1
|
Sun PF, Lu MR, Liu YC, Shaw BJP, Lin CP, Chen HW, Lin YF, Hoh DZ, Ke HM, Wang IF, Lu MYJ, Young EB, Millett J, Kirschner R, Lin YCJ, Chen YL, Tsai IJ. An acidophilic fungus promotes prey digestion in a carnivorous plant. Nat Microbiol 2024:10.1038/s41564-024-01766-y. [PMID: 39090391 DOI: 10.1038/s41564-024-01766-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Leaves of the carnivorous sundew plants (Drosera spp.) secrete mucilage that hosts microorganisms, but whether this microbiota contributes to prey digestion is unclear. We identified the acidophilic fungus Acrodontium crateriforme as the dominant species in the mucilage microbial communities, thriving in multiple sundew species across the global range. The fungus grows and sporulates on sundew glands as its preferred acidic environment, and its presence in traps increased the prey digestion process. A. crateriforme has a reduced genome similar to other symbiotic fungi. During A. crateriforme-Drosera spatulata coexistence and digestion of prey insects, transcriptomes revealed significant gene co-option in both partners. Holobiont expression patterns during prey digestion further revealed synergistic effects in several gene families including fungal aspartic and sedolisin peptidases, facilitating prey digestion in leaves, as well as nutrient assimilation and jasmonate signalling pathway expression. This study establishes that botanical carnivory is defined by adaptations involving microbial partners and interspecies interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Feng Sun
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- Biodiversity Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Min R Lu
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ching Liu
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Brandon J P Shaw
- Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
- NERC Environmental Omics Facility (NEOF), NEOF Visitor Facility, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chieh-Ping Lin
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Wei Chen
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Fei Lin
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Daphne Z Hoh
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huei-Mien Ke
- Department of Microbiology, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Fan Wang
- Department of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- University Center of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Yeh Jade Lu
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Erica B Young
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jonathan Millett
- Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Roland Kirschner
- School of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Chung Jimmy Lin
- Department of Life Science, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Plant Biology, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Lan Chen
- Department of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- University Center of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Isheng Jason Tsai
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Biodiversity Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bernardin JR, Gray SM, Bittleston LS. Arthropod prey type drives decomposition rates and microbial community processes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2024; 90:e0039424. [PMID: 38916291 PMCID: PMC11267907 DOI: 10.1128/aem.00394-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Microbial communities perform various functions, many of which contribute to ecosystem-level nutrient cycling via decomposition. Factors influencing leaf detrital decomposition are well understood in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, but much less is known about arthropod detrital inputs. Here, we sought to infer how differences in arthropod detritus affect microbial-driven decomposition and community function in a carnivorous pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea. Using sterile mesh bags filled with different types of sterile arthropod prey, we assessed if prey type influenced the rate of decomposition in pitcher plants over 7 weeks. Additionally, we measured microbial community composition and function, including hydrolytic enzyme activity and carbon substrate use. When comparing decomposition rates, we found that ant and beetle prey with higher exoskeleton content lost less mass compared with fly prey. We observed the highest protease activity in the fly treatment, which had the lowest exoskeleton content. Additionally, we saw differences in the pH of the pitcher fluid, driven by the ant treatment which had the lowest pH. According to our results from 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding, prey treatments with the highest bacterial amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness (ant and beetle) were associated with prey that lost a lower proportion of mass over the 7 weeks. Overall, arthropod detritus provides unique nutrient sources to decomposer communities, with different prey influencing microbial hydrolytic enzyme activity and composition. IMPORTANCE Microbial communities play pivotal roles in nutrient cycling via decomposition and nutrient transformation; however, it is often unclear how different substrates influence microbial activity and community composition. Our study highlights how different types of insects influence decomposition and, in turn, microbial composition and function. We use the aquatic pools found in a carnivorous pitcher plant as small, discrete ecosystems that we can manipulate and study independently. We find that some insect prey (flies) breaks down faster than others (beetles or ants) likely because flies contain more things that are easy for microbes to eat and derive essential nutrients from. This is also reflected in higher enzyme activity in the microbes decomposing the flies. Our work bridges a knowledge gap about how different substrates affect microbial decomposition, contributing to the broader understanding of ecosystem function in a nutrient cycling context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah M. Gray
- Department of Biology-Ecology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sweeney CJ, Kaushik R, Bottoms M. Considerations for the inclusion of metabarcoding data in the plant protection product risk assessment of the soil microbiome. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 2024; 20:337-358. [PMID: 37452668 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
There is increasing interest in further developing the plant protection product (PPP) environmental risk assessment, particularly within the European Union, to include the assessment of soil microbial community composition, as measured by metabarcoding approaches. However, to date, there has been little discussion as to how this could be implemented in a standardized, reliable, and robust manner suitable for regulatory decision-making. Introduction of metabarcoding-based assessments of the soil microbiome into the PPP risk assessment would represent a significant increase in the degree of complexity of the data that needs to be processed and analyzed in comparison to the existing risk assessment on in-soil organisms. The bioinformatics procedures to process DNA sequences into community compositional data sets currently lack standardization, while little information exists on how these data should be used to generate regulatory endpoints and the ways in which these endpoints should be interpreted. Through a thorough and critical review, we explore these challenges. We conclude that currently, we do not have a sufficient degree of standardization or understanding of the required bioinformatics and data analysis procedures to consider their use in an environmental risk assessment context. However, we highlight critical knowledge gaps and the further research required to understand whether metabarcoding-based assessments of the soil microbiome can be utilized in a statistically and ecologically relevant manner within a PPP risk assessment. Only once these challenges are addressed can we consider if and how we should use metabarcoding as a tool for regulatory decision-making to assess and monitor ecotoxicological effects on soil microorganisms within an environmental risk assessment of PPPs. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:337-358. © 2023 SETAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Sweeney
- Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
| | - Rishabh Kaushik
- Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
| | - Melanie Bottoms
- Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krohn C, Khudur L, Dias DA, van den Akker B, Rees CA, Crosbie ND, Surapaneni A, O'Carroll DM, Stuetz RM, Batstone DJ, Ball AS. The role of microbial ecology in improving the performance of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:1079136. [PMID: 36590430 PMCID: PMC9801413 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1079136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of next-generation diagnostic tools to optimise the anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage sludge has the potential to increase renewable natural gas recovery, improve the reuse of biosolid fertilisers and help operators expand circular economies globally. This review aims to provide perspectives on the role of microbial ecology in improving digester performance in wastewater treatment plants, highlighting that a systems biology approach is fundamental for monitoring mesophilic anaerobic sewage sludge in continuously stirred reactor tanks. We further highlight the potential applications arising from investigations into sludge ecology. The principal limitation for improvements in methane recoveries or in process stability of anaerobic digestion, especially after pre-treatment or during co-digestion, are ecological knowledge gaps related to the front-end metabolism (hydrolysis and fermentation). Operational problems such as stable biological foaming are a key problem, for which ecological markers are a suitable approach. However, no biomarkers exist yet to assist in monitoring and management of clade-specific foaming potentials along with other risks, such as pollutants and pathogens. Fundamental ecological principles apply to anaerobic digestion, which presents opportunities to predict and manipulate reactor functions. The path ahead for mapping ecological markers on process endpoints and risk factors of anaerobic digestion will involve numerical ecology, an expanding field that employs metrics derived from alpha, beta, phylogenetic, taxonomic, and functional diversity, as well as from phenotypes or life strategies derived from genetic potentials. In contrast to addressing operational issues (as noted above), which are effectively addressed by whole population or individual biomarkers, broad improvement and optimisation of function will require enhancement of hydrolysis and acidogenic processes. This will require a discovery-based approach, which will involve integrative research involving the proteome and metabolome. This will utilise, but overcome current limitations of DNA-centric approaches, and likely have broad application outside the specific field of anaerobic digestion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Krohn
- ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia,*Correspondence: Christian Krohn,
| | - Leadin Khudur
- ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Daniel Anthony Dias
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, Discipline of Laboratory Medicine, STEM College, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Aravind Surapaneni
- ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Denis M. O'Carroll
- Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard M. Stuetz
- Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Damien J. Batstone
- ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia,Australian Centre for Water and Environmental Biotechnology, Gehrmann Building, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew S. Ball
- ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The diversity and functional significance of microbiomes have become increasingly clear through the extensive sampling of Earth's many habitats and the rapid adoption of new sequencing technologies. However, much remains unknown about what makes a "healthy" microbiome, how to restore a disrupted microbiome, and how microbiomes assemble. In December 2019, we convened a workshop that focused on how to identify potential "rules of life" that govern microbiome structure and function. This collection of mSystems Perspective pieces reflects many of the main challenges and opportunities in the field identified by both in-person and virtual workshop participants. By borrowing conceptual and theoretical approaches from other fields, including economics and philosophy, these pieces suggest new ways to dissect microbiome patterns and processes. The application of conceptual advances, including trait-based theory and community coalescence, is providing new insights on how to predict and manage microbiome diversity and function. Technological and analytical advances, including deep transfer learning, metabolic models, and advances in analytical chemistry, are helping us sift through complex systems to pinpoint mechanisms of microbiome assembly and dynamics. Integration of all of these advancements (theory, concepts, technology) across biological and spatial scales is providing dramatically improved temporal and spatial resolution of microbiome dynamics. This integrative microbiome research is happening in a new moment in science where academic institutions, scientific societies, and funding agencies must act collaboratively to support and train a diverse and inclusive community of microbiome scientists.
Collapse
|
6
|
Berrios L, Rentsch JD. Linking Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) to Abiotic and Biotic Feedbacks in Plant Microbiomes: The Dose Makes the Poison. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23084402. [PMID: 35457220 PMCID: PMC9030523 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In nature, plants develop in complex, adaptive environments. Plants must therefore respond efficiently to environmental stressors to maintain homeostasis and enhance their fitness. Although many coordinated processes remain integral for achieving homeostasis and driving plant development, reactive oxygen species (ROS) function as critical, fast-acting orchestrators that link abiotic and biotic responses to plant homeostasis and development. In addition to the suite of enzymatic and non-enzymatic ROS processing pathways that plants possess, they also rely on their microbiota to buffer and maintain the oxidative window needed to balance anabolic and catabolic processes. Strong evidence has been communicated recently that links ROS regulation to the aggregated function(s) of commensal microbiota and plant-growth-promoting microbes. To date, many reports have put forth insightful syntheses that either detail ROS regulation across plant development (independent of plant microbiota) or examine abiotic–biotic feedbacks in plant microbiomes (independent of clear emphases on ROS regulation). Here we provide a novel synthesis that incorporates recent findings regarding ROS and plant development in the context of both microbiota regulation and plant-associated microbes. Specifically, we discuss various roles of ROS across plant development to strengthen the links between plant microbiome functioning and ROS regulation for both basic and applied research aims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Berrios
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Jeremy D. Rentsch
- Department of Biology, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC 29502, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grothjan JJ, Young EB. Bacterial Recruitment to Carnivorous Pitcher Plant Communities: Identifying Sources Influencing Plant Microbiome Composition and Function. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:791079. [PMID: 35359741 PMCID: PMC8964293 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.791079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Processes influencing recruitment of diverse bacteria to plant microbiomes remain poorly understood. In the carnivorous pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea model system, individual pitchers open to collect rainwater, invertebrates and a diverse microbial community, and this detrital food web is sustained by captured insect prey. This study examined how potential sources of bacteria affect the development of the bacterial community within pitchers, how the host plant tissue affects community development and how established vs. assembling communities differ. In a controlled greenhouse experiment, seven replicate pitchers were allocated to five treatments to exclude specific bacterial sources or host tissue: milliQ water only, milliQ + insect prey, rainwater + prey, established communities + prey, artificial pitchers with milliQ + prey. Community composition and functions were examined over 8-40 weeks using bacterial gene sequencing and functional predictions, measurements of cell abundance, hydrolytic enzyme activity and nutrient transformations. Distinct community composition and functional differences between artificial and real pitchers confirm an important influence of host plant tissue on community development, but also suggest this could be partially related to host nutrient uptake. Significant recruitment of bacteria to pitchers from air was evident from many taxa common to all treatments, overlap in composition between milliQ, milliQ + prey, and rainwater + prey treatments, and few taxa unique to milliQ only pitchers. Community functions measured as hydrolytic enzyme (chitinase, protease) activity suggested a strong influence of insect prey additions and were linked to rapid transformation of insect nutrients into dissolved and inorganic sources. Bacterial taxa found in 6 of 7 replicate pitchers within treatments, the "core microbiome" showed tighter successional trajectories over 8 weeks than all taxa. Established pitcher community composition was more stable over 8 weeks, suggesting a diversity-stability relationship and effect of microinvertebrates on bacteria. This study broadly demonstrates that bacterial composition in host pitcher plants is related to both stochastic and specific bacterial recruitment and host plants influence microbial selection and support microbiomes through capture of insect prey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob J. Grothjan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Erica B. Young
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- School of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Westoby M, Nielsen DA, Gillings MR, Gumerov VM, Madin JS, Paulsen IT, Tetu SG. Strategic traits of bacteria and archaea vary widely within substrate-use groups. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2021; 97:6402898. [PMID: 34665251 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiab142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantitative traits such as maximum growth rate and cell radial diameter are one facet of ecological strategy variation across bacteria and archaea. Another facet is substrate-use pathways, such as iron reduction or methylotrophy. Here, we ask how these two facets intersect, using a large compilation of data for culturable species and examining seven quantitative traits (genome size, signal transduction protein count, histidine kinase count, growth temperature, temperature-adjusted maximum growth rate, cell radial diameter and 16S rRNA operon copy number). Overall, quantitative trait variation within groups of organisms possessing a particular substrate-use pathway was very broad, outweighing differences between substrate-use groups. Although some substrate-use groups had significantly different means for some quantitative traits, standard deviation of quantitative trait values within each substrate-use pathway mostly averaged between 1.6 and 1.8 times larger than standard deviation across group means. Most likely, this wide variation reflects ecological strategy: for example, fast maximum growth rate is likely to express an early successional or copiotrophic strategy, and maximum growth varies widely within most substrate-use pathways. In general, it appears that these quantitative traits express different and complementary information about ecological strategy, compared with substrate use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Westoby
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia
| | - Daniel A Nielsen
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia
| | - Michae R Gillings
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia
| | - Vadim M Gumerov
- Department of Microbiology, Ohio State University, 318 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Joshua S Madin
- Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii, Kaneohe, HI 96744, USA
| | - Ian T Paulsen
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia
| | - Sasha G Tetu
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia
| |
Collapse
|