Al-Mutairi NM, Ahmad S, Mokaddas E. Discordance in Phenotypic and Genotypic Susceptibility Testing for Streptomycin Due to Nonsynonymous/Nonsense/Deletion Frame-Shift Mutations in Gidb Among Clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Kuwait.
Med Princ Pract 2024;
33:000538584. [PMID:
38560979 PMCID:
PMC11324218 DOI:
10.1159/000538584]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Increasing reports of resistance to newer anti-tuberculosis drugs have prompted the search for other alternative drugs. Streptomycin could be used for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis if susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate to streptomycin could be accurately detected. We performed phenotypic and genotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) of 118 M. tuberculosis isolates for streptomycin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty pansusceptible and 68 multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis (MDR-TB) isolates were used. Phenotypic DST for streptomycin, rifampicin, isoniazid and ethambutol was performed by mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960 System. Genotypic DST was done by GenoTypeMTBDRplus assay for rifampicin and isoniazid and by PCR-sequencing of rpsL, rrs and gidB genes for streptomycin. MDR-TB isolates were genotyped by spoligotyping.
RESULTS
Phenotypic DST identified 50 isolates susceptible to all four drugs (pansusceptible). Sixty-one of 68 MDR-TB isolates were resistant to streptomycin. Genotypic testing for rifampicin and isoniazid yielded expected results. Fifty pansusceptible and 7 streptomycin-susceptible MDR-TB isolates contained no mutation in rpsL or rrs, while 47, 2 and 1 STR-resistant isolate contained rpsL, rrs and rpsL + rrs mutations, respectively. Of the remaining 11 STR-resistant MDR-TB, 9 isolates contained deletion frame-shift/nonsynonymous mutations in gidB. Surprisingly, 13 pansusceptible isolates also contained deletion frame-shift/nonsense/nonsynonymous mutations in gidB. Also, 30 of 68 MDR-TB but only 2 of 50 pansusceptible isolates belonged to the Beijing genotype.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data show that, like ifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide, streptomycin also exhibits discordant phenotypic and genotypic DST results for some M. tuberculosis isolates. Hence, streptomycin should be included in therapy regimens only if both phenotypic and genotypic resistance testing indicate susceptibility to avoid amplification of resistance and drug toxicity.
Collapse