Role of poly(A) polymerase in the cleavage and polyadenylation of mRNA precursor

Structures of mammalian GLD-2 proteins reveal molecular basis of their functional diversity in mRNA and microRNA processing

The stability and processing of cellular RNA transcripts are efficiently controlled via non-templated addition of single or multiple nucleotides, which is catalyzed by various nucleotidyltransferases including poly(A) polymerases (PAPs). Germline development defective 2 (GLD-2) is among the first reported cytoplasmic non-canonical PAPs that promotes the translation of germline-specific mRNAs by extending their short poly(A) tails in metazoan, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Xenopus. On the other hand, the function of mammalian GLD-2 seems more diverse, which includes monoadenylation of certain microRNAs. To understand the structural basis that underlies the difference between mammalian and non-mammalian GLD-2 proteins, we determine crystal structures of two rodent GLD-2s. Different from C. elegans GLD-2, mammalian GLD-2 is an intrinsically robust PAP with an extensively positively charged surface. Rodent and C. elegans GLD-2s have a topological difference in the β-sheet region of the central domain. Whereas C. elegans GLD-2 prefers adenosine-rich RNA substrates, mammalian GLD-2 can work on RNA oligos with various sequences. Coincident with its activity on microRNAs, mammalian GLD-2 structurally resembles the mRNA and miRNA processor terminal uridylyltransferase 7 (TUT7). Our study reveals how GLD-2 structurally evolves to a more versatile nucleotidyltransferase, and provides important clues in understanding its biological function in mammals.

Formation of the 3' end of histone mRNA: getting closer to the end

Nearly all eukaryotic mRNAs end with a poly(A) tail that is added to their 3' end by the ubiquitous cleavage/polyadenylation machinery. The only known exceptions to this rule are metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs, which end with a highly conserved stem-loop structure. This distinct 3' end is generated by specialized 3' end processing machinery that cleaves histone pre-mRNAs 4-5 nucleotides downstream of the stem-loop and consists of the U7 small nuclear RNP (snRNP) and number of protein factors. Recently, the U7 snRNP has been shown to contain a unique Sm core that differs from that of the spliceosomal snRNPs, and an essential heat labile processing factor has been identified as symplekin. In addition, cross-linking studies have pinpointed CPSF-73 as the endonuclease, which catalyzes the cleavage reaction. Thus, many of the critical components of the 3' end processing machinery are now identified. Strikingly, this machinery is not as unique as initially thought but contains at least two factors involved in cleavage/polyadenylation, suggesting that the two mechanisms have a common evolutionary origin. The greatest challenge that lies ahead is to determine how all these factors interact with each other to form a catalytically competent processing complex capable of cleaving histone pre-mRNAs.

X-ray crystallographic and steady state fluorescence characterization of the protein dynamics of yeast polyadenylate polymerase

Polyadenylate polymerase (PAP) catalyzes the synthesis of poly(A) tails on the 3'-end of pre-mRNA. PAP is composed of three domains: an N-terminal nucleotide-binding domain (homologous to the palm domain of DNA and RNA polymerases), a middle domain (containing other conserved, catalytically important residues), and a unique C-terminal domain (involved in protein-protein interactions required for 3'-end formation). Previous X-ray crystallographic studies have shown that the domains are arranged in a V-shape such that they form a central cleft with the active site located at the base of the cleft at the interface between the N-terminal and middle domains. In the previous studies, the nucleotides were bound directly to the N-terminal domain and exhibited a conspicuous lack of adenine-specific interactions that would constitute nucleotide recognition. Furthermore, it was postulated that base-specific contacts with residues in the middle domain could occur either as a result of a change in the conformation of the nucleotide or domain movement. To address these issues and to better characterize the structural basis of substrate recognition and catalysis, we report two new crystal structures of yeast PAP. A comparison of these structures reveals that the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of PAP move independently as rigid bodies along two well defined axes of rotation. Modeling of the nucleotide into the most closed state allows us to deduce specific nucleotide interactions involving residues in the middle domain (K215, Y224 and N226) that are proposed to be involved in substrate binding and specificity. To further investigate the nature of PAP domain flexibility, 2-aminopurine labeled molecular probes were employed in steady state fluorescence and acrylamide quenching experiments. The results suggest that the closed domain conformation is stabilized upon recognition of the correct subtrate, MgATP, in an enzyme-substrate ternary complex. The implications of these results on the enzyme mechanism of PAP and the possible role for domain motion in an induced fit mechanism are discussed.

Poly(A) polymerase contains multiple functional domains

Poly(A) polymerase (PAP) contains regions of similarity with several known protein domains. Through site-directed mutagenesis, we provide evidence that PAP contains a functional ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain (RBD) that is responsible for primer binding, making it the only known polymerase to contain such a domain. The RBD is adjacent to, and probably overlaps with, an apparent catalytic region responsible for polymerization. Despite the presence of sequence similarities, this catalytic domain appears to be distinct from the conserved polymerase module found in a large number of RNA-dependent polymerases. PAP contains two nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in its C terminus, each by itself similar to the consensus bipartite NLS found in many nuclear proteins. Mutagenesis experiments indicate that both signals, which are separated by nearly 140 residues, play important roles in directing PAP exclusively to the nucleus. Surprisingly, basic amino acids in the N-terminal-most NLS are also essential for AAUAAA-dependent polyadenylation but not for nonspecific poly(A) synthesis, suggesting that this region of PAP is involved in interactions both with nuclear targeting proteins and with nuclear polyadenylation factors. The serine/threonine-rich C terminus is multiply phosphorylated, including at sites affected by mutations in either NLS.

Poly(A) polymerase contains multiple functional domains

Poly(A) polymerase (PAP) contains regions of similarity with several known protein domains. Through site-directed mutagenesis, we provide evidence that PAP contains a functional ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain (RBD) that is responsible for primer binding, making it the only known polymerase to contain such a domain. The RBD is adjacent to, and probably overlaps with, an apparent catalytic region responsible for polymerization. Despite the presence of sequence similarities, this catalytic domain appears to be distinct from the conserved polymerase module found in a large number of RNA-dependent polymerases. PAP contains two nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in its C terminus, each by itself similar to the consensus bipartite NLS found in many nuclear proteins. Mutagenesis experiments indicate that both signals, which are separated by nearly 140 residues, play important roles in directing PAP exclusively to the nucleus. Surprisingly, basic amino acids in the N-terminal-most NLS are also essential for AAUAAA-dependent polyadenylation but not for nonspecific poly(A) synthesis, suggesting that this region of PAP is involved in interactions both with nuclear targeting proteins and with nuclear polyadenylation factors. The serine/threonine-rich C terminus is multiply phosphorylated, including at sites affected by mutations in either NLS.

Multiple forms of poly(A) polymerases in human cells

We have cloned human poly(A) polymerase (PAP) mRNA as cDNA in Escherichia coli. The primary structure of the mRNA was determined and compared to the bovine PAP mRNA sequence. The two sequences were 97% identical at the nucleotide level, which translated into 99% similarity at the amino acid level. Polypeptides representing recombinant PAP were expressed in E. coli, purified, and used as antigens to generate monoclonal antibodies. Western blot analysis using these monoclonal antibodies as probes revealed three PAPs, having estimated molecular masses of 90, 100, and 106 kDa in HeLa cell extracts. Fractionation of HeLa cells showed that the 90-kDa polypeptide was nuclear while the 100- and 106-kDa species were present in both nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. The 106-kDa PAP was most likely a phosphorylated derivative of the 100-kDa species. PAP activity was recovered in vitro by using purified recombinant human PAP. Subsequent mutational analysis revealed that both the N- and C-terminal regions of PAP were important for activity and suggested that cleavage and polyadenylylation specificity factor (CPSF) interacted with the C-terminal region of PAP. Interestingly, tentative phosphorylation sites have been identified in this region, suggesting that phosphorylation/dephosphorylation may regulate the interaction between the two polyadenylylation factors PAP and CPSF.

Separation of factors required for cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast pre-mRNA

Cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast precursor RNA require at least four functionally distinct factors (cleavage factor I [CF I], CF II, polyadenylation factor I [PF I], and poly(A) polymerase [PAP]) obtained from yeast whole cell extract. Cleavage of precursor occurs upon combination of the CF I and CF II fractions. The cleavage reaction proceeds in the absence of PAP or PF I. The cleavage factors exhibit low but detectable activity without exogenous ATP but are stimulated when this cofactor is included in the reaction. Cleavage by CF I and CF II is dependent on the presence of a (UA)6 sequence upstream of the GAL7 poly(A) site. The factors will also efficiently cleave precursor with the CYC1 poly(A) site. This RNA does not contain a UA repeat, and processing at this site is thought to be directed by a UAG...UAUGUA-type motif. Specific polyadenylation of a precleaved GAL7 RNA requires CF I, PF I, and a crude fraction containing PAP activity. The PAP fraction can be replaced by recombinant PAP, indicating that this enzyme is the only factor in this fraction needed for the reconstituted reaction. The poly(A) addition step is also dependent on the UA repeat. Since CF I is the only factor necessary for both cleavage and poly(A) addition, it is likely that this fraction contains a component which recognizes processing signals located upstream of the poly(A) site. The initial separation of processing factors in yeast cells suggests both interesting differences from and similarities to the mammalian system.

Separation of factors required for cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast pre-mRNA

Cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast precursor RNA require at least four functionally distinct factors (cleavage factor I [CF I], CF II, polyadenylation factor I [PF I], and poly(A) polymerase [PAP]) obtained from yeast whole cell extract. Cleavage of precursor occurs upon combination of the CF I and CF II fractions. The cleavage reaction proceeds in the absence of PAP or PF I. The cleavage factors exhibit low but detectable activity without exogenous ATP but are stimulated when this cofactor is included in the reaction. Cleavage by CF I and CF II is dependent on the presence of a (UA)6 sequence upstream of the GAL7 poly(A) site. The factors will also efficiently cleave precursor with the CYC1 poly(A) site. This RNA does not contain a UA repeat, and processing at this site is thought to be directed by a UAG...UAUGUA-type motif. Specific polyadenylation of a precleaved GAL7 RNA requires CF I, PF I, and a crude fraction containing PAP activity. The PAP fraction can be replaced by recombinant PAP, indicating that this enzyme is the only factor in this fraction needed for the reconstituted reaction. The poly(A) addition step is also dependent on the UA repeat. Since CF I is the only factor necessary for both cleavage and poly(A) addition, it is likely that this fraction contains a component which recognizes processing signals located upstream of the poly(A) site. The initial separation of processing factors in yeast cells suggests both interesting differences from and similarities to the mammalian system.

Conditional defect in mRNA 3' end processing caused by a mutation in the gene for poly(A) polymerase

Maturation of most eukaryotic mRNA 3' ends requires endonucleolytic cleavage and polyadenylation of precursor mRNAs. To further understand the mechanism and function of mRNA 3' end processing, we identified a temperature-sensitive mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective for polyadenylation. Genetic analysis showed that the polyadenylation defect and the temperature sensitivity for growth result from a single mutation. Biochemical analysis of extracts from this mutant shows that the polyadenylation defect occurs at a step following normal site-specific cleavage of a pre-mRNA at its polyadenylation site. Molecular cloning and characterization of the wild-type allele of the mutated gene revealed that it (PAP1) encodes a previously characterized poly(A) polymerase with unknown RNA substrate specificity. Analysis of mRNA levels and structure in vivo indicate that shift of growing, mutant cells to the nonpermissive temperature results in the production of poly(A)-deficient mRNAs which appear to end at their normal cleavage sites. Interestingly, measurement of the rate of protein synthesis after the temperature shift shows that translation continues long after the apparent loss of polyadenylated mRNA. Our characterization of the pap1-1 defect implicates this gene as essential for mRNA 3' end formation in S. cerevisiae.

Conditional defect in mRNA 3' end processing caused by a mutation in the gene for poly(A) polymerase

Maturation of most eukaryotic mRNA 3' ends requires endonucleolytic cleavage and polyadenylation of precursor mRNAs. To further understand the mechanism and function of mRNA 3' end processing, we identified a temperature-sensitive mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective for polyadenylation. Genetic analysis showed that the polyadenylation defect and the temperature sensitivity for growth result from a single mutation. Biochemical analysis of extracts from this mutant shows that the polyadenylation defect occurs at a step following normal site-specific cleavage of a pre-mRNA at its polyadenylation site. Molecular cloning and characterization of the wild-type allele of the mutated gene revealed that it (PAP1) encodes a previously characterized poly(A) polymerase with unknown RNA substrate specificity. Analysis of mRNA levels and structure in vivo indicate that shift of growing, mutant cells to the nonpermissive temperature results in the production of poly(A)-deficient mRNAs which appear to end at their normal cleavage sites. Interestingly, measurement of the rate of protein synthesis after the temperature shift shows that translation continues long after the apparent loss of polyadenylated mRNA. Our characterization of the pap1-1 defect implicates this gene as essential for mRNA 3' end formation in S. cerevisiae.

The human 64-kDa polyadenylylation factor contains a ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain and unusual auxiliary motifs

Cleavage stimulation factor is one of the multiple factors required for 3'-end cleavage of mammalian pre-mRNAs. We have shown previously that this factor is composed of three subunits with estimated molecular masses of 77, 64, and 50 kDa and that the 64-kDa subunit can be UV-crosslinked to RNA in a polyadenylylation signal (AAUAAA)-dependent manner. We have now isolated cDNAs encoding the 64-kDa subunit of human cleavage stimulation factor. The 64-kDa subunit contains a ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain in the N-terminal region and a repeat structure in the C-terminal region in which a pentapeptide sequence (consensus MEARA/G) is repeated 12 times and the formation of a long alpha-helix stabilized by salt bridges is predicted. An approximately 270-amino acid segment surrounding this repeat structure is highly enriched in proline and glycine residues (approximately 20% for each). When cloned 64-kDa subunit was expressed in Escherichia coli, an N-terminal fragment containing the RNA binding domain bound to RNAs in a polyadenylylation-signal-independent manner, suggesting that the RNA binding domain is directly involved in the binding of the 64-kDa subunit to pre-mRNAs.

Regulation of polyadenylation in hepatitis B viruses: stimulation by the upstream activating signal PS1 is orientation-dependent, distance-independent, and additive

Hepatitis B viruses replicate by reverse transcription of a genomic RNA which harbors terminal redundancies. The synthesis of this RNA requires that transcription proceed twice through the polyadenylation (pA) site which, in mammalian strains, is flanked by the variant hexanucleotide UAUAAA and a T-rich downstream domain. These core elements are by themselves virtually defective in 3' end processing and require multiple upstream accessory elements which regulate pA site use. In ground squirrel hepatitis B virus (GSHV), one of these signals (PS1; -215 to -107 relative to UAUAAA) is transcribed only at the 3' end of genomic RNA and as such is analogous to retroviral U3 sequences. PS1 cooperates with other signals to enhance pA site use to very high levels and can be further sub-divided into two regions (A and B) which contribute equally to 3' end processing. Critical residues within PS1B have been localized to a 15 bp A/T-rich stretch which displays homology to other known upstream activating signals. A 15 bp segment within PS1A which has the identical A/T content but a divergent primary sequence plays a diminished role in processing. Furthermore, PS1 can activate GSHV core element usage autonomously. This stimulation has been shown to be additive since multiple copies of PS1 progressively increase polyadenylation, a phenomenon which also demands that PS1 exert its influence from a variety of distances from the hexanucleotide signal.

Ara-ATP impairs 3'-end processing of pre-mRNAs by inhibiting both cleavage and polyadenylation

Previous studies have demonstrated that Ara-ATP can inhibit poly(A) polymerase activity by competing with ATP. To elucidate the mechanism of action of this compound, its effect on the cleavage and polyadenylation of two specific substrates, SV40L and adenovirus L3 pre-mRNAs, was studied in HeLa nuclear extracts. Unlike cordycepin 5' triphosphate, Ara-ATP inhibited both cleavage and poly(A) addition. Addition of poly(A) polymerase fraction devoid of any other factors required for the processing reactions overcame the inhibitory effect on cleavage as well as polyadenylation of pre-mRNAs. These data suggest that Ara-ATP inhibits both cleavage and polyadenylation reactions by interacting with the ATP-binding site on poly(A) polymerase, the activity of which is essential for the cleavage reaction. Ara-ATP also blocked formation of the post-cleavage and polyadenylation-specific complexes, which further confirmed the inhibitory effect of the ATP analog on the two tightly coupled 3'-end processing reactions.

Potential role of poly(A) polymerase in the assembly of polyadenylation-specific RNP complexes

To elucidate the mechanism by which poly(A) polymerase functions in the 3'-end processing of pre-mRNAs, polyadenylation-specific RNP complexes were isolated by sedimentation in sucrose density gradients and the fractions were analyzed for the presence of the enzyme. At early stages of the reaction, the RNP complexes were resolved into distinct peaks which sedimented at approximately 18S and 25S. When reactions were carried out under conditions which support cleavage or polyadenylation, the pre-mRNA was specifically assembled into the larger 25S RNP complexes. Polyclonal antibodies raised against the enzyme purified from a rat hepatoma, which have been shown to inhibit cleavage and polyadenylation (Terns, M., and Jacob, S. T., Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:1435-1444, 1989) also prevented assembly of the 25S polyadenylation-specific RNP complexes. Furthermore, formation of these complexes required the presence of a chromatographic fraction containing poly(A) polymerase. UV cross-linking analysis indicated that the purified enzyme could be readily cross-linked to pre-mRNA but in an apparent sequence-independent manner. Reconstitution studies with the fractionated components showed that formation of the 25S RNP complex required the poly(A) polymerase fraction. Although the enzyme has not been directly localized to the specific complexes, the data presented in this report supports the role of poly(A) polymerase as an essential component of polyadenylation-specific complexes which functions both as a structural and enzymatic constituent.

The enzyme that adds poly(A) to mRNAs is a classical poly(A) polymerase

Virtually all mRNAs in eucaryotes end in a poly(A) tail. This tail is added posttranscriptionally. In this report, we demonstrate that the enzyme that catalyzes this modification is identical with an activity first identified 30 years ago, the function of which was previously unknown. This enzyme, poly(A) polymerase, lacks any intrinsic specificity for its mRNA substrate but gains specificity by interacting with distinct molecules: a poly(A) polymerase from calf thymus, when combined with specificity factor(s) from cultured human cells, specifically and efficiently polyadenylates only appropriate mRNA substrates. Our results thus demonstrate that this polymerase is responsible for the addition of poly(A) to mRNAs and that its interaction with specificity factors is conserved.

The enzyme that adds poly(A) to mRNAs is a classical poly(A) polymerase

Virtually all mRNAs in eucaryotes end in a poly(A) tail. This tail is added posttranscriptionally. In this report, we demonstrate that the enzyme that catalyzes this modification is identical with an activity first identified 30 years ago, the function of which was previously unknown. This enzyme, poly(A) polymerase, lacks any intrinsic specificity for its mRNA substrate but gains specificity by interacting with distinct molecules: a poly(A) polymerase from calf thymus, when combined with specificity factor(s) from cultured human cells, specifically and efficiently polyadenylates only appropriate mRNA substrates. Our results thus demonstrate that this polymerase is responsible for the addition of poly(A) to mRNAs and that its interaction with specificity factors is conserved.

Multiple forms of poly(A) polymerases purified from HeLa cells function in specific mRNA 3'-end formation

Poly(A) polymerases (PAPs) from HeLa cell cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were extensively purified by using a combination of fast protein liquid chromatography and standard chromatographic methods. Several forms of the enzyme were identified, two from the nuclear fraction (NE PAPs I and II) and one from the cytoplasmic fraction (S100 PAP). NE PAP I had chromatographic properties similar to those of S100 PAP, and both enzymes displayed higher activities in the presence of Mn2+ than in the presence of Mg2+, whereas NE PAP II was chromatographically distinct and had approximately equal levels of activity in the presence of Mn2+ and Mg2+. Each of the enzymes, when mixed with other nuclear fractions containing cleavage or specificity factors, was able to reconstitute efficient cleavage and polyadenylation of pre-mRNAs containing an AAUAAA sequence element. The PAPs alone, however, showed no preference for precursors containing an intact AAUAAA sequence over a mutated one, providing further evidence that the PAPs have no intrinsic ability to recognize poly(A) addition sites. Two additional properties of the three enzymes suggest that they are related: sedimentation in glycerol density gradients indicated that the native size of each enzyme is approximately 50 to 60 kilodaltons, and antibodies against a rat hepatoma PAP inhibited the ability of each enzyme to function in AAUAAA-dependent polyadenylation.

Multiple forms of poly(A) polymerases purified from HeLa cells function in specific mRNA 3'-end formation

Poly(A) polymerases (PAPs) from HeLa cell cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were extensively purified by using a combination of fast protein liquid chromatography and standard chromatographic methods. Several forms of the enzyme were identified, two from the nuclear fraction (NE PAPs I and II) and one from the cytoplasmic fraction (S100 PAP). NE PAP I had chromatographic properties similar to those of S100 PAP, and both enzymes displayed higher activities in the presence of Mn2+ than in the presence of Mg2+, whereas NE PAP II was chromatographically distinct and had approximately equal levels of activity in the presence of Mn2+ and Mg2+. Each of the enzymes, when mixed with other nuclear fractions containing cleavage or specificity factors, was able to reconstitute efficient cleavage and polyadenylation of pre-mRNAs containing an AAUAAA sequence element. The PAPs alone, however, showed no preference for precursors containing an intact AAUAAA sequence over a mutated one, providing further evidence that the PAPs have no intrinsic ability to recognize poly(A) addition sites. Two additional properties of the three enzymes suggest that they are related: sedimentation in glycerol density gradients indicated that the native size of each enzyme is approximately 50 to 60 kilodaltons, and antibodies against a rat hepatoma PAP inhibited the ability of each enzyme to function in AAUAAA-dependent polyadenylation.