Safeguarding children is everyone's responsibility: UK government statement on the duties of doctors

A Systematic Review of the Probability of Asphyxia in Children Aged <2 Years with Unexplained Epistaxis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of children aged <2 years who have been asphyxiated presenting with epistaxis in the absence of trauma or medical explanation and to identify the characteristics of the clinical presentation indicative of asphyxiation.

STUDY DESIGN

An all-language systematic review was conducted by searching 10 databases from 1900 to 2015 and gray literature to identify high-quality studies that included children with epistaxis aged <2 years (alive or dead) with explicit confirmation of intentional or unintentional asphyxiation (upper airway obstruction). Studies of traumatic or pathological epistaxis were excluded. For each comparative study, the proportion of children presenting with epistaxis that were asphyxiated is reported with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Of 2706 studies identified, 100 underwent full review, resulting in 6 included studies representing 30 children with asphyxiation-related epistaxis and 74 children with non-asphyxiation-related epistaxis. The proportion of children presenting with epistaxis that had been asphyxiated, reported by 3 studies, was between 7% and 24%. Features associated with asphyxiation in live children included malaise, altered skin color, respiratory difficulty, and chest radiograph abnormalities. There were no explicit associated features described among those children who were dead on arrival.

CONCLUSION

There is an association between epistaxis and asphyxiation in young children; however, epistaxis does not constitute a diagnosis of asphyxia in itself. In any infant presenting with unexplained epistaxis, a thorough investigation of etiology is always warranted, which must include active exploration of asphyxia as a possible explanation.

Update on child maltreatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The authors discuss the significance of studies published over the previous year regarding assessment and treatment and prevention of child maltreatment, including physical and sexual abuse, inflicted traumatic brain injury, and child neglect.

RECENT FINDINGS

The evidence base for many forms of child abuse is growing. As clinicians begin to understand the factors which may increase child vulnerability to abuse, more sophisticated and focused prevention efforts are being implemented. In response to a very public reprimand by the General Medical Council of two child abuse pediatricians, which was felt by many to be unwarranted, the UK government re-emphasized its commitment to the protection of children. In the US, this well-publicized set of events has renewed the medical community's commitment to the recognition of child abuse pediatrics as a formal subspecialty. Several authors detail the short-term and long-term outcome of varying forms of abuse for children as they grow into adults, reinforcing the importance of community efforts to prevent abuse and support families during times of heightened stress such as the current war in Iraq.

SUMMARY

The short-term and long-term impact of child maltreatment is significant not only for individuals, but for families and communities where abuse is taking place. General pediatricians have an important role to play with families and in the community as advocates for the protection of children.