Tuberculosis of the Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas

Peripancreatic tuberculosis

Peripancreatic tuberculosis (PTB) is a very rare variant of tuberculosis and its clinical and radiological findings are similar to those of pancreatic malignancy. Diagnosis of PTB is usually incidental and is made after surgical resection. We are presenting a male patient who had complaints of prolonged fever, significant weight loss and yellowish discolouration of eyes and dark-coloured urine. Investigations revealed that there was a pancreatic mass causing obstructive jaundice. However, the aetiology of the mass, whether tubercular or malignant, was not clear. Hence, the patient was planned for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytology and aspirate were sent for a cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test which revealed the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, sensitive to rifampicin. The patient improved completely after treatment with antitubercular therapy.

The great masquerader of pancreatic tuberculosis

Background

Pancreatic tuberculosis is a rare clinical entity. It represents a diagnostic challenge as the clinical presentation may mimic pancreatic malignancy.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old gentleman presented with an incidental finding of a pancreatic tail mass on routine ultrasonography of the abdomen whilst working up on chronic kidney disease. He denied abdominal pain, fever, night sweats, constitutional symptoms or tuberculosis contact. On examination, there was no palpable mass per abdomen. The tumour marker of Ca 19-9 was normal. Ultrasonography revealed a lobulated heterogeneous hypovascular and hypoechoic mass at the tail of the pancreas. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and abdomen revealed a thickened right pleura, right pleural effusion with right lung collapsed consolidation and multiple mediastinal lymph nodes. There is an ill-defined hypodense mass seen in the tail and body of the pancreas measuring 3 × 7 × 3 cm with the presences of calcification within. The constellation of CT findings suggests a pancreatic malignancy with metastasis to the lungs. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) assessment showed an irregular hypoechoic mass measuring 3.0 × 2.7 cm at the tail of the pancreas. Multiple rounded hypoechoic lesions were also seen scattered within the body of the pancreas with multiple enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes. A fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the lesion was consistent with granulomatous inflammation. The diagnosis of disseminated tuberculosis was made. The patient was subsequently started on antitubercular medication and recovered well.

Conclusion

A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose pancreatic tuberculosis, especially in patients whose radiological imaging shows a pancreatic mass with necrotic peripancreatic lymphadenopathy in endemic countries. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration is the diagnostic modality of choice, and vigorous attempts should be made at obtaining a preoperative histological or bacteriological diagnosis to avoid unnecessary surgery.

Disseminated tuberculosis following invasive procedures for peripancreatic lymph node tuberculosis with portal vein obstruction: a case report

Peripancreatic tuberculous lymphadenopathy can mimic pancreatic cancer on imaging. There have only a few reports on varices from portal vein obstruction due to abdominal tuberculous lymphadenopathy. Iatrogenic disseminated tuberculosis is also rare. Herein, we present a rare case of peripancreatic tuberculous lymphadenopathy with ruptured duodenal varices due to portal vein obstruction. The patient presented to our hospital with hematemesis. Computed tomography revealed a peripancreatic mass. Duodenal varices rupture from portal vein obstruction due to pancreatic cancer were initially suspected. The patient underwent portal vein stenting for portal vein obstruction and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis, which revealed granulomas indicative of tuberculosis. The patient was discharged once because fine-needle aspiration did not lead to a definitive diagnosis of tuberculosis. Subsequently, he developed disseminated tuberculosis. Peripancreatic tuberculous lymphadenopathy can cause ectopic varices with portal vein obstruction. Tuberculosis should also be included in the differential diagnosis in the case of portal vein obstruction, to facilitate early treatment and avoid unnecessary surgery. Furthermore, fine-needle aspiration or portal vein stenting for tuberculous lesions can cause disseminated tuberculosis. Since a diagnosis might not be made until after several fine-needle aspirations have been conducted, careful follow-up is necessary after the procedure for such lesions.

Tuberculous perihepatic abscess and neurosarcoidosis: report of 2 uncommon manifestations of 2 common granulomatous diseases in 1 patient

Infections caused by pathogens of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, i. e., tuberculosis (TB), and the non-infectious, autoimmune disease sarcoidosis are among the most common granulomatous diseases worldwide. Typically, the lung is the primary site of infection and manifestation, respectively which makes the two diseases important differential diagnoses. Both diseases can affect virtually all organ systems, albeit with significantly lower incidence. CASE PRESENTATION:  We report the case of a 50-year-old Indian man presenting with a tuberculous perihepatic abscess and a systemic inflammatory response after being diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis presenting as a single granuloma in the frontal lobe with lymphadenopathy in 2014. On day of admission the patient presented with right upper abdominal pain and fever for two weeks. With increased inflammatory parameters in serum and after finding of external CT images, a perihepatic abscess was suspected. This encapsulated cave was drained percutaneously under CT control. A high concentration of acid-fast rods was detected using ZN, PCR was positive for M. tuberculosis. Several samples of sputum and urine were microscopically negative but yielded growth of Mycobacteria after four weeks. DISCUSSION:  This is a case presenting with two different granulomatous diseases, each of which manifested itself in an atypical form. The tuberculous liver abscess might either be explained as a flare-up of latent tuberculosis under azathioprine therapy or as a reinfection acquired during one of several visits in the high-prevalence country India. In addition, it must be discussed whether the cerebral granuloma in 2014 could have been an early stage of tuberculous granuloma. Sensitivity of ZN staining is significantly reduced in cerebral samples, and negative PCR-results might be due to low germ load or methodical issues, e. g., decreased sensitivity in formalin fixated samples.