1
|
Papadopoulou E, Bekris F, Vasileiadis S, Krokida A, Rouvali T, Veskoukis AS, Liadaki K, Kouretas D, Karpouzas DG. Vineyard-mediated factors are still operative in spontaneous and commercial fermentations shaping the vinification microbial community and affecting the antioxidant and anticancer properties of wines. Food Res Int 2023; 173:113359. [PMID: 37803700 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
The grapevine and vinification microbiota have a strong influence on the characteristics of the produced wine. Currently we have a good understanding of the role of vineyard-associated factors, like cultivar, vintage and terroir in shaping the grapevine microbiota. Notwithstanding, their endurance along the vinification process remains unknown. Thus, the main objective of our study was to determine how these factors influence (a) microbial succession during fermentation (i.e., bacterial and fungal) and (b) the antioxidant, antimutagenic and anticancer potential of the produced wines. These were evaluated under different vinification strategies (i.e., spontaneous V1, spontaneous with preservatives V2, commercial V3), employed at near full-scale level by local wineries, for two cultivars (Roditis and Sideritis), two terroir types, and two vintages. Cultivar and vintage were strong and persistent determinants of the vinification microbiota, unlike terroir whose effect became weaker from the vineyard, and early fermentation stages, where non-Saccharomyces yeasts, filamentous fungi (i.e., Aureobasidium, Cladosporium, Lachancea, Alternaria, Aspergillus, Torulaspora) and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) (Gluconobacter, Acetobacter, Komagataeibacter) dominated, to late fermentation stages where Saccharomyces and Oenococcus become prevalent. Besides vineyard-mediated factors, the vinification process employed was the strongest determinant of the fungal community compared to the bacterial community were effects varied per cultivar. Vintage and vinification type were the strongest determinants of the antioxidant, antimutagenic and anticancer potential of the produced wines. Further analysis identified significant positive correlations between members of the vinification microbiota like the yeasts Torulaspora debrueckii and Lachancea quebecensis with the anticancer and the antioxidant properties of wines in both cultivars. These findings could be exploited towards a microbiota-modulated vinification process to produce high-quality wines with desirable properties and enhanced regional identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Papadopoulou
- University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, 41500 Viopolis - Larissa, Greece
| | - Fotiοs Bekris
- University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, 41500 Viopolis - Larissa, Greece
| | - Sotirios Vasileiadis
- University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, 41500 Viopolis - Larissa, Greece
| | | | | | - Aristidis S Veskoukis
- University of Thessaly, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, 42132 Trikala, Greece
| | - Kalliopi Liadaki
- University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, 41500 Viopolis - Larissa, Greece
| | - Demetrios Kouretas
- University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Animal Physiology, 41500 Viopolis - Larissa, Greece
| | - Dimitrios G Karpouzas
- University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, 41500 Viopolis - Larissa, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thiamine and Biotin: Relevance in the Production of Volatile and Non-Volatile Compounds during Saccharomyces cerevisiae Alcoholic Fermentation in Synthetic Grape Must. Foods 2023; 12:foods12050972. [PMID: 36900489 PMCID: PMC10000645 DOI: 10.3390/foods12050972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Vitamins are major cofactors to numerous key metabolic pathways in enological yeasts, and both thiamine and biotin, notably, are believed to be essential to yeast fermentation and growth, respectively. In order to further assess and clarify their role in winemaking, and in the resulting wine, alcoholic fermentations of a commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae active dried yeast were conducted in synthetic media containing various concentrations of both vitamins. Growth and fermentation kinetics were monitored and proved the essential character of biotin in yeast growth, and of thiamine in fermentation. The synthetic wine volatile compounds were quantified, and notable influences of both vitamins appeared, through a striking positive effect of thiamine on the production of higher alcohols, and of biotin on fatty acids. Beyond the evidence of this influence on fermentations and on the production of volatiles, this work proves, for the first time, the impact held by vitamins on wine yeasts' exometabolome, investigated through an untargeted metabolomic analysis. This highlighted chemical differences in the composition of synthetic wines through a notably marked influence of thiamine on 46 named S. cerevisiae metabolic pathways, and especially in amino acid-associated metabolic pathways. This provides, overall, the first evidence of the impact held by both vitamins on the wine.
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang R, Shen L, Yu H, Jiang J, Qin Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Song Y. Evaluation of rain-shelter cultivation mode effects on microbial diversity during Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) maturation in Jingyang, Shaanxi, China. Food Res Int 2022; 156:111165. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
4
|
Charting Shifts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gene Expression across Asynchronous Time Trajectories with Diffusion Maps. mBio 2021; 12:e0234521. [PMID: 34607457 PMCID: PMC8546541 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02345-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
During fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolizes sugars and other nutrients to obtain energy for growth and survival, while also modulating these activities in response to cell-environment interactions. Here, differences in S. cerevisiae gene expression were explored over a time course of fermentation and used to differentiate fermentations, using Pinot noir grapes from 15 unique sites. Data analysis was complicated by the fact that the fermentations proceeded at different rates, making a direct comparison of time series gene expression data difficult with conventional differential expression tools. This led to the development of a novel approach combining diffusion mapping with continuous differential expression analysis (termed DMap-DE). Using this method, site-specific deviations in gene expression were identified, including changes in gene expression correlated with the non-Saccharomyces yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum, as well as initial nitrogen concentrations in grape musts. These results highlight novel relationships between site-specific variables and Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene expression that are linked to repeated fermentation outcomes. It was also demonstrated that DMap-DE can extract biologically relevant gene expression patterns from other contexts (e.g., hypoxic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and offers advantages over other data dimensionality reduction approaches, indicating that DMap-DE offers a robust method for investigating asynchronous time series gene expression data.
Collapse
|
5
|
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gene Expression during Fermentation of Pinot Noir Wines at an Industrially Relevant Scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 2021; 87:AEM.00036-21. [PMID: 33741633 PMCID: PMC8208162 DOI: 10.1128/aem.00036-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This study characterized Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC212 gene expression during Pinot noir fermentation at pilot scale (150 liters) using industry-relevant conditions. The reported gene expression patterns of RC212 are generally similar to those observed under laboratory fermentation conditions but also contain gene expression signatures related to yeast-environment interactions found in a production setting (e.g., the presence of non-Saccharomyces microorganisms). Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism produces ethanol and other compounds during the fermentation of grape must into wine. Thousands of genes change expression over the course of a wine fermentation, allowing S. cerevisiae to adapt to and dominate the fermentation environment. Investigations into these gene expression patterns previously revealed genes that underlie cellular adaptation to the grape must and wine environments, involving metabolic specialization and ethanol tolerance. However, the majority of studies detailing gene expression patterns have occurred in controlled environments that may not recapitulate the biological and chemical complexity of fermentations performed at production scale. Here, an analysis of the S. cerevisiae RC212 gene expression program is presented, drawing from 40 pilot-scale fermentations (150 liters) using Pinot noir grapes from 10 California vineyards across two vintages. A core gene expression program was observed across all fermentations irrespective of vintage, similar to that of laboratory fermentations, in addition to novel gene expression patterns likely related to the presence of non-Saccharomyces microorganisms and oxygen availability during fermentation. These gene expression patterns, both common and diverse, provide insight into Saccharomyces cerevisiae biology critical to fermentation outcomes under industry-relevant conditions. IMPORTANCE This study characterized Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC212 gene expression during Pinot noir fermentation at pilot scale (150 liters) using industry-relevant conditions. The reported gene expression patterns of RC212 are generally similar to those observed under laboratory fermentation conditions but also contain gene expression signatures related to yeast-environment interactions found in a production setting (e.g., the presence of non-Saccharomyces microorganisms). Key genes and pathways highlighted by this work remain undercharacterized, indicating the need for further research to understand the roles of these genes and their impact on industrial wine fermentation outcomes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Griggs RG, Steenwerth KL, Mills DA, Cantu D, Bokulich NA. Sources and Assembly of Microbial Communities in Vineyards as a Functional Component of Winegrowing. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:673810. [PMID: 33927711 PMCID: PMC8076609 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.673810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Microbiomes are integral to viticulture and winemaking – collectively termed winegrowing – where diverse fungi and bacteria can exert positive and negative effects on grape health and wine quality. Wine is a fermented natural product, and the vineyard serves as a key point of entry for quality-modulating microbiota, particularly in wine fermentations that are conducted without the addition of exogenous yeasts. Thus, the sources and persistence of wine-relevant microbiota in vineyards critically impact its quality. Site-specific variations in microbiota within and between vineyards may contribute to regional wine characteristics. This includes distinctions in microbiomes and microbiota at the strain level, which can contribute to wine flavor and aroma, supporting the role of microbes in the accepted notion of terroir as a biological phenomenon. Little is known about the factors driving microbial biodiversity within and between vineyards, or those that influence annual assembly of the fruit microbiome. Fruit is a seasonally ephemeral, yet annually recurrent product of vineyards, and as such, understanding the sources of microbiota in vineyards is critical to the assessment of whether or not microbial terroir persists with inter-annual stability, and is a key factor in regional wine character, as stable as the geographic distances between vineyards. This review examines the potential sources and vectors of microbiota within vineyards, general rules governing plant microbiome assembly, and how these factors combine to influence plant-microbe interactions relevant to winemaking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reid G Griggs
- Department of Viticulture and Enology, Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Kerri L Steenwerth
- USDA-ARS, Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - David A Mills
- Department of Viticulture and Enology, Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.,Department of Food Science and Technology, Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.,Foods for Health Institute, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Dario Cantu
- Department of Viticulture and Enology, Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Nicholas A Bokulich
- Laboratory of Food Systems Biotechnology, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|