Control of beta-interferon expression in murine embryonal carcinoma F9 cells

Slicing and dicing viruses: antiviral RNA interference in mammals

To protect against the harmful consequences of viral infections, organisms are equipped with sophisticated antiviral mechanisms, including cell-intrinsic means to restrict viral replication and propagation. Plant and invertebrate cells utilise mostly RNA interference (RNAi), an RNA-based mechanism, for cell-intrinsic immunity to viruses while vertebrates rely on the protein-based interferon (IFN)-driven innate immune system for the same purpose. The RNAi machinery is conserved in vertebrate cells, yet whether antiviral RNAi is still active in mammals and functionally relevant to mammalian antiviral defence is intensely debated. Here, we discuss cellular and viral factors that impact on antiviral RNAi and the contexts in which this system might be at play in mammalian resistance to viral infection.

Molecular basis for an attenuated cytoplasmic dsRNA response in human embryonic stem cells

The introduction of double stranded RNA (dsRNA) into the cytoplasm of mammalian cells usually leads to a potent antiviral response resulting in the rapid induction of interferon beta (IFNβ). This response can be mediated by a number of dsRNA sensors, including TLR3, MDA5, RIG-I and PKR. We show here that pluripotent human cells (human embryonic stem (hES) cells and induced pluripotent (iPS) cells) do not induce interferon in response to cytoplasmic dsRNA, and we have used a variety of approaches to learn the underlying basis for this phenomenon. Two major cytoplasmic dsRNA sensors, TLR3 and MDA5, are not expressed in hES cells and iPS cells. PKR is expressed in hES cells, but is not activated by transfected dsRNA. In addition, RIG-I is expressed, but fails to respond to dsRNA because its signaling adapter, MITA/STING, is not expressed. Finally, the interferon-inducible RNAse L and oligoadenylate synthetase enzymes are also expressed at very low levels. Upon differentiation of hES cells into trophoblasts, cells acquire the ability to respond to dsRNA and this correlates with a significant induction of expression of TLR3 and its adaptor protein TICAM-1/TRIF. Taken together, our results reveal that the lack of an interferon response may be a general characteristic of pluripotency and that this results from the systematic downregulation of a number of genes involved in cytoplasmic dsRNA signaling.

RNA silencing: A remarkable parallel to protein-based immune systems in vertebrates?

Sequence-specific gene silencing by double-strand RNA has been observed in many eukaryotes. Accumulating data suggest that it is the major antiviral defense mechanism in plants and invertebrates. The discovery that this cellular mechanism is also highly conserved though somewhat impaired in mammals has stimulated debate about the evolution of antiviral systems. Here we suggest that the existence of the interferon response as an evolutionary intermediate could account for both the relative decline of RNA silencing and the development of protein-based immune systems in vertebrates. In addition, we emphasize the opportunities presented by RNA silencing and the deeper understanding of vertebrate antiviral systems that is needed.

Differential constitutive expression of interferon genes in early mouse embryos

Recent evidence suggests that several processes during mammalian embryogenesis may be regulated by IFNs or IFN-like molecules. With the use of MAPPing, the simultaneous presence of transcripts homologous to IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, IRF-1, and IRF-2 was examined in mouse embryos and in embryonal carcinoma (EC) P19 cells, which are equivalent to epiblast cells of the early postimplantation blastocysts. Transcripts for IFN-alpha, but not for IFN-beta, were detected as maternal transcripts in the ovulated oocyte and persisted over early embryogenesis. IRF-1 transcripts appeared only after the first cell cleavage in the two-cell stage embryo. IRF-2 transcripts were analyzed only in EC P19 cells and were found in both undifferentiated (D-) and differentiated (D+) cells. The IFN-alpha transcripts present in (D-) P19 cells were cloned and the partial cDNA sequences determined. Mu IFN-alpha A and a new Mu IFN-alpha species (Mu IFN-alpha 12) were isolated from (D-) P19 cells. The presence of constitutive IFN-alpha transcripts in early mouse embryos suggests a role for these molecules during embryogenesis.

Developmental changes of GM-CSF gene inducibility in embryonal carcinoma cells

Murine embryonal carcinoma (EC) P19 cells, a tissue culture model of early embryonic development, failed to produce cytokines, such as interleukin-3 (IL-3), IL-4, granulocytemacrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interferon-beta (IFN-beta) at the mRNA level. Differentiation induced by retinoic acid (RA) released this repression to produce some cytokines. GM-CSF and IFN-beta genes were expressed in response to PMA/A23187, poly(I):poly(C), IL-1 alpha, forskolin, or LPS stimulation in differentiated P19 cells, whereas IL-3 and IL-4 genes were not expressed. To elucidate the mechanism of the GM-CSF gene induction after differentiation, we transfected a series of 5' deletion mutants of the mouse GM-CSF promoter fused to the bacterial CAT gene. The 740-bp fragment of the 5'-flanking region mediated the positive response. Deletion analysis revealed that the 5' boundary region of the DNA element required for activation lies between positions -95 and -84 and the region upstream of position -95 appears inhibitory. These results indicate that the maturation of the transcriptional machinery after differentiation results in the activation of the GM-CSF gene.

Altered DNA/protein complexes specific for the beta-interferon regulatory region observed in murine embryonal carcinoma F9 cells

Murine embryonal carcinoma (EC) F9 cells do not produce interferon (IFN) at the protein or RNA level in response to inducing agents, while retinoic acid differentiated F9 cells do produce IFN. A probe was constructed spanning positions -104 to -39 of the human beta-IFN upstream regulatory region to examine this developmental control at the level of a transcriptional regulatory mechanism. Gel mobility shift analyses were used to examine this molecular mechanism to determine whether the differential expression of positive or negative trans-acting factors may act to control beta-IFN expression in undifferentiated EC cells. These analyses showed that while nuclear extracts from poly-I,C induced L929 cells, in the IFN producing cell line, showed two shifted bands, nuclear extracts from both induced and uninduced F9 cells showed only one shifted band using the -104/-39 probe. While this single shifted band co-migrated with the faster migrating species of L929 cell extracts, competition analysis revealed differences between the two complexes. An oligonucleotide representing the positive regulatory domain PRDII competed efficiently for the probe when induced F9 cell extracts were examined, but failed to compete when induced L929 cell extracts were examined. In contrast, an oligonucleotide representing the positive regulatory domain PRDI competed very well when induced L929 cell extracts were examined but had only a minimal effect when induced F9 cell extracts were examined. These data suggest the involvement of developmentally regulated transcriptional factor(s) which have yet to be characterized.

Absence of the type I IFN system in EC cells: transcriptional activator (IRF-1) and repressor (IRF-2) genes are developmentally regulated

Interferons (IFNs) are a heterogeneous family of cytokines that exhibits multiple biological activities. Upon viral infection, expression of type I IFNs (i.e., IFN-alpha and IFN-beta) is induced in a variety of differentiated cells but not in cells of embryonal origin. IRF-1 and IRF-2, which bind to the same cis-elements within the promoters of type I IFN and IFN-inducible MHC class I genes, were identified previously. Here we demonstrate that the expression of both IRF and IFN genes is developmentally regulated in mouse EC cells; these genes become functional only after cell differentiation. Furthermore, cDNA-directed IRF-1 produced in undifferentiated but not differentiated EC cells efficiently activates the transfected IFN-alpha and IFN-beta and endogenous IFN-alpha genes, whereas IRF-2 represses the IRF-1 effects. These findings emphasize the dual function of the IRF-responsive cis-elements as positive and negative regulators, since they can be occupied by transcriptionally active or inactive IRF molecules. This type of regulatory mechanism might operate in other cytokine systems.