Heteroresistance to cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the CREDIBLE-CR study was not linked to clinical outcomes: a post hoc analysis

The Challenge of Treating Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Narrative Review

Gram-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a significant challenge in clinical practice. Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative organisms, in particular, require careful consideration due to their complexity and varied prevalence, given that the microbiological diagnosis of these pathogens is intricate and compounded by challenges in assessing the efficacy of anti-MBL antimicrobials. We discuss both established and new approaches in the treatment of MBL-producing Gram-negative infections, focusing on 3 strategies: colistin; the recently approved combination of aztreonam with avibactam (or with ceftazidime/avibactam); and cefiderocol. Despite its significant activity against various Gram-negative pathogens, the efficacy of colistin is limited by resistance mechanisms, while nephrotoxicity and acute renal injury call for careful dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. Aztreonam combined with avibactam (or with avibactam/ceftazidime if aztreonam plus avibactam is not available) exhibits potent activity against MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol in monotherapy is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant organisms, including MBL producers, and favorable clinical outcomes have been observed in various clinical trials and case series. After examining scientific evidence in the management of infections caused by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria, we have developed a comprehensive clinical algorithm to guide therapeutic decision making. We recommend reserving colistin as a last-resort option for MDR Gram-negative infections. Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam represent favorable options against MBL-producing pathogens. In the case of P. aeruginosa with MBL-producing enzymes and with difficult-to-treat resistance, cefiderocol is the preferred option. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and minimize resistance.

Highly Effective Biocides against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Reveal New Mechanistic Insights Across Gram-Negative Bacteria

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major nosocomial pathogen that persists in healthcare settings despite rigorous disinfection protocols due to intrinsic mechanisms conferring resistance. We sought to systematically assess cationic biocide efficacy against this pathogen using a panel of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. Our studies revealed widespread resistance to commercial cationic disinfectants that are the current standard of care, raising concerns about their efficacy. To address this shortcoming, we highlight a new class of quaternary phosphonium compounds that are highly effective against all members of the panel. To understand the difference in efficacy, mechanism of action studies were carried out, which identified a discrete inner-membrane selective target. Resistance selection studies implicated the SmvRA efflux system (a transcriptionally regulated, inner membrane-associated efflux system) as a major determinant of resistance. This system is also implicated in resistance to two commercial bolaamphiphile antiseptics, octenidine and chlorhexidine, which was further validated herein. In sum, this work highlights, for the first time, a discrete inner-membrane specific mechanism for the bolaamphiphile class of disinfectants that contrasts with the prevailing model of indiscriminate membrane interactions of commercial amphiphiles paving the way for future innovations in disinfectant research.

An Update on Recent Clinical Trial Data in Bloodstream Infection

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality globally, exacerbated by an ageing population and rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This review offers an updated evaluation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in BSI management from 2018 onwards, focusing on the evolving landscape of diagnostics and treatment. New rapid diagnostic technologies and shorter antimicrobial courses have transformed clinical practice, reducing the time to appropriate therapy and hospital stays. Several RCTs demonstrated that rapid phenotypic and genotypic tests shorten the time to optimal therapy, especially when paired with antimicrobial stewardship. Ongoing trials are investigating novel antimicrobial regimens and the safety of early oral switch strategies, particularly for Gram-positive and Gram-negative BSIs. Recent RCTs on Staphylococcus aureus BSI (SAB) and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria highlight advances in treatment but emphasize the need for further study into the efficacy of combination therapies and the utility of rapid diagnostics in different healthcare settings. The review also explores challenges in trail design, with adaptive and pragmatic appropriates improving the efficacy of clinical trials. Finally, this paper identifies gaps in the research, including the need for further investigation into oral step-down therapy, optimal durations, and the role of rapid diagnostics in resource-limited settings.

Frequency of cefiderocol heteroresistance among patients treated with cefiderocol for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections

Background

Cefiderocol exhibits potent in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb), but this activity has not consistently translated to improved outcomes among patients. Cefiderocol heteroresistance, or the presence of a resistant subpopulation, has been proposed as one possible explanation. The objective of this study was to explore associations between heteroresistance and outcomes of patients with CRAb infections.

Methods

Baseline CRAb isolates were collected from 27 consecutive patients in the USA and Italy. Cefiderocol susceptibility was tested by broth microdilutions in triplicate. Heteroresistance was defined by population analysis profiling in duplicate. Resistance mechanisms and strain relatedness were evaluated through comparative genomic analysis.

Results

Overall, 59% of infecting CRAb isolates were identified as cefiderocol-heteroresistant; rates were higher among isolates from Italy (79%) than the USA (38%). The median Charlson Comorbidity and SOFA scores were 4 and 5, respectively; 44% of patients had pneumonia, which was the most common infection type. Rates of 28-day clinical success and survival were 30% and 73%, respectively. By broth microdilution, cefiderocol MICs ≥1 mg/L were associated with higher failure rates than MICs ≤0.5 mg/L (81% versus 55%). Rates of clinical failure were numerically higher among patients infected by cefiderocol-heteroresistant compared with susceptible CRAb (81% versus 55%). Whole-genome sequencing identified a premature stop codon in the TonB-dependent receptor gene piuA in six isolates, all of which were heteroresistant.

Conclusions

This pilot study supports the hypothesis that cefiderocol treatment failure may be associated with higher MICs and/or the presence of heteroresistance. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Should we, and how to, optimize cefiderocol administration during severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii? A viewpoint

OBJECTIVES

Acinetobacter baumannii is classified by the centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as an "urgent threat" due to its ability to acquire and develop resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics. As a result, it is one of the most concerning pathogens in healthcare settings, with increasing incidence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, there are ongoing efforts to find novel treatment options, one of which is cefiderocol. We aim to review available evidence on cefiderocol use for severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted from 2017 to 2023, covering articles from databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase, along with conference proceedings from ECCMID 2023. The primary focus was on severe nosocomial pneumonia due A. baumannii and cefiderocol.

DISCUSSION

Cefiderocol, targeting periplasmic space Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) via siderophore transport pathways, exhibits promise against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Its effectiveness in treating CRAB pneumonia remains debated. The CREDIBLE trial reported higher mortality with cefiderocol compared to the best available treatment, while other cohort studies showed contrasting outcomes. Patient variations and pharmacokinetic factors may underlie these discrepancies. The recommended cefiderocol dosage regimen may fall short of desired pharmacokinetic targets, especially in critically ill patients and lung infections. Pulmonary factors hindering cefiderocol's entry into bacteria through iron transporters are overlooked in clinical breakpoints. Optimized dosing or combination regimens may enhance infection site exposure and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to determine the optimal cefiderocol dosage and administration (mono vs. dual therapy, continuous vs. intermittent infusion), in severe Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial pneumonia.

Commercially available tests for determining cefiderocol susceptibility display variable performance in the Achromobacter genus

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections. Testing for cefiderocol susceptibility is challenging with distinct recommendations depending on the pathogens.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the performance of commercial tests for testing cefiderocol susceptibility in the Achromobacter genus and reviewed the literature.

METHODS

Diffusion (disks, MIC gradient test strips [MTS], Liofilchem) and broth microdilution (BMD) methods (ComASP™, Liofilchem; UMIC®, Bruker) were compared with the BMD reference method according to the EUCAST guidelines on 143 Achromobacter strains from 14 species with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L. A literature search was conducted regardless of method or species.

RESULTS

None of the methods tested fulfilled an acceptable essential agreement (EA). MTS displayed the lowest EA (30.8%) after UMIC® (49%) and ComASP™ (76.9%). All methods achieved an acceptable bias, with MICs either underestimated using MTS (-1.3%) and ComASP™ (-14.2%) or overestimated with UMIC® (+ 9.1%). Inhibition zone diameters ranged from 6 to 38 mm (IZD50/90=33/30 mm). UMIC® and ComASP™ failed to categorize one or the two cefiderocol-resistant strains of this study as resistant unlike the diffusion-based methods. The literature review highlighted distinct performance of the available methods according to pathogens and testing conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MTS is discouraged for Achromobacter spp. Disk diffusion can be used to screen for susceptible strains by setting a threshold diameter of 30 mm. UMIC® and ComASP™ should not be used as the sole method but have to be systematically associated with disk diffusion to detect the yet rarely described cefiderocol-resistant Achromobacter sp. strains.

Adaptive resistance to cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB): Microbiological and clinical issues

Objectives

Determining the best available therapy for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections is a challenge. Cefiderocol is an attractive alternative drug effective against many resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria. However, its place in the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections remains unclear and much debated, with contradictory results.

Methods

We describe here the case of a 37-year-old man with ventilator-associated bacteraemic CRAB pneumonia in an intensive care unit. He was initially treated with a combination of colistin and tigecycline, and was then switched onto colistin and cefiderocol. We then used a new accessible protocol to test 30 CRAB isolates (OXA-23/OXA-24/OXA-58/NDM-1) for adaptive resistance to cefiderocol (ARC) after exposure to this drug.

Results

After clinical failure with the initial combination, we noted a significant clinical improvement in the patient on the second combination, leading to clinical cure. No ARC was detected in the two OXA-23 case-CRAB isolates. All NDM-1 CRAB isolates were resistant to cefiderocol in standard tests; the OXA-23, OXA-24 and OXA-58 CRAB isolates presented 84.2 %, 50 % and 0 % ARC, respectively.

Conclusions

ARC is not routinely assessed for CRAB isolates despite frequently being reported in susceptible isolates (69.2 %). Subpopulations displaying ARC may account for treatment failure, but this hypothesis should be treated with caution in the absence of robust clinical data. The two main findings of this work are that (i) cefiderocol monotherapy should probably not be recommended for OXA-23/24 CRAB infections and (ii) the characterisation of carbapenemases in CRAB strains may be informative for clinical decision-making.

Heteroresistance to piperacillin/tazobactam in Klebsiella pneumoniae is mediated by increased copy number of multiple β-lactamase genes

Background

Piperacillin/tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a broad spectrum of activity that is often used as empirical and/or targeted therapy among hospitalized patients. Heteroresistance (HR) is a form of antibiotic resistance in which a minority population of resistant cells coexists with a majority susceptible population that has been found to be a cause of antibiotic treatment failure in murine models.

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of HR and mechanisms of HR to piperacillin/tazobactam among Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates.

Materials

From July 2018 to June 2021, K. pneumoniae piperacillin/tazobactam-susceptible BSI isolates were collected from two tertiary hospitals in Atlanta, GA, USA. Only first isolates from each patient per calendar year were included. Population analysis profiling (PAP) and WGS were performed to identify HR and its mechanisms.

Results

Among 423 K. pneumoniae BSI isolates collected during the study period, 6% (25/423) were found to be HR with a subpopulation surviving above the breakpoint. WGS of HR isolates grown in the presence of piperacillin/tazobactam at concentrations 8-fold that of the MIC revealed copy number changes of plasmid-located β-lactamase genes blaCTX-M-15, blaSHV33, blaOXA-1 and blaTEM-1 by tandem gene amplification or plasmid copy number increase.

Conclusions

Prevalence of HR to piperacillin/tazobactam among bloodstream isolates was substantial. The HR phenotype appears to be caused by tandem amplification of β-lactamase genes found on plasmids or plasmid copy number increase. This raises the possibility of dissemination of HR through horizontal gene transfer and requires further study.

Rates of resistance and heteroresistance to newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

Background

Heteroresistance (HR), the presence of antibiotic-resistant subpopulations within a primary isogenic population, may be a potentially overlooked contributor to newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) treatment failure in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections.

Objectives

To determine rates of susceptibility and HR to BL/BLIs ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in clinical CRE isolates.

Methods

The first CRE isolate per patient per year from two >500 bed academic hospitals from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2021, were included. Reference broth microdilution (BMD) was used to determine antibiotic susceptibility, and population analysis profiling (PAP) to determine HR. Carbapenemase production (CP) was determined using the Carba NP assay.

Results

Among 327 CRE isolates, 46% were Enterobacter cloacae, 38% Klebsiella pneumoniae and 16% Escherichia coli. By BMD, 87% to 98% of CRE were susceptible to the three antibiotics tested. From 2016 to 2021, there were incremental decreases in the rates of susceptibility to each of the three BL/BLIs. HR was detected in each species-antibiotic combination, with the highest rates of HR (26%) found in K. pneumoniae isolates with imipenem/relebactam. HR or resistance to at least one BL/BLI by PAP was found in 24% of CRE isolates and 65% of these had detectable CP.

Conclusion

Twenty-four percent of CRE isolates tested were either resistant or heteroresistant (HR) to newer BL/BLIs, with an overall decrease of ∼10% susceptibility over 6 years. While newer BL/BLIs remain active against most CRE, these findings support the need for ongoing antibiotic stewardship and a better understanding of the clinical implications of HR in CRE.

Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) remain a clinical challenge due to limited treatment options. Recently, cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, and sulbactam-durlobactam, a bactericidal β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of and resistance to cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, the antimicrobial susceptibility of A. baumannii isolates to these drugs, as well as the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol and sulbactam/durlobactam-based regimens against CRAB. Overall, cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam show an excellent antimicrobial activity against CRAB. The review of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of cefiderocol therapy against CRAB indicates it is non-inferior to colistin/other treatments for CRAB infections, with a better safety profile. Combination treatment is not associated with improved outcomes compared to monotherapy. Higher mortality rates are often associated with prior patient comorbidities and the severity of the underlying infection. Regarding sulbactam-durlobactam, current data from the pivotal clinical trial and case reports suggest this antibiotic combination could be a valuable option in critically ill patients affected by CRAB infections, in particular where no other antibiotic appears to be effective.