Recovery and Its Dynamics of Filamentous Fungi from Clinical Specimen Cultures: An Extensive Study

Update on methods used for mycological testing: wide diversity and opportunities for improvement persist

Past analysis of laboratory methods used for mycology specimens revealed significant variation in practices, many of which fell short of recommended procedures. In 2016 these findings led to a set of recommendations for laboratories to consider modification of their methods where appropriate, to analyse current laboratory methods used by participants in the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) Mycology module, and to compare these to the 2016 recommendations. Seven test items, with 105-107 participants each, were analysed. Several laboratories (7-12%) did not handle specimens as recommended in an appropriate biological safety cabinet. Direct microscopy was not performed on tissue specimens 23-25% of the time. The most used staining method was potassium hydroxide with an optical brightener for fluorescent microscopy (49%) followed by Gram stain (33%). While 17-25% of laboratories used three or more media, use of four or more was uncommon (<3%). Between 9-13% of participants used only a single non-inhibitory medium for cultures. Urine specimens were incubated longer than recommended with 57% of laboratories incubating for >7days and 24% >21 days. Duration of incubation was shorter than recommended for several specimen types with 36% of skin specimens and 37-48% of tissue specimens being kept ≤21 days. For cultures kept >7 days, 13% were inspected daily but for those incubating >14 days only 3%. The methods of several laboratories remain outside recommended practice. An updated set of recommendations are made.

Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future

Despite the scientific advances observed in the recent decades and the emergence of new methodologies, the diagnosis of systemic fungal infections persists as a problematic issue. Fungal cultivation, the standard method that allows a proven diagnosis, has numerous disadvantages, as low sensitivity (only 50% of the patients present positive fungal cultures), and long growth time. These are factors that delay the patient's treatment and, consequently, lead to higher hospital costs. To improve the accuracy and quickness of fungal infections diagnosis, several new methodologies attempt to be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories. Most of these innovative methods are independent of pathogen isolation, which means that the diagnosis goes from being considered proven to probable. In spite of the advantage of being culture-independent, the majority of the methods lack standardization. PCR-based methods are becoming more and more commonly used, which has earned them an important place in hospital laboratories. This can be perceived now, as PCR-based methodologies have proved to be an essential tool fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to go through the main steps of the diagnosis for systemic fungal infection, from diagnostic classifications, through methodologies considered as "gold standard", to the molecular methods currently used, and finally mentioning some of the more futuristic approaches.