1
|
Shuvalova E, Shuvalov A, Al Sheikh W, Ivanov A, Biziaev N, Egorova T, Dmitriev S, Terenin I, Alkalaeva E. Eukaryotic initiation factors eIF4F and eIF4B promote translation termination upon closed-loop formation. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:gkaf161. [PMID: 40066881 PMCID: PMC11894530 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaf161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), comprising subunits eIF4G, eIF4E, and eIF4A, plays a pivotal role in the 48S preinitiation complex assembly and ribosomal scanning. Additionally, eIF4B enhances the helicase activity of eIF4A. eIF4F also interacts with poly (A)-binding protein (PABP) bound to the poly (A) tail of messenger RNA (mRNA), thereby forming a closed-loop structure. PABP, in turn, interacts with eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3), stimulating translation termination. Here, we employed a reconstituted mammalian system to directly demonstrate that eIF4F potently enhances translation termination. Specifically, eIF4A and eIF4B promote the loading of eRF1 into the A site of the ribosome, while eIF4G1 stimulates the GTPase activity of eRF3 and facilitates the dissociation of release factors following peptide release. We also identified MIF4G as the minimal domain required for this activity and showed that eIF4G2/DAP5 can also promote termination. Our findings provide compelling evidence that the closed-loop mRNA structure facilitates translation termination, with PABP and eIF4F directly involved in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Shuvalova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey Shuvalov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Walaa Al Sheikh
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander V Ivanov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Nikita Biziaev
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatiana V Egorova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey E Dmitriev
- Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - Ilya M Terenin
- Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Alkalaeva
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Biziaev N, Shuvalov A, Salman A, Egorova T, Shuvalova E, Alkalaeva E. The impact of mRNA poly(A) tail length on eukaryotic translation stages. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:7792-7808. [PMID: 38874498 PMCID: PMC11260481 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
The poly(A) tail plays an important role in maintaining mRNA stability and influences translation efficiency via binding with PABP. However, the impact of poly(A) tail length on mRNA translation remains incompletely understood. This study explores the effects of poly(A) tail length on human translation. We determined the translation rates in cell lysates using mRNAs with different poly(A) tails. Cap-dependent translation was stimulated by the poly(A) tail, however, it was largely independent of poly(A) tail length, with an exception observed in the case of the 75 nt poly(A) tail. Conversely, cap-independent translation displayed a positive correlation with poly(A) tail length. Examination of translation stages uncovered the dependence of initiation and termination on the presence of the poly(A) tail, but the efficiency of initiation remained unaffected by poly(A) tail extension. Further study unveiled that increased binding of eRFs to the ribosome with the poly(A) tail extension induced more efficient hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA. Building upon these findings, we propose a crucial role for the 75 nt poly(A) tail in orchestrating the formation of a double closed-loop mRNA structure within human cells which couples the initiation and termination phases of translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Biziaev
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey Shuvalov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Ali Salman
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatiana Egorova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Shuvalova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Alkalaeva
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salman A, Biziaev N, Shuvalova E, Alkalaeva E. mRNA context and translation factors determine decoding in alternative nuclear genetic codes. Bioessays 2024; 46:e2400058. [PMID: 38724251 DOI: 10.1002/bies.202400058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
The genetic code is a set of instructions that determine how the information in our genetic material is translated into amino acids. In general, it is universal for all organisms, from viruses and bacteria to humans. However, in the last few decades, exceptions to this rule have been identified both in pro- and eukaryotes. In this review, we discuss the 16 described alternative eukaryotic nuclear genetic codes and observe theories of their appearance in evolution. We consider possible molecular mechanisms that allow codon reassignment. Most reassignments in nuclear genetic codes are observed for stop codons. Moreover, in several organisms, stop codons can simultaneously encode amino acids and serve as termination signals. In this case, the meaning of the codon is determined by the additional factors besides the triplets. A comprehensive review of various non-standard coding events in the nuclear genomes provides a new insight into the translation mechanism in eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Salman
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nikita Biziaev
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Shuvalova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Alkalaeva
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shestakova ED, Smirnova VV, Shatsky IN, Terenin IM. Specific mechanisms of translation initiation in higher eukaryotes: the eIF4G2 story. RNA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 29:282-299. [PMID: 36517212 PMCID: PMC9945437 DOI: 10.1261/rna.079462.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The eukaryotic initiation factor 4G2 (eIF4G2, DAP5, Nat1, p97) was discovered in 1997. Over the past two decades, dozens of papers have presented contradictory data on eIF4G2 function. Since its identification, eIF4G2 has been assumed to participate in noncanonical translation initiation mechanisms, but recent results indicate that it can be involved in scanning as well. In particular, eIF4G2 provides leaky scanning through some upstream open reading frames (uORFs), which are typical for long 5' UTRs of mRNAs from higher eukaryotes. It is likely the protein can also help the ribosome overcome other impediments during scanning of the 5' UTRs of animal mRNAs. This may explain the need for eIF4G2 in higher eukaryotes, as many mRNAs that encode regulatory proteins have rather long and highly structured 5' UTRs. Additionally, they often bind to various proteins, which also hamper the movement of scanning ribosomes. This review discusses the suggested mechanisms of eIF4G2 action, denotes obscure or inconsistent results, and proposes ways to uncover other fundamental mechanisms in which this important protein factor may be involved in higher eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina D Shestakova
- Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
| | - Victoria V Smirnova
- Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
| | - Ivan N Shatsky
- Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
| | - Ilya M Terenin
- Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
- Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi 354349, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu S, Liu C, Bai S, Lu Z, Liu G. Broadening the Horizons of RNA Delivery Strategies in Cancer Therapy. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9:bioengineering9100576. [PMID: 36290544 PMCID: PMC9598637 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9100576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
RNA-based therapy is a promising and innovative strategy for cancer treatment. However, poor stability, immunogenicity, low cellular uptake rate, and difficulty in endosomal escape are considered the major obstacles in the cancer therapy process, severely limiting the development of clinical translation and application. For efficient and safe transport of RNA into cancer cells, it usually needs to be packaged in appropriate carriers so that it can be taken up by the target cells and then be released to the specific location to perform its function. In this review, we will focus on up-to-date insights of the RNA-based delivery carrier and comprehensively describe its application in cancer therapy. We briefly discuss delivery obstacles in RNA-mediated cancer therapy and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of different carriers (cationic polymers, inorganic nanoparticles, lipids, etc.). In addition, we further summarize and discuss the current RNA therapeutic strategies approved for clinical use. A comprehensive overview of various carriers and emerging delivery strategies for RNA delivery, as well as the current status of clinical applications and practice of RNA medicines are classified and integrated to inspire fresh ideas and breakthroughs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuaiying Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
| | - Chao Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
| | - Shuang Bai
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
| | - Zhixiang Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
- Correspondence: (Z.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Gang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
- State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Innovation Center for Cell Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
- Correspondence: (Z.L.); (G.L.)
| |
Collapse
|