Phylogenetic analysis of the promoter element 2 of paramyxo- and filoviruses

Nanopore sequencing-based measurement of paramyxovirus RNA editing reveals virus-specific differences in editing efficiency of mRNA, antigenome and genome

Paramyxovirus polymerase recognizes an RNA editing signal on the viral genome and transcribes mRNA in which guanine nucleotides are inserted in a template-independent manner. This enables the synthesis of multiple proteins from a single gene, which is important for viral growth. We developed a method to quantify RNA editing efficiency using Oxford Nanopore Technologies' MinION platform. We performed sequence analysis of reverse transcription-PCR amplicons with the RNA editing sites in cells infected with Sendai virus (SeV) and canine distemper virus (CDV). By modifying reverse transcription primers, we simultaneously assessed RNA editing efficiency in mRNA, antigenome and genome. We observed distinct differences in mRNA editing efficiency between SeV and CDV. Notably, while RNA editing in SeV is confined to mRNA, in CDV it is also observed in antigenome/genome. (Anti)genomes harboring extra nucleotides may deviate from a multiple-of-six sequence, suggesting that RNAs not following the "Rule of Six" are produced in CDV-infected cells.

Functional analysis of promoter element 2 within the viral polymerase gene of an emerging paramyxovirus, Sosuga virus

Paramyxovirus genomes carry bipartite promoters at the 3' ends of both their genome and antigenome, thereby initiating RNA synthesis, which requires the viral polymerase to recognize two elements: the primary promoter element 1 (PE1) and the secondary promoter element 2 (PE2). We have previously shown that the antigenomic PE2 (agPE2) in many viruses in the Rubulavirinae subfamily is located within the coding region of the viral RNA polymerase L gene. Sosuga virus (SOSV), belonging to the Rubulavirinae subfamily, is highly pathogenic to humans, thus necessitating high-level containment facilities for infectious virus research. The use of a minigenome system permits studies of viral RNA synthesis at lower biosafety levels. Because minigenomes of negative-strand RNA viruses generally comprise only the untranslated regions, agPE2 within the L coding region-such as those found in Rubulavirinae like SOSV-is typically omitted. However, generating an SOSV minigenome that retains agPE2 led to a pronounced increase in activity, enabling a detailed examination of the role of agPE2 in SOSV replication. In many Rubulavirinae, the agPE2 not only acts as a promoter but also encodes part of the L protein, resulting in a distinct motif at the C-terminus of the L protein. We have further shown that this motif is preserved even in Rubulavirinae that no longer contain the agPE2 within the L gene.IMPORTANCEParamyxoviruses are classified into three major subfamilies: Orthoparamyxovirinae, Avulavirinae, and Rubulavirinae. All paramyxovirus genomes and antigenomes possess bipartite promoters, comprising two elements: promoter element 1 (PE1) at the 3' end and promoter element 2 (PE2) located internally. We previously revealed that, in many Rubulavirinae, the antigenomic PE2 lies within the coding region of the viral RNA polymerase L gene. In this study, we used Sosuga virus, a member of the Rubulavirinae subfamily, to elucidate the role of antigenomic PE2 in viral replication. Because the PE2 region encodes part of the L protein, its presence leads to a distinctive motif at the C-terminus of L protein. Notably, this motif is conserved in all Rubulavirinae, including those that do not harbor the antigenomic PE2 within their L gene, indicating its importance in viral propagation.

Segment-specific promoter activity for RNA synthesis in the genome of Oz virus, genus Thogotovirus

Oz virus (OZV), a tick-borne, six-segmented negative-strand RNA virus in the genus Thogotovirus, caused a fatal human infection in Japan in 2023. To study viral RNA synthesis, we developed an OZV minigenome assay using mammalian cells. This revealed variations in promoter activities among the six genome segments. The "distal duplex," a double-stranded RNA structure beginning at the 11th nucleotide on the 5' end and the 10th on the 3' end, was found in all segments. A factor affecting promoter activity was the base pairing between the 12th nucleotide at the 5' end and the 11th at the 3' end, forming either G:C or A:U pairs. Disruption of this pairing caused a significant loss of promoter activity, emphasizing the importance of the distal duplex with at least six consecutive base pairs. Comparative analysis of genome terminal sequences suggests similar structural variations in the promoters of other species in Thogotovirus.

A Comparative Assessment of the Pathogenic Potential of Newly Discovered Henipaviruses

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have led to the discovery of a plethora of previously unknown viruses in animal samples. Some of these newly detected viruses are closely related to human pathogens. A prime example are the henipaviruses. Both Nipah (NiV) and Hendra virus (HeV) cause severe disease in humans. Henipaviruses are of zoonotic origin, and animal hosts, including intermediate hosts, play a critical role in viral transmission to humans. The natural reservoir hosts of NiV and HeV seem to be restricted to a few fruit bat species of the Pteropus genus in distinct geographic areas. However, the recent discovery of novel henipa- and henipa-like viruses suggests that these viruses are far more widespread than was originally thought. To date, these new viruses have been found in a wide range of animal hosts, including bats, shrews, and rodents in Asia, Africa, Europe, and South America. Since these viruses are closely related to human pathogens, it is important to learn whether they pose a threat to human health. In this article, we summarize what is known about the newly discovered henipaviruses, highlight differences to NiV and HeV, and discuss their pathogenic potential.