Cell-cycle-specific and serum-dependent expression of gamma-actin mRNA in Swiss mouse 3T3 cells

Intracellular mRNA transport and localized translation

Fine-tuning cellular physiology in response to intracellular and environmental cues requires precise temporal and spatial control of gene expression. High-resolution imaging technologies to detect mRNAs and their translation state have revealed that all living organisms localize mRNAs in subcellular compartments and create translation hotspots, enabling cells to tune gene expression locally. Therefore, mRNA localization is a conserved and integral part of gene expression regulation from prokaryotic to eukaryotic cells. In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms of mRNA transport and local mRNA translation across the kingdoms of life and at organellar, subcellular and multicellular resolution. We also discuss the properties of messenger ribonucleoprotein and higher order RNA granules and how they may influence mRNA transport and local protein synthesis. Finally, we summarize the technological developments that allow us to study mRNA localization and local translation through the simultaneous detection of mRNAs and proteins in single cells, mRNA and nascent protein single-molecule imaging, and bulk RNA and protein detection methods.

Beta and gamma actin mRNAs are differentially located within myoblasts

Actin is of fundamental importance to all eukaryotic cells. Of the six mammalian actins, beta (beta) and gamma (gamma) cytoplasmic are the isoforms found in all nonmuscle cells and differ by only four amino acids at the amino-terminal region. Both genes are regulated temporally and spatially, though no differences in protein function have been described. Using fluorescent double in situ hybridization we describe the simultaneous intracellular localization of both beta and gamma actin mRNA. This study shows that myoblasts differentially segregate the beta and gamma actin mRNAs. The distribution of gamma actin mRNA, only to perinuclear and nearby cytoplasm, suggests a distribution based on diffusion or restriction to nearby cytoplasm. The distribution of beta actin mRNA, perinuclear and at the cell periphery, implicates a peripheral localizing signal which is unique to the beta isoform. The peripheral beta actin mRNA corresponded to cellular morphologies, extending processes, and ruffling edges that reflect cell movement. Total actin and gamma actin protein steady-state distributions were identified by specific antibodies. gamma actin protein was found in both stress fibers and at the cell plasma membrane and does not correspond to its mRNA distribution. We suggest that localized protein synthesis rather than steady-state distribution functionally differentiates between the actin isoforms.

Noncoding regions of the gamma-actin gene influence the impact of the gene on myoblast morphology

We have addressed the question of whether two highly conserved noncoding regions of the gamma-actin gene are of functional importance. Human gamma-actin gene constructs deleted for either the entire 3' untranslated region (UTR) and 3' flank or intron III sequences were transfected into mouse myoblasts and the resulting clones were analyzed for cell morphology and actin protein expression. Transfectants carrying the gamma-actin gene deleted for the 3' end (gamma 22) exhibited numerous long pseudopods and increased surface area. In contrast, transfectants expressing the gamma-actin gene deleted for intron III (gamma 156) were rounded with blebs over the cell surface and showed decreased surface area. The relative expression of beta- to gamma-actin protein decreased for both transfectant types. The total actin protein levels remained constant for the gamma 22 cells but decreased for the gamma 156 cells. The results indicate that alterations to transfectant cell morphology can be influenced by the presence or absence of different noncoding regions in the transfected gamma-actin gene. The mechanisms by which noncoding regions of the gamma-actin gene influence the impact of the gene are unknown. Nevertheless, these noncoding regions are isoform specific and highly conserved in evolution. We propose that the functional significance of the different actin isoforms may involve the properties of these noncoding regions in addition to the differences in protein sequence.

Chicken nonmuscle myosin heavy chains: differential expression of two mRNAs and evidence for two different polypeptides

Two different mRNAs encoding two different nonmuscle myosin heavy chains (MHCs) of approximately 200 kD have been identified in chicken nonmuscle cells, in agreement with the results of Katsuragawa et al. (Katsuragawa, Y., M. Yanagisawa, A. Inoue, and T. Masaki. 1989. Eur. J. Biochem. 184:611-616). In this paper, we quantitate the content of mRNA encoding the two MHCs in a number of different tissues using RNA blot analysis with two specific oligonucleotide probes. Our results show that the relative content of mRNA encoding MHC-A and MHC-B differs in a tissue-dependent manner. Thus the ratio of mRNA encoding MHC-A versus MHC-B varies from greater than 9:1 in spleen and intestinal epithelial cells, to 6:4 in kidney and 2:8 in brain. The effect of serum on MHC mRNA expression was studied in serum-starved cultures of chick embryo fibroblasts. Serum stimulation results in a threefold increase in the mRNA encoding MHC-A and a threefold decrease in mRNA encoding MHC-B. Using SDS polyacrylamide gels, we have separated two nonmuscle MHC isoforms (198 and 196 kD) that can be distinguished from each other by two-dimensional peptide mapping of chymotryptic digests. We provide preliminary evidence that the MHC-A mRNA encodes the 196-kD polypeptide and that the MHC-B mRNA encodes the 198-kD polypeptide.