upstream of TSS of non-poised active genes suggests a potential role of quadruplexes in expression regulation.

Analyses of promoter-proximal pausing by RNA polymerase II on the hsp70 heat shock gene promoter in a Drosophila nuclear extract

Analyses of Drosophila cells have revealed that RNA polymerase II is paused in a region 20 to 40 nucleotides downstream from the transcription start site of the hsp70 heat shock gene when the gene is not transcriptionally active. We have developed a cell-free system that reconstitutes this promoter-proximal pausing. The paused polymerase has been detected by monitoring the hyperreactivity of thymines in the transcription bubble toward potassium permanganate. The pattern of permanganate reactivity for the hsp70 promoter in the reconstituted system matches the pattern found on the promoter after it has been introduced back into files by P-element-mediated transposition. Matching patterns of permanganate reactivity are also observed for a non-heat shock promoter, the histone H3 promoter. Further analysis of the hsp70 promoter in the reconstituted system reveals that pausing does not depend on sequence-specific interactions located immediately downstream from the pause site. Sequences upstream from the TATA box influence the recruitment of polymerase rather than the efficiency of pausing. Kinetic analysis indicates that the polymerase rapidly enters the paused state and remains stably in this state for at least 25 min. Further analysis shows that the paused polymerase will initially resume elongation when Sarkosyl is added but loses this capacity within minutes of pausing. Using an alpha-amanitin-resistant polymerase, we provide evidence that promoter-proximal pausing does not require the carboxy-terminal domain of the polymerase.

Rapid changes in Drosophila transcription after an instantaneous heat shock

Heat shock rapidly activates expression of some genes and represses others. The kinetics of changes in RNA polymerase distribution on heat shock-modulated genes provides a framework for evaluating the mechanisms of activation and repression of transcription. Here, using two methods, we examined the changes in RNA polymerase II association on a set of Drosophila genes at 30-s intervals following an instantaneous heat shock. In the first method, Drosophila Schneider line 2 cells were quickly frozen to halt transcription, and polymerase distribution was analyzed by a nuclear run-on assay. RNA polymerase transcription at the 5' end of the hsp70 gene could be detected within 30 to 60 s of induction, and by 120 s the first wave of polymerase could already be detected near the 3' end of the gene. A similar rapid induction was found for the small heat shock genes (hsp22, hsp23, hsp26, and hsp27). In contrast to this rapid activation, transcription of the histone H1 gene was found to be rapidly repressed, with transcription reduced by approximately 90% within 300 s of heat shock. Similar results were obtained by an in vivo UV cross-linking assay. In this second method, cell samples removed at 30-s intervals were irradiated with 40-microseconds bursts of UV light from a Xenon flash lamp, and the distribution of polymerase was examined by precipitating UV cross-linked protein-DNA complexes with an antibody to RNA polymerase II. Both approaches also showed the in vivo rate of movement of the first wave of RNA polymerase through the hsp70 gene to be approximately 1.2 kb/min.

Rapid changes in Drosophila transcription after an instantaneous heat shock

Heat shock rapidly activates expression of some genes and represses others. The kinetics of changes in RNA polymerase distribution on heat shock-modulated genes provides a framework for evaluating the mechanisms of activation and repression of transcription. Here, using two methods, we examined the changes in RNA polymerase II association on a set of Drosophila genes at 30-s intervals following an instantaneous heat shock. In the first method, Drosophila Schneider line 2 cells were quickly frozen to halt transcription, and polymerase distribution was analyzed by a nuclear run-on assay. RNA polymerase transcription at the 5' end of the hsp70 gene could be detected within 30 to 60 s of induction, and by 120 s the first wave of polymerase could already be detected near the 3' end of the gene. A similar rapid induction was found for the small heat shock genes (hsp22, hsp23, hsp26, and hsp27). In contrast to this rapid activation, transcription of the histone H1 gene was found to be rapidly repressed, with transcription reduced by approximately 90% within 300 s of heat shock. Similar results were obtained by an in vivo UV cross-linking assay. In this second method, cell samples removed at 30-s intervals were irradiated with 40-microseconds bursts of UV light from a Xenon flash lamp, and the distribution of polymerase was examined by precipitating UV cross-linked protein-DNA complexes with an antibody to RNA polymerase II. Both approaches also showed the in vivo rate of movement of the first wave of RNA polymerase through the hsp70 gene to be approximately 1.2 kb/min.

Transcription of adenovirus and HeLa cell genes in the presence of drugs that inhibit topoisomerase I and II function

The requirements for topoisomerases in transcription of adenovirus and HeLa cell genes were analyzed using drugs that specifically inhibit either topoisomerases I or II. Cleavage of viral DNA by topoisomerases in the presence of either camptothecin or VM26 was used to determine drug concentrations that led to maximal inhibition of ligation in the cleavage and ligation step of topoisomerase I or II respectively. Inhibition of topoisomerase II with VM26 did not cause a direct reduction in transcription of adenoviral genes or HeLa cell heat shock genes. VM26 did, however, interfere with other cellular processes. It reduced nucleoside uptake into HeLa cells from the medium, and it altered the normal nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio of specific RNAs. Treatment of cells with camptothecin to inhibit topoisomerase I reduced but did not abolish transcription of viral and HeLa cell genes. Transcription mediated by both RNA polymerases I and II was reduced. Topoisomerase II did not appear to substitute for topoisomerase I in transcription since treatment of cells with VM26 and camptothecin did not reduce transcript accumulation relative to cells treated with camptothecin alone.