Evaluation of the Novel CE-IVD-Marked Multiplex PCR QIAstat-Dx Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel

Towards improved point-of-care (POC) testing for patients with suspected sepsis: POC tests for host biomarkers and possible microbial pathogens

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is a heterogeneous syndrome often misdiagnosed. Point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests are commonly used to guide decision and include host biomarkers and molecular diagnostics.

AREAS COVERED

The diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of established and emerging biomarkers for sepsis, including procalcitonin (PCT) soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), presepsin, TRAIL/IP-10/CRP, MxA, and MxA-CRP, are analyzed in this review. The clinical utility of the two prevalent molecular techniques for pathogens identification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays is also presented: FILMARRAY and QIAstat-Dx RP.

EXPERT OPINION

The rising benefits of the combined use of POC biomarkers with molecular diagnostics in daily clinical routine appear to outperform conventional practices in terms of reduced turnaround time, timely diagnosis, and prompt administration of the appropriate treatment. Yet, this must be further demonstrated in future investigations. However, the cost-effectiveness of POC tests and the high rate of false positive and negative results, indicate the need for a comprehensive clinical evaluation.

Comment on Cuesta et al. An Assessment of a New Rapid Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Meningoencephalitis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 802

In April 2024, the manuscript by Cuesta et al [...].

An Assessment of a New Rapid Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Meningoencephalitis

The rapid and broad microbiological diagnosis of meningoencephalitis (ME) has been possible thanks to the development of multiplex PCR tests applied to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We aimed to assess a new multiplex PCR panel (the QIAstat-Dx ME panel), which we compared to conventional diagnostic tools and the Biofire FilmArray ME Panel. The pathogens analyzed using both methods were Escherichia coli K1, Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterovirus, herpes simplex virus 1-2, human herpesvirus 6, human parechovirus, varicella zoster virus, and Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii. We used sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and kappa correlation index parameters to achieve our objective. Fifty CSF samples from patients with suspected ME were included. When conventional methods were used, 28 CSF samples (56%) were positive. The sensitivity and specificity for QIAstat-Dx/ME were 96.43% (CI95%, 79.8-99.8) and 95.24% (75.2-99.7), respectively, whereas the PPV and NPV were 96.43% (79.8-99.8) and 95.24% (75.1-99.7), respectively. The kappa value was 91.67%. Conclusions: A high correlation of the QIAstat-Dx ME panel with reference methods was shown. QIAstat-Dx ME is a rapid-PCR technique to be applied in patients with suspected ME with a high accuracy.

A multicenter evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx meningitis-encephalitis syndromic test kit as compared to the conventional diagnostic microbiology workflow

PURPOSE

Rapid diagnosis and treatment of infectious meningitis and encephalitis (ME) is critical to minimize morbidity and mortality. Recently, Qiagen introduced the CE-IVD QIAstat-Dx ME panel (QS-ME) for syndromic diagnostic testing of meningitis and encephalitis. Some data on the performance of the QS-ME in comparison to the BioFire FilmArray ME panel are available. In this study, the performance of the QS-ME is compared to the current diagnostic workflow in two academic medical centers in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A total of 110 cerebrospinal fluid samples were retrospectively tested with the QS-ME. The results obtained were compared to the results of laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays (LDTs), IS-pro, bacterial culture, and cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing. In addition, the accuracy of the QS-ME was also investigated using an external quality assessment (EQA) panel consisting of ten samples.

RESULTS

Four of the 110 samples tested failed to produce a valid QS-ME result. In the remaining 106 samples, the QS-ME detected 53/53 viral targets, 38/40 bacterial targets, and 7/13 Cryptococcus neoformans targets. The discrepant bacterial results consisted of two samples that were previously tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes (CT 35.8) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (CT 40), respectively. The QS-ME detected one additional result, consisting of a varicella-zoster virus signal (CT 35.9), in a sample in which both techniques detected Streptococcus pyogenes. Finally, 100% concordance was achieved in testing a blinded bacterial ME EQA panel.

CONCLUSION

The QS-ME is a relevant addition to the syndromic testing landscape to assist in diagnosing infectious ME.

The diagnosis of central nervous system infections in resource-limited settings and the use of novel and molecular diagnostic platforms to improve diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Central nervous system infections (CNSI) disproportionately affect individuals in low-resource settings where diagnosis is challenging; large proportions of patients never receive a confirmed microbiological diagnosis resulting in inadequate management and high mortality. The epidemiology of CNSI varies globally and conventional diagnostics deployed in resource-limited settings have significant limitations, with an urgent need for improved diagnostic strategies.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes molecular platforms and other novel diagnostics used in the diagnosis of CNSI that are applicable to resource-limited settings. An extensive literature search of Medline and PubMed was performed. The emphasis is on investigations targeting infections of relevance to resource-limited settings either due to variation in regional CNSI epidemiology or due to increased prevalence in patients with immunosuppression. This includes commercially available multiplex PCR platforms, mycobacterial PCR platforms, and rapid diagnostics tests. To offer a framework for the optimal implementation in clinical settings, existing evidence highlighting the advantages and limitations of available platforms is reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

The implementation of molecular platforms and other novel diagnostics has the potential to transform CNSI diagnosis in resource-limited settings, with several examples of successful rollout of novel diagnostics such as Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and cryptococcal antigen testing.

Distinguishing community-acquired bacterial and viral meningitis: Microbes and biomarkers

Diagnostic tools to differentiate between community-acquired bacterial and viral meningitis are essential to target the potentially lifesaving antibiotic treatment to those at greatest risk and concurrently spare patients with viral meningitis from the disadvantages of antibiotics. In addition, excluding bacterial meningitis and thus decreasing antibiotic consumption would be important to help reduce antimicrobial resistance and healthcare expenses. The available diagnostic laboratory tests for differentiating bacterial and viral meningitis can be divided microbiological pathogen-focussed methods and biomarkers of the host response. Bacterial culture-independent microbiological methods, such as highly multiplexed nucleic acid amplification tests, are rapidly making their way into the clinical practice. At the same time, more conventional host protein biomarkers, such as procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, are supplemented by newer proteomic and transcriptomic signatures. This review aims to summarise the current state and the recent advances in diagnostic methods to differentiate bacterial from viral meningitis.