Stepwise Expansion of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs and Its Impact on Antibiotic Use and Resistance Rates at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Korea

Impact of antibiotic changes on hospital stay and treatment duration in community-acquired pneumonia

The misuse and overtreatment of antibiotics in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can cause multi-drug resistance and worsen clinical outcomes. We aimed to analyze the trends and appropriateness of antibiotic changes in hospitalized patients with CAP and their impact on clinical outcomes. This retrospective study enrolled patients with CAP, aged > 18 years, admitted from January 2017 to December 2021 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, South Korea. We examined the pathogens identified, antibiotics prescribed, and the appropriateness of antibiotic changes as reviewed by infectious disease specialists. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed based on adherence to the 2019 ATS/IDSA guidelines and the 2018 Korean national guidelines for CAP, targeting appropriate pathogens, proper route, dosage, and duration of therapy. Outcomes measured included time to clinical stability (TCS), length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, and in-hospital mortality. The study included 436 patients with a mean age of 72.11 years, of whom 35.1% were male. The average duration of antibiotic treatment was 13.5 days. More than 55% of patients experienced at least one antibiotic change, and 21.7% had consecutive changes. Throughout their hospital stay, 273 patients (62.6%) received appropriate antibiotic treatment, while 163 patients (37.4%) received at least one inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Those who received at least one inappropriate prescription experienced longer antibiotic treatment durations and extended hospital stays, despite having similar TCS. In conclusion, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in hospitalized patients with CAP is associated with prolonged antibiotic treatment and increased length of stay. Emphasizing the appropriate initial antibiotic selection may help mitigate these negative effects.

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship programme on antibiotic utilization and resistance burden in patients with acute leukaemia: an 11-year longitudinal cohort study using interrupted time-series analysis

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), driven by inappropriate and overuse of antibiotics, poses a significant threat, especially to patients with acute leukaemia.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) on antibiotic use and analyse temporal changes in bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by AMR organisms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, interventional, longitudinal cohort study spanning an 11-year period. ASPs included optimizing antibiotic use, enhancing tracking and reporting systems and delineating leadership and accountability. A segmented regression model of interrupted time series was used to evaluate the trend of antibiotic consumption and BSI with AMR organisms after the interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 3296 BSI episodes with 454 419 days of therapy (DOT) from 7754 patients were obtained. ASPs were significantly associated with an immediate reduction [-70.03 DOT/1000 patient-days (PD), P = 0.036] and a decreasing trend (-11.65 DOT/1000 PD per quarter, P < 0.001) in overall antibiotic use. The increasing incidence of BSI with AMR before ASP intervention was notably curbed and revealed a decreasing trend (slope change: -0.06 BSI/1000 PD per quarter, P = 0.002). The decreasing trend was more significant for Enterobacterales: ciprofloxacin-resistant and ESBL-producing isolates showed a slope change of -0.06 BSI/1000 PD and -0.08 BSI/1000 PD per quarter, respectively (all P < 0.05). However, Pseudomonas aeruginosa BSI increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidimensional ASPs effectively reduced both the immediate and trends in overall antibiotic usage even in patients with acute leukaemia. Additionally, there was a notable decrease in the incidence of BSI caused by AMR organisms, particularly among Enterobacterales.

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of antimicrobial usage: the first step for antimicrobial stewardship

The identification of antimicrobial use patterns is essential for determining key targets for antimicrobial stewardship interventions and evaluating the effectiveness thereof. Accurately identifying antimicrobial use patterns requires quantitative evaluation, which focuses on measuring the quantity and frequency of antimicrobial use, and qualitative evaluation, which assesses the appropriateness, effectiveness, and potential side effects of antimicrobial prescriptions. This paper summarizes the quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate antimicrobials, drawing insights from overseas and domestic cases.

Implementing antimicrobial stewardship: lessons and perspectives from a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Korea

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can lower antibiotic use, decrease medical expenses, prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria, and enhance treatment for infectious diseases. This study summarizes the stepwise implementation and effects of ASPs in a single university-affiliated tertiary care hospital in Korea; it also presents future directions and challenges in resource-limited settings. At the study hospital, the core elements of the ASP such as leadership commitment, accountability, and operating system were established in 2000, then strengthened by the formation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Team in 2018. The actions of ASPs entail key components including a computerized restrictive antibiotic prescription system, prospective audit, post-prescription review through quantitative and qualitative intervention, and pharmacy-based interventions to optimize antibiotic usage. The AMS Team regularly tracked antibiotic use, the effects of interventions, and the resistance patterns of pathogens in the hospital. The reporting system was enhanced and standardized by participation in the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System, and educational efforts are ongoing. Stepwise implementation of the ASP and the efforts of the AMS Team have led to a substantial reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics, particularly regarding injectables, and optimization of antibiotic use. Our experience highlights the importance of leadership, accountability, institution-specific interventions, and the AMS Team.

Impact of financial incentives for infection prevention and management on antibiotic use: A Korea National Health Insurance cohort study

BACKGROUND

The Korean government implemented financial incentives to enhance infection prevention and management within general hospital settings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of infection control compensation on antibiotic usage using a controlled interrupted time series analysis.

METHODS

The main unit of analysis was 270,901 inpatient episodes extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort Database from 2013 to 2019. The 96-month period was examined before and after the intervention, which was set to September 1, 2017, by applying a 1-year lag time after the incentive was introduced. Segmented regression was used to estimate the effects of interventions in a controlled interrupted time series. Hospitals that received nationwide financial incentives for infection prevention and management were included in the analysis. The study's primary outcome was the use of antibiotics based on the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification of antibiotics, and the secondary outcome was the number of days of antibiotic use as days of therapy (DOTs) per patient day (PD).

RESULTS

The probability of overall antibiotic use decreased between incentivized and unincentivized hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 0.922; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.859-1.000). The difference in level change in the use of third-generation cephalosporins (OR,0.894; 95% CI, 0.817-0.977) and carbapenem (OR,0.790; 95% CI, 0.630-0.992) was significantly reduced between incentivized and unincentivized hospitals. The difference in slope change on DOTs/PD of glycopeptides was - 0.005 DOT/PDs, and that of carbapenem was - 0.003 between incentivized and unincentivized hospitals.

CONCLUSION

We observed that incentives for infection prevention and management have had a positive impact on some aspects of antibiotic usage. A partial decrease was observed in antibiotic use, accompanied by a modest reduction in DOTs/PD, particularly for antibiotics aimed at addressing multidrug-resistant pathogens. Further investigation is necessary to establish evidence for extending these incentives.

Development of machine learning algorithms for scaling-up antibiotic stewardship

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) aim to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics, but their labor-intensive nature impedes their wide adoption. The present study introduces explainable machine learning (ML) models designed to prioritize inpatients who would benefit most from stewardship interventions.

METHODS

A cohort of inpatients who received systemic antibiotics and were monitored by a multidisciplinary ASP team at a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea was assembled. Data encompassing over 130,000 patient-days and comprising more than 160 features from multiple domains, including prescription records, laboratory, microbiology results, and patient conditions was collected.Outcome labels were generated using medication administration history: discontinuation, switching from intravenous to oral medication (IV to PO), and early or late de-escalation. The models were trained using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis used to explain the model's predictions.

RESULTS

The models demonstrated strong discrimination when evaluated on a hold-out test set(AUROC - IV to PO: 0.81, Early de-escalation: 0.78, Late de-escalation: 0.72, Discontinue: 0.80). The models identified 41%, 16%, 22%, and 17% more cases requiring discontinuation, IV to PO, early and late de-escalation, respectively, compared to the conventional length of therapy strategy, given that the same number of patients were reviewed by the ASP team. The SHAP results explain how each model makes their predictions, highlighting a unique set of important features that are well-aligned with the clinical intuitions of the ASP team.

CONCLUSIONS

The models are expected to improve the efficiency of ASP activities by prioritizing cases that would benefit from different types of ASP interventions along with detailed explanations.

Antimicrobial Sales Comparison before and after the Implementation of Nationwide Restriction Policy in Saudi Arabia

Antimicrobial dispensing without a prescription has been identified as a significant contributor to the burgeoning crisis of antimicrobial resistance. To combat this, the Saudi Ministry of Health introduced a stringent antimicrobial restriction policy in mid-2018, mandating prescriptions for all antimicrobial drug dispensations at pharmacies. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the immediate impact of this policy on retail antimicrobial sales. To do so, we analyzed annual sales data from 2017 to 2019 sourced from the IQVIA-MIDAS® database, which included a range of antimicrobials, such as antibiotics, antifungals, and other related agents. The analysis revealed a notable reduction in overall antimicrobial sales by 23.2%, decreasing from 818.9 million SAR in 2017 to 648.4 million SAR in 2019. While the Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated a statistically significant median reduction in total antimicrobial sales post-policy implementation (p = 0.0397), it is important to acknowledge that the long-term effects and adherence to the policy require further investigation. Notably, sales of amoxicillin dropped by 70% in 2019 compared to 2017, contributing largely to the decline. Conversely, a continuous increase in sales of some antimicrobial drugs following the restriction policy was observed, led by amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Our data support the implementation of antimicrobial restriction measures as an effective means of controlling excessive antimicrobial sales and dispensing without prescriptions.

Appropriateness of antibiotic use for patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria or urinary tract infection with positive urine culture: a retrospective observational multi-centre study in Korea

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance threatens public health worldwide, and inappropriate use of antibiotics is one of the main causes.

AIM

To evaluate qualitative use of antibiotics in asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) and urinary tract infection (UTI).

METHODS

Cases of positive urine culture (≥105 colony-forning units/mL) performed in inpatient, outpatient and emergency departments in April 2021 were screened in 26 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The cases were classified as ABU, lower UTI and upper UTI. The appropriateness of antibiotic use was evaluated retrospectively by infectious disease specialists using quality indicators based on clinical guidelines for ABU and UTI.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 2697 patients with ABU or UTI. The appropriateness of antibiotic use was assessed in 1157 patients with ABU, and in 677 and 863 patients with lower and upper UTI, respectively. Among the 1157 patients with ABU, 251 (22%) were prescribed antibiotics without appropriate indications. In 66 patients with ABU in which antibiotics were prescribed with appropriate indications, the duration was adequate in only 23 (34.8%) patients. The appropriateness of empirical and definite antibiotics was noted in 527 (77.8%) and 353 (68.0%) patients with lower UTI, and 745 (86.3%) and 583 (78.2%) patients with upper UTI, respectively. The duration of antibiotics was adequate in 321 (61.8%) patients with lower UTI and 576 (78.7%) patients with upper UTI.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide qualitative assessment of antibiotic use in ABU and UTI revealed that antibiotics were often prescribed inappropriately, and the duration of antibiotics was unnecessarily prolonged.

Understanding Post-Sepsis Syndrome: How Can Clinicians Help?

Sepsis is a global health challenge, with over 49 million cases annually. Recent medical advancements have increased in-hospital survival rates to approximately 80%, but the escalating incidence of sepsis, owing to an ageing population, rise in chronic diseases, and antibiotic resistance, have also increased the number of sepsis survivors. Subsequently, there is a growing prevalence of "post-sepsis syndrome" (PSS). This syndrome includes long-term physical, medical, cognitive, and psychological issues after recovering from sepsis. PSS puts survivors at risk for hospital readmission and is associated with a reduction in health- and life span, both at short and long term, after hospital discharge. Comprehensive understanding of PSS symptoms and causative factors is vital for developing optimal care for sepsis survivors, a task of prime importance for clinicians. This review aims to elucidate our current knowledge of PSS and its relevance in enhancing post-sepsis care provided by clinicians.

Effects of implementing a clinical pathway on antibiotic prophylaxis for patients who underwent an elective surgery

A reduction in the unnecessary use of antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent antibiotic resistance and adverse drug events. We aimed to evaluate the effects of implementing clinical pathways (CPs) on adherence to a systematic and appropriate duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. We identified 61 eligible CPs and a total of 44,062 patients who underwent elective surgeries associated with CPs. The Poisson mixed model with an interrupted time-series analysis frame was applied to the patient-level data. This enabled a comparison of the adherence rate before and after CP implementation. Furthermore, we examined the effect of application or completion of CP on the adherence rate after implementation. Adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis guideline substantially increased (incident rate ratio [IRR] 8.05; 95 confidence interval [CI] 2.64-24.55), compared with that before implementation. Following the implementation into the electronic entry system, we observed an improved adherence not only in CP completion but also in attempted CP execution (IRR of the executed but not completed cases 1.54; 95% CI 1.17-2.04; IRR of the executed and competed cases, 1.94; 95% CI 1.4-2.69). The implementation of CP into the electronic prescribing system was associated with a significant increase in the appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis among patients who underwent elective surgeries. The results suggest that a computer-assisted CP system for electronic health records could improve antibiotic adherence without significant expense.