Increased Expression and Amplification of blaKPC-2 Contributes to Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam in a Sequence Type 11 Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain

In vitro mimicry of in vivo KPC mutations by ceftazidime-avibactam: phenotypes, mechanisms, genetic structure and kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the blaKPC. We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo blaKPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the blaKPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and blaKPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various blaKPC-2 variants, including blaKPC-25, blaKPC-127, blaKPC-100, blaKPC-128, blaKPC-137, blaKPC-138, blaKPC-144 and blaKPC-180. Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased blaKPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as blaKPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the blaKPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a blaKPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from blaKPC-2) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The blaKPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to blaKPC-2, rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.

Double blaKPC-2 copies quadrupled minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime-avibactam in hospital-derived Klebsiella pneumoniae

To illustrate the genomic and drug resistance traits of the Klebsiella pneumoniae Kpn_XM9, which harbors a transposon (Tn) As1 and was barely susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). Whole-genome sequencing, gene deletion, antimicrobial susceptibility, and conjugation tests were carried out to illustrate the traits of Kpn_XM9. As confirmed by whole-genome sequencing, the Kpn_XM9 harbored a 5,523,536 bp chromosome and five plasmids with lengths being 128,129, 196,512, 84,812, 43,695, and 5,596 bp, respectively. Plasmid p1_Kpn_XM9 (128,219 bp) contained four resistance genes, blaCTX-M-65, blaTEM-1B, rmtB, and two copies of blaKPC-2. Genes blaKPC-2 were bracketed by ISKpn17 and ISKpn16 within a new composite Tn3-like TnAs1. The two tandem repeats, positioned opposite each other, were spaced 93,447 bp apart in p1_Kpn_XM9. Kpn_XM9 belonged to K64 and sequence type (ST) 11. The Kpn_XM9 was resistant to amikacin, aztreonam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, doxycycline, minocycline, tigecycline, colistin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; it was barely susceptible to CZA with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 8/4 µg/mL, which declined to 2/4 µg/mL after a 18,555 bp nucleotide was knocked out and one copy of blaKPC-2 was sustained on p1_Kpn_XM9. Kpn_XM9 had virulence genes encoding Types 1 and 3 fimbriae, four siderophores, and capsular polysaccharide anchoring protein but no genes upregulating capsular polysaccharide synthesis. The Kpn_XM9 presented a classical phenotype with extreme drug resistance. The emergence of double copies of blaKPC-2 in a single plasmid from the predominant ST11 K. pneumoniae represents a new therapeutic challenge.IMPORTANCEWith the wide use of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant organisms, its resistance is increasingly documented; among the corresponding resistance mechanisms, mutations of blaKPC-2 or blaKPC-3 into other subtypes are dominant to date. However, more copies of blaKPC-2 may also greatly increase the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime-avibactam, which could be conferred by transposon As1 and insertion sequence 26 and should be of concern.

IS26 and the IS26 family: versatile resistance gene movers and genome reorganizers

SUMMARYIn Gram-negative bacteria, the insertion sequence IS26 is highly active in disseminating antibiotic resistance genes. IS26 can recruit a gene or group of genes into the mobile gene pool and support their continued dissemination to new locations by creating pseudo-compound transposons (PCTs) that can be further mobilized by the insertion sequence (IS). IS26 can also enhance expression of adjacent potential resistance genes. IS26 encodes a DDE transposase but has unique properties. It forms cointegrates between two separate DNA molecules using two mechanisms. The well-known copy-in (replicative) route generates an additional IS copy and duplicates the target site. The recently discovered and more efficient and targeted conservative mechanism requires an IS in both participating molecules and does not generate any new sequence. The unit of movement for PCTs, known as a translocatable unit or TU, includes only one IS26. TU formed by homologous recombination between the bounding IS26s can be reincorporated via either cointegration route. However, the targeted conservative reaction is key to generation of arrays of overlapping PCTs seen in resistant pathogens. Using the copy-in route, IS26 can also act on a site in the same DNA molecule, either inverting adjacent DNA or generating an adjacent deletion plus a circular molecule carrying the DNA segment lost and an IS copy. If reincorporated, these circular molecules create a new PCT. IS26 is the best characterized IS in the IS26 family, which includes IS257/IS431, ISSau10, IS1216, IS1006, and IS1008 that are also implicated in spreading resistance genes in Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.

Ceftazidime/avibactam versus polymyxin B in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a propensity score-matched multicenter real-world study

OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective observational multicenter study, we aimed to assess efficacy and mortality between ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) or polymyxin B (PMB)-based regimens for the treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections, as well as identify potential risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 276 CRKP-infected patients were enrolled in our study. Binary logistic and Cox regression analysis with a propensity score-matched (PSM) model were performed to identify risk factors for efficacy and mortality.

RESULTS

The patient cohort was divided into PMB-based regimen group (n = 98, 35.5%) and CAZ/AVI-based regimen group (n = 178, 64.5%). Compared to the PMB group, the CAZ/AVI group exhibited significantly higher rates of clinical efficacy (71.3% vs. 56.1%; p = 0.011), microbiological clearance (74.7% vs. 41.4%; p < 0.001), and a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (13.5% vs. 33.7%; p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression revealed that the treatment duration independently influenced both clinical efficacy and microbiological clearance. Vasoactive drugs, sepsis/septic shock, APACHE II score, and treatment duration were identified as risk factors associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. The CAZ/AVI-based regimen was an independent factor for good clinical efficacy, microbiological clearance, and lower AKI incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with CRKP infection, the CAZ/AVI-based regimen was superior to the PMB-based regimen.

Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship of the Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections are a major public health threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. The introduction of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) has, however, altered the treatment options for such pathogens. Thus, four new BL/BLI combinations-namely, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam-have been approved for infections attributed to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nevertheless, although these antimicrobials are increasingly being used in place of other drugs such as polymyxins, their optimal clinical use is still challenging. Furthermore, there is evidence that resistance to these agents might be increasing, so urgent measures should be taken to ensure their continued effectiveness. Therefore, clinical laboratories play an important role in the judicious use of these new antimicrobial combinations by detecting and characterizing carbapenem resistance, resolving the presence and type of carbapenemase production, and accurately determining the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) for BL/BLIs. These three targets must be met to ensure optimal BL/BLIs use and prevent unnecessary exposure that could lead to the development of resistance. At the same time, laboratories must ensure that results are interpreted in a timely manner to avoid delays in appropriate treatment that might be detrimental to patient safety. Thus, we herein present an overview of the indications and current applications of the new antimicrobial combinations and explore the diagnostic limitations regarding both carbapenem resistance detection and the interpretation of MIC results. Moreover, we suggest the use of alternative narrower-spectrum antibiotics based on susceptibility testing and present data regarding the effect of synergies between BL/BLIs and other antimicrobials. Finally, in order to address the absence of a standardized approach to using the novel BL/BLIs, we propose a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm, which can be modified based on local epidemiological criteria. This framework could also be expanded to incorporate other new antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol, or currently unavailable BL/BLIs such as aztreonam/avibactam and cefepime/taniborbactam.

Genome sequencing unveils blaKPC-2-harboring plasmids as drivers of enhanced resistance and virulence in nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae

The threat posed by Klebsiella pneumoniae in healthcare settings has worsened due to the evolutionary advantages conferred by blaKPC-2-harboring plasmids (pKPC-2). However, the specific evolutionary pathway of nosocomial K. pneumoniae carrying pKPC-2 and its transmission between patients and healthcare environments are not yet well understood. Between 1 August and 31 December 2019, 237 ST11 KPC-2-producing-carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) (KPC-2-CRKP) were collected from patient or ward environments in an intensive care unit and subjected to Illumina sequencing, of which 32 strains were additionally selected for Nanopore sequencing to obtain complete plasmid sequences. Bioinformatics analysis, conjugation experiments, antimicrobial susceptibility tests, and virulence assays were performed to identify the evolutionary characteristics of pKPC-2. The pKPC-2 plasmids were divided into three subgroups with distinct evolutionary events, including Tn3-mediated plasmid homologous recombination, IS26-mediated horizontal gene transfer, and dynamic duplications of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Surprisingly, the incidence rates of multicopy blaKPC-2, blaSHV-12, and blaCTX-M-65 were quite high (ranging from 27.43% to 67.01%), and strains negative for extended-spectrum β-lactamase tended to develop multicopy blaKPC-2. Notably, the presence of multicopy blaSHV-12 reduced sensitivity to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), and the relative expression level of blaSHV-12 in the CZA-resistant group was 6.12 times higher than that in the sensitive group. Furthermore, a novel hybrid pKPC-2 was identified, presenting enhanced virulence levels and decreased susceptibility to CZA. This study emphasizes the notable prevalence of multicopy ARGs and provides a comprehensive insight into the intricate and diverse evolutionary pathways of resistant plasmids that disseminate among patients and healthcare environments.IMPORTANCEThis study is based on a CRKP screening program between patients and ward environments in an intensive care unit, describing the pKPC-2 (blaKPC-2-harboring plasmids) population structure and evolutionary characteristics in clinical settings. Long-read sequencing was performed in genetically closely related strains, enabling the high-resolution analysis of evolution pathway between or within pKPC-2 subgroups. We revealed the extremely high rates of multicopy antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in clinical settings and its effect on resistance profile toward novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, which belongs to the last line treatment choices toward CRKP infection. A novel hybrid pKPC-2 carrying CRKP with enhanced resistance and virulence level was captured during its clonal spread between patients and ward environment. These evidences highlight the threat of pKPC-2 to CRKP treatment and control. Thus, surveillance and timely disinfection in clinical settings should be practiced to prevent transmission of CRKP carrying threatful pKPC-2. And rational use of antibiotics should be called for to prevent inducing of pKPC-2 evolution, especially the multicopy ARGs.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: resistance in vitro

This article reviews resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam as an aspect of its primary pharmacology, linked thematically with recent reviews of the basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology of the combination (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52). In Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, single-step exposures to 8×  MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam yielded frequencies of resistance from <∼0.5 × 10-9 to 2-8 × 10-9, depending on the host strain and the β-lactamase harboured. β-Lactamase structural gene mutations mostly affected the avibactam binding site through changes in the Ω-loop: e.g. Asp179Tyr (D179Y) in KPC-2. Other mutations included ones proposed to reduce the permeability to ceftazidime and/or avibactam through changes in outer membrane structure, up-regulated efflux, or both. The existence, or otherwise, of cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other antibacterial agents was also reviewed as a key element of the preclinical primary pharmacology of the new agent. Cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other β-lactam-based antibacterial agents was caused by MBLs. Mechanism-based cross-resistance was not observed between ceftazidime/avibactam and fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides or colistin. A low level of general co-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. For example, among 2821 MDR Klebsiella spp., 3.4% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 0.07% of 8177 non-MDR isolates. Much of this was caused by possession of MBLs. Among 1151 MDR, XDR and pandrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from the USA, 11.1% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 3.0% of 7452 unselected isolates. In this case, the decreased proportion susceptible was not due to MBLs.