Diabatic States of Molecules

Quantitative simulations of electronically nonadiabatic molecular processes require both accurate dynamics algorithms and accurate electronic structure information. Direct semiclassical nonadiabatic dynamics is expensive due to the high cost of electronic structure calculations, and hence it is limited to small systems, limited ensemble averaging, ultrafast processes, and/or electronic structure methods that are only semiquantitatively accurate. The cost of dynamics calculations can be made manageable if analytic fits are made to the electronic structure data, and such fits are most conveniently carried out in a diabatic representation because the surfaces are smooth and the couplings between states are smooth scalar functions. Diabatic representations, unlike the adiabatic ones produced by most electronic structure methods, are not unique, and finding suitable diabatic representations often involves time-consuming nonsystematic diabatization steps. The biggest drawback of using diabatic bases is that it can require large amounts of effort to perform a globally consistent diabatization, and one of our goals has been to develop methods to do this efficiently and automatically. In this Feature Article, we introduce the mathematical framework of diabatic representations, and we discuss diabatization methods, including adiabatic-to-diabatic transformations and recent progress toward the goal of automatization.

Dynamics near a conical intersection-A diabolical compromise for the approximations of ab initio multiple spawning

Full multiple spawning (FMS) offers an exciting framework for the development of strategies to simulate the excited-state dynamics of molecular systems. FMS proposes to depict the dynamics of nuclear wavepackets by using a growing set of traveling multidimensional Gaussian functions called trajectory basis functions (TBFs). Perhaps the most recognized method emanating from FMS is the so-called ab initio multiple spawning (AIMS). In AIMS, the couplings between TBFs-in principle exact in FMS-are approximated to allow for the on-the-fly evaluation of required electronic-structure quantities. In addition, AIMS proposes to neglect the so-called second-order nonadiabatic couplings and the diagonal Born-Oppenheimer corrections. While AIMS has been applied successfully to simulate the nonadiabatic dynamics of numerous complex molecules, the direct influence of these missing or approximated terms on the nonadiabatic dynamics when approaching and crossing a conical intersection remains unknown to date. It is also unclear how AIMS could incorporate geometric-phase effects in the vicinity of a conical intersection. In this work, we assess the performance of AIMS in describing the nonadiabatic dynamics through a conical intersection for three two-dimensional, two-state systems that mimic the excited-state dynamics of bis(methylene)adamantyl, butatriene cation, and pyrazine. The population traces and nuclear density dynamics are compared with numerically exact quantum dynamics and trajectory surface hopping results. We find that AIMS offers a qualitatively correct description of the dynamics through a conical intersection for the three model systems. However, any attempt at improving the AIMS results by accounting for the originally neglected second-order nonadiabatic contributions appears to be stymied by the hermiticity requirement of the AIMS Hamiltonian and the independent first-generation approximation.