The effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on the cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antihypertensive drugs are one of the most effective strategies to prevent disability and mortality; however, there have been contradictory findings about the best dosing time for antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

We synthesized randomized controlled studies (RCTs) from the Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until 13 October 2022. The risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022368612.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 59 200 participants were included. Bedtime dosing was significantly associated with less incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.70-0.91), P = 0.0007] compared with morning dosing; however, there was no statistically significant difference between bedtime and morning dosing, regarding all-cause mortality [RR: 0.77 with 95% CI (0.51-1.16), P = 0.21], cardiovascular mortality [RR: 0.65 with 95% CI (0.35-1.21), P = 0.17], major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56-1.10), P = 0.16], heart failure [RR: 0.68 with 95% CI (0.42-1.09), P = 0.11], cerebrovascular accidents [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.53-1.22), P = 0.30], coronary revascularization [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.50-1.24), P = 0.30}, and angina [RR: 0.91 with 95% CI (0.55-1.50), P = 0.70].

CONCLUSION

Evidence about the comparative efficacy of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensives is still uncertain. However, bedtime dosing significantly reduced MI, which warrants more robust RCTs to validate.

Association between plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to Parkinson's disease in Chinese patients

PURPOSE

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease that usually leads to memory impairment, cognitive decline and dementia. Previous studies have reported that plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) gene polymorphisms play important roles in cardiovascular diseases, obesity, inflammation and other diseases. However, the role of PAI-1 in the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease has not been reported so far.

METHODS

This study was a case-control study. This study included 131 PD patients and 97 healthy volunteers. polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used to analyze the polymorphic loci of five different regions in PAI-1 gene (rs2227631, rs1799889, rs6092, rs2227694 and rs7242). 60 PD patients and 60 healthy volunteers were selected to detect the plasma PAI-1 concentration. The allele and genotype frequencies of SNPs were assessed using the SHEsis program.

RESULTS

We found that GG genotype frequency and G allele frequency of rs2227631 was significantly higher in the PD patients. Statistically significant difference for rs1799889 could be observed in overdominant model. In subgroup analysis, a significant difference in genotype frequency distribution and allele frequency was found for rs2227631 and rs1799889 between early-onset PD group and the control group. For cognitive dysfunction, the subcomponent showed that GG genotype frequency and G allele frequency of rs2227631 was significantly higher in normal cognition group. The codominant model of rs1799889 was significantly different between the cognitive impairment group and the control group. In addition, the expression of PAI-1 in plasma of PD patients was significantly higher than that of controls, and further analysis showed that the expression of PAI-1 in patients with cognitive impairment was significantly higher than that in patients with cognitive normal.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the PAI-1 gene rs2227631 and rs1799889 polymorphisms were significantly associated with PD susceptibility in the Chinese Han population. PAI-1 has the potential to become a new therapeutic target and diagnostic marker.

Targeting PAI-1 in Cardiovascular Disease: Structural Insights Into PAI-1 Functionality and Inhibition

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), a member of the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily with antiprotease activity, is the main physiological inhibitor of tissue-type (tPA) and urokinase-type (uPA) plasminogen activators (PAs). Apart from being crucially involved in fibrinolysis and wound healing, PAI-1 plays a pivotal role in various acute and chronic pathophysiological processes, including cardiovascular disease, tissue fibrosis, cancer, and age-related diseases. In the prospect of treating the broad range of PAI-1-related pathologies, many efforts have been devoted to developing PAI-1 inhibitors. The use of these inhibitors, including low molecular weight molecules, peptides, antibodies, and antibody fragments, in various animal disease models has provided ample evidence of their beneficial effect in vivo and moved forward some of these inhibitors in clinical trials. However, none of these inhibitors is currently approved for therapeutic use in humans, mainly due to selectivity and toxicity issues. Furthermore, the conformational plasticity of PAI-1, which is unique among serpins, poses a real challenge in the identification and development of PAI-1 inhibitors. This review will provide an overview of the structural insights into PAI-1 functionality and modulation thereof and will highlight diverse approaches to inhibit PAI-1 activity.