1
|
Bisen M, Kharga K, Mehta S, Jabi N, Kumar L. Bacteriophages in nature: recent advances in research tools and diverse environmental and biotechnological applications. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2024; 31:22199-22242. [PMID: 38411907 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-32535-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Bacteriophages infect and replicate within bacteria and play a key role in the environment, particularly in microbial ecosystems and bacterial population dynamics. The increasing recognition of their significance stems from their wide array of environmental and biotechnological uses, which encompass the mounting issue of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Beyond their therapeutic potential in combating antibiotic-resistant infections, bacteriophages also find vast applications such as water quality monitoring, bioremediation, and nutrient cycling within environmental sciences. Researchers are actively involved in isolating and characterizing bacteriophages from different natural sources to explore their applications. Gaining insights into key aspects such as the life cycle of bacteriophages, their host range, immune interactions, and physical stability is vital to enhance their application potential. The establishment of diverse phage libraries has become indispensable to facilitate their wide-ranging uses. Consequently, numerous protocols, ranging from traditional to cutting-edge techniques, have been developed for the isolation, detection, purification, and characterization of bacteriophages from diverse environmental sources. This review offers an exploration of tools, delves into the methods of isolation, characterization, and the extensive environmental applications of bacteriophages, particularly in areas like water quality assessment, the food sector, therapeutic interventions, and the phage therapy in various infections and diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monish Bisen
- School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India
| | - Kusum Kharga
- School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India
| | - Sakshi Mehta
- School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India
| | - Nashra Jabi
- School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India
| | - Lokender Kumar
- School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India.
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, Raj Khosla Centre for Cancer Research, Shoolini University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 173229, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gladysheva-Azgari M, Sharko F, Evteeva M, Kuvyrchenkova A, Boulygina E, Tsygankova S, Slobodova N, Pustovoit K, Melkina O, Nedoluzhko A, Korzhenkov A, Kudryavtseva A, Utkina A, Manukhov I, Rastorguev S, Zavilgelsky G. ArdA genes from pKM101 and from B. bifidum chromosome have a different range of regulated genes. Heliyon 2023; 9:e22986. [PMID: 38144267 PMCID: PMC10746416 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The ardA genes are present in a wide variety of conjugative plasmids and play an important role in overcoming the restriction barrier. To date, there is no information on the chromosomal ardA genes. It is still unclear whether they keep their antirestriction activity and why bacterial chromosomes contain these genes. In the present study, we confirmed the antirestriction function of the ardA gene from the Bifidobacterium bifidum chromosome. Transcriptome analysis in Escherichia coli showed that the range of regulated genes varies significantly for ardA from conjugative plasmid pKM101 and from the B. bifidum chromosome. Moreover, if the targets for both ardA genes match, they often show an opposite effect on regulated gene expression. The results obtained indicate two seemingly mutually exclusive conclusions. On the one hand, the pleiotropic effect of ardA genes was shown not only on restriction-modification system, but also on expression of a number of other genes. On the other hand, the range of affected genes varies significally for ardA genes from different sources, which indicates the specificity of ardA to inhibited targets. Author Summary. Conjugative plasmids, bacteriophages, as well as transposons, are capable to transfer various genes, including antibiotic resistance genes, among bacterial cells. However, many of those genes pose a threat to the bacterial cells, therefore bacterial cells have special restriction systems that limit such transfer. Antirestriction genes have previously been described as a part of conjugative plasmids, and bacteriophages and transposons. Those plasmids are able to overcome bacterial cell protection in the presence of antirestriction genes, which inhibit bacterial restriction systems. This work unveils the antirestriction mechanisms, which play an important role in the bacterial life cycle. Here, we clearly show that antirestriction genes, which are able to inhibit cell protection, exist not only in plasmids but also in the bacterial chromosomes themselves. Moreover, antirestrictases have not only an inhibitory function but also participate in the regulation of other bacterial genes. The regulatory function of plasmid antirestriction genes also helps them to overcome the bacterial cell protection against gene transfer, whereas the regulatory function of genomic antirestrictases has no such effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - F.S. Sharko
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182, Moscow, Russia
- Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia
| | - M.A. Evteeva
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - E.S. Boulygina
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182, Moscow, Russia
| | - S.V. Tsygankova
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182, Moscow, Russia
| | - N.V. Slobodova
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182, Moscow, Russia
| | - K.S. Pustovoit
- State Research Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia, 115454
| | - O.E. Melkina
- State Research Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia, 115454
| | - A.V. Nedoluzhko
- European University at Saint Petersburg, 191187, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - A.A. Korzhenkov
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182, Moscow, Russia
| | - A.A. Kudryavtseva
- Research Center for Molecular Mechanisms of Aging and Age-Related Diseases, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - A.A. Utkina
- Research Center for Molecular Mechanisms of Aging and Age-Related Diseases, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - I.V. Manukhov
- Research Center for Molecular Mechanisms of Aging and Age-Related Diseases, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Faculty of Physics, HSE University, 109028, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory for Microbiology, BIOTECH University, 125080, Moscow, Russia
| | - S.M. Rastorguev
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182, Moscow, Russia
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ostrovityanova Str. 1, Moscow, 117997, Russia
| | - G.B. Zavilgelsky
- State Research Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia, 115454
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
New temperature-switchable acyl homoserine lactone-regulated expression vector. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2023; 107:807-818. [PMID: 36580089 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-12341-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Bacterial expression systems play an indispensable role in the biosynthesis of recombinant proteins. Different proteins and the tasks associated with them may require different systems. The purpose of this work is to make an expression vector that allows switching on and off the expression of the target gene during cell incubation. Several expression vectors for use in Escherichia coli cells were developed using elements of the luxR/luxI type quorum sensing system of psychrophilic bacterium Aliivibrio logei. These vectors contain A. logei luxR2 and (optionally) luxI genes and LuxR2-regulated promoter, under the control of which a target gene is intended to be inserted. The synthesis of the target protein depends directly on the temperature: gene expression starts when the temperature drops to 22 °C and stops when it rises to 37 °C, which makes it possible to fix the desired amount of the target protein in the cell. At the same time, the expression of the target gene at a low temperature depends on the concentration of the autoinducer (L-homoserine N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-lactone, AI) in the culture medium in a wide range from 1 nM to 10 μM, which makes it possible to smoothly regulate the rate of target protein synthesis. Presence of luxI in the vector provides the possibility of autoinduction. Constructed expression vectors were tested with gfp, ardA, and ardB genes. At maximum, we obtained the target protein in an amount of up to 33% of the total cellular protein. KEY POINTS: • A. logei quorum sensing system elements were applied in new expression vectors • Expression of target gene is inducible at 22 °C and it is switched off at 37 °C • Target gene expression at 22 °C is tunable by use different AI concentrations.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kudryavtseva AA, Cséfalvay E, Gnuchikh EY, Yanovskaya DD, Skutel MA, Isaev AB, Bazhenov SV, Utkina AA, Manukhov IV. Broadness and specificity: ArdB, ArdA, and Ocr against various restriction-modification systems. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1133144. [PMID: 37138625 PMCID: PMC10149784 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
ArdB, ArdA, and Ocr proteins inhibit the endonuclease activity of the type I restriction-modification enzymes (RMI). In this study, we evaluated the ability of ArdB, ArdA, and Ocr to inhibit different subtypes of Escherichia coli RMI systems (IA, IB, and IC) as well as two Bacillus licheniformis RMI systems. Furthermore we explored, the antirestriction activity of ArdA, ArdB, and Ocr against a type III restriction-modification system (RMIII) EcoPI and BREX. We found that DNA-mimic proteins, ArdA and Ocr exhibit different inhibition activity, depending on which RM system tested. This effect might be linked to the DNA mimicry nature of these proteins. In theory, DNA-mimic might competitively inhibit any DNA-binding proteins; however, the efficiency of inhibition depend on the ability to imitate the recognition site in DNA or its preferred conformation. In contrast, ArdB protein with an undescribed mechanism of action, demonstrated greater versatility against various RMI systems and provided similar antirestriction efficiency regardless of the recognition site. However, ArdB protein could not affect restriction systems that are radically different from the RMI such as BREX or RMIII. Thus, we assume that the structure of DNA-mimic proteins allows for selective inhibition of any DNA-binding proteins depending on the recognition site. In contrast, ArdB-like proteins inhibit RMI systems independently of the DNA recognition site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna A. Kudryavtseva
- Laboratory for Molecular Genetics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- *Correspondence: Anna A. Kudryavtseva
| | - Eva Cséfalvay
- Laboratory of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Nové Hrady, Czechia
| | - Evgeniy Yu Gnuchikh
- Kurchatov Genomic Center, National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Darya D. Yanovskaya
- Center of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mikhail A. Skutel
- Center of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Artem B. Isaev
- Center of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey V. Bazhenov
- Laboratory for Molecular Genetics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Laboratory for Microbiology, BIOTECH University, Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Physics, HSE University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna A. Utkina
- Laboratory for Molecular Genetics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Ilya V. Manukhov
- Laboratory for Molecular Genetics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Laboratory for Microbiology, BIOTECH University, Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Physics, HSE University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|